← Issue №3/ week of Jul 19, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Colorectal, in full.

All 1 Colorectal paper in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 1, in full

most clinically useful first
Colorectal rct · n=102 · Jul 21, 2026 · Dis Colon Rectum · IF 3.5

Five-Year Follow-up of the Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Laser Hemorrhoidoplasty With Sutured Mucopexy and Excisional Hemorrhoidectomy.

New evidencecolorectal surgery
Clinical takeawayFor symptomatic grade 2-3 hemorrhoids requiring surgery, counsel patients on a two-option framework: excisional hemorrhoidectomy for maximum long-term durability (24% recurrence) if the patient tolerates longer recovery, or laser hemorrhoidoplasty for nearly equivalent recurrence control (29%) with notably better quality-of-life scores and a significantly shorter and less painful postoperative course. The choice should hinge on patient priority-durable symptom control versus rapid functional recovery-rather than recurrence rates alone, as the 5% absolute difference is not statistically significant at 5 years. Sutured mucopexy shows the worst long-term recurrence (44%) and should be reserved for highly selected cases.
What it foundFive-year symptom recurrence: excisional hemorrhoidectomy 24%, laser hemorrhoidoplasty 29%, sutured mucopexy 44% (differences not statistically significant, p=0.076); excisional hemorrhoidectomy had the lowest bleeding recurrence (18% vs 31% for both LH and SM) and prolapse (12% vs 23% for LH and 34% for SM); laser hemorrhoidoplasty group reported the highest general health evaluation scores.
ContextConfirms excisional hemorrhoidectomy as the most durable surgical option while validating laser hemorrhoidoplasty as a clinically equivalent alternative on recurrence; shifts the focus from efficacy alone to patient-centered shared decision-making on postoperative quality of life and recovery speed.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids" (Hawkins AT, Davis BR, Bhama AR, et al.; Dis Colon Rectum 2024;67(5):614-623; DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003276), 2024

Decision at stakechoice of surgical approach (excisional hemorrhoidectomy vs. laser hemorrhoidoplasty) for refractory grade III hemorrhoids

(8) Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation may be used for patients with internal hemorrhoids; compared with excisional hemorrhoidectomy it may result in decreased pain but increased recurrence rates (conditional, moderate-quality).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Nine GRADE recommendations (verified against the full text, Table 2). (1) A disease-specific history and physical examination should be performed, emphasizing the degree and duration of symptoms and risk factors (strong, low-quality evidence). (2) Complete endoscopic evaluation of the colon is indicated in select patients with symptomatic hemorrhoids and rectal bleeding (conditional, low-quality); rectal bleeding should not automatically be attributed to hemorrhoids: colonoscopy is indicated when no obvious source of anorectal bleeding is observed or when associated abdominal symptoms (abdominal pain, distention, new-onset or progressive constipation) are reported at initial evaluation; patients with continued hematochezia after otherwise successful hemorrhoid treatment should undergo further investigation; patients due for colorectal cancer screening per consensus guidelines should be counseled appropriately. (3) Dietary and behavioral modifications are the primary first-line therapies for patients with symptomatic hemorrhoidal disease (strong, moderate-quality): increased fiber and fluid intake for all patients, plus counseling on bowel habits (avoid straining, limit time on the commode). (4) Medical therapy for hemorrhoids, while heterogeneous (topical creams, ointments, foams, and suppositories, including hydrocortisone, phenylephrine, pramoxine, and witch hazel, with limited supporting data; oral phlebotonics with Cochrane-level evidence of benefit for pruritus, bleeding, discharge, and overall symptoms but not pain), carries minimal harm and has the potential for symptomatic relief (conditional, low-quality). (5) Most patients with symptomatic grade I or II hemorrhoids and select patients with grade III hemorrhoids refractory to conservative treatment can be effectively treated with office-based procedures (rubber band ligation, injection sclerotherapy, infrared coagulation); hemorrhoid banding is considered the most effective office-based treatment (strong, moderate-quality). (6) Select patients with thrombosed external hemorrhoids may benefit from early surgical excision (conditional, low-quality); the guideline states there is no evidence regarding the optimal time period for nonoperative management, and that excision may yield faster symptom resolution, reduced recurrence, and longer remission intervals than incision with thrombus evacuation or topical 0.2% glyceryl trinitrate. (7) Excisional hemorrhoidectomy should typically be offered to select patients with external hemorrhoids or patients with symptomatic combined internal and external hemorrhoids, grades III-IV (strong, high-quality); it is also the approach for patients who fail, cannot tolerate, or are not candidates for office-based procedures. (8) Doppler-guided hemorrhoid artery ligation may be used for patients with internal hemorrhoids; compared with excisional hemorrhoidectomy it may result in decreased pain but increased recurrence rates (conditional, moderate-quality). (9) Stapled hemorrhoidopexy is not routinely recommended as a first-line surgical treatment for internal hemorrhoids given its marginal efficacy and significant risk profile (conditional, moderate-quality); the guideline documents higher recurrence than excisional surgery and unique complications including rectovaginal fistulas, staple-line bleeding and strictures, a 16.1% median complication rate with 5 documented mortalities in a 14,232-patient systematic review, and 40 published rectal perforations (2000-2009) with 4 deaths.

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Hemorrhoids" (Hawkins AT, Davis BR, Bhama AR, et al.; Dis Colon Rectum 2024;67(5):614-623; DOI 10.1097/DCR.0000000000003276), 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Makunaite G … Poskus T · Diseases of the Colon and Rectum · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №3 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Colorectal by RSS