Actionability = is there something to do. Prevalence = how much of a general GI practice it touches. Stakes = how consequential the decision is. Evidence strength = how far the study design and the result support the action. Novelty = how likely you are not already doing it.
IBDprospective cohort · n=7,283 · Sep 29, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2
New evidenceulcerative colitisJAK inhibitorsbiologicshealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider upadacitinib as a potential advanced therapy option for ulcerative colitis, particularly in patients who have failed or are intolerant to other advanced therapies, given its association with a lower risk of treatment failure (hospitalization, surgery, or steroid need) compared to infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib in this real-world analysis.
What it foundIn a real-world cohort of ulcerative colitis patients, initiating upadacitinib was associated with a 31-41% lower risk of treatment failure (a composite of IBD-related hospitalization, surgery, or new corticosteroid use) compared to infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib (HRs 0.59-0.69).
ContextThis large real-world study provides comparative effectiveness data across six advanced therapies, which is largely absent from head-to-head randomized trials. It supports the high efficacy of upadacitinib seen in its pivotal trials and positions it favorably against all other major biologic and small molecule classes in a real-world setting. Findings were consistent in patients with and without prior AT exposure.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
Hupé M … Singh S · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDprospective cohort · n=51,844 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
New evidenceCrohn's diseaseulcerative colitisepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayAvoid chronic opioid use in adult IBD patients when possible, as it is associated with significantly higher risks of infections and mortality, regardless of opioid strength.
What it foundChronic opioid use (≥3 prescriptions/year) in adult IBD patients increased hospital-diagnosed infections (aHR 1.91-1.93), antibiotic prescriptions (aHR 1.47-1.56), and mortality (aHR 1.74-1.76) compared to non-users.
ContextConfirms prior concerns about opioid risks in IBD, extending evidence to a nationwide cohort with robust adjustment for confounders. Both strong and weak opioids were associated with these adverse outcomes.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
New evidencebiologicsJAK inhibitorsanti-TNFsystematic review
Clinical takeawayFor musculoskeletal EIMs in IBD, consider TNF antagonists or JAK inhibitors, noting that TNF antagonists have higher efficacy in peripheral (73%) than axial (57%) arthritis. Avoid vedolizumab for axial arthritis due to its very low efficacy (12% improvement).
What it foundTNF antagonists achieved clinical improvement in 61% of musculoskeletal EIMs, with higher rates for peripheral (73%) than axial arthritis (57%); vedolizumab had significantly lower efficacy (42%), particularly for axial arthritis (12%).
ContextThis meta-analysis confirms TNF antagonists and JAK inhibitors as effective for musculoskeletal EIMs, refining prior evidence by highlighting vedolizumab's limited efficacy in axial arthritis.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
Clinical takeawayConsider selective IL-23 inhibitors as foundational therapies in IBD treatment algorithms, particularly for refractory disease, while monitoring for long-term safety and efficacy.
What it foundSelective IL-23 inhibitors are increasingly positioned as foundational therapies in IBD, supported by comparative studies against other advanced therapies.
ContextRefines current practice by emphasizing mechanism-based therapeutic positioning over expanding treatment options, aligning with recent comparative effectiveness research in refractory IBD populations.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH)ShowHide
Decision at stakethe positioning of selective IL-23 inhibitors and novel therapeutic strategies in IBD treatment algorithms
…The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA.…THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure.…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text. The rest of this standard includes DIAGNOSIS.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Two current US guidelines govern Crohn's disease and should be read together. ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al.) remains the reference for diagnosis, mild-to-moderate disease, perianal, postoperative and abscess management. DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. MILD-TO-MODERATE: recommend against oral mesalamine; sulfasalazine only for symptomatic mild colonic CD; ileal-release budesonide 9 mg for induction in ileocecal disease but not for maintenance. MODERATE-TO-SEVERE (AGA Living Guideline, Scott et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1397-1448, 16 recommendations: 1 strong, 9 conditional, 6 knowledge gaps; updated quarterly, adult outpatients only): RECOMMEND infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab or upadacitinib over no treatment; SUGGEST certolizumab pegol or vedolizumab over no treatment. Advanced-therapy-naive: suggest higher-efficacy agents (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) over lower-efficacy ones (certolizumab pegol, upadacitinib). Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). Suggest against thiopurine monotherapy for induction; suggest it for maintenance of remission. Suggest SC/IM methotrexate monotherapy; suggest against oral methotrexate. In thiopurine-naive patients starting infliximab, suggest infliximab + thiopurine over infliximab alone. No recommendation on IFX + MTX, adalimumab + immunomodulator, or non-TNF biologic + immunomodulator. After ≥6 months of steroid-free remission on anti-TNF + immunomodulator, suggest withdrawing the immunomodulator and suggest against withdrawing the anti-TNF. SUGGEST upfront advanced therapy over step-up therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator first). No recommendation on treating to endoscopic vs symptomatic remission. The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA. ACG perianal (infliximab first; drain abscesses and place setons before escalating), postoperative (endoscopy at 6-12 months; anti-TNF strong, vedolizumab conditional in high-risk patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (>2 cm: antibiotics plus drainage, hold immunosuppression) positions are unchanged. THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). Longer or multiple strictures, or ≥3 risk factors, favor surgery.
New evidenceCrohn's diseasebiologicsanti-TNFsystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider anti-TNF agents for adults with stricturing Crohn's disease, particularly in passable lesions, and use imaging (ultrasonography or MRI) for monitoring bowel wall thickness, though standardized fibrosis assessment is lacking.
What it foundBiologic therapy, predominantly anti-TNF agents, showed clinical improvement compared to standard of care in stricturing Crohn's disease, with lower response rates in nonpassable lesions.
ContextConfirms the clinical utility of anti-TNF agents in stricturing Crohn's disease but highlights the need for phenotype-specific trials and standardized imaging biomarkers.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH)ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Two current US guidelines govern Crohn's disease and should be read together. ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al.) remains the reference for diagnosis, mild-to-moderate disease, perianal, postoperative and abscess management. DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. MILD-TO-MODERATE: recommend against oral mesalamine; sulfasalazine only for symptomatic mild colonic CD; ileal-release budesonide 9 mg for induction in ileocecal disease but not for maintenance. MODERATE-TO-SEVERE (AGA Living Guideline, Scott et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1397-1448, 16 recommendations: 1 strong, 9 conditional, 6 knowledge gaps; updated quarterly, adult outpatients only): RECOMMEND infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab or upadacitinib over no treatment; SUGGEST certolizumab pegol or vedolizumab over no treatment. Advanced-therapy-naive: suggest higher-efficacy agents (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) over lower-efficacy ones (certolizumab pegol, upadacitinib). Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). Suggest against thiopurine monotherapy for induction; suggest it for maintenance of remission. Suggest SC/IM methotrexate monotherapy; suggest against oral methotrexate. In thiopurine-naive patients starting infliximab, suggest infliximab + thiopurine over infliximab alone. No recommendation on IFX + MTX, adalimumab + immunomodulator, or non-TNF biologic + immunomodulator. After ≥6 months of steroid-free remission on anti-TNF + immunomodulator, suggest withdrawing the immunomodulator and suggest against withdrawing the anti-TNF. SUGGEST upfront advanced therapy over step-up therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator first). No recommendation on treating to endoscopic vs symptomatic remission. The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA. ACG perianal (infliximab first; drain abscesses and place setons before escalating), postoperative (endoscopy at 6-12 months; anti-TNF strong, vedolizumab conditional in high-risk patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (>2 cm: antibiotics plus drainage, hold immunosuppression) positions are unchanged. THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). Longer or multiple strictures, or ≥3 risk factors, favor surgery.
New evidenceulcerative colitisCrohn's diseasebiologicsperianal disease
Clinical takeawayIn late-onset Crohn’s disease patients (≥60 years), particularly those with comorbidities or less ileocolonic/perianal disease, vedolizumab and ustekinumab may be considered as alternatives to anti-TNF agents, though further research is needed to confirm differential treatment benefits.
What it foundLate-onset IBD patients (≥60 years) received less corticosteroid, immunomodulator, and anti-TNF therapy compared to young-onset (16-39 years) and mid-onset (40-59 years) patients (OR 0.34 for vedolizumab, 0.29 for ustekinumab) but had equivalent colectomy and intestinal resection rates.
ContextChallenges prior assumptions that late-onset IBD (≥60 years) requires similar treatment to younger patients, highlighting distinct phenotypes and therapeutic preferences.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH)ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Two current US guidelines govern Crohn's disease and should be read together. ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al.) remains the reference for diagnosis, mild-to-moderate disease, perianal, postoperative and abscess management. DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. MILD-TO-MODERATE: recommend against oral mesalamine; sulfasalazine only for symptomatic mild colonic CD; ileal-release budesonide 9 mg for induction in ileocecal disease but not for maintenance. MODERATE-TO-SEVERE (AGA Living Guideline, Scott et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1397-1448, 16 recommendations: 1 strong, 9 conditional, 6 knowledge gaps; updated quarterly, adult outpatients only): RECOMMEND infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab or upadacitinib over no treatment; SUGGEST certolizumab pegol or vedolizumab over no treatment. Advanced-therapy-naive: suggest higher-efficacy agents (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) over lower-efficacy ones (certolizumab pegol, upadacitinib). Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). Suggest against thiopurine monotherapy for induction; suggest it for maintenance of remission. Suggest SC/IM methotrexate monotherapy; suggest against oral methotrexate. In thiopurine-naive patients starting infliximab, suggest infliximab + thiopurine over infliximab alone. No recommendation on IFX + MTX, adalimumab + immunomodulator, or non-TNF biologic + immunomodulator. After ≥6 months of steroid-free remission on anti-TNF + immunomodulator, suggest withdrawing the immunomodulator and suggest against withdrawing the anti-TNF. SUGGEST upfront advanced therapy over step-up therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator first). No recommendation on treating to endoscopic vs symptomatic remission. The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA. ACG perianal (infliximab first; drain abscesses and place setons before escalating), postoperative (endoscopy at 6-12 months; anti-TNF strong, vedolizumab conditional in high-risk patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (>2 cm: antibiotics plus drainage, hold immunosuppression) positions are unchanged. THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). Longer or multiple strictures, or ≥3 risk factors, favor surgery.
New evidenceCrohn's diseaseperianal diseasemeta-analysissystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider mesenchymal stem cell therapy for Crohn's disease-associated perianal fistulas refractory to conventional treatment, as it achieves durable closure in approximately two-thirds of patients with a favorable safety profile.
What it foundPooled long-term healing rate with stem cell-based therapy was 59% (95% CI, 51%-67%) in RCTs, compared to conventional treatment.
ContextConfirms stem cell-based therapy as a viable long-term option for refractory Crohn's-related perianal fistulas in patients who have failed conventional treatment, extending prior evidence of short-term efficacy.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Heidari M … Alatab S · Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
New evidenceulcerative colitisJAK inhibitorsanti-TNFvedolizumab
Clinical takeawayConsider upadacitinib over vedolizumab for anti-TNF-exposed UC patients prioritizing symptom and endoscopic remission, but weigh the higher overall adverse event rate (0.475 vs 0.213 per person-year).
What it foundUpadacitinib achieved steroid-free symptomatic remission in 71.7% vs 54.6% with vedolizumab at week 16 (aOR 2.11, 95% CI 1.67-2.65) and endoscopic remission in 41.5% vs 22.2% at week 26 (aOR 2.49, 95% CI 1.71-3.63).
ContextThis study provides the first head-to-head comparison of upadacitinib and vedolizumab in anti-TNF-exposed UC, confirming upadacitinib's superior efficacy but higher adverse event burden.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
Clinical takeawayConsider integrating biological therapies and small-molecule agents into treatment plans for patients with moderate-to-severe IBD, tailoring choices based on patient tolerance, efficacy, and safety profiles.
What it foundBiological therapies (e.g., TNF-α inhibitors, integrin blockers, interleukin inhibitors) and small-molecule agents (e.g., JAK inhibitors, S1P receptor modulators) have improved clinical remission and mucosal healing rates in moderate-to-severe IBD compared to previous therapies.
ContextConfirms and refines current practice by summarizing the efficacy and safety of newer therapies, emphasizing individualized treatment approaches and the role of head-to-head trials.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
New evidenceulcerative colitisCrohn's diseasebiologicsvedolizumab
Clinical takeawayConsider switching eligible IBD patients in remission from intravenous to subcutaneous vedolizumab, as it demonstrates high persistence (84% at Week 52) but be aware that 54% reported adverse events, including injection-site reactions (20%) and infections (17%), leading to discontinuation in 7%.
What it foundSwitching to subcutaneous vedolizumab (SC-VDZ) in IBD patients in remission achieved 84% persistence at Week 52 [95% CI: 80-88].
ContextSupports SC-VDZ as an alternative to IV-VDZ for maintaining remission in IBD patients, though adverse events were common and led to discontinuation in some cases.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
…Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease.…Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab.…After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class.…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
New evidenceulcerative colitisbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayPopulation-specific predictive tools for ASUC are needed but not yet available for clinical use. East Asian patients require distinct models, while European models remain valid for Australia/New Zealand patients.
What it foundEast Asian ASUC patients had distinct predictors of 1-year colectomy (female sex, TNF inhibitor exposure, albumin ≤3 g/dL) and non-response to steroids (age ≤37, baseline steroid use, albumin ≤2.5 g/dL, extraintestinal manifestations). European models (e.g., French 1-year colectomy score, ADMIT-ASC index) accurately predicted outcomes in Australia/New Zealand patients.
ContextPredictive factors for ASUC differ significantly between East Asian and Australia/New Zealand patients, based on a retrospective study of 826 ASUC cases across 23 referral hospitals.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.
Kim ES … Australia New Zealand IBD Consortium (ANZIBDC) and the Asian Organization for Crohn’s and Colitis (AOCC) · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDretrospective · n=37 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
New evidenceCrohn's diseaseperianal diseasebiomarkerartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayConsider transperineal CEUS over conventional B-mode TPUS for differentiating perianal abscesses from inflammatory masses/phlegmons in adult Crohn’s disease patients with perianal symptoms and suspected septic complications, particularly in clinically ambiguous cases, while noting contraindications and exclusion criteria.
What it foundCEUS improved inter-observer agreement from κ=0.31 (B-mode) to κ=0.83 and intra-observer reliability from κ=0.55 to κ=0.95, reclassifying 13/17 abscesses and 11/31 inflammatory masses.
ContextRefines current practice: CEUS outperforms B-mode TPUS in diagnostic accuracy and reliability, aligning with its established role in abdominal IUS, but is not routinely necessary for all patients.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Anorectal Abscess, Fistula-in-Ano, and Rectovaginal Fistula" (Gaertner WB, Burgess PL, Davids JS, et al.), Diseases of the Colon & Rectum 2022;65(8):964-985, doi:10.1097/DCR.0000000000002473ShowHide
…Routine diagnostic imaging is NOT typically necessary (1B); reserve imaging for selected patients with occult abscess, recurrent or complex fistula, immunosuppression, or anorectal Crohn's disease (MRI sensitivity 97% vs 74% for endoanal ultrasound in complex fistula; combined accuracy approaches 100%).…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Diagnose anorectal abscess and fistula-in-ano clinically: a disease-specific history and physical examination assessing symptoms, relevant history, abscess and fistula location, and secondary cellulitis (1C), with digital rectal exam and anoscopy/proctoscopy as needed. Routine diagnostic imaging is NOT typically necessary (1B); reserve imaging for selected patients with occult abscess, recurrent or complex fistula, immunosuppression, or anorectal Crohn's disease (MRI sensitivity 97% vs 74% for endoanal ultrasound in complex fistula; combined accuracy approaches 100%). Treat acute anorectal abscess promptly with incision and drainage (1C), placing the incision close to the anal verge to limit subsequent tract length and preserve the sphincter complex; packing is not required and unpacked wounds gave better resolution, less pain and faster healing in randomized trials. Reserve antibiotics for abscess complicated by cellulitis, systemic signs of infection, or underlying immunosuppression (2B); routine antibiotics after uncomplicated drainage in healthy patients do not improve healing or reduce recurrence, and conversely immunosuppressed patients with low neutrophil counts and no fluctuance may initially be treated with antibiotics alone rather than drainage. Concomitant fistulotomy at the time of drainage may be performed in selected patients with a simple anal fistula (2B), balancing lower recurrence (RR 0.13 in a 479-patient meta-analysis) against a non-significant increase in continence disturbance. For simple fistula-in-ano with normal sphincter function, lay-open fistulotomy heals over 90% (1B); for low fistulas involving less than one third of the external sphincter the clinically significant incontinence risk is minimal, and marsupialization improves healing and reduces bleeding. Sphincter-preserving options: endorectal advancement flap (1B; 66% to 87% initial healing, but up to 35% mild-to-moderate incontinence) and, for transsphincteric tracts, ligation of the intersphincteric fistula tract (LIFT) (1B; 76% pooled success, 1.4% incontinence). A cutting seton may be used selectively for complex cryptoglandular fistula (2C, downgraded from 2B; reported incontinence ranges 0% to 67%). The anal fistula plug and fibrin glue are relatively ineffective (1B, upgraded from 2B; contemporary healing 50% or less). Endoscopic or laser closure techniques (VAAFT, FiLaC, OTSC) have reasonable short-term healing but unknown long-term healing and recurrence rates (2C). In Crohn's disease, where abscess and fistula arise from penetrating inflammation rather than cryptoglandular infection, management is multidisciplinary and a draining seton is typically useful and may be used for long-term disease control (1B, upgraded from 1C); Crohn's disease is a named risk factor for failure or recurrence of fistulotomy, advancement flap, LIFT, and plug.
New evidenceulcerative colitisbiologicstherapeutic drug monitoring
Clinical takeawayConsider carotegrast methyl for patients with ulcerative colitis who have an inadequate response to 5-ASA, particularly if symptom improvement is a priority. Monitor for response at 8 weeks and consider continuing treatment up to 16 weeks for further symptom improvement. Be aware of adverse drug reactions, which occurred in 15.8% of patients.
What it foundCarotegrast methyl achieved PRO-2-defined response and remission rates of 57.8% and 43.3% at week 8, and 58.9% and 50.0% at end of treatment (median duration: 83.5 days).
ContextThis study provides real-world evidence supporting carotegrast methyl as an effective option for patients with ulcerative colitis who have an inadequate response to 5-ASA, aligning with its use in clinical practice but offering new data on timing and cumulative benefits.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Hirai F … Hisamatsu T · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDretrospective · n=50 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
New evidenceCrohn's diseaseperianal diseaseustekinumabpediatric
Clinical takeawayConsider ustekinumab as a potential therapeutic option for pediatric perianal Crohn's disease patients who fail anti-TNF therapy, recognizing its investigational role in this population.
What it foundUstekinumab achieved clinical remission in 48% (23/48) and radiological remission in 30% (13/43) of pediatric perianal Crohn's disease patients at 1 year compared to baseline.
ContextThis study supports ustekinumab's potential role in pediatric perianal Crohn's disease, particularly in anti-TNF-exposed patients, where remission rates approach 50% clinically and 30% radiologically at 1 year compared to baseline.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Orlin I … Rinawi F · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDmeta analysis · n=4,225 · Oct 1, 2026 · Colorectal Disease · IF 3.2
New evidenceIBD surgerycolorectal surgerysystematic reviewmeta-analysis
Clinical takeawayConsider implementing ERAS protocols for IBD patients undergoing colorectal surgery to reduce hospital length of stay, as evidence supports its benefit without increasing 30-day readmissions, reoperations, or complications.
What it foundERAS protocols reduced hospital length of stay by 1.62 days (95% CI: -2.03, -1.21) in IBD patients undergoing colorectal surgery.
ContextThis meta-analysis confirms the utility of ERAS protocols in IBD patients, extending evidence previously established in colorectal cancer surgery to this population.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Johnson G … Kennedy ED · Colorectal Disease : the Official Journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDsystematic review · n=54,258 · Oct 1, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7
New evidencesystematic reviewbiologicsJAK inhibitors
Clinical takeawayConsider that RCTs of advanced therapies for IBD rarely include patients with DTT-IBD, and subgroup-specific efficacy data for this population are lacking. Discuss trial limitations and extrapolation risks when recommending advanced therapies to DTT-IBD patients.
What it foundOnly 16.1% of UC trials and 10.5% of CD trials included patients with DTT-IBD (exposure to ≥ 2 ATs with different mechanisms), and DTT-IBD patients accounted for 16.2% of UC and 22.4% of CD study populations.
ContextChallenges current practice by highlighting the limited representation of DTT-IBD patients in RCTs, despite their clinical relevance. Prior evidence assumes generalizability of trial results to all IBD patients.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Parigi TL … Danese S · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDretrospective · n=67 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
Clinical takeawayConsider anti-IL therapy for chronic pouchitis patients aiming to reduce antibiotic dependence, particularly in those with persistent antibiotic use despite other advanced therapies, while acknowledging that many patients may still require antibiotics.
What it found61% of patients on advanced therapies for chronic pouchitis had reduced antibiotic use, with anti-IL therapy associated with higher odds of reduction compared to other advanced therapies (adjusted OR 11.1; 95% CI, 2.12-57.62). However, 79% of prevalent AT users still required antibiotics.
ContextChallenges the current reliance on antibiotics for chronic pouchitis by suggesting advanced therapies, especially anti-IL agents, may reduce antibiotic dependence in select patients.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Pan Y … Ananthakrishnan AN · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDprospective cohort · n=84 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
Clinical takeawaySerum LRG shows higher sensitivity than FC for endoscopic remission in Crohn’s disease, particularly for small-intestinal lesions, but further validation is needed before clinical adoption.
What it foundLRG had 85.9% sensitivity and 90.0% specificity for endoscopic remission (aSES-CD ≤3) vs 70.3% sensitivity and 85.0% specificity for FC, using cutoffs of 11 µg/mL (LRG) and 100 µg/g (FC).
ContextRefines current practice by suggesting LRG may outperform FC in assessing endoscopic remission, particularly for small bowel involvement, where FC has limitations. However, LRG is not yet validated for widespread use and remains investigational.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Kawamura T … Kawashima H · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDsystematic review · Oct 1, 2026 · UEG Journal · IF 5.6
Clinical takeawayConsider IgG-based serology for diagnosis and monitoring in CeD patients with suspected IgAD, but be aware of its limitations in long-term follow-up due to slow antibody decline.
What it foundIgAD prevalence in CeD patients is 1.4%-4.8%, and CeD prevalence in IgAD patients is 5.9%-14.1%.
ContextConfirms the known association between CeD and IgAD but highlights diagnostic challenges and the need for improved monitoring strategies.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease" (Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Semrad C, Kelly CP, Greer KB, Limketkai BN, Lebwohl B), Am J Gastroenterol 2023;118(1):59-76, 2023ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
DIAGNOSIS (patient must be on a gluten-containing diet). Serologic testing consists of TTG-IgA plus, if IgA deficiency has not previously been excluded, concurrent total IgA; if IgA deficiency is present, measure an IgG-based serology (DGP-IgG and/or TTG-IgG). This algorithm, previously restricted to those >=2 years, now applies to adults and children at ANY age. An elevated TTG-IgA should proceed to EGD with duodenal biopsy. A negative TTG-IgA in a non-IgA-deficient patient adequately rules out CD only when pretest probability is low or moderate; in symptomatic patients whose pretest suspicion is high (>5%), EGD with duodenal biopsy should be performed irrespective of serologic result. ACG recommends EGD with multiple duodenal biopsies to confirm the diagnosis in both children and adults with suspicion of CD (STRONG recommendation, moderate quality; 1 dissent); sampling should be 1 or 2 biopsies from the bulb (9-o'clock or 12-o'clock position) and at least 4 from the distal duodenum. Lymphocytic duodenosis (>=25 IELs/100 epithelial cells) without villous atrophy is NOT specific for CD. NONBIOPSY PATHWAY (CONDITIONAL recommendation, moderate quality): a combination of high-level TTG-IgA (>10x ULN) with a positive EMA in a SECOND blood sample is suggested as reliable for diagnosis in CHILDREN, and only if the family agrees with the no-biopsy strategy; in SYMPTOMATIC ADULTS unwilling or unable to undergo upper GI endoscopy the same criteria may be considered AFTER THE FACT, as a diagnosis of 'likely CD', ACG does not endorse a prospective no-biopsy pathway in adults, noting a >=10-fold TTG-IgA elevation carries a PPV of only ~95% in adults, which may be unacceptably low given lifelong treatment implications. HLA-DQ2/DQ8 is not required for diagnosis but is useful for serology-histology discrepancy or in patients already on a GFD; if negative, CD is ruled out. TREATMENT AND MONITORING. Strict lifelong GFD. A visit with a dietitian after diagnosis is MANDATORY, with subsequent visits as needed to reinforce education and adherence encouraged; interview with a dietitian experienced in the GFD is the standard of care for assessing adherence. ACG RECOMMENDS consumption of gluten-free oats (STRONG recommendation, moderate quality), with the qualifier that gluten contamination of oats, variable toxicity across oat varieties, and a small risk of immune reaction to avenin require monitoring for oat tolerance (monitoring intervals are not known). ACG suggests AGAINST routine use of gluten detection devices in food or biospecimens (conditional, low quality; 1 dissent), and finds INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE to recommend for or against probiotics (evidence gap). ACG suggests setting a goal of intestinal healing as an end point of GFD therapy, advocating individualized discussion of goals beyond clinical and serological remission (CONDITIONAL recommendation, low quality). Follow-up may require multiple visits in the first year (e.g. 3, 6, and 12 months) and regular visits (e.g. twice a year or yearly) thereafter, tracking symptoms and TTG or DGP serology; other tests may include CBC, ALT, AST, vitamins A/D/E/B12, copper, zinc, folic acid, ferritin, and iron, with follow-up bloodwork individualized to verify correction of values abnormal at baseline. Preventive care includes vaccines and DXA. Symptoms improve within days of strict adherence (diarrhea improved in 80% within 60 days), but mucosal healing lags: median time from GFD onset to mucosal healing in adults is 3 years, so it is reasonable to consider a follow-up biopsy in adults after 2 years of starting a GFD, in the ABSENCE of symptoms, after shared decision-making; children heal faster (95% within 2 years), altering the risk-benefit calculus. Repeat biopsy is the only reliable method to document mucosal healing, seroconversion correlates poorly. Upper endoscopy with biopsies is also indicated for lack of clinical response or relapse of symptoms despite a GFD. VACCINATION: ACG suggests vaccination to prevent pneumococcal disease in patients with CD (CONDITIONAL recommendation, low quality), because increased pneumococcal risk is attributed to hyposplenism (frequently subclinical) present in roughly one-third of patients. The regimen follows CDC recommendations by age, immunization record, and comorbidity: for an adult with CD and functional asplenia not previously vaccinated or with unknown history, 1 dose of PCV15 (followed by PPSV23 at least 1 year later) or 1 dose of PCV20 (no PPSV23 indicated); for an adult with CD and no other condition carrying a specific CDC recommendation, ACG suggests 1 dose of PCV20 alone, or 1 dose of PCV15 first and then consider PPSV23 at least 1 year later. NONRESPONSIVE CD (NRCD): defined as persistent symptoms, signs, or laboratory abnormalities typical of CD despite 6-12 MONTHS of dietary gluten avoidance. Evaluation should review and confirm the initial diagnosis of CD, assess for inadvertent gluten exposure (via expert dietitian assessment and serology, positive serologies despite 12 months of GFD suggest ongoing gluten ingestion), assess for a coexisting functional disorder, and selectively test based on clinical suspicion for food intolerances (e.g. lactose, fructose), pancreatic insufficiency, microscopic colitis, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, among others. REFRACTORY CD (RCD) is a separate, rarer entity (<1% of patients outside referral centers): ongoing malabsorptive symptoms and signs with villous atrophy despite strict adherence to a GFD for MORE THAN 12 months and absence of other disorders including overt lymphoma; initial assessment centers on distinguishing RCD type 1 from type 2 by CD3/CD8 immunostains, T-cell receptor clonality by PCR, and/or flow cytometry of duodenal biopsies.
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: this study confirms that timing of complementary food introduction does not influence IBD risk, so no change to current feeding recommendations is needed.
What it foundTiming of complementary food introduction (<4, 4-5, or ≥6 months) was not associated with IBD risk (aHRs 1.04, 0.83, and 1.00, respectively).
ContextThis study refutes prior hypotheses that early complementary feeding might increase IBD risk, aligning with current guidelines that do not link feeding timing to IBD prevention.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Sigvardsson I … Mårild K · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBDprospective cohort · n=226 · Oct 1, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: this study quantifies the hidden workload of between-visit care in pediatric IBD but does not propose specific interventions or changes to practice.
What it foundBetween-visit care in pediatric IBD rose from a median of 1 event per 6 months >1 year prediagnosis to 64 events in the year following diagnosis, remaining persistently elevated thereafter.
ContextThis study highlights a previously underrecognized aspect of pediatric IBD management, confirming that between-visit care is substantial and persistent, particularly in moderate-severe disease.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Huang JS … Polk DB · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink