← Issue №13/ week of Sep 27, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Pancreas/Biliary, in full.

All 4 Pancreas/Biliary papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 4, in full

most clinically useful first
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=3,016 · Sep 23, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Acute cholecystopancreatitis: Diagnostic accuracy, true frequency, and clinical implications. Insights from the RELAPSTONE multicentre cohort.

New evidenceacute pancreatitischoledocholithiasisepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider CCP in patients presenting with both AP and ACC, as accurate classification is essential to avoid unnecessary antibiotic use and optimize timing of cholecystectomy. Note that CCP does not consistently lead to worse outcomes than isolated AP or ACC.
What it foundCholecystopancreatitis (CCP) confirmed in 3.9% of cases, representing 11.1% of acute pancreatitis (AP) and 12.3% of acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) cases, with 65% presenting simultaneously. CCP showed slightly higher rates of organ failure but no differences in ICU admission or hospital stay compared to isolated AP or ACC.
ContextRefines understanding of CCP, showing it is relatively frequent but often misclassified, with no consistent association with worse clinical outcomes compared to isolated AP or ACC.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437

Decision at stakediagnosis and management of acute biliary pancreatitis with concurrent acute calculous cholecystitis

… Perform cholecystectomy preferably before discharge for mild acute biliary pancreatitis, and after a second unexplained AP episode even without identified gallstones; reserve ERCP within 24h for AP complicated by cholangitis, with rectal indomethacin +/- pancreatic duct stent and periprocedural hydration to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose acute pancreatitis (AP) by the Atlanta criteria (2 of 3: characteristic epigastric/LUQ pain, lipase or amylase >3x ULN [lipase preferred for specificity/duration], or characteristic imaging). ACG 2024 stratifies severity risk using SIRS on admission plus bedside risk factors, rising/elevated BUN, rising/elevated hematocrit (>44), obesity (BMI>30), extrapancreatic fluid collections/pleural effusion/infiltrates, altered mental status, and older age/comorbidities, rather than mandating a formal BISAP or APACHE II composite score. Give moderately aggressive lactated Ringer's, most important in the first 6-12 hours, reassessing volume status/BUN/HCT at 6 hours (further aggressive hydration has little added benefit after 24-48h). Start oral low-fat solid food within 24-48h as tolerated in mild disease; if enteral feeding is needed for moderately severe/severe disease, prefer nasogastric over nasojejunal with small-peptide/medium-chain-triglyceride formula and continuous (not bolus/cyclic) feeding; avoid parenteral nutrition if possible. Do not give prophylactic antibiotics, even in severe disease or sterile necrosis; reserve antibiotics for suspected infected necrosis (typically arising 10-14 days in), and choose agents that penetrate pancreatic necrosis while together covering both gut-derived gram-negative enterics and anaerobes, a carbapenem supplies this as monotherapy, whereas a fluoroquinolone or a third-or-higher-generation cephalosporin must be combined with metronidazole; metronidazole alone (anaerobic cover only), or a cephalosporin or a quinolone alone, does not adequately treat infected necrosis. Perform cholecystectomy preferably before discharge for mild acute biliary pancreatitis, and after a second unexplained AP episode even without identified gallstones; reserve ERCP within 24h for AP complicated by cholangitis, with rectal indomethacin +/- pancreatic duct stent and periprocedural hydration to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. Check triglycerides when gallstones/alcohol are absent (>1000 mg/dL supports a hypertriglyceridemia etiology). For stable pancreatic necrosis, defer surgical, radiological, or endoscopic intervention 4-6 weeks to allow walling-off (step-up approach).

American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Velamazán R … de-Madaria E · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=116 · Sep 21, 2026 · Pancreas · IF 1.9

Multi-hole Versus Fully Covered Self-expandable Metal Stents for Distal Biliary Obstruction in Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer.

New evidencepancreatic cancerbiliary strictureERCP
Clinical takeawayConsider using MHSEMS over FCSEMS for biliary obstruction in unresectable pancreatic cancer, given the longer TRBO and lower migration risk, with comparable safety profiles.
What it foundMedian time to recurrent biliary obstruction (TRBO) was longer with multi-hole SEMS (MHSEMS) than fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) (394 vs 238 days, P<0.01), with fewer RBO events including migration (P=0.01). Adverse event rates were similar between groups.
ContextCurrent practice often uses FCSEMS to prevent tumor ingrowth, but this study suggests MHSEMS may offer better durability compared to FCSEMS with similar adverse event rates.
Measured against the standard of care· ESGE 2026 (biliary stricture management; replaces ESGE 2018 stenting guideline) / ESGE 2025 (biliary stricture diagnosis)

Decision at stakechoice of stent type for distal biliary obstruction in unresectable pancreatic cancer

… For distal extrahepatic strictures with no pancreatic mass, do combined same-session EUS-guided tissue acquisition plus ERCP brushing and biopsy. … A fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) is an option only if the stricture is more than 2 cm below the hepatic confluence or the patient will not comply with repeated ERCPs. … High-grade PSC strictures get balloon dilation alone, with no stent, because stenting adds no benefit and may add adverse events. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnosis is unchanged and still follows the separate ESGE diagnostic guideline (Endoscopy 2025;57:166-185). Start with MRI/MRCP plus laboratory tests, read CA19-9 only after decompression, and check IgG4 when IgG4-related sclerosing cholangitis is suspected. For distal extrahepatic strictures with no pancreatic mass, do combined same-session EUS-guided tissue acquisition plus ERCP brushing and biopsy. For perihilar strictures, sample by ERCP first and move to cholangioscopy-guided biopsy if the result is indeterminate. Do not place an uncovered SEMS (USEMS) until malignancy is confirmed. Management now follows the 2026 ESGE biliary stricture management guideline, which replaces the 2018 stenting guideline and brings it into line with the 2022 therapeutic EUS guideline. Benign: post-cholecystectomy strictures get temporary multiple plastic stents (MPSs), exchanged every 3-4 months with as many stents as possible, for about 12 months. A fully covered SEMS (FCSEMS) is an option only if the stricture is more than 2 cm below the hepatic confluence or the patient will not comply with repeated ERCPs. Anastomotic strictures after liver transplant get MPSs, or a temporary FCSEMS if more than 2 cm below the confluence. Nonanastomotic post-transplant strictures that can be treated endoscopically get MPSs plus balloon dilation if needed. Chronic pancreatitis strictures get a temporary 8-10 mm FCSEMS for 6-12 months. High-grade PSC strictures get balloon dilation alone, with no stent, because stenting adds no benefit and may add adverse events. Endotherapy is indicated for a benign stricture with liver tests raised for more than 1 month and/or cholangitis. Malignant distal: drain before surgery only selectively (cholangitis, severe jaundice or pruritus, delayed surgery). When drainage is needed before surgery or neoadjuvant therapy, or for palliation, place a 10-mm SEMS endoscopically. Endoscopic drainage is preferred over surgery or PTBD for inoperable obstruction. Malignant hilar: manage in high-volume centres with a hepatobiliary multidisciplinary team (MDT). ERCP is preferred over PTBD for preoperative drainage. Palliate Bismuth I-II with ERCP. For Bismuth III-IV, ERCP or ERCP combined with EUS-guided drainage (EUS-BD) is preferred over primary PTBD, with PTBD as a complement if needed. For proven Bismuth II-IV, aim to drain more than 50%, ideally 70% or more, of the viable nonatrophic liver volume using several routes as needed. Use plastic stents when the drainage strategy is undefined or the centre is not expert. USEMS are for expert centres when the diagnosis is proven, the tumour is unresectable, and complete drainage is predicted. After failed or unfeasible ERCP, EUS-BD is recommended over PTBD. Use hepaticogastrostomy (EUS-HGS) if there is a duodenal stricture, and EUS-HGS or choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) if there is not. PTBD is used if EUS-BD fails. In surgically altered anatomy, benign disease gets enteroscopy-assisted ERCP first; malignant disease gets enteroscopy-assisted ERCP or EUS-BD. Give antibiotics before ERCP in selected cases: predicted incomplete drainage, hilar strictures, immunocompromised patients, PSC, cholangioscopy. This follows the ESGE ERCP-adverse-events guideline. Etiology-specific care (Strasberg injuries, IgG4-SC, Mirizzi, choledochal cysts) is unchanged.

ESGE 2026 (biliary stricture management; replaces ESGE 2018 stenting guideline) / ESGE 2025 (biliary stricture diagnosis) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Ito T … Naganuma M · Pancreas · IF 1.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=90 · Sep 24, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

Long-Term Outcomes of Low-Dose Steroid Induction for Autoimmune Pancreatitis: A Multicenter Retrospective Study Identifying Risk Factors for Relapse.

New evidenceautoimmune pancreatitis
Clinical takeawayConsider low-dose steroid induction (≤0.4 mg/kg/day) for autoimmune pancreatitis, as it is non-inferior to high-dose in efficacy and relapse risk. Monitor for predictors of relapse: discontinuation of maintenance treatment within 3 years, larger pancreatic volume, and smaller IgG4 reduction rate at 1 month.
What it foundLow-dose (≤0.4 mg/kg/day) and high-dose (>0.4 mg/kg/day) steroid induction had identical treatment response (100% vs 100%) and relapse rates (32.1% vs 33.9%) in autoimmune pancreatitis. Discontinuation of maintenance treatment within 3 years, larger pancreatic volume, and smaller IgG4 reduction rate at 1 month were independent predictors of relapse.
ContextChallenges the assumption that higher steroid doses are needed for autoimmune pancreatitis induction, showing equivalent outcomes with lower doses, but highlights the importance of monitoring for predictors of relapse.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720.

Decision at stakesteroid dosing for autoimmune pancreatitis induction

… Fecal elastase does NOT confirm chronic pancreatitis: it is a test of exocrine FUNCTION and is the appropriate initial test for the exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) that chronic pancreatitis causes, a consequence of the disease, not the diagnosis of it. … Screen for PDAC per lifetime risk and pursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing and autoimmune pancreatitis evaluation.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Confirm chronic pancreatitis on CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, CT for late calcific disease, MRI/MRCP (with secretin where available) for earlier ductal and parenchymal change, EUS an acceptable alternative; per ACG 2020, "Diagnosis is made usually on cross-sectional imaging, with modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography and pancreatic function tests playing a secondary role". Fecal elastase does NOT confirm chronic pancreatitis: it is a test of exocrine FUNCTION and is the appropriate initial test for the exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) that chronic pancreatitis causes, a consequence of the disease, not the diagnosis of it. A normal fecal elastase does not exclude chronic pancreatitis and a low one does not establish it. Per AGA 2023, fecal elastase must be run on a semi-solid or solid stool specimen; below 100 mcg/g is good evidence of EPI and 100-200 mcg/g is indeterminate (below 200 mcg/g is the cutoff commonly used to screen). Then manage with smoking and alcohol cessation, PERT for exocrine insufficiency titrated to symptoms, fat-soluble vitamin and bone surveillance, and individualized type 3c diabetes control, considering insulin early in patients with marked hyperglycemia or symptoms of insulin deficiency. Treat pain with a stepwise ladder from scheduled acetaminophen and neuromodulators to EUS-guided celiac plexus block and endoscopic/surgical intervention, referring early for surgery per ESCAPE 2020 in candidates with main pancreatic duct obstruction. Screen for PDAC per lifetime risk and pursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing and autoimmune pancreatitis evaluation.

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Iwasa Y … Shimizu M · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary review · Sep 24, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Metastatic pancreatic cancer: from human disease to preclinical modelling.

Guideline / reviewpancreatic cancerbasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a review of preclinical models and mechanisms in pancreatic cancer.
What it foundReview outlines molecular heterogeneity and microenvironment interactions in metastatic PDAC, with no new clinical data reported.
ContextSummarizes current understanding of metastatic PDAC biology but does not challenge or refine clinical practice.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Min J … Maitra A · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №13 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Pancreas/Biliary by RSS