← Issue №5/ week of Aug 2, 2026/Hepatology

Laparoscopic or Open Liver Resection Versus Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of HCC Within Milan Criteria on Cirrhosis.

From GI Signals issue №5: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Hepatology retrospective · n=1,040 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Laparoscopic or Open Liver Resection Versus Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of HCC Within Milan Criteria on Cirrhosis.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomacirrhosisportal hypertensionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider minimally invasive modalities (LLR or mbpRFA) for early HCC within Milan criteria on cirrhosis. Prioritize LLR for better oncological outcomes, but mbpRFA is a reasonable alternative with less morbidity and optimal transplant-free survival. Note that LLR is associated with more severe adverse events compared to mbpRFA.
What it foundMultibipolar radiofrequency ablation (mbpRFA) had similar overall survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.65-1.69), transplant-free survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.47), and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.43) compared to open liver resection (OLR), but OLR had more severe adverse events (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.16-5.71) and mortality (RR 4.51, 95% CI 1.16-17.59). Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) had better overall survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.88) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.91) than mbpRFA, but similar transplant-free survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55-1.1) and more severe adverse events (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.15-5.96).
ContextThis study refines the choice of treatment for early HCC within Milan criteria in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, showing that minimally invasive options (LLR or mbpRFA) are preferable to open resection due to comparable or better survival outcomes with less morbidity.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakethe choice of curative treatment for early HCC within Milan criteria

AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Hobeika C … Nault JC · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №5 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues