← Issue №15/ week of Oct 11, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Esophagus/Reflux, in full.

All 4 Esophagus/Reflux papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 4, in full

most clinically useful first
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=1,240 · Oct 7, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Novel insights into autoimmune gastritis: clinical profile and gastric neoplastic risk from an international multicentre study.

New evidenceepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayMonitor AIG patients aged >65, with intestinal metaplasia, elevated gastrin-17 (>1316 pg/mL), prior PPI use, smoking history, or incomplete H. pylori eradication more closely for gastric adenocarcinoma and NETs, considering region-specific risk profiles and using high-quality endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy as per standard of care.
What it foundAIG patients had a 2.9% incidence of gastric adenocarcinoma and 10.6% incidence of NETs, with adenocarcinoma risk factors including age >65 (OR 4.50), intestinal metaplasia (OR 1.51), gastrin-17 >1316 pg/mL (OR 15.52), and prior PPI use (OR 5.74).
ContextThis study provides the first international multicentre data on AIG-associated neoplastic risks, highlighting regional variations in anemia and autoimmune comorbidities, and identifying specific risk factors for adenocarcinoma and NETs.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP), "Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): Guideline update 2025", Endoscopy, 2025 (Recommendations 31 and 34)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform individual gastric risk assessment and staging of precancerous conditions at first-time gastroscopy, irrespective of the patient's country of origin. Use high quality endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, for screening, diagnosis and staging of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia and after endoscopic therapy; VCE guides the biopsy site, with random biopsies taken only when there are no endoscopically suspected changes. Take biopsies from at least two topographic sites, 2 from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, VCE-guided, in two separate, clearly labeled vials; an additional incisura biopsy is optional, not required. Stage with validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e.g. Kimura-Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e.g. EGGIM) to stratify gastric cancer risk (suggestion, weaker than the biopsy recommendation). Follow up patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3+ or EGGIM 5+) OR an advanced histological stage that reaches OLGA/OLGIM III/IV, severe atrophy or intestinal metaplasia and/or significant changes in both antrum and corpus rising to stage III/IV, not any intestinal metaplasia or any antrum-plus-corpus involvement on its own, with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of country of origin (strong recommendation, moderate quality). Propose NO surveillance for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history of gastric cancer, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection), the guideline states this group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice. Eradicate H. pylori in all patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy. Discontinue or do not start gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80, and weigh comorbidities when planning treatment of superficial lesions. Advise smoking cessation; low-dose daily aspirin may be considered for gastric cancer prevention only in selected individuals already at high cardiovascular risk. For visible neoplasia, use ESD for differentiated lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low or high grade) or intramucosal carcinoma (any size if not ulcerated, or ≤30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions ≤10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy. At the population level, endoscopic screening is suggested every 2-3 years in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate >20 per 100,000 person-years), every 5 years in intermediate-risk regions (ASR 10-20) only if cost-effectiveness has been proven, and not at all in low-risk regions (ASR <10).

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP), "Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): Guideline update 2025", Endoscopy, 2025 (Recommendations 31 and 34) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Lenti MV … Di Sabatino A · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux rct · n=240 · Oct 6, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Clinical Trial: Dupilumab Improves Eosinophilic Oesophagitis Outcomes Versus Placebo Regardless of Comorbidities or Treatment History in a Randomised Clinical Trial.

New therapyeosinophilic esophagitisproton pump inhibitorsdysphagia
Clinical takeawayWhen dupilumab is being considered for EoE, expect similar histological and symptom benefit regardless of comorbidities or treatment history; this is a post hoc subgroup analysis of LIBERTY EoE TREET through 52 weeks and does not change where dupilumab sits relative to PPI, topical steroid and diet.
What it foundDupilumab increased histological remission (≤6 eos/hpf) at 24 weeks versus placebo across all subgroups, with sustained improvements at 52 weeks.
ContextConfirms and extends prior evidence that dupilumab is effective in EoE, showing consistent benefits across diverse patient subgroups.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Dellon et al., Am J Gastroenterol 120(1):31-59) / ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (Dellon et al., Gastrointest Endosc 103(3):396-417)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

ACG 2025 (GRADE) is still the governing guideline. The ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (modified Delphi, 28 statements at ≥80% agreement; not GRADE) adds endoscopic and pediatric detail without contradicting it. DIAGNOSIS: symptoms of esophageal dysfunction plus ≥15 eos/hpf after excluding other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. A PPI trial is not a diagnostic criterion (PPI-REE abandoned). Do the initial diagnostic EGD off PPI, topical steroid and dietary therapy (ACG key concept; ASGE consensus, which gives no washout duration). Initial assessment is a standard EGD, not a less-invasive modality, so that full biopsies and dilation are possible (ASGE). Take ≥6 esophageal biopsies from ≥2 levels in anyone with symptoms or endoscopic findings consistent with EoE, targeting visible lesions. In CHILDREN with suspected EoE, also biopsy the stomach and duodenum (ASGE). Use EREFS at every endoscopy and report a quantified peak eosinophil count (ACG strong/low; ASGE). TREATMENT (ACG): swallowed topical steroids STRONG/moderate; high-dose PPI CONDITIONAL/low; empiric elimination diet CONDITIONAL/low. Choose a single initial therapy by shared decision-making. Fluticasone or budesonide are both reasonable. Adult doses: PPI double the reflux dose (e.g., omeprazole 20 mg BID or 40 mg daily); budesonide 2-4 mg/day (BOS 2 mg BID); fluticasone 1,760 mcg/day divided. Pediatric doses: PPI 2 mg/kg/day; budesonide 1-2 mg/day; fluticasone 110-880 mcg/day. Allergy testing is not used to direct diets. A 1FED/2FED step-up diet with a dietitian is acceptable, with endoscopic and biopsy confirmation after each reintroduced food. Dupilumab is CONDITIONAL for PPI-nonresponsive patients aged ≥12 (moderate) and for ages 1-11 at ≥15 kg (low). Weight-band dosing: 15-<30 kg 200 mg q2w; 30-<40 kg 300 mg q2w; ≥40 kg 300 mg weekly. Recommendations AGAINST: omalizumab, cromolyn, montelukast. No recommendation for cendakimab, benralizumab, lirentelimab, mepolizumab or reslizumab. DILATION: an adjunct to anti-inflammatory therapy for strictures causing dysphagia (ACG conditional/low). Start low and go slow; target ≥16 mm in adults and adolescents over ≥1 session. In children, ASGE supports dilation of symptomatic strictures or a narrow-caliber esophagus regardless of disease activity, using the same start-low/go-slow approach. MAINTENANCE: continue effective therapy (ACG STRONG despite low evidence) at the lowest effective dose. MONITORING: judge response on symptoms, endoscopy and histology together, never symptoms alone. Assess response endoscopically at 8-12 weeks after starting a PPI or topical steroid. For diet, ACG says 8-12 weeks and ASGE says 6-8 weeks. For dupilumab or biologics, assess at 12-24 weeks (ASGE: up to 24 weeks). Allow appropriate washout or timing after any treatment change before the follow-up EGD (ASGE). Take monitoring biopsies from the most severe-appearing lesions (rings, furrows, exudates) (ASGE). Monitoring biopsies may be limited to the esophagus when prior gastric and duodenal biopsies were normal and nothing new suggests other pathology (ASGE). The histologic response threshold of <15 eos/hpf is a 'may consider' target, read alongside endoscopic and symptom findings. Shorten follow-up after complications. Care gaps of ≥2 years are associated with fibrostenosis. PEDIATRIC (ACG): esophagram for children with dysphagia to assess fibrostenotic disease; feeding therapy and dietitian for feeding dysfunction; growth, development and nutrition are treatment goals.

ACG 2025 (Dellon et al., Am J Gastroenterol 120(1):31-59) / ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (Dellon et al., Gastrointest Endosc 103(3):396-417) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Dellon ES … Radin A · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=168 · Oct 7, 2026 · Endoscopy · IF 11.8

High rate of neoplasia diagnosis at endoscopic reassessment and incidence of progression in patients with ultra-long Barrett esophagus referred to expert centers.

New evidenceBarrett's esophagusesophageal cancer
Clinical takeawaySupports ESGE 2023 advice to refer ultra-long (10 cm or more) Barrett's esophagus to expert centers: 17% of referred nondysplastic cases were upgraded to dysplasia or adenocarcinoma at expert reassessment, 3% with high-grade dysplasia or cancer in a visible lesion. The study has no standard-care comparator.
What it found17% of ultra-long Barrett esophagus (≥10 cm) patients were upgraded to dysplasia/EAC at expert reassessment, and 12% progressed to LGD, 4% to HGD, and 5% to EAC during surveillance.
ContextSupports ESGE 2023 guideline recommendation for expert center referral in ultra-long BE (≥10 cm), highlighting the high rate of dysplasia/EAC detection (17%) and progression (12% LGD, 4% HGD, 5% EAC) in this subgroup.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA 2025 (surveillance) / ACG 2022 (diagnosis, endoscopic therapy, post-EET)

… Its 8 GRADE recommendations are: (1) endoscopic surveillance for nondysplastic BE rather than none (conditional, low certainty); (2) NO endoscopic surveillance for columnar-lined esophagus <1 cm, even with intestinal metaplasia, when there is no neoplasia (conditional); (3) high-definition white-light endoscopy PLUS chromoendoscopy over white light alone (STRONG); (4) no recommendation for or against wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS-3D) as an adjunct to structured biopsy; (5) no recommendation on p53 IHC and (6) no recommendation on TissueCypher as adjuncts to histopathology in NDBE, indefinite for dysplasia (IND), or LGD; (7) daily PPI over no PPI to prevent neoplastic progression (conditional); (8) PPI over antireflux surgery to prevent progression to HGD/EAC (conditional). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Surveillance practice is now defined by the AGA 2025 surveillance guideline (Wani et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169:1184-1231; endorsed by the Canadian Association of Gastroenterology). Its 8 GRADE recommendations are: (1) endoscopic surveillance for nondysplastic BE rather than none (conditional, low certainty); (2) NO endoscopic surveillance for columnar-lined esophagus <1 cm, even with intestinal metaplasia, when there is no neoplasia (conditional); (3) high-definition white-light endoscopy PLUS chromoendoscopy over white light alone (STRONG); (4) no recommendation for or against wide-area transepithelial sampling (WATS-3D) as an adjunct to structured biopsy; (5) no recommendation on p53 IHC and (6) no recommendation on TissueCypher as adjuncts to histopathology in NDBE, indefinite for dysplasia (IND), or LGD; (7) daily PPI over no PPI to prevent neoplastic progression (conditional); (8) PPI over antireflux surgery to prevent progression to HGD/EAC (conditional). Implementation statements require a high-quality exam, a structured (Seattle-type) biopsy protocol, confirmation of any BE-related dysplasia by an expert GI pathologist, intervals tailored to segment length and dysplasia grade, and shared decision-making. Surveillance should stop when a patient could not tolerate endoscopic therapy, surgery, or oncologic treatment for EAC, at any age. The AGA 2025 interval table could not be read directly (full text paywalled). Until it is, the intervals below are the ACG 2022 intervals, which remain consistent with AGA's segment-length framing: NDBE <3 cm every 5 years; NDBE >=3 cm every 3 years; IND, after a second-pathologist read, optimize to twice-daily PPI, repeat EGD within 6 months, then annually if IND persists; confirmed LGD on surveillance, EGD at 6 and 12 months, then annually. Diagnosis (IM plus >=1 cm columnar mucosa, no biopsy of a normal or <1 cm irregular Z line, >=8 biopsies), endoscopic eradication therapy (EET over esophagectomy for HGD/T1a (strong); EET suggested for confirmed LGD with surveillance an acceptable alternative; resect visible lesions before RFA; sm1 low-risk T1b may be considered for EET) and post-EET intervals (baseline LGD: 1 year, 3 years, then every 2 years; baseline HGD/T1a: 3, 6, 12 months, then annually) are still governed by ACG 2022. The AGA surveillance guideline does not address them, and AGA has said a separate screening guideline will follow in 2026.

AGA 2025 (surveillance) / ACG 2022 (diagnosis, endoscopic therapy, post-EET) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Verheij EPD … Dutch Barrett Expert Centers · Endoscopy · IF 11.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux prospective cohort · Oct 6, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Trends and Projections of Esophageal Cancer Incidence and Mortality in China, 1990 to 2050: An Analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2023.

Epidemiologyepidemiologyesophageal cancer
Clinical takeawayConsider intensified surveillance and targeted screening for high-risk populations in China, given the post-2020 rebound in esophageal cancer incidence.
What it foundEsophageal cancer age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) in China declined from 28.23 to 11.45 per 100,000 from 1990 to 2023, with a rebound from 2020 to 2023 (APC: 4.86%; 95% CI: 3.01-6.73).
ContextConfirms long-term decline in esophageal cancer burden in China but highlights a recent rebound, challenging assumptions of continued progress.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Su P … Tian Z · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №15 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Esophagus/Reflux by RSS