← Issue №3/ week of Jul 19, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Esophagus/Reflux, in full.

All 2 Esophagus/Reflux papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 2, in full

most clinically useful first
Esophagus/Reflux meta analysis · n=1,495 · Jul 24, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Efficacy of Proton Pump Inhibitor Therapy for Nocturnal GERD Symptoms and Associated Sleep Disturbances: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

New evidenceGERDproton pump inhibitorsmeta-analysissystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider PPI therapy for adults with nocturnal GERD symptoms and associated sleep disturbances, especially if symptoms are reflux-driven, noting that treatment-emergent adverse events were similar to placebo.
What it foundPPI therapy improved nighttime heartburn relief and GERD-related sleep disturbances compared with placebo in 3 RCTs involving 1495 adults with GERD and sleep disturbances.
ContextConfirms the utility of PPIs for nocturnal GERD symptoms, an area where prior evidence was unclear.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56

Decision at stakethe use of PPI therapy for GERD symptoms

In patients with classic GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and no alarm symptoms, give an 8-week trial of empiric PPI ONCE DAILY before a meal (strong, moderate evidence); administer PPI 30-60 minutes before a meal rather than at bedtime (strong, moderate). For extraesophageal symptoms WITHOUT typical GERD symptoms, perform reflux testing BEFORE starting PPI therapy (strong, moderate); with concomitant typical symptoms, consider twice-daily PPI for 8-12 weeks before further testing (conditional, low).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In patients with classic GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and no alarm symptoms, give an 8-week trial of empiric PPI ONCE DAILY before a meal (strong, moderate evidence); administer PPI 30-60 minutes before a meal rather than at bedtime (strong, moderate). Endoscopy is the FIRST test in patients presenting with dysphagia or other alarm symptoms, the guideline names weight loss and GI bleeding, and also in patients with multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (strong, low). If classic symptoms respond to the 8-week trial, attempt to discontinue the PPI (conditional, low); for patients without erosive esophagitis or Barrett's whose symptoms resolved, an attempt at discontinuation should be made; patients requiring maintenance should take the lowest effective dose. If symptoms do not respond adequately to the 8-week trial, or return on discontinuation, perform diagnostic endoscopy, ideally after PPIs are stopped for 2-4 weeks (strong, low). Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low). In refractory GERD, optimize PPI therapy first (strong, moderate); then pH monitoring OFF PPIs if GERD was not previously established by pH study, long-segment Barrett's, or LA grade C/D esophagitis, versus impedance-pH ON PPIs where GERD is already established but symptoms persist on twice-daily PPI (both conditional, low). Before antireflux surgery or endoscopic therapy, HRM is recommended to rule out achalasia and absent contractility, with provocative testing (e.g., multiple rapid swallows) to identify contractile reserve in ineffective esophageal motility; on-therapy reflux monitoring is suggested before intervention in patients with prior objective GERD findings who remain symptomatic. Antireflux surgery by an experienced surgeon is an option for patients with OBJECTIVE evidence of GERD, with severe esophagitis (LA C/D), large hiatal hernia, or persistent troublesome symptoms benefiting most; TIF is suggested only for troublesome regurgitation or heartburn in patients who do not wish to undergo antireflux surgery and who are WITHOUT severe esophagitis (LA C/D) or hiatal hernia >2 cm. For extraesophageal symptoms WITHOUT typical GERD symptoms, perform reflux testing BEFORE starting PPI therapy (strong, moderate); with concomitant typical symptoms, consider twice-daily PPI for 8-12 weeks before further testing (conditional, low). Lifestyle: weight loss in overweight/obese patients (strong, moderate); avoid meals within 2-3 hours of bedtime, avoid tobacco, avoid trigger foods, and elevate the head of the bed for nighttime symptoms (all conditional, low).

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Koo TH … Fass R · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=802,758 · Jul 22, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Burden of Eosinophilic Esophagitis and Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease: A Comprehensive US Healthcare Analysis.

EpidemiologyGERDeosinophilic esophagitisMASLDepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo intervention is tested. Observational study documents EoE and GERD are substantially more common in MASLD patients compared to matched controls without MASLD, but causation is unproven. No change to current screening or management algorithms; in a symptomatic MASLD patient, heightened clinical suspicion for EoE and GERD is reasonable pending mechanistic clarification.
What it foundMASLD was associated with 2.3-2.9-fold higher odds of eosinophilic esophagitis compared to matched controls without MASLD across age groups (18-44 years OR 2.905, 45-64 years OR 2.423, ≥65 years OR 2.327), and similarly increased odds of GERD and its phenotypes (nonerosive reflux disease, erosive esophagitis, Barrett's esophagus).
ContextConfirms and quantifies an association prior work suspected: EoE and GERD are 2-3 fold more common in MASLD across all ages. Raises the question of shared pathophysiology but does not establish it.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· British Society of Gastroenterology-endorsed international consensus, "Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0" (Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, et al.), Gut, 2024

Decision at stakewhether metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease should prompt heightened diagnostic vigilance for eosinophilic esophagitis and GERD in patients with reflux symptoms

If symptoms persist after optimization, perform EGD (ideally 2-4 weeks off PPI when GERD is unproven) with esophageal biopsies to exclude EoE (>=15 eos/hpf; the ACG 2025 EoE guideline has removed the PPI trial from the diagnostic pathway) and then physiologic testing per Lyon Consensus 2.0: in unproven GERD, ambulatory reflux monitoring OFF therapy, applying Lyon 2.0's modality-specific thresholds -- on catheter-based single-day (24-hour) pH or pH-impedance, AET >6% is conclusive for GERD, 4-6% is inconclusive, and <4% argues against GERD; on prolonged wireless (Bravo, up to 96-hour) monitoring, AET >6% on >=2 days is conclusive for GERD while AET <4% on all days excludes it, and a study meeting neither threshold is inconclusive (the number of days with AET <4% carries prognostic weight for PPI discontinuation) -- and, in either modality, a normal-AET (<4%) study with positive symptom association indicates reflux hypersensitivity or, without it, functional heartburn; in previously proven GERD, pH-impedance ON optimized therapy, where AET >4% plus >80 reflux episodes defines actionable refractory GERD (MNBI <1500 ohms supportive, >2300 ohms against).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

For heartburn or regurgitation persisting despite PPI therapy, current practice (ACG 2022 GERD guideline, still the operative ACG guideline, plus the AGA 2022 personalized-GERD CPU) is to first optimize the PPI: confirm adherence, dose 30-60 minutes before meals, escalate to twice-daily dosing or switch agents for an 8-week trial. Empiric escalation to vonoprazan/P-CAB is NOT a routine pre-testing step: the AGA 2024 P-CAB clinical practice update advises against P-CABs as first-line therapy and reserves them for PPI failure with confirmatory GERD evidence (LA grade B or worse erosive esophagitis, biopsy-proven Barrett's, peptic stricture, or acid exposure time >6%). If symptoms persist after optimization, perform EGD (ideally 2-4 weeks off PPI when GERD is unproven) with esophageal biopsies to exclude EoE (>=15 eos/hpf; the ACG 2025 EoE guideline has removed the PPI trial from the diagnostic pathway) and then physiologic testing per Lyon Consensus 2.0: in unproven GERD, ambulatory reflux monitoring OFF therapy, applying Lyon 2.0's modality-specific thresholds -- on catheter-based single-day (24-hour) pH or pH-impedance, AET >6% is conclusive for GERD, 4-6% is inconclusive, and <4% argues against GERD; on prolonged wireless (Bravo, up to 96-hour) monitoring, AET >6% on >=2 days is conclusive for GERD while AET <4% on all days excludes it, and a study meeting neither threshold is inconclusive (the number of days with AET <4% carries prognostic weight for PPI discontinuation) -- and, in either modality, a normal-AET (<4%) study with positive symptom association indicates reflux hypersensitivity or, without it, functional heartburn; in previously proven GERD, pH-impedance ON optimized therapy, where AET >4% plus >80 reflux episodes defines actionable refractory GERD (MNBI <1500 ohms supportive, >2300 ohms against). High-resolution manometry per Chicago Classification 4.0 (still current) excludes achalasia and major motility disorders and is required before anti-reflux surgery. Therapy is phenotype-directed: surgical or endoscopic anti-reflux intervention for confirmed refractory pathologic reflux, and neuromodulators with or without brain-gut behavioral therapy for reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn.

British Society of Gastroenterology-endorsed international consensus, "Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0" (Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, et al.), Gut, 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Chowdhary R … Fass R · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №3 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Esophagus/Reflux by RSS