← Issue №3/ week of Jul 19, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Nutrition, in full.

All 2 Nutrition papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 2, in full

most clinically useful first
Nutrition retrospective · n=220 · Jul 20, 2026 · Clin Nutrition · IF 6.6

The hierarchy of copper status in paediatric enteral tube feeding: A comparative retrospective cohort study of jejunal and gastric feeding.

Epidemiologypediatricmicronutrient deficiencyenteral nutrition
Clinical takeawayMeasure serum copper annually in pediatric patients on jejunal tube feeding. If depletion is identified, initiate copper sulphate supplementation via gastric or jejunal tube to restore normal levels and prevent cytopenia. Consider more frequent monitoring in patients with neurodisability or complex gastrointestinal comorbidities, as these groups have significantly higher depletion rates (up to 25%).
What it foundPediatric jejunal tube feeding patients have a 13% cumulative copper depletion rate, 6.27 times higher than simple gastric feeding, with more severe deficiency (median 8.7 μmol/L) and increased cytopenia risk; all patients receiving copper sulphate supplementation normalized their levels.
ContextThis 21-year cohort study confirms and extends existing pediatric guidelines recommending annual copper screening in jejunally-fed patients. It demonstrates a clear risk hierarchy: complex gastric feeding (25% depletion) > jejunal feeding (13%) >> simple gastric feeding (2.5%), supporting the hypothesis that bypassing normal upper gastrointestinal absorption mechanisms is the primary driver of copper depletion.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· ASGE 2024 (Gastrointest Endosc 2025;101:25-35) / ESGE 2021 (Endoscopy 2021;53:178-195)

Decision at stakewhether to implement annual copper screening in children on jejunal tube feeding

Device selection among PEG, PEG-J, DPEJ, surgical gastrostomy, and parenteral nutrition remains multidisciplinary, and a goals-of-care discussion before placement, including avoiding routine PEG in advanced dementia in favor of careful hand feeding (AGA 2020 / Choosing Wisely), is unchanged.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

PEG remains the standard for durable enteral access in patients unable to swallow safely or meet nutritional needs orally, placed by the pull (Gauderer-Ponsky) technique, and ASGE 2024 now suggests PEG over IR-guided gastrostomy for initial placement in normal foregut anatomy. A single prophylactic IV dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (e.g., cefazolin) is given before placement. Post-procedure bowel rest is no longer recommended: feeding may start within 3-4 hours of uncomplicated placement (ESGE 2021, strong/high-quality; ASGE 2024, strong/moderate), medications may be given immediately, and routine gastric residual volume checks are not indicated. Buried bumper prophylaxis is daily site care with DAILY inward tube mobilization and a loose external bumper kept 1-2 cm from the abdominal wall (ESGE 2021), not weekly rotation. Antiplatelet agents, including dual antiplatelet therapy, need not be routinely withheld for PEG; anticoagulant management is individualized by multidisciplinary discussion of bleeding versus thrombotic risk. In malignant dysphagia, either transoral pull PEG or direct (introducer) PEG is acceptable with counseling about implantation metastasis and periodic site examination. Device selection among PEG, PEG-J, DPEJ, surgical gastrostomy, and parenteral nutrition remains multidisciplinary, and a goals-of-care discussion before placement, including avoiding routine PEG in advanced dementia in favor of careful hand feeding (AGA 2020 / Choosing Wisely), is unchanged.

ASGE 2024 (Gastrointest Endosc 2025;101:25-35) / ESGE 2021 (Endoscopy 2021;53:178-195) · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Cairney DG … Merrick V · Clinical Nutrition · IF 6.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition prospective cohort · n=5,956 · Jul 21, 2026 · BMC Gastro · IF 2.5

Gender differences in the relationship between dynapenic abdominal obesity and non-neoplastic digestive system diseases among middle-aged and older adults.

Epidemiologyepidemiologyobesity
Clinical takeawayIn middle-aged and older women, identify low muscle strength combined with abdominal obesity as a marker of elevated digestive disease risk. Implement combined resistance and aerobic exercise programs to address both components. No specific indication for men based on this finding.
What it foundDynapenic abdominal obesity (low muscle strength plus abdominal obesity) predicted increased risk of non-neoplastic digestive system diseases over 9 years, with 1.82-fold higher hazard in women (95% CI 1.24-2.68) but no significant association in men. Note: specific digestive diseases included in NNDSD are not detailed in the abstract.
ContextExtends prior evidence linking metabolic dysfunction and low muscle mass to chronic disease, providing prospective data on the combined DAO phenotype as a GI disease risk factor with an important sex-specific pattern. Data from a Chinese cohort; generalizability to other populations uncertain.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association, 'AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Pharmacological Interventions for Adults With Obesity' (Grunvald E et al., Gastroenterology 2022;163(5):1198-1225). DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.045, PMID 36273831.

Decision at stakehow to individualize lifestyle intervention in older women with abdominal obesity based on muscle strength assessment

PRIMARY, AGA 2022 (pharmacotherapy, the GI-society spine): Manage obesity as a chronic disease with lifestyle intervention as the foundation.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

PRIMARY, AGA 2022 (pharmacotherapy, the GI-society spine): Manage obesity as a chronic disease with lifestyle intervention as the foundation. In adults with BMI ≥30 kg/m², OR BMI ≥27 kg/m² with a weight-related complication, who have an inadequate response to lifestyle intervention alone, the AGA STRONGLY recommends ADDING long-term pharmacotherapy to (not replacing) continued lifestyle intervention. Among agents the AGA suggests semaglutide 2.4 mg, liraglutide 3.0 mg, phentermine-topiramate ER, and naltrexone-bupropion ER (all moderate-certainty evidence), and, as lower-certainty options, e.g., where cost is a barrier, phentermine and diethylpropion (low-certainty evidence); when prioritizing for greatest weight loss the panel favored semaglutide 2.4 mg. The AGA suggests AGAINST orlistat and made no recommendation on Gelesis100 (identified as a knowledge gap). Agent choice should be individualized to comorbidities, contraindications, patient preference, and cost/access. COMORBIDITY BRANCHES (attributed separately, NOT part of the AGA document): For obesity-associated MASH, AASLD Practice Guidance supports selecting patients with stage F2-F3 fibrosis by non-invasive tests (VCTE ~8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than mandatory biopsy, and endorses resmetirom (thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist; FDA-approved March 2024) as the only currently approved pharmacotherapy for MASH (not indicated for MASH cirrhosis). For metabolic/bariatric surgery, the 2022 ASMBS/IFSO indications recommend surgery at BMI ≥35 kg/m² regardless of comorbidity and consideration at BMI 30-34.9 kg/m² with metabolic disease (lower Asian-population thresholds: offer surgery at BMI >27.5, clinical obesity from >25), with multidisciplinary pre-operative evaluation. Concurrently screen for and manage the GI/hepatology comorbidities of obesity (MASLD/MASH, GERD, cholelithiasis).

American Gastroenterological Association, 'AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Pharmacological Interventions for Adults With Obesity' (Grunvald E et al., Gastroenterology 2022;163(5):1198-1225). DOI 10.1053/j.gastro.2022.08.045, PMID 36273831. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Dong X … Li M · BMC Gastroenterology · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №3 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Nutrition by RSS