← Issue №15/ week of Oct 11, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Nutrition, in full.

All 2 Nutrition papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 2, in full

most clinically useful first
Nutrition systematic review · n=866 · Oct 6, 2026 · JPEN · IF 3.2

Safety of bioelectrical impedance analysis in patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices: A systematic review.

Guideline / reviewsystematic reviewbiomarkerhealth services
Clinical takeawayThe evidence base is small and mostly pacemakers, so this is reassurance, not clearance: device labelling and local policy still restrict BIA in patients with pacemakers or defibrillators. Where BIA is wanted for nutrition assessment in such a patient, discuss with cardiology rather than assume safety.
What it foundNo electromagnetic interference or adverse effects on CIED function were observed in 866 BIA measurements across frequencies from 5 to 500 kHz.
ContextChallenges longstanding recommendations against BIA use in patients with CIEDs due to electromagnetic interference concerns.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Zweers H … Jager-Wittenaar H · JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition prospective cohort · Oct 7, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Roseburia inulinivorans increases muscle strength.

Basic sciencemicrobiomebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in mice. Consider future human trials for R. inulinivorans as a probiotic for muscle-wasting conditions.
What it foundRoseburia inulinivorans supplementation in mice increased forelimb grip strength, with no effect from other Roseburia species.
ContextOpens a question: suggests a potential link between gut microbiota and muscle strength, previously unexplored in humans.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Martinez-Tellez B … Rensen PC · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №15 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Nutrition by RSS