← Issue №14/ week of Oct 4, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 38 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 38, in full

most clinically useful first · the 3 the issue led with are ruled in green
Everything here, in one line each38
Hepatology rct · n=880 · Sep 30, 2026 · Lancet · IF 98.4

8 weeks versus 12 weeks of sofosbuvir-velpatasvir for treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic, chronic hepatitis C (RESOLVE): a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial in India.

New evidenceviral hepatitisbasic sciencebiomarkerhealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider shortening sofosbuvir-velpatasvir treatment to 8 weeks in treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic HCV patients, as it was non-inferior to the 12-week regimen with no serious adverse events.
What it found8-week sofosbuvir-velpatasvir achieved SVR12 in 98.8% vs 99.0% with 12-week treatment, non-inferior within a 5% margin.
ContextChallenges the standard 12-week regimen, offering equivalent efficacy with a shorter duration in treatment-naive, non-cirrhotic HCV patients, with no serious adverse events reported.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

… Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Goel A … Aggarwal R · The Lancet · IF 98.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=184 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

A 7-mm Covered TIPS Reduces Hepatic Encephalopathy Without Increasing Rebleeding in Cirrhotic Patients With Small Liver: A Randomized Study.

Practice-changingcirrhosisportal hypertensionhepatic encephalopathyvariceal bleeding
Clinical takeawayConsider using 7-mm covered TIPS instead of 8-mm stents in cirrhotic patients with a relatively small liver to prevent variceal rebleeding, as it reduces hepatic encephalopathy without increasing rebleeding or shunt dysfunction.
What it found7-mm covered TIPS cut 2-year overt hepatic encephalopathy to 21.4% vs 37.2% with 8-mm stents, with no difference in rebleeding (10.9% vs 9.8%) or shunt dysfunction (8.7% vs 8.7%).
ContextChallenges the current guideline recommendation of 8-mm TIPS stents, providing evidence for a safer alternative in patients with small livers.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Liu F … Yang Y · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=4,467 · Sep 29, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Characterizing the Benefits of Serial Ascitic Fluid Testing in Ambulatory Patients with Cirrhosis: A National Cohort Study.

New evidenceascitesepidemiologyhealth servicesbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider universal ascitic fluid testing at every outpatient paracentesis in cirrhosis patients, especially those with higher CTP scores, to reduce short-term hospitalization and mortality. Note: observational data may reflect differences in patient selection and care delivery.
What it foundUniversal ascitic fluid testing at every outpatient paracentesis reduced 7-day hospitalization risk by 35% (RR 0.65 vs. intermediate-frequency testing, 95% CI 0.58-0.72) and 30-day mortality, particularly in patients with higher CTP scores.
ContextChallenges current variable practices (32.7% testing rate) and suggests universal testing may improve outcomes, particularly in higher-risk patients with higher CTP scores.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2021 Practice Guidance (Biggins et al., Hepatology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2025 (Orman et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1547-1557)

… Initial fluid testing: neutrophil (PMN) count, total protein, and ascitic albumin with a same-day serum albumin to calculate the SAAG. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis as soon as possible in any patient with new-onset ascites that can be sampled. Also perform one in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is admitted to hospital. AASLD 2021 says this applies to emergent admission for any reason. AGA 2025 BPA 2 names admission for ascites- or encephalopathy-related symptoms. The tap rules out SBP even without signs of infection, because up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic. Repeat it whenever signs, symptoms or labs suggest infection, and in tense ascites with AKI. Paracentesis is safe with coagulopathy: INR >1.5 or platelets <50×10^9/L is not a contraindication, and routine FFP or platelet transfusion is not recommended. Possible exceptions are DIC, and uremia with thrombocytopenia, where desmopressin may be considered. Initial fluid testing: neutrophil (PMN) count, total protein, and ascitic albumin with a same-day serum albumin to calculate the SAAG. AGA 2025 adds Gram stain and culture to the initial panel for new-onset ascites and hospitalized patients. AASLD 2021 treats culture as part of the SBP workup rather than the routine panel. Either way, inoculate ≥10 mL into aerobic and anaerobic blood-culture bottles at the bedside before antibiotics. Amylase, cytology, glucose, LDH, AFB/ADA and triglycerides are ordered only for a clinical reason. SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL means portal hypertension (~97% accuracy). SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to a non-portal-hypertensive cause: carcinomatosis, TB peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, pancreatic or chylous ascites. Within high-SAAG ascites, total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastases or late Budd-Chiari). Total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a cardiac or postsinusoidal cause (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, SOS, early Budd-Chiari), so work up with echocardiography, hepatic-vein Doppler or right-heart catheterization. SBP is diagnosed by ascitic PMN >250/mm^3, with or without a positive culture, once a surgically treatable source has been excluded. SBE is diagnosed by pleural fluid PMN >250/mm^3 in a hepatic hydrothorax after pneumonia and other secondary causes are excluded. It is treated with antibiotics and no chest tube.

AASLD 2021 Practice Guidance (Biggins et al., Hepatology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2025 (Orman et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1547-1557) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Mahmud N … Serper M · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,873 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

ALPS-HCC Score: A Dynamic Liver Stiffness Measurement-Based Machine Learning Model to Predict Risk of Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaartificial intelligencebiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider using the ALPS-HCC score to stratify HCC risk in patients with CHB and compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD), incorporating baseline age, albumin levels, platelet count, and change in liver stiffness measurement over time to guide surveillance strategies.
What it foundThe ALPS-HCC score stratified HCC risk in CHB patients with cACLD into low-risk (reference), intermediate-risk (HR=5.25), and high-risk (HR=24.47) groups, with an AUROC of 0.852, outperforming existing HCC risk scores reliant on static indicators.
ContextThis refines current HCC risk prediction by integrating dynamic liver stiffness changes and other biomarkers, demonstrating robust predictive power in both training and validation cohorts.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Huang Y … Yang Y · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,552 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Five Years of HCV Dried Blood Spot Testing in At-Risk Populations and the Impact of Reduced Sensitivity on Missed Diagnoses.

New evidenceviral hepatitisepidemiologyhealth servicesbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider DBS testing for HCV screening in underserved populations despite its lower sensitivity compared to plasma-based testing, as it increases testing coverage and identifies a substantial proportion of infections.
What it foundDBS testing detected 27.6% HCV RNA positivity (428/1552) but missed 2.7% of infections (12 cases) due to a detection threshold of 1252 IU/mL, with systematic underestimation compared to plasma measurements (mean bias -2.29 log10 IU/mL).
ContextConfirms the utility of DBS testing in expanding HCV screening in underserved populations, though it highlights a small but notable risk of missed diagnoses due to lower sensitivity compared to plasma-based testing.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Capelli N … Tuaillon E · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=350 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Impact of PD-1 Inhibitor Timing Relative to Locoregional Therapy on Outcomes in uHCC Treated With Lenvatinib-Based Triple Therapy.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomasystematic reviewbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider initiating PD-1 inhibitors prior to HAIC in uHCC patients receiving lenvatinib-based triple therapy, particularly in HAIC-treated patients.
What it foundPre-LRT PD-1 inhibitors improved overall survival to 34.03 months vs 30.6 months with Post-LRT PD-1 inhibitors (p=0.032) in uHCC patients receiving HAIC combined with lenvatinib and PD-1 inhibitors.
ContextChallenges current practice by suggesting PD-1 inhibitor timing relative to LRT impacts survival, particularly in HAIC-treated uHCC patients compared to Post-LRT PD-1 inhibitors.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

He J … Chen Z · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=25,782 · Oct 1, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Association of Aspirin With Improved Clinical Outcomes and Survival in Patients With Compensated Cirrhosis: A Propensity Score-Matched Study of 25 782 Individuals.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionvariceal bleedinghepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayConsider aspirin for adults with compensated cirrhosis without prior HCC, particularly those with high cardiovascular risk, after weighing bleeding risk.
What it foundAspirin reduced cirrhosis decompensation risk (HR 0.75 at 12 months, 17.8% vs 22.7%) and mortality (NNT 20 at 12 months) compared to no aspirin in adults with compensated cirrhosis without prior HCC, despite an increased risk of nonvariceal bleeding (NNH 143 at 12 months).
ContextChallenges current practice by suggesting aspirin may prevent decompensation in cirrhosis, a condition with limited pharmacologic options.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Abbarh S … Siepmann T · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=116 · Sep 29, 2026 · Lancet GH · IF 39.1

Short-course prophylaxis with the Toronto HCV protocol for recipients of non-liver solid organ transplants from donors with hepatitis C viraemia: a retrospective, matched cohort study.

New evidenceviral hepatitisliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting the Toronto HCV protocol (glecaprevir 300 mg/day, pibrentasvir 120 mg/day, and ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 8 days) for HCV-negative recipients of non-liver solid organ transplants from HCV NAT-positive donors, acknowledging the retrospective design and monitoring for adverse events.
What it foundThe Toronto HCV protocol achieved undetectable HCV RNA at 12 weeks post-transplantation in 100% of recipients (n=116) of non-liver solid organ transplants from HCV NAT-positive donors, compared to the standard 8-12 week course.
ContextThis study confirms the efficacy of a short-course (8-day) antiviral protocol in HCV-negative recipients of non-liver solid organ transplants from HCV NAT-positive donors, challenging the standard 8-12 week course, and supports its adoption as a new standard of care, though further prospective studies are needed.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Aleyadeh W … Feld JJ · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 39.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 30, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Surveillance of Pancreatic Cystic Lesions and Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Older Adults: Expert Review.

Guideline / reviewhepatocellular carcinomapancreatic cystguidelineepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel patients aged ≥65 with significant comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥3-5) and low-risk PCLs against routine surveillance, emphasizing the low attributable mortality to pancreatic cancer and high risks of intervention.
What it foundPatients aged ≥65 with significant comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index ≥3-5) and low-risk pancreatic cystic lesions (PCLs) should avoid routine PCL surveillance due to low attributable mortality to pancreatic cancer and high intervention risks.
ContextRefines current guidelines by addressing when to stop surveillance in older adults with comorbidities, a gap in prior recommendations.
Measured against the standard of care· IAP Kyoto 2024 (Ohtsuka et al., Pancreatology 2024) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Das, Serper, Vege, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2026)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Kyoto 2024 (IAP) is still the core algorithm for IPMN, and nothing in it has changed. MD-, mixed- and BD-IPMN all go through one HRS/WF algorithm. MDCT, MRI/MRCP and EUS are treated as equivalent for diagnosis, with tumor markers and HbA1c added. Since 2024, EUS imaging and EUS-FNA cytology count toward HRS/WF when EUS is done. High-risk stigmata are: obstructive jaundice with a head cyst; an enhancing mural nodule >=5 mm or a solid component; MPD >=10 mm; or suspicious/positive cytology. Worrisome features are: pancreatitis; CA19-9 >37 U/mL; new-onset or worsening diabetes within 1 year; cyst >=30 mm; enhancing mural nodule <5 mm; thickened or enhancing cyst wall; MPD 5-9 mm; abrupt change in duct caliber with distal atrophy; lymphadenopathy; or growth >=2.5 mm/year. HRS should prompt consideration of resection, weighed against fitness and life expectancy; it does not mean automatic surgery. WF should prompt EUS and multidisciplinary review. EUS-FNA is used only when its result would change management. Surveillance of non-resected BD-IPMN depends on size: <20 mm at 6 months, then every 18 months; 20 to <30 mm every 6 months twice, then every 12 months; >=30 mm every 6 months. Under Kyoto, surveillance may stop for cysts <20 mm with no change and no WF after 5 years, and should stop if the patient is unfit for surgery or life expectancy is <10 years. Continued surveillance remains an option because the risk of a separate pancreatic cancer keeps accumulating. NEW in 2026: an AGA Clinical Practice Update (Das, Serper, Vege; expert opinion, not formally graded) adds stopping rules by age and comorbidity for any pancreatic cystic lesion. (1) At any age, patients with significant comorbidity (age-adjusted Charlson index >=3-5) and an incidental, especially low-risk, cyst should be counseled against routine surveillance. (2) Over 65, cysts <=15 mm stable for 5 years with no WF/HRS should be considered for stopping after shared decision-making. 'Stable' means growth under 3 mm/year and under 6 mm over 2 years. (3) Over 75, cysts <30 mm stable for 5 years with no WF/HRS call for a discussion of whether surveillance is worth continuing, and it may stop if the patient accepts the small residual risk. (4) If comorbidity develops that rules out surgery, stopping should be discussed, even when WF/HRS were found earlier, provided there is no evidence of HGD or cancer. (5) After resection with no HGD or cancer, the remnant follows the same rules, counting surveillance time before surgery, and stopping is discussed after 5 years of stability. (6) After resection with HGD, MRI/MRCP every 6 months for 2 years and then yearly while the patient can still have a completion pancreatectomy. If invasive cancer was found, the remnant follows oncology guidelines. In both cases, stopping is discussed with oncology after 5 years of remnant stability with no WF/HRS. The resect-all-MCNs rule and the familial/germline (CAPS) screening pathway come from other guidelines, not from either of these documents.

IAP Kyoto 2024 (Ohtsuka et al., Pancreatology 2024) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Das, Serper, Vege, Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2026) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Das KK … Vege SS · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=18,326 · Sep 30, 2026 · JAMA · IF 63.1

Histologic Features and Clinical Outcomes of Lean Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

New evidenceMASLDepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider lean MASLD in patients with normal BMI and waist circumference, especially in Asian populations, and prioritize liver stiffness measurement (LSM) over FIB-4 for fibrosis assessment in this subgroup, as LSM demonstrated higher accuracy (AUC 0.87 vs 0.83) in lean MASLD.
What it foundLean MASLD had lower prevalence of advanced fibrosis (29.3% vs 37.2%) and type 2 diabetes (38.2% vs 48.3%) compared to overweight/obese MASLD, but similar clinical outcomes.
ContextConfirms lean MASLD as a distinct entity with lower fibrosis and diabetes prevalence but similar clinical outcomes compared to overweight/obese MASLD, refining risk stratification and supporting the use of LSM over FIB-4 in this subgroup.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
de Avila L … Racila A · JAMA · IF 63.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology systematic review · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Ultrasound-Based Skeletal Muscle Assessment for Prognostication in Cirrhosis: A Systematic Review.

New evidencesystematic reviewbiomarkercirrhosis
Clinical takeawayConsider incorporating ultrasound-based skeletal muscle assessment as a prognostic tool in cirrhosis patients, particularly in decompensated or hospitalized cases, but await standardized protocols and validated thresholds before routine clinical use.
What it foundLower ultrasound-derived muscle measures were consistently associated with higher mortality in adults with cirrhosis, particularly in decompensated or hospitalized cases, with ultrasound-defined sarcopenia linked to a 6.37-fold increase in 6-month mortality (HR 6.37; 95% CI 3.15-12.87) compared to CT or MRI-based assessments.
ContextThis review confirms the prognostic value of muscle loss in cirrhosis, previously assessed via CT or MRI, and introduces ultrasound as a feasible bedside alternative. However, it highlights the need for standardization and validated thresholds, which are currently lacking.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Cola SD … Merli M · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=135 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Prognostic Value of Liver Stiffness in Advanced Chronic Liver Disease After Hepatitis C Virus Eradication.

New evidenceviral hepatitiscirrhosisbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayMonitor post-SVR liver stiffness in HCV-related compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) patients, particularly focusing on absolute LSM values >20 kPa for risk stratification.
What it foundPost-SVR liver stiffness measurement (LSM) >20 kPa predicted liver-related events with a subdistribution hazard ratio of 5.61 (p=0.007), significantly outperforming dynamic LSM changes (ΔLSM and percentage ΔLSM) at 2 and 3 years post-SVR.
ContextRefines current practice by showing absolute post-SVR LSM is more predictive of liver-related events than dynamic changes, supporting repeated LSM assessment over reliance on Baveno-VII criteria for LSM regression, which were not significantly associated with outcomes (SHR 0.33, p=0.097).
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Cerini F … Berzigotti A · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 1, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Liver transplantation for primary liver cancers in the era of transplant oncology.

Guideline / reviewliver transplanthepatocellular carcinomabiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayConsider LT as a multi-step process for selected patients with primary liver cancer, incorporating neoadjuvant strategies (bridging, downstaging, conversion therapies) and post-transplant immunosuppression minimization to balance graft preservation and tumor immune surveillance.
What it foundLiver transplantation (LT) remains the most effective curative-intent surgical approach for selected patients with primary hepatic malignancies, with eligibility determined by a dynamic 'window of eligibility' based on predicted overall survival and transplant benefit.
ContextConfirms and refines current practice by emphasizing the dynamic assessment of transplant candidacy and the integration of neoadjuvant therapies to expand eligibility for advanced disease.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Mazzaferro V … Tabrizian P · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 29, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Review Article: Cancer Surveillance for Early Detection of Liver Cancer in Patients with HBV Infection.

Guideline / reviewhepatocellular carcinomaviral hepatitisbiomarkerguideline
Clinical takeawayFollow guideline-defined risk criteria for HCC surveillance in HBV-infected patients: perform ultrasound with or without AFP every 6 months for those meeting surveillance criteria, and reassess risk periodically for those with an annual HCC risk below 0.2%. Emerging biomarker, imaging, and artificial-intelligence approaches remain adjunctive or investigational pending further HBV-specific validation.
What it foundPatients with HBV infection and an estimated annual HCC risk below 0.2% do not require routine surveillance, while guideline-eligible patients should undergo ultrasound with or without AFP every 6 months. Guideline-defined risk criteria include specific thresholds and factors not detailed here.
ContextConfirms current practice of risk-stratified HCC surveillance in HBV infection, emphasizing adherence to guideline-defined criteria and periodic risk reassessment. Emerging approaches are not yet validated for routine use.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Park AJ … Pan CQ · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology guideline · Oct 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

World Gastroenterology Organisation Practice Guidelines.

Guideline / reviewviral hepatitisguidelineepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting the WGO's simplified hepatitis B care pathways and treatment eligibility criteria, especially in lower-resource settings, to improve access and management. Implement strategies to prevent new infections and optimize screening and linkage to care. In high-burden settings, consider the test-and-treat approach where diagnostic tools are unavailable.
What it foundThe WGO guidelines provide a simplified framework for hepatitis B care pathways, particularly in lower-resource settings, with a focus on broadening treatment eligibility, decentralized care, preventing new infections, and optimizing screening and linkage to care. The guidelines also discuss a test-and-treat approach for high-burden settings and support the global community's commitment to triple elimination of HIV, HBV, and syphilis.
ContextThis updates and refines prior guidelines (AASLD, EASL, ALEH, APASL) by focusing on global applicability, particularly in resource-limited settings, and simplifying treatment pathways. It also aligns with the WHO's updated recommendations and the global commitment to triple elimination of HIV, HBV, and syphilis.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Lee AU … Pan CQ · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=897 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Applicability of Non-Invasive Eligibility Criteria for MASH Pharmacotherapy: A Multicentre Cohort Study.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarkerepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider that current non-invasive criteria (AASLD: LSM 8-15 kPa without cirrhosis; expert panel-derived: LSM 10-19.9 kPa, platelet count ≥140 × 10^9/L, no cirrhosis) identify different patient populations for MASH pharmacotherapy and may miss a significant proportion of adults with histological F2-F3 fibrosis (47.9% missed by AASLD criteria, 67.1% missed by expert panel-derived criteria). Discuss the limitations of these criteria with patients and consider liver biopsy in cases of diagnostic uncertainty, acknowledging its feasibility and risks in routine clinical practice.
What it foundAASLD criteria identified 22.5% of patients as eligible for MASH pharmacotherapy, while expert panel-derived criteria identified 12.7%, with only partial alignment with histological F2-F3 fibrosis (47.9% missed by AASLD criteria, 67.1% missed by expert panel-derived criteria).
ContextChallenges current reliance on non-invasive criteria for MASH pharmacotherapy eligibility in adults with MASLD, highlighting their partial alignment with histologically confirmed fibrosis.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

… Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Pugliese N … Aghemo A · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=5,094 · Sep 30, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

Liver Transplantation Versus Resection for Single-Nodule Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaliver transplantsystematic reviewmeta-analysis
Clinical takeawayConsider LT over LR for single-nodule HCC in eligible adult patients, particularly for long-term oncological benefit, but weigh baseline differences and the observational nature of the evidence.
What it foundLiver transplantation (LT) showed higher overall survival (OS) at 3, 5, and 10 years and superior disease-free survival (DFS) at all time points compared to liver resection (LR) in adults with single-nodule HCC, based on observational data.
ContextRefines current practice by providing meta-analytic evidence favoring LT over LR for long-term outcomes in single-nodule HCC, though prior debate persists due to observational data limitations.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Rosa-Sánchez C … Redondo-Cerezo E · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=141 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Unravelling the Itch: Cross-Sectional Analysis of Pruritus Patterns in the PicnicHealth Primary Biliary Cholangitis Registry.

New evidencePBCbiomarkerepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayAssess pruritus and its impact on quality of life in all PBC patients, regardless of ALP levels, and consider targeted itch management for those with clinically significant pruritus (PBC-40 itch domain score ≥7).
What it found52% of patients with high ALP (≥1.67 × ULN) reported clinically significant pruritus (PBC-40 itch domain score ≥7), versus 23% with normal ALP (≤1 × ULN).
ContextConfirms pruritus is common in PBC and impacts HRQoL, independent of ALP levels, challenging the assumption that ALP correlates with itch severity.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021

Treat with first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) 13-15 mg/kg/d divided, and assess biochemical response at 12 months using Paris-II plus continuous risk scores (Globe, UK-PBC). Escalate to a second-line agent (obeticholic acid [contraindicated in cirrhosis with portal hypertension or prior decompensation], seladelpar, elafibranor, or a fibrate) when response is inadequate, guided by a Child-Pugh/portal-hypertension hard gate, and manage pruritus with a stepwise ladder (cholestyramine → rifampin → sertraline → naltrexone). Refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, refractory pruritus, or rising bilirubin.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Levy C … Halliday A · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=6,402 · Sep 28, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Alcohol-Associated Pancreatitis Confers Higher Risk of Advanced Liver Disease Than Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome.

New evidencealcohol-associated liver diseaseacute pancreatitisepidemiology
Clinical takeawayPrioritize liver surveillance in patients with alcohol-associated pancreatitis without pre-existing liver disease, as they are at higher risk for advanced chronic liver disease compared to those with alcohol withdrawal syndrome.
What it foundAlcohol-associated pancreatitis patients had a 29% higher risk of advanced chronic liver disease (9.3% vs. 7.0%) compared to alcohol withdrawal syndrome patients over 3.5-3.7 years.
ContextIdentifies alcohol-associated pancreatitis as a marker for hepatotoxic susceptibility in patients without pre-existing liver disease.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Fakhoury B … Arab JP · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=195,837 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Sex Disparities in Hepatitis C Treatment Initiation: Role of Universal Access to DAA in France (ANRS FANTASIO 2).

Epidemiologyviral hepatitishealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayMonitor for sex disparities in DAA initiation in your practice and advocate for equitable access policies, as universal DAA access can reverse treatment gaps, particularly in populations with similar healthcare systems.
What it foundUniversal DAA access reversed sex disparity in treatment initiation: women’s DAA initiation rate rose to 22.3 per 100 PY vs. men’s 18.5 per 100 PY (p < 0.001).
ContextIn France (2017-2022), universal DAA access reversed sex disparities in treatment initiation, previously driven by differences in disease progression risk factors.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Marcellin F … Protopopescu C · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=113 · Sep 28, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Atezolizumab Plus Bevacizumab Treatment for Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma in the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer B2 Stage.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayConsider atezolizumab plus bevacizumab for BCLC-B2 HCC patients, especially those with high tumor burden (tumor number plus size ≥11), as it showed survival benefit in this retrospective analysis. Note that these findings are exploratory and associative, not causal.
What it foundAtezolizumab plus bevacizumab was associated with a survival benefit (OR 3.77, p=0.0065) exceeding model predictions in BCLC-B2 HCC, particularly in high tumor burden (tumor number plus size ≥11), based on retrospective data.
ContextChallenges the standard of care (transarterial chemoembolization) for BCLC-B2 HCC, suggesting systemic therapy may offer superior survival in selected patients based on retrospective data.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Ouchi K … Masamune A · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=121 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Subcutaneous Fat Density Is an Independent Predictor of Adverse Outcomes and Shows Early Improvement After Liver Transplantation.

New evidencecirrhosisliver transplantbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider assessing SAT density on routine CT scans in cirrhosis patients listed for liver transplantation to identify those at higher risk of mortality. No specific intervention is recommended yet, as this is an observational finding.
What it foundHigh subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) density (> -83 HU in women; > -74 HU in men) was associated with higher pre-transplant mortality (p = 0.005) and reduced overall survival (p = 0.005) in cirrhosis patients awaiting liver transplantation.
ContextThis study confirms and refines the prognostic role of body composition in cirrhosis, highlighting SAT density as a novel CT-derived marker for mortality risk in liver transplant candidates.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD/AST, 'AASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation' (Dove L et al., Hepatology 2026;83(6):1609-1645). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001644, PMID 41405234.

Decision at stakeassessing body composition in liver transplant candidates

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Refer patients with decompensated cirrhosis (including those with MELD-Na <15 or MELD 3.0 <15 if they have clinically significant portal hypertension, recurrent ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding), acute liver failure meeting King's College Criteria/UNOS Status 1A, or HCC within Milan/UCSF criteria for comprehensive multidisciplinary liver transplant evaluation, with MELD 3.0 driving UNOS waitlist allocation and MELD exception scoring for HCC/HPS/FAP. Optimize modifiable risk factors before listing (alcohol abstinence, HCV DAA treatment, vaccinations, DM/obesity/OSA and dental clearance) and use bridging/downstaging locoregional therapy for HCC while awaiting transplant. After transplant, maintain lifelong immunosuppression with tacrolimus plus mycophenolate ± tapered steroids alongside infection prophylaxis and recurrent-disease surveillance.

AASLD/AST, 'AASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation' (Dove L et al., Hepatology 2026;83(6):1609-1645). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001644, PMID 41405234. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Dahlqvist G … Lanthier N · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=47 · Sep 29, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Hypothermic oxygenated and normothermic machine perfusion mitigate innate systemic and hepatic inflammation after liver transplantation.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalliver transplantbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in humans showing immune modulation by machine perfusion in liver transplantation.
What it foundHOPE and NMP reduced neutrophil infiltration during early IRI and normalized peripheral lymphocyte numbers faster compared to SCS, with HOPE showing lower systemic neutrophil numbers.
ContextThis study provides mechanistic evidence supporting the immunological benefits of machine perfusion over static cold storage in liver transplantation, refining understanding of its impact on immune responses.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Lurje I … Lurje G · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=70 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Diagnostic Value and Influencing Factors of Ultrasound-Derived Fat Fraction for Quantifying MASLD in Children.

Diagnosticpediatricbiomarkerbasic science
Clinical takeawayConsider using UDFF as a non-invasive, accurate, and reproducible tool for screening, staging, and longitudinal follow-up of paediatric MASLD, particularly in mild-to-moderate cases. Be cautious in severe steatosis due to a systematic numerical bias (-9.23%) compared to MRI-PDFF.
What it foundUDFF had an AUC of 0.98 for detecting steatosis (≥6.4%) with an optimal cutoff of 5.5% (sensitivity 97.6%, specificity 92.9%, accuracy 95.7%).
ContextThis study confirms UDFF as a viable alternative to MRI-PDFF for quantifying hepatic steatosis in children, aligning with current efforts to reduce reliance on costly and invasive imaging.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Zheng X … Chen J · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology guideline · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

EuroHePP: The European Toolkit to Strengthen National Responses for the Elimination of Viral Hepatitis in Prisons.

Guideline / reviewviral hepatitishealth servicesguidelineepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider implementing EuroHePP's evidence-based strategies in prison health systems to improve hepatitis B and C care and reduce transmission risks among incarcerated individuals.
What it foundEuroHePP, a European toolkit developed by ECDC and EUDA, provides practical guidance for hepatitis B and C prevention, testing, treatment, and monitoring in prison settings, emphasizing opt-out testing, decentralized care, harm reduction, continuity of care post-release, and micro-elimination approaches tailored to prison populations.
ContextThis toolkit addresses the gap in hepatitis care in prisons, aligning with Europe's 2030 elimination targets and refining current practices with tailored interventions.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Fondelli S … Duffell E · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=300 · Oct 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Gap in Care: Follow-up of Incidental Hepatic Steatosis in an Urban Safety-net Hospital.

New evidenceepidemiologyhealth servicesMASLD
Clinical takeawayEnsure systematic follow-up for incidental hepatic steatosis in adult patients, including LFTs, hepatology referral, and risk-stratification using transient elastography, particularly in ED settings where follow-up is less frequent.
What it found41% of patients with incidental hepatic steatosis received no follow-up, with transient elastography used in 10.2% of outpatients vs. 2.8% of ED patients (P=0.02). Outpatients had higher rates of moderate-to-severe disease compared to ED patients (P <0.001).
ContextConfirms a widespread gap in care for incidental hepatic steatosis in adult patients at an urban safety-net hospital, highlighting the need for improved awareness and evaluation practices, especially in ED settings where mild steatosis is more prevalent.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. … Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Sunkesula V … Niu B · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=66 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Liver and Spleen Stiffness as Non-Invasive Tools Assessing Liver Congestion in Patients With Budd-Chiari Syndrome.

New evidenceportal hypertensionbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider using liver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography to monitor clinical status in Budd-Chiari syndrome, with a cut-off of 25 kPa to distinguish controlled from uncontrolled disease. SSM may provide complementary information but does not outperform LSM.
What it foundLiver stiffness measurement (LSM) by transient elastography discriminated controlled vs. uncontrolled clinical status in Budd-Chiari syndrome with AUC 0.985, and a cut-off of 25 kPa yielded 97.5% sensitivity and 92.5% specificity. Spleen stiffness measurement (SSM) showed good discrimination (AUC 0.854), with values ≤30 kPa ruling out and >40 kPa ruling in uncontrolled status, though accuracy was inferior to LSM. LSM values rapidly decreased following liver congestion resolution after interventional procedures.
ContextThis confirms and refines the utility of transient elastography in Budd-Chiari syndrome, providing a specific cut-off for clinical decision-making, which was previously lacking. The rapid decrease in LSM after successful treatment highlights its potential for monitoring treatment response.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on vascular diseases of the liver," Journal of Hepatology, 2025

Budd-Chiari syndrome (primary hepatic venous outflow obstruction): initiate therapeutic anticoagulation as soon as possible after diagnosis and continue it indefinitely unless contraindicated (strong recommendation), LMWH initially, transitioned to a vitamin K antagonist targeting INR 2-3; DOACs such as apixaban are increasingly used but rest on more limited evidence, so use them cautiously in advanced liver disease. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Budd-Chiari syndrome (primary hepatic venous outflow obstruction): initiate therapeutic anticoagulation as soon as possible after diagnosis and continue it indefinitely unless contraindicated (strong recommendation), LMWH initially, transitioned to a vitamin K antagonist targeting INR 2-3; DOACs such as apixaban are increasingly used but rest on more limited evidence, so use them cautiously in advanced liver disease. Concurrently identify and treat the underlying cause after a comprehensive thrombophilia/myeloproliferative-neoplasm workup (including JAK2 V617F). Manage the outflow obstruction with a response-guided stepwise strategy, escalating only in patients who do not respond to medical therapy: percutaneous angioplasty/stenting for short-segment venous stenosis, then TIPS for non-correctable outflow obstruction with persistent portal hypertension or clinical deterioration, and liver transplantation for a fulminant presentation or failure of/contraindication to TIPS. Sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, treated with defibrotide, e.g. after HSCT, and acute mesenteric venous thrombosis, a surgical emergency when bowel ischemia is present, are distinct disorders with their own management pathways and are not steps in this Budd-Chiari algorithm.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on vascular diseases of the liver," Journal of Hepatology, 2025 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Fodor A … García-Pagan JC · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,082 · Sep 27, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

PNPLA3 Is Associated With Hepatocellular Carcinoma, While a Five-Variant Polygenic Risk Score Shows Limited Discrimination in Korean Patients With MASLD.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaMASLDbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayPNPLA3 genotyping may help identify Korean MASLD patients with advanced fibrosis at higher HCC risk (11.4% vs 7.8%), but further evidence is needed to determine clinical utility. Do not use the PRS-5 polygenic risk score, as it showed poor discrimination (AUROC 0.566).
What it foundPNPLA3 rs738409 GG genotype increased HCC prevalence to 11.4% vs 7.8% in GC/CC carriers (p=0.047), but only in Korean MASLD patients with advanced fibrosis.
ContextConfirms PNPLA3's role in HCC risk but refines it to advanced fibrosis patients in a Korean cohort. Challenges the utility of a polygenic risk score in this population.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Lee J … Sung PS · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=2,613 · Sep 28, 2026 · JPEN · IF 3.2

Urea-to-Creatinine-Ratio and the risk of 28-day mortality in critically ill adults with or without Acute Kidney Injury: A post-hoc analysis of a randomized clinical trial.

Basic sciencebiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayFurther research is needed to determine if monitoring urea-to-creatinine ratio on Day 7 in critically ill patients without baseline acute kidney injury can improve outcomes, as both low and high values are associated with increased 28-day mortality.
What it foundDay 7 urea-to-creatinine ratio showed a U-shaped association with 28-day mortality in patients without baseline acute kidney injury, with adjusted hazard ratios of 2.06 (95% CI, 1.30-3.26) for low and 2.21 (95% CI, 1.45-3.38) for high ratios.
ContextThis study identifies a U-shaped association between Day 7 urea-to-creatinine ratio and 28-day mortality in critically ill patients without baseline acute kidney injury, refining prior evidence by specifying timing and subgroup.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Zhou L … Chinese Critical Care Nutrition Trials Group (CCCNTG) · JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=369 · Oct 2, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

TESERA: morphologic subtyping and prognostic stratification of hepatocellular carcinoma from H&E whole-slide images.

Diagnostichepatocellular carcinomaartificial intelligencebiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a computational pathology tool validated in retrospective cohorts. Consider TESERA-MI for future risk stratification in HCC if validated prospectively.
What it foundTESERA-MI, a morphologic index derived from H&E whole-slide images, predicted overall survival (HR=3.17) and disease-free survival (HR=2.19) in HCC, outperforming clinical variables and molecular markers (C-index 0.73) in the TCGA-LIHC cohort and independently validated in an external cohort (HR=2.16).
ContextChallenges current reliance on clinical and molecular markers for HCC prognosis by demonstrating superior predictive power of routine histology-derived indices in HCC patients.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Yasaka TM … Chiu YC · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 1, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Artificial Intelligence in MASLD: A Three-Level Framework Across Clinical, Health-System, and Policy Decisions.

New evidenceartificial intelligencehealth servicesbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: AI applications in MASLD are promising but remain unvalidated in prospective multicenter studies and lack evidence of improved clinical outcomes.
What it foundAI models perform comparably to or better than conventional non-invasive tests (e.g., FIB-4, VCTE) and expert interpretation in fibrosis assessment, histopathologic and imaging interpretation, multi-omics integration, and hepatocellular carcinoma risk stratification, but no validated tool predicts treatment response before therapy. Current evidence is largely retrospective, single-center, and lacks external validation.
ContextThis review highlights the potential of AI in MASLD care but underscores the need for robust validation, implementation frameworks, and governance, as current evidence is largely retrospective and single-center.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Kalligeros M … Younossi ZM · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=943 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Multicenter Evaluation of Large Language Models Versus Hepatologists for Prognostic Prediction in Drug-Induced Liver Injury.

New evidenceartificial intelligencebiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: LLMs show potential as clinician-supervised complementary tools for DILI outcome prediction but require further validation in clinical practice.
ContextThis literature reports that large language models show potential in predicting outcomes in drug-induced liver injury, though their utility relative to hepatologists remains under evaluation.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD practice guidance on drug, herbal, and dietary supplement-induced liver injury" (Fontana RJ, Liou I, Reuben A, Suzuki A, Fiel MI, Lee W, Navarro V), Hepatology, 2023 (Guidance Statement 13)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Initiate the DILI evaluation only for clinically significant liver injury, serum AST or ALT > 5× ULN, or ALP > 2× ULN (or the pretreatment baseline if that value is abnormal) on two separate occasions; total serum bilirubin > 2.5 mg/dL with an elevated AST, ALT or ALP; or INR > 1.5 with an elevated AST, ALT or ALP, not for any minor liver-test abnormality (GS 13). In a patient with new liver test abnormalities after drug, herbal or dietary supplement (HDS) exposure, take a detailed medication and HDS history including intravenous agents such as monoclonal antibodies; most hepatotoxic drugs cause injury within the first 6 months, though some agents have longer latency and hypersensitivity reactions may appear within 24-72 hours (GS 14). Treat DILI as a diagnosis of exclusion: test for hepatitis A IgM, HBsAg, anti-HBc IgM and HCV RNA, obtain autoantibodies (ANA, anti-smooth muscle) and serum immunoglobulins, add antimitochondrial antibody in cholestatic presentations, test anti-HEV IgM in selected cases, and image the biliary tree, usually with abdominal ultrasound (GS 16). Categorize the case by R value at presentation, R = (ALT/ULN)/(ALP/ULN) (GS 15). Liver biopsy is NOT required for diagnosis but may help in severe or protracted cases, when there is diagnostic uncertainty, or when biochemistries/symptoms fail to improve after dechallenge (GS 19-20). For causality, note that the guidance does not endorse a single instrument: it describes three commonly used methods each with strengths and limitations (GS 24), observes that DILIN semiquantitative expert opinion is frequently used in practice and research but requires specialized expertise that limits generalizability (GS 26), and that updated RUCAM has better instructions but retains age, alcohol and pregnancy as risk factors of unclear value (GS 27). Management: discontinuation of the suspect drug plus supportive care, antiemetics, antipruritics, hydration, is the mainstay (GS 39). A short course of intravenous N-acetylcysteine may benefit hospitalized ADULT patients with DILI-related acute liver failure, but NAC is NOT recommended for children (GS 40); in acetaminophen overdose with established liver injury, continue NAC infusion at 6.25 mg/kg/h until ALT is falling and INR < 2. Corticosteroids for 1-3 months may benefit selected patients, severe hypersensitivity features, DRESS, immune checkpoint inhibitor injury with ALT > 5× ULN, or autoimmune-like features on biopsy, but optimal dose and duration are unknown for lack of controlled trials; typical dosing is prednisone 40-60 mg/day, or methylprednisolone-equivalent 1 mg/kg/day for checkpoint inhibitor cases (GS 41). Ursodeoxycholic acid is not established therapy but is presumably safe, and may be used at 10-15 mg/kg/day in divided doses for severe pruritus (GS 42). Because spontaneous survival in idiosyncratic DILI-related acute liver failure is only about 25%, transfer such patients EARLY to a liver transplant center (GS 36); roughly 10% of registry patients suffer ALF, transplant or death within 6 months (GS 35), with higher bilirubin and INR, lower albumin, severe necrosis or fibrosis on biopsy, comorbidity burden, and pre-existing liver disease marking increased risk (GS 38). Rechallenge with the suspect drug should generally be avoided UNLESS the anticipated benefit is high for a severe or life-threatening condition, e.g. isoniazid rechallenge causes recurrent injury in only 10% but should be attempted only in active, drug-resistant TB (GS 44). Follow liver tests to resolution: DILI persisting beyond 6-12 months (chronic DILI) occurs in 10%-20% of patients (GS 37).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD practice guidance on drug, herbal, and dietary supplement-induced liver injury" (Fontana RJ, Liou I, Reuben A, Suzuki A, Fiel MI, Lee W, Navarro V), Hepatology, 2023 (Guidance Statement 13) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Fu H … Xie Q · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=487 · Sep 28, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Revisiting Ferritin-IgG Score to Predict Complete Biochemical Response in Autoimmune Hepatitis.

New evidenceautoimmune hepatitisbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayDo not use the ferritin-IgG score to predict treatment response in autoimmune hepatitis. In a multicentre AIH cohort, IgG <1.89×ULN may serve as a potential predictor of biochemical response, but further validation is needed.
What it foundFerritin-IgG score failed external validation (C-statistic 0.51 at 6 and 12 months), but IgG <1.89×ULN predicted higher CBR probability (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.67-1.10).
ContextChallenges prior evidence supporting the ferritin-IgG score, confirming IgG as a standalone predictor in an independent multicentre AIH cohort.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), 'EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis,' Journal of Hepatology, 2025 (vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 453-501)

… Azathioprine is added only when bilirubin is <6 mg/dL and ideally 2 weeks after corticosteroid start (to avoid confusing non-response with azathioprine toxicity), at an initial dose of 50 mg/day titrated to a final dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day according to toxicity and response; azathioprine must never be used alone as induction; before starting azathioprine, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity should ideally be tested to exclude COMPLETE (absent) TPMT activity, in which azathioprine is CONTRAINDICATED because of the risk of severe, potentially life-threatening myelosuppression, whereas in PARTIAL (intermediate/heterozygous) TPMT deficiency it may be used only with caution and dose reduction; azathioprine should likewise be given cautiously in pregnancy, cytopenias or malignancy, and should be AVOIDED in acute severe AIH and decompensated cirrhosis. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with AIH, first-line induction is predniso(lo)ne of AT LEAST 0.5 mg/kg/day, potentially up to 1 mg/kg/day in more severe and advanced disease, in combination with EITHER azathioprine OR mycophenolate mofetil (LoE 2, strong recommendation; 82% agreement). Azathioprine is added only when bilirubin is <6 mg/dL and ideally 2 weeks after corticosteroid start (to avoid confusing non-response with azathioprine toxicity), at an initial dose of 50 mg/day titrated to a final dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day according to toxicity and response; azathioprine must never be used alone as induction; before starting azathioprine, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity should ideally be tested to exclude COMPLETE (absent) TPMT activity, in which azathioprine is CONTRAINDICATED because of the risk of severe, potentially life-threatening myelosuppression, whereas in PARTIAL (intermediate/heterozygous) TPMT deficiency it may be used only with caution and dose reduction; azathioprine should likewise be given cautiously in pregnancy, cytopenias or malignancy, and should be AVOIDED in acute severe AIH and decompensated cirrhosis. Mycophenolate mofetil is dosed 1.5-2 g/day (0.75-1.0 g twice daily) and is positioned by EASL as an alternative first-line option to azathioprine; the CAMARO RCT found MMF superior to azathioprine in treatment-naive patients (CBR at 6 months 72.2% vs 32.3%, p=0.004) with fewer severe adverse events (0% vs 12.9%) and less withdrawal (5.1% vs 25.8%). MMF is teratogenic and counselling of both female and male patients is recommended (LoE 2, strong); it must be withdrawn at least 3 months before conception, and first presentations during pregnancy are treated with standard regimens EXCLUDING MMF. Induction therapy and corticosteroid tapering should be individualised according to CBR status (LoE 4, strong). Budesonide is NOT recommended as part of first-line treatment for AIH and is CONTRAINDICATED in patients with cirrhosis (LoE 2, strong; 82%), but it retains a defined second-line role: switching to budesonide may be suggested because of corticosteroid side effects in patients WITHOUT cirrhosis who are predniso(lo)ne-dependent (LoE 3, WEAK recommendation; 91%). Maintenance after CBR should consist of azathioprine or MMF as monotherapy OR in combination with low-dose corticosteroids (predniso(lo)ne ≤5 mg/day), with the dose adapted to sustain stable CBR (LoE 2, strong); low-dose predniso(lo)ne monotherapy can be suggested ONLY in patients with mild disease who achieved CBR and are intolerant to both azathioprine and MMF (LoE 3, weak). Most patients require long-term, often lifelong immunosuppression, and a trial of stopping is appropriate only in carefully selected patients whose low-dose monotherapy has maintained stable CBR for at least 2 years. For ACUTE SEVERE AIH the guideline stratifies by liver failure: in acute severe AIH WITHOUT ALF or ACLF, an early treatment trial with predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1 mg/kg/day (or intravenous methylprednisolone at equivalent dose) is recommended, and failure to improve after 3-7 days of treatment initiation should trigger REFERRAL TO A LIVER TRANSPLANT CENTRE (LoE 3, strong; 91%); in acute severe AIH WITH ALF or ACLF, direct evaluation (discussion with a transplant centre) for liver transplantation is recommended, because data on the role of corticosteroids in these patients is very limited and outcomes are poor (LoE 3, strong; 97%), and if corticosteroids are given, strict surveillance for infection and close monitoring of efficacy is recommended.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), 'EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis,' Journal of Hepatology, 2025 (vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 453-501) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Díaz-González Á … Londoño MC · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · Sep 28, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

A Markov model cost threshold analysis of potential hepatitis B virus cure regimens.

New evidenceviral hepatitiscost-effectivenesshealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a modeling study projecting cost-effectiveness thresholds for a potential CHB cure regimen.
What it foundA 30% effective functional cure regimen for CHB could be cost-effective at a one-time treatment cost under USD46,642 in the U.S. and USD13,008 in China.
ContextThis analysis provides a framework for evaluating the cost-effectiveness of future CHB cure therapies compared to long-term NUC treatment, which is the current standard.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Wong GL … Yip TC · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=60 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Ductular Reaction Underlies Development of Portal Hypertension in Biliary Atresia.

Basic sciencebasic sciencebiomarkerpediatricartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in pediatric biliary atresia patients. Consider DR% as a potential biomarker for PH risk in future research.
What it foundDuctular reaction (DR%) ≥6.9% at portoenterostomy and ≥3.5% at 1 year predicted portal hypertension (PH) in biliary atresia patients, with AUROC >0.7.
ContextChallenges the current focus on fibrosis as the primary predictor of PH in biliary atresia, suggesting DR% may be a more consistent marker.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Luokkala P … Pakarinen MP · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=81 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

An Automated Microfluidic System for Haemostasis Assessment in Cirrhosis With Thrombocytopenia.

Basic sciencecirrhosisbiomarkertranslationalartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: further validation is needed before clinical use.
What it foundT-TAS showed high reproducibility (intraclass correlation coefficients ≈0.90) and reduced thrombus formation with worsening cirrhosis severity and bacterial infection (p < 0.05) compared to conventional lab tests.
ContextChallenges current practice by offering a reproducible alternative to conventional lab tests for assessing bleeding risk in cirrhosis patients with thrombocytopenia, which currently lack precision.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Bitto N … La Mura V · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=952 · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Distinct Plasma Proteomic Signatures Distinguish MASLD From Non-Steatotic Individuals but Not From MetALD.

Basic sciencebiomarkerepidemiologybasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding identifying proteomic signatures in MASLD and MetALD. Further validation and larger studies are needed to assess clinical utility.
What it foundMASLD showed 17 upregulated and 3 downregulated proteins vs controls, including leptin (LEP), FABP1, ACY1, and IGFBP1, but no proteomic distinction from MetALD.
ContextChallenges the current clinical thresholds for distinguishing MASLD from MetALD, suggesting proteomic profiles may not support a molecular distinction under these definitions.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Jakhar N … Schneider CV · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

E3 Ubiquitin Ligases in MASH-Associated Liver Fibrosis: Mechanisms and Therapeutic Opportunities.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic review of E3 ubiquitin ligases in liver fibrosis, with potential therapeutic strategies still in preclinical stages.
What it foundE3 ubiquitin ligases regulate fibrosis progression and resolution in MASH through cell type-specific mechanisms.
ContextThis review synthesizes emerging evidence on the role of E3 ubiquitin ligases in MASH-related fibrosis, highlighting their dual pro-fibrotic and anti-fibrotic effects depending on cell type and disease stage. It builds on prior understanding of fibrosis mechanisms but does not yet translate to clinical practice.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Oh AR … Kim K · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №14 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS