← Issue №3/ week of Jul 19, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 4 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 4, in full

most clinically useful first
Hepatology meta analysis · n=1,659 · Jul 22, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Prior decompensation Identifies Patients at High Mortality Risk Despite Standard Therapy After Variceal Hemorrhage: An IPD Meta-analysis.

New evidencevariceal bleedingcirrhosisasciteshepatic encephalopathy
Clinical takeawayIn patients with prior decompensation (ascites or encephalopathy) presenting with variceal hemorrhage, standard NSBB+EVL carries 25% 2-year mortality. Consider whether pre-emptive TIPS might be beneficial in this high-risk subgroup despite current guidelines recommending against it in Child-Pugh A-B, based on this evidence of substantially worse outcomes with standard therapy; definitive benefit requires further study.
What it foundIn Child-Pugh A-B cirrhotic patients with variceal hemorrhage treated with NSBB+EVL, prior decompensation identified substantially higher 2-year mortality: 25.1% vs 13.5% without (aHR 1.4, 95% CI 1.1-1.7), with prior ascites showing aHR 1.8 (95% CI 1.2-2.6) and prior encephalopathy aHR 1.7 (95% CI 1.3-2.3).
ContextCurrent standard recommends NSBB+EVL (not pre-emptive TIPS) for variceal hemorrhage in Child-Pugh A-B patients. This meta-analysis identifies a substantial subgroup with nearly double the mortality risk despite standard therapy, suggesting current risk stratification for TIPS eligibility may inadequately capture highest-risk patients.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakewhether to consider TIPS in patients with variceal hemorrhage and prior decompensation

… In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Turco L … Garcia-Tsao G · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=82 · Jul 23, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Oral vancomycin is not associated with meaningful changes in liver-related endpoints among adults with primary sclerosing cholangitis: A randomized, placebo-controlled trial.

New evidencePSCmicrobiome
Clinical takeawayDo not use oral vancomycin for PSC. The biochemical reduction in SAP did not translate to clinically meaningful disease improvement, and a material cosmetic adverse effect was observed. PSC remains without proven medical therapy.
What it foundOral vancomycin reduced SAP by 21.9% versus 1.2% placebo (p=0.03) but did not normalize SAP (6.7% vs 5%, p=1.00), improve Mayo risk score (-0.1 both groups, p=0.88), or change liver stiffness (OV -4.0 kPa vs placebo +0.1 kPa, p=0.15). Tooth and tongue discoloration occurred in 17.5% of OV recipients.
ContextPSC currently lacks approved medical therapies; prior evidence suggested OV as a potential candidate, but this negative phase 3 trial definitively rules it out.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries," Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(1):18-35

Decision at stakewhether oral vancomycin should be prescribed for primary sclerosing cholangitis

… Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should also be tested for primary sclerosing cholangitis with cholangiography by MRCP (or ERCP) together with serum IgG4, because some extrahepatic cholestatic disease (e.g., PSC, HIV/AIDS cholangiopathy) may not be visible on ultrasound; a history of cholangitis or of colonic inflammatory bowel disease further raises suspicion but is not a prerequisite for obtaining cholangiography. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

An elevated alkaline phosphatase should first be confirmed to be of hepatic origin: confirm with an elevated GGT, or use ALP isoenzyme fractionation or 5'-nucleotidase to separate liver from non-hepatic (e.g., bone) sources. GGT should NOT be used as a standalone screening test in the absence of otherwise-abnormal liver chemistries, and GGT is not specific (elevated in >50% of alcohol users without overt liver disease). Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should be tested for primary biliary cholangitis with an anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA). Once ALP is confirmed to be of hepatic origin, obtain a liver ultrasound to assess the hepatic parenchyma and bile ducts: biliary dilatation suggests an extrahepatic cause, while a non-dilated biliary system suggests an intrahepatic cause. Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should also be tested for primary sclerosing cholangitis with cholangiography by MRCP (or ERCP) together with serum IgG4, because some extrahepatic cholestatic disease (e.g., PSC, HIV/AIDS cholangiopathy) may not be visible on ultrasound; a history of cholangitis or of colonic inflammatory bowel disease further raises suspicion but is not a prerequisite for obtaining cholangiography. Liver biopsy is generally not required; about 80% of isolated ALP elevations can be diagnosed from history, physical exam, routine labs, and chest X-ray.

American College of Gastroenterology (Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries," Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(1):18-35 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Eaton JE … Carey EJ · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=24 · Jul 21, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Clonal diversity underpins distinct modes of recurrence in hepatocellular carcinoma: the PLANet cohort study.

Basic sciencehepatocellular carcinomabasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo direct clinical action yet. This mechanistic study reveals how clonal architecture and immunosuppression determine recurrence patterns and suggests checkpoint inhibitors may be more effective against polyclonal tumors, but prospective validation of the predictive model and treatment strategies are required before clinical implementation.
What it foundMore than 50% of intrahepatic HCC recurrences showed polyclonal seeding (multiple subclones) with early recurrence, whereas most distant metastases were monoclonal from a dominant C5/C6 subclone; a multi-omics model predicted recurrence with 86% accuracy (AUC 0.86).
ContextHCC recurrence risk stratification after curative resection lacks biologic mechanistic insight. This work identifies polyclonal spread (enabled by regulatory T cell enrichment) as distinct from monoclonal metastatic spread and challenges the single dominant-clone model, potentially enabling future risk assessment and treatment personalization.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

Decision at stakepost-resection surveillance strategy and risk stratification for recurrence in HCC patients after curative-intent resection

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Zhang Y … Tam WL · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · Jul 21, 2026 · Lancet GH · IF 39.1

The glucagon and GLP-1 receptor dual agonist DD01 for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and steatohepatitis (DD01-DN-02): 12-week results from a randomised, double-blind, multicentre, placebo-controlled, phase 2 trial.

New evidenceMASLD
Clinical takeawayNo change to MASH management yet - this phase 2 interim data (12 weeks) shows liver fat reduction, but fibrosis regression, MASH resolution, and long-term safety remain unknown. Patients meeting trial criteria (NCT06410924) might discuss enrollment if interested.
What it foundAt 12 weeks, 76% of participants receiving DD01 40 mg weekly achieved at least a 30% relative reduction in liver fat on MRI-PDFF versus 12% with placebo.
ContextDual GLP-1/glucagon agonists represent a novel approach beyond GLP-1 monotherapy. This provides the first human efficacy signal for DD01, with liver fat reduction confirmed in humans.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

Decision at stakePrescribe pharmacotherapy (semaglutide, resmetirom, pioglitazone, or vitamin E) for biopsy or imaging-confirmed MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis.

… Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. … Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Noureddin M … Lee S · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 39.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №3 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS