← Issue №15/ week of Oct 11, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 20 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 20, in full

most clinically useful first · the 3 the issue led with are ruled in green
Everything here, in one line each20
Hepatology guideline · Oct 5, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

ACG Clinical Guideline: Preventive Care for Patients With Cirrhosis.

Guideline / reviewcirrhosishepatocellular carcinomaportal hypertensionguideline
Clinical takeawayImplement the guideline's strong recommendations in clinical practice for patients with cirrhosis: use carvedilol or variceal ligation for high-risk esophageal varices, conduct semiannual HCC surveillance, and ensure vaccination for hepatitis A, influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV. Consider conditional recommendations like lactulose for minimal hepatic encephalopathy and short-course antibiotic prophylaxis for upper GI bleeding based on patient-specific factors, acknowledging that most evidence is of low certainty.
What it foundThe guideline provides 18 GRADED recommendations and 6 key concept statements for preventive care in cirrhosis, including strong recommendations for carvedilol or variceal ligation for high-risk esophageal varices, semiannual HCC surveillance, and vaccination for hepatitis A, influenza, SARS-CoV-2, and RSV.
ContextThis guideline consolidates and updates preventive care strategies for cirrhosis, emphasizing evidence-based interventions to reduce complications and improve outcomes. It refines prior practices by incorporating recent evidence and GRADED recommendations, though most evidence is of low certainty.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2026 (Bajaj JS, Jakab SS, Jesudian AB, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2026;121(3):588-618) / EASL 2022

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with cirrhosis, hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a clinical diagnosis. It is graded by West Haven (minimal plus grade 1 = covert; grades 2-4 = overt) and made only after other causes of altered mentation are excluded. Routine brain imaging is not needed in a patient with cirrhosis and confusion. Do not routinely check serum ammonia to guide HE treatment (conditional, very low certainty), and do not use ammonia alone to diagnose minimal or covert HE (conditional, very low). Ammonia should not be used to grade overt HE or to titrate therapy, though EASL 2022 notes that a normal level calls the diagnosis into question. For covert or minimal HE, use a single psychometric or neurophysiological test rather than two in combination (conditional, very low). Lactulose is suggested over no treatment for covert or minimal HE (conditional, low), but the evidence is insufficient to recommend routine treatment to prevent overt HE. In every episode of overt HE, search for and treat precipitants: infection, GI bleeding, dehydration or diuretic excess, electrolyte disturbance, constipation, sedatives. Reassess if the patient has not improved within 48-72 h. Lactulose is first-line for overt HE (strong, moderate), titrated to 2-3 soft bowel movements a day, given orally or by enema in grade 3-4. High-volume polyethylene glycol (about 4 L) is suggested as an alternative to lactulose (conditional, low). In acute inpatient overt HE, adding rifaximin to lactulose is suggested over lactulose alone (conditional, low). After a first episode of overt HE, give lactulose as secondary prophylaxis titrated to 2-3 BM/day. Outpatient rifaximin is suggested to prevent recurrence (conditional, low). Adding rifaximin 550 mg twice daily to lactulose is strongly recommended for recurrence while on lactulose (strong, high). If symptoms persist on lactulose plus rifaximin, zinc may be added when blood zinc is low (conditional, very low). Do not restrict protein (conditional, very low). Target protein 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day (strong, moderate) and give a late-evening snack (conditional, very low). Use BCAA supplementation when food alone cannot meet protein needs (strong, moderate). Before elective TIPS in decompensated cirrhosis, start rifaximin 14 days ahead and continue it for at least 6 months, with or without prior overt HE (strong, moderate). Extrahepatic collaterals may be embolized at the time of TIPS to reduce post-TIPS HE (conditional, low). For HE refractory to optimized medical therapy, embolization of a spontaneous portosystemic shunt is suggested in patients with adequate hepatic function and no contraindications (conditional, very low). Post-TIPS refractory HE may warrant TIPS reduction. Refer for transplant evaluation in patients with recurrent or persistent HE. In patients with multiple HE episodes and MELD <15, evaluate candidacy for living-donor liver transplant (conditional, low). Give oral and written advice against driving.

ACG 2026 (Bajaj JS, Jakab SS, Jesudian AB, et al. Am J Gastroenterol 2026;121(3):588-618) / EASL 2022 · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Tapper EB … Lai JC · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=1,294 · Oct 6, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Optimal Corticosteroid Use in Patients With Severe Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Practice-changingalcohol-associated liver diseasesystematic reviewmeta-analysisguideline
Clinical takeawayUse the Lille score to guide corticosteroid therapy in patients with severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (MELD >20), as it is associated with lower mortality without increased infection risk.
What it foundLille-guided corticosteroid use reduced 28-day mortality to 8% (vs 21% in non-Lille-guided arms) and 90-day mortality to 15% (vs 40% in non-Lille-guided arms) in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (MELD >20), with no significant difference in infection rates.
ContextConfirms and strengthens prior evidence supporting Lille-guided corticosteroid use in severe alcohol-associated hepatitis, addressing inconsistent application in trials.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54

… For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. … Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Elmustafa F … Singal AK · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=738 · Oct 5, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Effects of MASH risk genotypes on resmetirom efficacy in patients with MASH and fibrosis.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider resmetirom for non-cirrhotic MASH patients regardless of common risk genotypes (PNPLA3, HSD17B13, TM6SF2, MTARC1, MBOAT7), as efficacy appears genotype-independent, though the study was not powered to detect small effects.
What it foundResmetirom improved MASH resolution and fibrosis similarly in patients with high-risk genotypes (PNPLA3, HSD17B13, TM6SF2, MTARC1, MBOAT7) vs. low-risk genotypes compared to placebo in the MAESTRO-NASH trial.
ContextConfirms resmetirom's broad efficacy in non-cirrhotic MASH, extending prior evidence that genetic risk variants do not limit its therapeutic benefit, but with a caveat on sample size limitations.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. … In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Chalasani NP … Anstee QM · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=30,784 · Oct 7, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

EASL 2025 indications revisited: phase-specific outcomes with and without nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in chronic hepatitis B virus infection.

New evidenceviral hepatitishepatocellular carcinomacirrhosisepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider NA therapy for HBeAg-positive chronic HBV patients with high replicative or impending phase transition phenotypes, even if they fall outside current EASL strongly recommended treatment criteria, particularly in Chinese populations.
What it foundNA therapy reduced cirrhosis risk (HR 0.18) and HCC risk (HR 0.03) in HBeAg-positive, high replicative patients (age <30, HBV DNA ≥8 log₁₀IU/mL, normal ALT, no/mild fibrosis, no family history of liver cancer), and cirrhosis (HR 0.50) and HCC (HR 0.25) in HBeAg-positive, impending phase transition patients (typically age ≥30, HBV DNA ≥6 log₁₀IU/mL, normal ALT, no advanced fibrosis), compared to no treatment.
ContextChallenges current EASL guidelines by showing benefit of NA therapy in subgroups not currently recommended for treatment. Findings are based on a Chinese population and require validation in other settings.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakewhether to treat HBeAg-positive individuals with high replicative or impending phase transition phenotypes outside current treatment criteria

… (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tang S … Zeng Y · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=4,302 · Oct 6, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Associations of RAS inhibitors and Calcium Channel Blockers with Liver Stiffness Dynamics and Long-term Liver-Related Events in MASLD.

New evidenceMASLDepidemiologybiomarkerhealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider RAS inhibitors or CCBs as antihypertensive therapy in MASLD patients with hypertension, given their association with reduced liver stiffness progression and lower liver-related event risk, but monitor for potential adverse effects as safety data were not detailed in the abstract.
What it foundRAS inhibitors reduced long-term liver-related events by 57% (HR=0.431) compared to non-users and CCBs reduced them by 44% (HR=0.559) compared to non-users in MASLD patients with hypertension over 4.6 years.
ContextConfirms and extends prior evidence on the hepatoprotective effects of RAS inhibitors and CCBs in MASLD, providing longitudinal data on liver stiffness and clinical outcomes in patients with hypertension.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Zhou XD … VCTE-Prognosis Study Group · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=111 · Oct 6, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

First-line durvalumab and tremelimumab in poor-prognosis unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Phase IIIb single-arm SIERRA study.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawaySTRIDE (tremelimumab 300 mg once plus durvalumab 1500 mg every 4 weeks) was tolerable in patients usually excluded from trials, with grade 3/4 related adverse events in 19.8% (95% CI 12.9-28.5) at 6 months and an objective response rate of 14.4%. SIERRA is single-arm with no comparator, so it shows feasibility, not benefit over alternatives or best supportive care.
What it foundSTRIDE regimen showed a 14.4% ORR (95% CI 8.5-22.4) and 19.8% Grade 3/4 PRAEs ≤6 months (95% CI 12.9-28.5) in poor-prognosis uHCC patients.
ContextThis literature reports that the dual immune checkpoint inhibitor regimen STRIDE shows promise as a first-line treatment for poor-prognosis unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, based on early safety data from the phase IIIb SIERRA study.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Chan SL … Rimassa L · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=11,882 · Oct 9, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Weight changes differentially impact MASLD incidence, progression and outcomes based on genetic and metabolic risk profiles.

New evidenceMASLDepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayReinforce weight loss as the core MASLD intervention: each 1% reduction was associated with 10% lower incident MASLD (HR 0.90) and 9% higher resolution (HR 1.09). The subgroup thresholds by polygenic and metabolic risk (roughly 5% to 14%) are observational estimates that need genetic profiling not available in clinic; existing targets of at least 5% for steatosis and 7 to 10% for MASH or fibrosis stand.
What it foundEach 1% reduction in body weight lowered MASLD risk by 10% (HR = 0.90 [0.89-0.91]) and increased MASLD resolution by 9% (HR = 1.09 [1.08-1.10]), with varying weight-loss thresholds by genetic and metabolic risk subgroups.
ContextRefines current weight-management strategies for MASLD by identifying subgroup-specific weight-loss thresholds for prevention, resolution, and fibrosis-risk regression in the general population.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (with October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide updates) / EASL 2026 holistic guidance on the steatotic liver disease trajectory (JHEP Reports 2026;8(9):101798)

Decision at stakethe weight loss targets for MASLD prevention and resolution

… For adults with overweight or obesity, sustained loss of ≥5% of body weight reduces liver fat, 7-10% improves steatohepatitis, and ≥10% improves fibrosis. In lean MASLD the target is 3-5% loss. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Lifestyle change is still the foundation of MASLD care, and it is graded by goal. For adults with overweight or obesity, sustained loss of ≥5% of body weight reduces liver fat, 7-10% improves steatohepatitis, and ≥10% improves fibrosis. In lean MASLD the target is 3-5% loss. Diet should follow a Mediterranean pattern. Sugar-sweetened beverages are restricted first; fructose and other sugars, refined carbohydrates, saturated fat, ultra-processed food and red or processed meat are also cut. Low-carbohydrate diets or time-restricted eating are acceptable if they keep Mediterranean principles. Patients should do ≥150 min/week of moderate aerobic exercise plus resistance training (resistance work protects against sarcopenia and suits patients who cannot do aerobic exercise) and should cut sedentary time. Any amount of alcohol is treated as potentially hazardous: screen with AUDIT-C, and in compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) or cirrhosis advise abstinence. Drugs and surgery are added to lifestyle, never substituted for it, and each is limited by disease stage. Resmetirom is approved by the FDA and EMA (EMA in May 2025), with diet and exercise, for noncirrhotic MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis; it is not for cirrhosis. GLP-1 receptor agonists, or dual GIP/GLP-1 agonists, are the preferred class for patients with type 2 diabetes and/or obesity. Semaglutide 2.4 mg has FDA accelerated approval and AASLD November 2025 guidance support for noncirrhotic MASH F2-F3, with cirrhosis excluded first by noninvasive tests. Anti-obesity drugs are not yet recommended in cirrhosis. Pioglitazone is for selected patients, with or without diabetes, with biopsy-proven MASH (AASLD); it is not for all patients with MASLD and should be avoided in cACLD or cirrhosis. Under AASLD 2023, vitamin E 800 IU/day is limited to biopsy-proven MASH without diabetes or cirrhosis; the 2026 EASL guidance does not cover it. Bariatric or metabolic surgery should be discussed at BMI >35 kg/m2 with comorbidity, or ≥40. In compensated cirrhosis it may help carefully selected patients (MELD <12, Child-Pugh A), usually by sleeve gastrectomy, done at high-volume centres if clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH) is present. It is contraindicated in decompensated cirrhosis. Comorbidity care is part of MASLD treatment: cardiovascular risk, under-prescribed statins (safe in compensated cirrhosis; avoid high doses when decompensated), diabetes, sleep apnea, mental health and sleep, and vaccination.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (with October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide updates) / EASL 2026 holistic guidance on the steatotic liver disease trajectory (JHEP Reports 2026;8(9):101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Chen L … Tacke F · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,016 · Oct 8, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

The Clinical Utility of Adding Laminin Gamma 2 Monomer to the PAGE-B Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Chronic Hepatitis B.

Diagnostichepatocellular carcinomabiomarkerviral hepatitisepidemiology
Clinical takeawayKeep HCC surveillance decisions in treated chronic hepatitis B on guideline risk factors. In this cohort LG2m identified a higher-risk subgroup among patients with non-high PAGE-B scores (adjusted HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.26-15.44), while no patient with a low PAGE-B score developed HCC over 5 years. The assay is not routinely available and no guideline endorses it.
What it foundIn nonhigh PAGE-B patients (PAGE-B score <10), high LG2m predicted 5-year HCC incidence of 5.5% vs. 1.0% for low LG2m (HR 4.40, 95% CI 1.26-15.44), whereas AFP did not significantly stratify risk.
ContextRefines HCC surveillance in CHB by identifying LG2m as a predictive biomarker in intermediate PAGE-B patients, a subgroup previously lacking clear risk stratification.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Huang CF … Yu ML · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=216 · Oct 8, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

ALBI-6-A Novel Prognostic Score Combining ALBI and Interleukin-6 in Patients With HCC Treated With Atezolizumab and Bevacizumab.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider using ALBI-6 for risk stratification in advanced HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab, pending prospective validation.
What it foundALBI-6, combining interleukin-6 and albumin-bilirubin grade, stratified advanced HCC patients into three risk groups with significantly different survival (log-rank p=0.002) and outperformed modified albumin-bilirubin grade (p=0.040) and CRAFITY score.
ContextThis refines current prognostic tools by integrating systemic inflammation (interleukin-6) with liver function (albumin-bilirubin grade), offering improved discrimination over existing scores like modified albumin-bilirubin grade and CRAFITY in advanced HCC patients treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

Decision at stakerisk stratification in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with immunotherapy

… Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Bark P … Foerster F · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=5,586 · Oct 9, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Real-world hepatic safety of the potassium-competitive acid blocker: A RUCAM-adjudicated multicenter cohort study.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaepidemiologybasic science
Clinical takeawayReassuring but inconclusive: RUCAM-adjudicated DILI occurred in 3, 2 and 3 patients per matched group (0.17, 0.07 and 0.15 per 100 person-years), so confidence intervals were wide (HR vs PPI 1.63, 95% CI 0.28-9.56). Choose acid suppression on indication and availability; this study removes a signal, it does not establish equivalence.
What it foundRUCAM-possible DILI occurred at 0.17, 0.07, and 0.15 per 100 person-years in tegoprazan, PPI, and H2RA groups, respectively, with no significant difference (tegoprazan vs H2RAs HR 0.98; 95% CI, 0.20-4.95; vs PPIs HR 1.63; 95% CI, 0.28-9.56).
ContextThis study addresses concerns from early-generation P-CABs' hepatotoxicity, providing real-world evidence that newer P-CABs like tegoprazan do not increase DILI risk compared to PPIs or H2RAs, though the rarity of events limits definitive conclusions.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Chon HY … Huh CW · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=2,124 · Oct 6, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Preventable Visits to the Emergency Department in Patients with Cirrhosis.

New evidencecirrhosisasciteshealth servicescost-effectiveness
Clinical takeawayConsider optimizing outpatient hepatology access, paracentesis availability, and medication management for cirrhosis patients to reduce preventable ED visits, particularly in those with active alcohol use, lack of primary care access, or uncontrolled ascites.
What it found15% of ED visits in cirrhosis patients were preventable, with urgent hepatology follow-up (45%), paracentesis access (33%), and outpatient medication management (31%) as key interventions. Preventable visits had lower 90-day mortality (10% vs 17%; p=0.001) but higher 90-day ED revisits (50% vs 41%; p=0.003) compared to non-preventable visits. Preventability was adjudicated using predefined cirrhosis-specific criteria: urgent hepatology evaluation, urgent paracentesis, expanded outpatient access, or outpatient medication optimization.
ContextThis study highlights a significant proportion of preventable ED visits in cirrhosis patients, challenging current outpatient care models and suggesting targeted redesign to reduce acute healthcare use.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Parvataneni S … Desai AP · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 6, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Review Article: Fibrosis-4 Index in Steatotic Liver Disease-Past, Present and Future.

Guideline / reviewbiomarkerMASLD
Clinical takeawayUse FIB-4 as the first-line triage test for fibrosis assessment in steatotic liver disease, followed by transient elastography or another second-line test for indeterminate or elevated results, with selective biopsy reserved for diagnostic uncertainty or discordant testing. Note that FIB-4 should not serve as a stand-alone selector for drug eligibility; confirmatory staging is required.
What it foundFIB-4 provides moderate discrimination for advanced fibrosis and high negative predictive value (NPV) when used with dual thresholds (e.g., low and high cutoffs) and age-adjusted cutoffs across various steatotic liver disease (SLD) subtypes.
ContextConfirms and refines current practice: FIB-4 is already widely used as a noninvasive test for fibrosis assessment, but this review emphasizes its role in modern care pathways and the need for confirmatory staging in precision therapy.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. … Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). … On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Soni K … Díaz LA · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology guideline · Oct 7, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

AASLD EXPO: Liver biopsy.

Guideline / reviewbiomarkerguideline
Clinical takeawayConsider liver biopsy for diagnosis, staging, or management of liver disease, selecting the approach (percutaneous, transjugular, or endoscopic ultrasound) based on patient-specific factors such as ascites, coagulopathy, or need for portal pressure measurement.
What it foundLiver biopsy remains essential for diagnosis, staging, and management of liver disease, with percutaneous, transjugular, and endoscopic ultrasound approaches showing similar safety and adequacy.
ContextConfirms the ongoing role of liver biopsy in hepatology, despite advances in noninvasive methods, and highlights newer techniques like endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Verna EC … Rockey DC · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=345 · Oct 7, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

An international multicenter analysis of the outcome of pediatric first variceal hemorrhage.

New evidenceportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingpediatricepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider referring pediatric patients with first variceal hemorrhage to high-volume centers, as outcomes are significantly better in these settings compared to low-volume centers. Monitor closely for decompensated disease, cirrhosis, or biliary atresia, as these factors are associated with diminished survival. Be cautious with sclerotherapy, as it is linked to worse outcomes.
What it foundOverall 6-week mortality after pediatric first variceal hemorrhage was 4.1%, with 1.4% in nonhospitalized subjects and significantly higher in low-volume centers (cluster 2) vs. high-volume centers (cluster 1) (P=.010).
ContextThis study confirms that pediatric variceal hemorrhage outcomes are diagnosis-specific and worse in decompensated disease, refining prior understanding of risk factors and center-specific influences.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Shneider BL … Grammatikopoulos T · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=73 · Oct 5, 2026 · BMC Gastro · IF 2.5

Superior diagnostic yield of mini-laparoscopy over transjugular liver biopsy in acute-on-chronic liver failure: a case-control study.

New evidencecirrhosisacute liver failure
Clinical takeawayWhere mini-laparoscopy is available at an expert center, it is an option when a transjugular sample is likely to be inadequate: in this single-center retrospective series (57 vs 16 ACLF patients) transjugular specimens were technically inadequate in 31%, while mini-laparoscopy caused minor complications in 81% of ACLF patients and major complications were rare with both. Transjugular biopsy remains the standard route when coagulopathy or ascites preclude percutaneous biopsy.
What it foundMini-laparoscopy (MB) achieved 100% technical evaluability vs. 31.3% failure in transjugular biopsy (TB) in ACLF patients, with 3.6% diagnostic failure in MB vs. 6.2% in TB, despite higher minor complication rates (80.7% in ACLF-MB vs. 52.6% in LC-MB).
ContextRefines current practice by demonstrating superior diagnostic yield of MB over TB in ACLF patients, a high-risk population where accurate diagnosis is critical.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Weisner L … Huebener P · BMC Gastroenterology · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=28 · Oct 9, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Phenotype and prognosis of primary sclerosing cholangitis-autoimmune hepatitis variant syndrome.

New evidencePSCautoimmune hepatitiscirrhosisliver transplant
Clinical takeawayIn PSC, look for autoimmune hepatitis features (moderate-to-severe interface hepatitis plus ALT at least 5x ULN, IgG at least 1.5x ULN, or SMA titer at least 1:80), which define the variant syndrome. In this cohort variant patients were younger, more often cirrhotic at diagnosis, less often had IBD, and had fewer liver-related events (adjusted HR 0.27) with similar transplant-free survival. Single-center retrospective data; not a reason to relax surveillance.
What it foundPSC-AIH variant syndrome (VS) patients, defined by moderate-to-severe interface hepatitis plus ALT ≥5×ULN, IgG ≥1.5×ULN, or smooth muscle antibody titer ≥1:80, had lower adjusted hazard of liver-related events (HR 0.27, 95% CI 0.09-0.80) and similar transplant-free survival (HR 0.33, 95% CI 0.11-1.00) compared to non-VS PSC patients.
ContextThis study refines understanding of PSC-AIH variant syndrome, showing that despite cirrhosis at diagnosis, VS patients have a comparable prognosis to non-VS PSC patients.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 (Bowlus et al., Hepatology 77:659-702) practice guidance on PSC and cholangiocarcinoma, supersedes AASLD 2010; alongside EASL 2022 sclerosing cholangitis guideline

Diagnose PSC with high-quality MRCP as the reference-standard imaging (avoid ERCP for diagnostic purposes; if MRCP findings are equivocal, repeat MRCP rather than proceeding to ERCP), reserving ERCP for therapeutic intervention, and exclude secondary sclerosing cholangitis/IgG4-related disease. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose PSC with high-quality MRCP as the reference-standard imaging (avoid ERCP for diagnostic purposes; if MRCP findings are equivocal, repeat MRCP rather than proceeding to ERCP), reserving ERCP for therapeutic intervention, and exclude secondary sclerosing cholangitis/IgG4-related disease. No disease-modifying therapy is proven to alter transplant-free survival, but moderate-dose UDCA (13-23 mg/kg/day) may now be considered and continued in patients not enrolled in or eligible for a clinical trial if it produces a meaningful improvement in alkaline phosphatase (GGT in children) and/or symptoms by 12 months, discontinuing if no response; high-dose UDCA remains contraindicated. Perform annual abdominal MRI/MRCP with or without serum CA19-9 for cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder-cancer surveillance in adults with large-duct PSC (not recommended under age 18 or in small-duct PSC). Manage gallbladder polyps by size, cholecystectomy for polyps >8 mm, ultrasound surveillance every 6 months for polyps ≤8 mm, rather than referring every polyp. For colorectal surveillance, begin surveillance colonoscopy at the time of PSC-IBD diagnosis (or at age 15 for childhood-onset disease) and repeat at 1-2 year intervals; in PSC without IBD, perform a diagnostic colonoscopy at PSC diagnosis and repeat every 5 years if IBD is not found. Evaluate dominant strictures with brush cytology plus FISH (± cholangioscopy) before/at balloon dilation, repeating ERCP with sampling in 3 months if cytology is suspicious regardless of FISH result. Treat recurrent cholangitis and cholestatic pruritus, maintain bone health, and refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, intractable pruritus, recurrent bacterial cholangitis, or early-stage CCA per Mayo protocol.

AASLD 2023 (Bowlus et al., Hepatology 77:659-702) practice guidance on PSC and cholangiocarcinoma, supersedes AASLD 2010; alongside EASL 2022 sclerosing cholangitis guideline · reviewed 2026-07-24 ↗
Kolev M … Lemoinne S · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=299 · Oct 5, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Early Changes in Lymphocyte Counts Predict Clinical Outcomes in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treated With Durvalumab Plus Tremelimumab.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarker
Clinical takeawayMonitor peripheral blood lymphocyte counts at 2 weeks after initiating Dur/Tre therapy in advanced HCC patients, as a high increase (> +107/μL) may predict better treatment response and PFS. However, this finding requires prospective validation before routine clinical use.
What it foundPatients with a high early lymphocyte increase (> +107/μL) had higher ORR (29.6% vs. 14.0%, p < 0.001) and longer PFS (4.3 vs. 2.8 months, p = 0.035) compared to those with a low increase (≤ +107/μL) in advanced HCC treated with Dur/Tre.
ContextThis study introduces a potential dynamic biomarker for Dur/Tre therapy in advanced HCC, complementing established prognostic factors like albumin-bilirubin grade and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage. However, the association with PFS was attenuated after propensity score matching, indicating the need for further validation.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. … Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Honma Y … Harada M · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=557 · Oct 5, 2026 · J Gastroenterology · IF 5.7

Healthcare burden and clinical spectrum of symptomatic polycystic liver disease in Japan: a nationwide epidemiological survey.

Epidemiologyepidemiologyhealth servicesbasic science
Clinical takeawayConsider multidisciplinary care for symptomatic PLD patients, particularly those with Gigot type III classification, due to higher mortality risk.
What it foundSymptomatic PLD prevalence in Japan is 28.6 per million, with 60.4% requiring multidisciplinary care and mortality highest in Gigot type III. Symptomatic PLD was defined as 10 or more hepatic cysts with cyst-related symptoms or complications.
ContextThis study provides the first comprehensive epidemiological and clinical characterization of symptomatic PLD in Japan, establishing a benchmark for future severity classification and management. The population includes patients with 10 or more hepatic cysts and cyst-related symptoms or complications.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of cystic liver diseases," Journal of Hepatology, 2022

Decision at stakethe clinical decision to manage symptomatic polycystic liver disease

Polycystic liver disease (PLD, defined as >10 hepatic cysts, seen with ADPKD or isolated ADPLD) is usually asymptomatic and managed with observation, ultrasound as first-line imaging (CT/MRI with volumetry for surveillance or pre-treatment planning), reassurance, avoidance of exogenous estrogen (OCP/HRT, PLD is more severe in women), and family screening; patients over 40 with only minimal hepatic involvement can generally be reassured of low progression risk. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Polycystic liver disease (PLD, defined as >10 hepatic cysts, seen with ADPKD or isolated ADPLD) is usually asymptomatic and managed with observation, ultrasound as first-line imaging (CT/MRI with volumetry for surveillance or pre-treatment planning), reassurance, avoidance of exogenous estrogen (OCP/HRT, PLD is more severe in women), and family screening; patients over 40 with only minimal hepatic involvement can generally be reassured of low progression risk. Candidacy for medical therapy is now anchored to validated symptom-burden instruments rather than a global 'symptomatic' impression: somatostatin analogs (lanreotide 120 mg or octreotide 40 mg monthly) are indicated for liver-volume-related symptoms meeting PLD-Q ≥32 or POLCA ≥14, with response (symptom relief and/or volume stabilization) reassessed at 6-12 months and therapy continued as long as benefit outweighs side effects. For SSA failure/ineligibility, management remains stepwise: cyst aspiration with sclerotherapy for a solitary dominant cyst, laparoscopic fenestration for multiple superficial cysts, partial hepatectomy for localized disease, and liver transplantation for refractory massive/end-stage disease. In ADPKD-associated PLD, combined liver-kidney transplant is recommended only when an independent indication for liver transplantation (refractory massive/end-stage PLD, as above) coexists with advanced kidney disease (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73m²), rather than for low eGFR alone; nephrology co-management includes BP control and tolvaptan, now specifically indicated (KDIGO 2025) for eGFR ≥25 mL/min/1.73m² with high progression risk (Mayo imaging class 1C-1E, or historical eGFR decline ≥3 mL/min/1.73m²/year), titrated from 45/15 mg to a target 90/30 mg split dose.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of cystic liver diseases," Journal of Hepatology, 2022 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tsuruya K … Kagawa T · Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 5.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=41 · Oct 9, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Adjuvant pegylated interferon-alpha after nucleos(t)ide analog withdrawal drives a temporally coordinated expansion of regulatory B cells and contraction of HBV-specific T cells.

Basic scienceviral hepatitisbasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in a small substudy of 41 patients. The results suggest potential biomarkers (HBV-specific T cells and BREG) for selecting patients for NUC withdrawal ±PEG-IFNα, but further validation is needed.
What it foundPEG-IFNα led to a transient reduction in HBV-specific T cells persisting >1 month and a >5-fold expansion of IL-10-producing BREG cells.
ContextThis refines understanding of immune mechanisms in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B after NUC withdrawal, suggesting biomarkers for patient selection.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe management of HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B after nucleos(t)ide analog withdrawal

… (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Phillips S … NUC-B Study Group · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 8, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

Notation System for Liver Transplant Recipients: Key Information in Transplant Procedure.

New evidenceliver transplant
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: this paper proposes a notation system for documenting liver transplant procedures, not a clinical intervention.
What it foundABO-incompatible liver transplants with desensitization show outcomes comparable to ABO-compatible transplants when a desensitization protocol is used.
ContextRefines current practice by proposing a standardized notation system to improve communication and management of diverse liver transplant procedures.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Kojima H … Hatano E · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №15 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS