← Issue №13/ week of Sep 27, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Esophagus/Reflux, in full.

All 2 Esophagus/Reflux papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 2, in full

most clinically useful first
Esophagus/Reflux prospective cohort · n=273 · Sep 25, 2026 · Dig Dis Sci · IF 2.5

Prevalence of Gastric Intestinal Metaplasia Among Patients with Active Helicobacter Pylori Infection Served by a Safety-Net Healthcare System.

Epidemiologyepidemiologybiomarkerhealth servicesbasic science
Clinical takeawayConfirm all GIM cases in this population were low-risk (OLGIM I/II), which does not meet SOC thresholds for surveillance (requires III/IV).
What it found28.9% of safety-net patients with active H. pylori had gastric intestinal metaplasia (GIM; all OLGIM stage I/II), with 8.1% having extensive GIM (body involvement).
ContextReinforces that GIM staging (not just prevalence) determines management; OLGIM I/II prevalence was high but clinically non-actionable per current guidelines.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP), "Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): Guideline update 2025", Endoscopy, 2025 (Recommendations 31 and 34)

Decision at stakesurveillance for gastric intestinal metaplasia in patients with active H. pylori infection

… Propose NO surveillance for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history of gastric cancer, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection), the guideline states this group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform individual gastric risk assessment and staging of precancerous conditions at first-time gastroscopy, irrespective of the patient's country of origin. Use high quality endoscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy (VCE), after proper training, for screening, diagnosis and staging of atrophy and intestinal metaplasia and after endoscopic therapy; VCE guides the biopsy site, with random biopsies taken only when there are no endoscopically suspected changes. Take biopsies from at least two topographic sites, 2 from the antrum/incisura and 2 from the corpus, VCE-guided, in two separate, clearly labeled vials; an additional incisura biopsy is optional, not required. Stage with validated endoscopic classifications of atrophy (e.g. Kimura-Takemoto) or intestinal metaplasia (e.g. EGGIM) to stratify gastric cancer risk (suggestion, weaker than the biopsy recommendation). Follow up patients with extensive endoscopic changes (Kimura C3+ or EGGIM 5+) OR an advanced histological stage that reaches OLGA/OLGIM III/IV, severe atrophy or intestinal metaplasia and/or significant changes in both antrum and corpus rising to stage III/IV, not any intestinal metaplasia or any antrum-plus-corpus involvement on its own, with high quality endoscopy every 3 years, irrespective of country of origin (strong recommendation, moderate quality). Propose NO surveillance for patients with mild to moderate atrophy or intestinal metaplasia restricted to the antrum, in the absence of endoscopic signs of extensive lesions or other risk factors (family history of gastric cancer, incomplete intestinal metaplasia, persistent H. pylori infection), the guideline states this group constitutes most individuals found in clinical practice. Eradicate H. pylori in all patients with precancerous conditions and after endoscopic or surgical therapy. Discontinue or do not start gastric cancer screening or surveillance in asymptomatic individuals over 80, and weigh comorbidities when planning treatment of superficial lesions. Advise smoking cessation; low-dose daily aspirin may be considered for gastric cancer prevention only in selected individuals already at high cardiovascular risk. For visible neoplasia, use ESD for differentiated lesions clinically staged as dysplastic (low or high grade) or intramucosal carcinoma (any size if not ulcerated, or ≤30 mm if ulcerated), with EMR an alternative for Paris 0-IIa lesions ≤10 mm with low likelihood of malignancy. At the population level, endoscopic screening is suggested every 2-3 years in high-risk regions (age-standardized rate >20 per 100,000 person-years), every 5 years in intermediate-risk regions (ASR 10-20) only if cost-effectiveness has been proven, and not at all in low-risk regions (ASR <10).

European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE), European Helicobacter and Microbiota Study Group (EHMSG) and European Society of Pathology (ESP), "Management of epithelial precancerous conditions and early neoplasia of the stomach (MAPS III): Guideline update 2025", Endoscopy, 2025 (Recommendations 31 and 34) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Thrift AP … Tan MC · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux guideline · Sep 25, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

EUropean consensus on the Resolution Of SympToms After oesophago-gastric Resection (EUROSTAR): Peri-Operative Quality Initiative (POQI) consensus statement.

Guideline / reviewguidelinehealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting the EUROSTAR consensus recommendations, which provide specific diagnostic criteria, investigation pathways, and management strategies, for standardizing postoperative care in patients after major UGI cancer surgery.
What it foundA multidisciplinary panel developed 8 statements and 13 recommendations using a modified GRADE methodology for symptom monitoring, service provision, and management of postoperative conditions after major UGI cancer surgery, including specific diagnostic criteria, investigation pathways, and management strategies.
ContextThis consensus addresses the lack of standardization in postoperative care for UGI cancer surgery survivors, refining current practices and providing a structured, evidence-based approach to symptom management.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Barman S … EUROSTAR Study Faculty Members · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №13 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Esophagus/Reflux by RSS