← Issue №13/ week of Sep 27, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Motility, in full.

All 6 Motility papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 6, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Motility rct · n=150 · Sep 24, 2026 · Lancet · IF 98.4

Faecal microbiota transplantation in irritable bowel syndrome (REFIT2): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial.

New evidencemicrobiomeIBS
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: FMT did not outperform placebo for IBS symptoms in this RCT. Do not offer FMT for IBS outside clinical trials.
What it found40% of IBS patients receiving donor FMT vs 38% receiving placebo achieved ≥75-point IBS-SSS improvement at 90 days (absolute difference 2%, 95% CI -8 to 12).
ContextChallenges prior observational data suggesting FMT benefit in IBS; first high-quality RCT shows no meaningful effect over placebo.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnosis: use a positive diagnostic strategy based on Rome IV criteria rather than a strategy of exclusion (strong for cost-effectiveness, high quality; consensus for time-to-therapy), and categorize by IBS subtype (consensus). In patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms: check celiac serology (strong, moderate) and, in those WITHOUT alarm features, fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) plus CRP to rule out IBD (strong; moderate quality for CRP/calprotectin, very low for lactoferrin). Recommend AGAINST routine stool testing for enteric pathogens (conditional, low) and AGAINST routine colonoscopy in patients younger than 45 without warning signs (conditional, low). Anorectal physiology testing only when symptoms suggest a pelvic floor disorder and/or for refractory constipation not responding to standard medical therapy (consensus). Treatment, all subtypes: soluble, not insoluble, fiber (strong, moderate); a LIMITED trial of a low-FODMAP diet (conditional, very low); gut-directed psychotherapies for global symptoms (conditional, very low); TCAs for global symptoms (strong, moderate); peppermint suggested (conditional, low); antispasmodics for abdominal pain (conditional, low); AGAINST probiotics (conditional, very low), AGAINST fecal transplant (strong, very low). IBS-C: chloride channel activators (strong, moderate) and guanylate cyclase activators (strong, high); AGAINST PEG products for global IBS-C symptoms (conditional, low); tegaserod reserved for women younger than 65 with ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor who have not adequately responded to secretagogues (strong/conditional, low). IBS-D: rifaximin (strong, moderate); alosetron only for women with severe IBS-D who have failed conventional therapy (conditional, low); mixed opioid agonists/antagonists, i.e. eluxadoline (conditional, moderate); AGAINST bile acid sequestrants (conditional, very low).

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Johnsen PH … Goll R · The Lancet · IF 98.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility rct · n=260 · Sep 25, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Effectiveness of Medical-Behavioral Therapy in Patients with Fecal Incontinence.

New evidencefecal incontinence
Clinical takeawayConsider MBT (dietary modifications, medications, and pelvic floor exercises) for patients with moderate-to-severe FI, particularly those with higher baseline FI frequency and no external anal sphincter defects, as these subgroups are more likely to respond. Note that this is within the standard stepwise approach (optimize stool consistency, pelvic floor PT, etc.).
What it found23% of patients achieved a ≥75% reduction in fecal incontinence (FI) frequency at 1 month, and 15% sustained this response at 3 months with individualized medical-behavioral therapy (MBT).
ContextSupports MBT as a viable option within the existing stepwise management of FI, refining its use by identifying subgroups with higher likelihood of response. No comparator or safety data reported.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023

Decision at stakethe effectiveness of medical-behavioral therapy (MBT) in fecal incontinence

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

First exclude emergency/secondary causes (cauda equina/cord compression, fecal impaction with overflow) with a mandatory digital rectal exam, screen for eating disorder before dietary restriction, and classify the subtype (urge, passive, overflow, mixed) since it drives therapy. Work up loose-stool FI for inflammatory, infectious, and bile-acid drivers before labeling idiopathic. Manage with a stepwise ladder: optimize stool consistency (fiber, loperamide, bile-acid sequestrant, or TCA neuromodulator), pelvic floor PT plus biofeedback, skin protection and bridge devices, then escalate to surgical therapy. Prescribe the antimotility/neuromodulator agents with their indications, dosing, and safety limits: loperamide is first-line for loose-stool/urge FI, start low (e.g., 2 mg before meals or as needed) and titrate to stool consistency while staying within the FDA-approved maximum (8 mg/day OTC, 16 mg/day prescription), because the FDA warns that higher-than-recommended doses cause QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and cardiac arrest; the TCA neuromodulator (e.g., amitriptyline, typically low-dose ~20 mg) is an off-label option reserved for loose-stool/idiopathic FI, and the AGS Beers Criteria recommend avoiding TCAs such as amitriptyline in older adults given their strong anticholinergic burden, sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and fall risk. Per the dedicated ASCRS 2023 fecal-incontinence guideline (updating ASCRS 2007, superseding reliance on ACG's broader 2021 anorectal-disorders guideline as the primary specialty source), sacral neuromodulation is a first-line surgical option for incontinent patients WITH OR WITHOUT a defined anal sphincter defect (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence), it is not gated on documenting a sphincter defect. Sphincteroplasty remains appropriate for symptomatic patients with a defined external anal sphincter defect; repeat sphincteroplasty after a failed overlapping repair should generally be avoided in favor of other modalities. Antegrade continence enemas are an option before colostomy, which remains last resort.

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Rehman MA … Bharucha AE · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility guideline · Sep 21, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

The Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome: A Position Paper of the Neurogastroenterology and Motility Section of the Israeli Gastroenterology Association.

Guideline / reviewIBSguidelinepediatric
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting a structured treatment algorithm incorporating locally available therapeutic tools, emphasizing patient education, dietary modifications, and a bio-psycho-social model approach for general practitioners and adult/pediatric gastroenterologists.
What it foundThe position paper provides a comprehensive review of validated IBS management approaches, including dietary modifications (low FODMAP diet), pharmacotherapy (antispasmodics, rifaximin, linaclotide), probiotics, psychological therapies, and complementary medicine. It emphasizes the importance of physician-patient communication and a therapeutic partnership.
ContextConfirms and refines current practice by consolidating evidence-based approaches into a structured algorithm, emphasizing multidisciplinary management and physician-patient communication.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021

Decision at stakethe use of a multidisciplinary approach including dietary modifications, pharmacotherapy, and psychological therapies for IBS management

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnosis: use a positive diagnostic strategy based on Rome IV criteria rather than a strategy of exclusion (strong for cost-effectiveness, high quality; consensus for time-to-therapy), and categorize by IBS subtype (consensus). In patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms: check celiac serology (strong, moderate) and, in those WITHOUT alarm features, fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) plus CRP to rule out IBD (strong; moderate quality for CRP/calprotectin, very low for lactoferrin). Recommend AGAINST routine stool testing for enteric pathogens (conditional, low) and AGAINST routine colonoscopy in patients younger than 45 without warning signs (conditional, low). Anorectal physiology testing only when symptoms suggest a pelvic floor disorder and/or for refractory constipation not responding to standard medical therapy (consensus). Treatment, all subtypes: soluble, not insoluble, fiber (strong, moderate); a LIMITED trial of a low-FODMAP diet (conditional, very low); gut-directed psychotherapies for global symptoms (conditional, very low); TCAs for global symptoms (strong, moderate); peppermint suggested (conditional, low); antispasmodics for abdominal pain (conditional, low); AGAINST probiotics (conditional, very low), AGAINST fecal transplant (strong, very low). IBS-C: chloride channel activators (strong, moderate) and guanylate cyclase activators (strong, high); AGAINST PEG products for global IBS-C symptoms (conditional, low); tegaserod reserved for women younger than 65 with ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor who have not adequately responded to secretagogues (strong/conditional, low). IBS-D: rifaximin (strong, moderate); alosetron only for women with severe IBS-D who have failed conventional therapy (conditional, low); mixed opioid agonists/antagonists, i.e. eluxadoline (conditional, moderate); AGAINST bile acid sequestrants (conditional, very low).

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Shibli F … Dickman R · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility prospective cohort · n=1,082 · Sep 25, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

IMPROVED SEVERITY AND QUALITY-OF-LIFE MEASURES FOR FECAL INCONTINENCE: DEVELOPMENT OF THE MINNESOTA (MiNi)-FISI AND MiNi-FI-QOL.

Diagnosticfecal incontinence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a new severity and QoL instrument for fecal incontinence requires further validation, including direct patient input to confirm content validity, before clinical use.
What it foundThe new 7-item Minnesota Fecal Incontinence Severity Index (MiNi-FISI) explained 46% of FI-QoL variance vs 36% for the original FISI, and the 11-item Minnesota Fecal Incontinence Quality of Life (MiNi-FI-QoL) captured 97% of the variance in the 29-item FI-QoL.
ContextRefines existing FI severity and QoL measures by developing shorter, more predictive instruments.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023

Decision at stakeassessing fecal incontinence severity and quality of life impact

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

First exclude emergency/secondary causes (cauda equina/cord compression, fecal impaction with overflow) with a mandatory digital rectal exam, screen for eating disorder before dietary restriction, and classify the subtype (urge, passive, overflow, mixed) since it drives therapy. Work up loose-stool FI for inflammatory, infectious, and bile-acid drivers before labeling idiopathic. Manage with a stepwise ladder: optimize stool consistency (fiber, loperamide, bile-acid sequestrant, or TCA neuromodulator), pelvic floor PT plus biofeedback, skin protection and bridge devices, then escalate to surgical therapy. Prescribe the antimotility/neuromodulator agents with their indications, dosing, and safety limits: loperamide is first-line for loose-stool/urge FI, start low (e.g., 2 mg before meals or as needed) and titrate to stool consistency while staying within the FDA-approved maximum (8 mg/day OTC, 16 mg/day prescription), because the FDA warns that higher-than-recommended doses cause QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and cardiac arrest; the TCA neuromodulator (e.g., amitriptyline, typically low-dose ~20 mg) is an off-label option reserved for loose-stool/idiopathic FI, and the AGS Beers Criteria recommend avoiding TCAs such as amitriptyline in older adults given their strong anticholinergic burden, sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and fall risk. Per the dedicated ASCRS 2023 fecal-incontinence guideline (updating ASCRS 2007, superseding reliance on ACG's broader 2021 anorectal-disorders guideline as the primary specialty source), sacral neuromodulation is a first-line surgical option for incontinent patients WITH OR WITHOUT a defined anal sphincter defect (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence), it is not gated on documenting a sphincter defect. Sphincteroplasty remains appropriate for symptomatic patients with a defined external anal sphincter defect; repeat sphincteroplasty after a failed overlapping repair should generally be avoided in favor of other modalities. Antegrade continence enemas are an option before colostomy, which remains last resort.

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Oblizajek NR … Bharucha AE · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility meta analysis · n=869 · Sep 25, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Orthostatic Intolerance in Patients With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

New evidencesystematic reviewmeta-analysisepidemiologypediatric
Clinical takeawayConsider screening for orthostatic intolerance (OI) and POTS in patients with severe DGBI, particularly pediatric patients and those diagnosed using Rome IV criteria or questionnaire-based methods, as these groups show higher prevalence. Be cautious due to clinical heterogeneity and low-quality evidence.
What it foundOI prevalence in DGBI patients was 50.0% (95% CI: 35.0-64.9), with odds 5.17 times higher than controls (95% CI: 1.73-15.50, P=0.003). Pediatric patients had a higher prevalence (59.7%, 95% CI: 36.4-79.3) than adults (32.5%, 95% CI: 19.3-49.4). OI prevalence was higher with Rome IV criteria (66.1%, 95% CI: 43.3-83.3) vs. Rome III (30.6%, 95% CI: 21.4-41.6) and with questionnaire-based diagnosis (54.5%, 95% CI: 9.7-93.0) vs. physician-based (48.8%, 95% CI: 35.2-62.7). POTS prevalence was 31.5% (95% CI: 17.3-50.2).
ContextConfirms the association between severe DGBI and OI, with higher prevalence in pediatric patients, Rome IV-diagnosed cases, and questionnaire-based diagnoses, but highlights clinical heterogeneity and low-quality evidence.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Ayaki K … Holtmann G · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility retrospective · n=225,338 · Sep 21, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

The Associations Between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder Stimulant Medications and Irritable Bowel Syndrome.

New evidenceIBSepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: retrospective EHR data showing association, not causation. Consider stimulants as a potential IBS modifier in ADHD patients, but do not prescribe for IBS prevention.
What it foundStimulant use in ADHD patients was associated with a 10.3% decreased risk of any IBS (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.85-0.95) and a 14.1% decreased risk for IBS-C (OR 0.86, 95% CI 0.74-0.99) compared to unmedicated ADHD patients.
ContextChallenges the assumption that stimulants worsen IBS in ADHD patients, suggesting instead a modest protective effect, particularly for IBS-C.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021

Decision at stakethe potential impact of ADHD stimulant medications on IBS risk

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnosis: use a positive diagnostic strategy based on Rome IV criteria rather than a strategy of exclusion (strong for cost-effectiveness, high quality; consensus for time-to-therapy), and categorize by IBS subtype (consensus). In patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms: check celiac serology (strong, moderate) and, in those WITHOUT alarm features, fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) plus CRP to rule out IBD (strong; moderate quality for CRP/calprotectin, very low for lactoferrin). Recommend AGAINST routine stool testing for enteric pathogens (conditional, low) and AGAINST routine colonoscopy in patients younger than 45 without warning signs (conditional, low). Anorectal physiology testing only when symptoms suggest a pelvic floor disorder and/or for refractory constipation not responding to standard medical therapy (consensus). Treatment, all subtypes: soluble, not insoluble, fiber (strong, moderate); a LIMITED trial of a low-FODMAP diet (conditional, very low); gut-directed psychotherapies for global symptoms (conditional, very low); TCAs for global symptoms (strong, moderate); peppermint suggested (conditional, low); antispasmodics for abdominal pain (conditional, low); AGAINST probiotics (conditional, very low), AGAINST fecal transplant (strong, very low). IBS-C: chloride channel activators (strong, moderate) and guanylate cyclase activators (strong, high); AGAINST PEG products for global IBS-C symptoms (conditional, low); tegaserod reserved for women younger than 65 with ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor who have not adequately responded to secretagogues (strong/conditional, low). IBS-D: rifaximin (strong, moderate); alosetron only for women with severe IBS-D who have failed conventional therapy (conditional, low); mixed opioid agonists/antagonists, i.e. eluxadoline (conditional, moderate); AGAINST bile acid sequestrants (conditional, very low).

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Kim S … Lembo A · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №13 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Motility by RSS