← Issue №5/ week of Aug 2, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 36 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 36, in full

most clinically useful first · the 6 the issue led with are ruled in green
Everything here, in one line each36
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,352 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Diagnostic Performance of Serum AKR1B10 in Early-Stage and AFP-Negative Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Multicentre Study.

Diagnostichepatocellular carcinomabiomarkerbasic science
Clinical takeawayAKR1B10 shows promise as a diagnostic biomarker for early and AFP-negative HCC, but further validation is needed before clinical adoption. Post-resection AKR1B10 decline and imaging concordance (94.41% vs AFP's 70.63%) warrant investigation in prospective studies.
What it foundSerum AKR1B10 had an AUC of 0.866 (sensitivity 73.10%, specificity 95.24%) for HCC diagnosis, outperforming AFP (AUC 0.750, sensitivity 64.27%, specificity 82.14%) in this cohort. In AFP-negative HCC, AKR1B10 was positive in 69.27% of cases (AUC 0.852, sensitivity 72.2%, specificity 90.48%). Performance in non-HCC liver diseases or non-hepatocyte cancers was not reported.
ContextCurrent HCC diagnosis relies on AFP and imaging, but AFP has limited sensitivity in early-stage or AFP-negative HCC. This study suggests AKR1B10 may complement AFP, though its role in non-HCC liver conditions remains unclear.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakethe use of serum biomarkers for HCC diagnosis and surveillance

Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Cao Z … Sun Z · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=296 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Viscoelastic Tests in Cirrhotic Patients Undergoing Invasive Procedures: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of RCTs.

Practice-changingcirrhosissystematic reviewmeta-analysis
Clinical takeawayConsider using viscoelastic testing (VET) to guide transfusion strategies in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures, as it reduces unnecessary transfusions compared to standard-of-care without increasing bleeding risk.
What it foundVET-guided transfusion strategies, compared to standard-of-care, reduced any blood product transfusion (RR 0.33, 95% CI 0.26-0.44), platelet transfusion (RR 0.20, 95% CI 0.13-0.32), and FFP exposure (RR 0.40, 95% CI 0.28-0.57) without increasing bleeding risk (RR 0.74, 95% CI 0.24-2.31) in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures.
ContextChallenges the traditional reliance on conventional coagulation tests, which often lead to unnecessary transfusions in cirrhotic patients due to poor reflection of their rebalanced haemostatic state.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakeassessing bleeding risk in cirrhotic patients undergoing invasive procedures

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Boccatonda A … Simioni P · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=16,973 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Impact of Antiviral Therapy Scale-Up Among People Who Inject Drugs in Scotland: Regional Evidence of Hepatitis C Virus Elimination.

New evidenceviral hepatitisepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayPrioritize community-wide scale-up of DAA treatment and population-level monitoring surveys in people who inject drugs (PWID) to reduce HCV prevalence and support elimination goals, with particular attention to regional variability in outcomes.
What it foundBetween 2015-16 and 2022-23, DAA uptake increased 2.7-, 5.6-, and 4.5-fold to 95%, 78%, and 76% in Tayside, GGC, and RoS, respectively, with viraemia prevalence declining to 4%, 16%, and 15% (86%, 65%, and 53% decline from pre-2015 baseline).
ContextConfirms the effectiveness of DAA treatment-as-prevention (TasP) strategies in reducing HCV prevalence among PWID in Scotland, aligning with WHO elimination targets, with notable regional differences in success (Tayside achieved the greatest reduction).
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

Decision at staketreatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Palmateer NE … Hutchinson SJ · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=75 · Jul 30, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Decompression of portal hypertension by transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt reverses markers of gut barrier dysfunction and cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionbasic sciencebiomarker
Clinical takeawayTIPS is already standard of care for select patients with decompensated cirrhosis, ascites, and portal hypertension; this study reinforces its role in reversing CAID and reducing bacterial infections, particularly in those achieving ascites resolution.
What it foundTIPS reduced markers of gut barrier dysfunction, bacterial translocation, systemic inflammation, and monocyte activation in decompensated cirrhosis, with CAID improvement linked to ascites resolution and fewer bacterial infections.
ContextConfirms PH as a central driver of CAID and supports TIPS, already SOC, in restoring immune homeostasis in decompensated cirrhosis with ascites.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021

Decision at stakethe role of TIPS in managing cirrhosis-associated immune dysfunction and ascites

Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset ascites that is accessible for sampling, and in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is emergently admitted to the hospital for any reason, to rule out SBP even in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection (up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic). Also perform it whenever a patient with ascites develops signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of infection, and in patients with tense ascites and AKI to exclude SBP as the cause. LVP/paracentesis is safe even with coagulopathy: elevated prothrombin time (INR >1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets <50×10^9/L) is not a contraindication, and routine transfusion of clotting factors or platelets is NOT recommended, with possible exceptions in disseminated intravascular coagulation, or uremia with thrombocytopenia (where desmopressin may be considered, especially with prior bleeding). The initial laboratory investigation of ascitic fluid should include ascitic fluid neutrophil (PMN) count, ascitic fluid total protein, and ascitic fluid albumin plus a simultaneous serum albumin to calculate the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG). Ascitic fluid culture is not part of that routine initial panel but should be obtained whenever SBP is being evaluated (routinely for inpatients and when secondary bacterial peritonitis is suspected); when cultured, inoculate ≥10 mL of fluid into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles at the bedside, before the first dose of antibiotics. Amylase, cytology, glucose, LDH, and mycobacterial (AFB/ADA) or triglyceride testing are not routinely indicated and should be guided by clinical context (e.g., suspected pancreatic, malignant, secondary-bacterial, tuberculous, or chylous ascites). Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites. Within high-SAAG ascites, use ascitic total protein to distinguish the source: total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastasis, late Budd-Chiari), whereas total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a postsinusoidal/cardiac source (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, early Budd-Chiari), directing workup toward right-heart catheterization, hepatic-vein Doppler, and echocardiography. The diagnosis of SBP is established with an ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil (PMN) count >250/mm^3 (with or without a positive culture, and in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection). Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) is the analogous spontaneous infection of a pre-existing hepatic hydrothorax, not a parapneumonic effusion, and is established by the same pleural fluid PMN count >250/mm^3, but only after pneumonia and other secondary causes of the effusion have been excluded; despite the term "empyema" it is managed as an infection with antibiotics, and a chest tube should NOT be placed.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Piecha F … in Cooperation with the German Cirrhosis Study Group of the DGVS · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

From Diagnosis to Durability: A Review of the European Bulevirtide Experience and Practical Learnings for CHD Management.

New therapyviral hepatitisguidelinehealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider bulevirtide 2 mg as a treatment option for chronic hepatitis D (CHD), especially in patients with compensated cirrhosis, and provide ongoing patient support for long-term adherence. Monitor for potential adverse events as long-term safety data continues to accumulate.
What it foundReal-world evidence shows bulevirtide monotherapy is safe and effective long-term compared to off-label pegylated interferon alpha, with high adherence, even in compensated cirrhosis, and may improve liver fibrosis and reduce liver-related events.
ContextBulevirtide is the first approved treatment for CHD in Europe, replacing off-label pegylated interferon alpha, with real-world evidence supporting its use and benefits primarily in patients with compensated cirrhosis.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe management of chronic hepatitis D (CHD) with bulevirtide

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Radu M … Wedemeyer H · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=803 · Aug 3, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Reproducibility of Biomarkers in MASLD: A Benchmark for Clinically Meaningful Change in Serially Measured Non-Invasive Tests.

New evidencebiomarkerMASLD
Clinical takeawayConsider variability in liver stiffness measurements by VCTE when interpreting changes in MASLD patients with biopsy-confirmed at-risk disease: a change exceeding 55.2% may indicate meaningful disease progression or treatment response compared to baseline. Prefer CAP or ELF for monitoring when lower variability is desired.
What it foundLiver stiffness measurement by VCTE showed a within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV) of 19.9% and reproducibility coefficient (RDC) of 55.2% in the screening analysis set (n=803) of patients with biopsy-confirmed at-risk MASLD. Controlled attenuation parameter (CAP) and enhanced liver fibrosis (ELF) score demonstrated lower variability (wCV 8.8% and 3.4%, respectively).
ContextThis study provides the first robust benchmarks for variability in non-invasive tests (NITs) for MASLD, addressing uncertainty in interpreting longitudinal changes in clinical practice and trials.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeinterpreting serial non-invasive test results in MASLD monitoring

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Au TY … Anstee QM · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=2,192 · Aug 3, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Metabolically healthy obesity, its resolution, and the risk of incident hepatic steatosis in Chinese children: evidence from two prospective cohorts.

New evidencepediatricepidemiologyMASLD
Clinical takeawayMonitor liver health (ultrasonography and/or ALT) in children with obesity, even if metabolically healthy, as they are at high risk for hepatic steatosis. Early weight management is supported regardless of metabolic status.
What it foundMetabolically healthy obesity (MHO) at baseline was associated with a 7.23-fold higher risk of incident hepatic steatosis (OR = 7.23, 95% CI: 4.73-11.07) compared to metabolically healthy normal weight (MHN), and persistent MHO had a 9.40-fold higher risk (OR = 9.40, 95% CI: 5.47-16.15).
ContextExtends prior evidence by showing that MHO, not just metabolically unhealthy obesity, is a significant risk factor for hepatic steatosis in children, and that resolution of MHO may mitigate this risk.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeearly weight management in children with obesity regardless of metabolic status

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wang J … Xi B · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=364 · Jul 30, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Rate and clinical predictors of skeletal muscle loss in patients with cirrhosis.

New evidencecirrhosisepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayMonitor skeletal muscle index (SMI) via CT in ambulatory adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation, especially those with ascites or higher MELD-Na, as RML predicts waitlist mortality. Future research is needed to identify effective interventions to mitigate muscle loss in this population.
What it foundRapid muscle loss (RML, < -7.4%/year) in ambulatory adults with cirrhosis awaiting liver transplantation predicted higher waitlist mortality at 12 months (32% vs 10%) and 24 months (75% vs 27%).
ContextConfirms and quantifies the prognostic value of muscle loss in cirrhosis, previously suspected but poorly defined. Links RML to ascites and MELD-Na, refining risk stratification.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Yang TC … Lai JC · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=1,385 · Aug 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Carvedilol Versus Endoscopic Variceal Ligation for Prophylaxis of Esophageal Variceal Bleeding in Patients With Liver Cirrhosis: An Updated Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingsystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider carvedilol as a noninvasive alternative to EVL for primary prophylaxis of esophageal variceal bleeding, especially where endoscopy access is limited.
What it foundCarvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation (EVL) showed no significant differences in all-cause mortality (RR: 1.00, 95% CI: 0.64-1.54), variceal bleeding (RR: 1.04, 95% CI: 0.75-1.45), or bleeding-related mortality (RR: 1.71, 95% CI: 0.83-3.50) in 1385 patients with cirrhosis.
ContextConfirms current guidelines that both carvedilol and EVL are effective for primary prophylaxis, with no clear superiority. Prior uncertainty about comparative efficacy is resolved.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakechoosing between carvedilol and endoscopic variceal ligation for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Almeida LGS … de Vasconcelos Carneiro M · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=1,040 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Laparoscopic or Open Liver Resection Versus Multibipolar Radiofrequency Ablation of HCC Within Milan Criteria on Cirrhosis.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomacirrhosisportal hypertensionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider minimally invasive modalities (LLR or mbpRFA) for early HCC within Milan criteria on cirrhosis. Prioritize LLR for better oncological outcomes, but mbpRFA is a reasonable alternative with less morbidity and optimal transplant-free survival. Note that LLR is associated with more severe adverse events compared to mbpRFA.
What it foundMultibipolar radiofrequency ablation (mbpRFA) had similar overall survival (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.65-1.69), transplant-free survival (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.56-1.47), and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.69-1.43) compared to open liver resection (OLR), but OLR had more severe adverse events (RR 2.58, 95% CI 1.16-5.71) and mortality (RR 4.51, 95% CI 1.16-17.59). Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) had better overall survival (HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.38-0.88) and recurrence-free survival (HR 0.7, 95% CI 0.53-0.91) than mbpRFA, but similar transplant-free survival (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55-1.1) and more severe adverse events (RR 2.61, 95% CI 1.15-5.96).
ContextThis study refines the choice of treatment for early HCC within Milan criteria in patients with advanced fibrosis or cirrhosis, showing that minimally invasive options (LLR or mbpRFA) are preferable to open resection due to comparable or better survival outcomes with less morbidity.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakethe choice of curative treatment for early HCC within Milan criteria

AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Hobeika C … Nault JC · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=6,313 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Threshold-Defined Liver Stiffness Trajectories and Liver-Related Event Risk in Chronic Liver Disease: A Cohort Study.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider more frequent monitoring (e.g., biannual liver stiffness tests) for patients with chronic liver disease and Persistent High liver stiffness (≥10 kPa), especially those with non-viral aetiologies (HR 6.4 vs 2.6 for viral), pending external validation of these findings.
What it foundPatients with Persistent High liver stiffness (≥10 kPa, per Baveno VII criteria) had a 15.0% 3-year risk of liver-related events (LREs), accounting for 61.9% of all LREs, with HR 4.1 (3.1-5.5) vs Stable Low.
ContextRefines risk stratification by showing that Persistent High liver stiffness, even with numerical decreases, concentrates most LRE risk, particularly in non-viral aetiologies. The findings require external validation.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Kim DY … Kim SU · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 3, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Review article: Immunosuppression in Decompensated Autoimmune Hepatitis Cirrhosis - To Suppress or Not to Suppress?

Practice-changingautoimmune hepatitiscirrhosisliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider a time-limited trial of immunosuppression in decompensated AIH cirrhosis patients with a narrow therapeutic window, governed by strict 'stop rules' (specifics not provided in abstract) and immediate LT evaluation for non-responders or high-risk patients.
What it foundClinical 'recompensation' with immunosuppression is achievable in 19%-31% of decompensated AIH cirrhosis cases, less frequent than in other etiologies, with early bilirubin and MELD-Na changes at weeks 1 and 4 predicting response.
ContextChallenges the 'one-size-fits-all' approach, proposing a risk-stratified framework balancing immunosuppression benefits (recompensation) against risks (infection, delayed LT). Prior practice lacked clear criteria for patient selection or response assessment.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), 'EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis,' Journal of Hepatology, 2025 (vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 453-501)

Decision at stakewhether to initiate immunosuppression in decompensated AIH cirrhosis

Azathioprine is added only when bilirubin is <6 mg/dL and ideally 2 weeks after corticosteroid start (to avoid confusing non-response with azathioprine toxicity), at an initial dose of 50 mg/day titrated to a final dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day according to toxicity and response; azathioprine must never be used alone as induction; before starting azathioprine, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity should ideally be tested to exclude COMPLETE (absent) TPMT activity, in which azathioprine is CONTRAINDICATED because of the risk of severe, potentially life-threatening myelosuppression, whereas in PARTIAL (intermediate/heterozygous) TPMT deficiency it may be used only with caution and dose reduction; azathioprine should likewise be given cautiously in pregnancy, cytopenias or malignancy, and should be AVOIDED in acute severe AIH and decompensated cirrhosis.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with AIH, first-line induction is predniso(lo)ne of AT LEAST 0.5 mg/kg/day, potentially up to 1 mg/kg/day in more severe and advanced disease, in combination with EITHER azathioprine OR mycophenolate mofetil (LoE 2, strong recommendation; 82% agreement). Azathioprine is added only when bilirubin is <6 mg/dL and ideally 2 weeks after corticosteroid start (to avoid confusing non-response with azathioprine toxicity), at an initial dose of 50 mg/day titrated to a final dose of 1-2 mg/kg/day according to toxicity and response; azathioprine must never be used alone as induction; before starting azathioprine, thiopurine methyltransferase (TPMT) activity should ideally be tested to exclude COMPLETE (absent) TPMT activity, in which azathioprine is CONTRAINDICATED because of the risk of severe, potentially life-threatening myelosuppression, whereas in PARTIAL (intermediate/heterozygous) TPMT deficiency it may be used only with caution and dose reduction; azathioprine should likewise be given cautiously in pregnancy, cytopenias or malignancy, and should be AVOIDED in acute severe AIH and decompensated cirrhosis. Mycophenolate mofetil is dosed 1.5-2 g/day (0.75-1.0 g twice daily) and is positioned by EASL as an alternative first-line option to azathioprine; the CAMARO RCT found MMF superior to azathioprine in treatment-naive patients (CBR at 6 months 72.2% vs 32.3%, p=0.004) with fewer severe adverse events (0% vs 12.9%) and less withdrawal (5.1% vs 25.8%). MMF is teratogenic and counselling of both female and male patients is recommended (LoE 2, strong); it must be withdrawn at least 3 months before conception, and first presentations during pregnancy are treated with standard regimens EXCLUDING MMF. Induction therapy and corticosteroid tapering should be individualised according to CBR status (LoE 4, strong). Budesonide is NOT recommended as part of first-line treatment for AIH and is CONTRAINDICATED in patients with cirrhosis (LoE 2, strong; 82%), but it retains a defined second-line role: switching to budesonide may be suggested because of corticosteroid side effects in patients WITHOUT cirrhosis who are predniso(lo)ne-dependent (LoE 3, WEAK recommendation; 91%). Maintenance after CBR should consist of azathioprine or MMF as monotherapy OR in combination with low-dose corticosteroids (predniso(lo)ne ≤5 mg/day), with the dose adapted to sustain stable CBR (LoE 2, strong); low-dose predniso(lo)ne monotherapy can be suggested ONLY in patients with mild disease who achieved CBR and are intolerant to both azathioprine and MMF (LoE 3, weak). Most patients require long-term, often lifelong immunosuppression, and a trial of stopping is appropriate only in carefully selected patients whose low-dose monotherapy has maintained stable CBR for at least 2 years. For ACUTE SEVERE AIH the guideline stratifies by liver failure: in acute severe AIH WITHOUT ALF or ACLF, an early treatment trial with predniso(lo)ne 0.5-1 mg/kg/day (or intravenous methylprednisolone at equivalent dose) is recommended, and failure to improve after 3-7 days of treatment initiation should trigger REFERRAL TO A LIVER TRANSPLANT CENTRE (LoE 3, strong; 91%); in acute severe AIH WITH ALF or ACLF, direct evaluation (discussion with a transplant centre) for liver transplantation is recommended, because data on the role of corticosteroids in these patients is very limited and outcomes are poor (LoE 3, strong; 97%), and if corticosteroids are given, strict surveillance for infection and close monitoring of efficacy is recommended.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), 'EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of autoimmune hepatitis,' Journal of Hepatology, 2025 (vol. 83, no. 2, pp. 453-501) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Passos PRC … Cançado GGL · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=1,464 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Baseline DCP May Modify Response to Atezolizumab-Bevacizumab Versus Durvalumab-Tremelimumab in Unresectable HCC.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider measuring baseline DCP in unresectable HCC to guide immunotherapy selection: Atez/Bev may be preferred at lower DCP levels, while Dur/Tre gains relative benefit as DCP rises. Interpret DCP as a continuum rather than a strict cutoff.
What it foundAtezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atez/Bev) had a stable ORR across DCP levels, while durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur/Tre) showed increasing ORR with higher DCP, with a prespecified 10% ΔORR threshold considered clinically meaningful. However, the DCP level at which ΔORR exceeded 10% varied across analyses, supporting a transition zone rather than a fixed cutoff.
ContextCurrent practice lacks biomarkers to choose between first-line immunotherapies for unresectable HCC. This study identifies DCP as a potential modifier of response, refining rather than replacing existing options.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakechoosing first-line systemic therapy for advanced HCC with preserved liver function

Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tanaka K … Real‐life Practice Experts for HCC (RELPEC) Study Group and hepatocellular carcinoma experts from 48 clinics in Japan (HCC 48) Group · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=289 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Enhanced Liver Fibrosis Test, FIB-4 and FibroScan: Real-World Prognostic Accuracy for MASLD in a Biopsy-Controlled Cohort.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider using the ELF test alongside or as an alternative to LSM and biopsy for prognostic stratification in MASLD patients without decompensated cirrhosis, particularly to identify high-risk patients (ELF ≥11.3), acknowledging wide confidence intervals due to limited events.
What it foundELF test stratified LRE risk into low (1% for ELF <9.8), intermediate (27.8% for ELF ≥9.8 to <11.3), and high (72.7% for ELF ≥11.3) categories over 64 months.
ContextConfirms ELF's prognostic accuracy matches histology and LSM in MASLD, offering a non-invasive alternative to biopsy for risk stratification.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakestratifying MASLD patients by fibrosis severity for HCC risk

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Liguori A … Miele L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=5,465 · Aug 4, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Validation of Liver Cirrhosis Network Criteria for Compensated Cirrhosis Through Natural Language Processing for Predicting Liver-Related Events.

New evidencecirrhosisartificial intelligencebiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider using LCN criteria (FIB-4, platelet counts, etc.) to stratify risk in patients with ICD-coded cirrhosis, as it predicts a 44% higher likelihood of LREs, though feasibility in clinical practice requires further validation.
What it foundMeeting the Liver Cirrhosis Network (LCN) criteria (FIB-4, platelet counts, etc.) increased the probability of a liver-related event (LRE; ascites, SBP, hepatic encephalopathy, HCC, or variceal bleed) by 44% in multivariable analysis versus patients not meeting these criteria, with each additional LCN component increasing LRE risk by 43%.
ContextRefines risk stratification in compensated cirrhosis: LCN criteria, previously consensus-based, now validated as predictive of LREs in a large VA cohort.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakerisk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease with non-invasive tests

Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Silvey S … Bajaj JS · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=917 · Jul 29, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Clinical Trial: Phase 3 Trial of Resmetirom Versus Placebo in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis-Reanalysis of Fibrosis Stage 2-3 Subset.

New therapyMASLD
Clinical takeawayConsider resmetirom (80-100 mg daily) for MASH patients with F2-F3 fibrosis, given its efficacy in improving histology and LDL cholesterol, with no new safety signals.
What it foundResmetirom 80 mg and 100 mg achieved MASH resolution in 25.7% and 29.9% of F2-F3 fibrosis patients vs 9.5% with placebo, and fibrosis improvement in 26.5% and 28.9% vs 17.3% with placebo at 52 weeks.
ContextConfirms resmetirom's benefit in the F2-F3 fibrosis subgroup, aligning with its approved label and prior MAESTRO-NASH trial results.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeusing resmetirom for adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests or biopsy

For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Mironova M … Loomba R · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=917,345 · Jul 30, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Trends, Burden, and Impact of Infections on Outcomes Among Patients With Alcohol-Associated Hepatitis: A Nationwide Analysis.

New evidenceepidemiologyalcohol-associated liver disease
Clinical takeawayMonitor adult inpatients with AH closely for common infections (UTIs, pneumonia, SSTIs) and implement standard infection prevention and management protocols to mitigate complications like sepsis, AKI, and shock.
What it foundAmong adult inpatients with alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), 20.3% developed infections, with higher odds of in-hospital mortality (aOR 1.84), sepsis (aOR 1.87), AKI (aOR 1.78), shock (aOR 2.54), ICU admission (aOR 2.52), and thrombotic events (aOR 2.02-2.39) compared to AH patients without infections.
ContextConfirms prior evidence linking infections to worse outcomes in adult inpatients with AH, quantifying the increased risk across multiple complications compared to AH patients without infections.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney International 2024;105(4S):S117-S314, Chapter 4, 'Medication management and drug stewardship in CKD' (with Recommendation 3.16.1 / Practice Points 3.16.2-3.16.3 on anticoagulation and Practice Point 3.14.3 on acute gout).

Decision at stakethe need for early identification and management of infections in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Dose and select GI/hepatology drugs by GFR, and treat imaging contrast as a procedure-specific decision rather than a contraindication. KDIGO 2024 Chapter 4 gives practice points, not graded recommendations. Nephrotoxin stewardship (PP 4.1.1-4.1.3): people with CKD may be more susceptible to nephrotoxic effects, always weigh benefits versus potential harms before prescribing; monitor eGFR, electrolytes and drug levels in those on medications with narrow therapeutic windows, potential adverse effects or nephrotoxicity; review and limit OTC medicines and dietary/herbal remedies. The guideline names two GI-relevant nephrotoxins in Table 31: NSAIDs (reduced prostaglandin-dependent kidney blood flow, acute interstitial nephritis, nephrotic syndrome; alternative = acetaminophen) and proton pump inhibitors (AKI and CKD via tubulointerstitial/acute interstitial nephritis; alternative = H2-receptor antagonists). On NSAIDs the guideline is deliberately conditional, not prohibitive: indiscriminate chronic OTC NSAID use is associated with higher risk of kidney failure and should be discouraged, but 'judicious NSAID use, under careful supervision of a nephrologist, may be preferred to other pain medications such as opioids.' For acute gout specifically (PP 3.14.3), low-dose colchicine or intra-articular/oral glucocorticoids are preferable to NSAIDs (colchicine dose adjustment considered at CKD G5; e.g. prednisolone 30 mg orally for 3-5 days as an alternative). Dosing (PP 4.2.1-4.2.5): consider GFR for renally cleared drugs; validated eGFRcr equations suffice for most drug dosing; use creatinine+cystatin C or measured GFR where more accuracy is needed (narrow therapeutic range, drug toxicity, unreliable eGFRcr); use non-BSA-indexed eGFR at extremes of body weight; adapt dosing when GFR or volume of distribution is not at steady state. Stewardship (PP 4.3.1-4.3.3): perform medication review periodically and at transitions of care; consider planned discontinuation of metformin, ACEi, ARBs and SGLT2i 48-72 hours before elective surgery, but note that failure to restart is itself a source of harm, so a clear documented restart plan must be communicated (PP 4.3.2). Anticoagulation (Rec 3.16.1, 1C): NOACs are recommended in preference to vitamin K antagonists for thromboprophylaxis in atrial fibrillation in CKD G1-G4; NOAC dose adjustment for GFR is required, with caution at G4-G5 (PP 3.16.2); duration of pre-procedure NOAC hold depends on procedural bleeding risk, the specific NOAC, and GFR (PP 3.16.3, Figure 44). Imaging (PP 4.4.1): image on general-population indications, with individualized risk/benefit, the guideline explicitly warns against harm from delayed, omitted or suboptimal imaging driven by fear of contrast. Iodinated contrast: assess AKI risk with validated tools for intra-arterial cardiac procedures (PP 4.4.1.1); manage intravenous contrast per radiology-society consensus statements in people with AKI or GFR <60 (CKD G3a-G5) undergoing elective investigation (PP 4.4.1.2), which the Work Group summarizes as, use low- or iso-osmolar media at the minimum diagnostic dose; withdraw nonessential potentially nephrotoxic medications (NSAIDs, diuretics, aminoglycosides, amphotericin, platins, zoledronate, methotrexate) in people with AKI or eGFR <30 for 24-48 hours before and 48 hours after contrast; at eGFR >30 without AKI metformin need not be stopped and no post-procedure GFR testing is needed, whereas with AKI or eGFR ≤30 metformin should be stopped at or before injection and not restarted for at least 48 hours and only if GFR is stable and use has been reassessed; consider withholding RAASi ≥48 hours before elective contrast-enhanced CT in at-risk people; avoid dehydration in non-dialysis people with eGFR <30 or AKI receiving IV contrast; N-acetylcysteine, ascorbic acid, furosemide, dopamine, fenoldopam and calcium channel blockers have not shown consistent benefit, and prophylactic peri-contrast hemodialysis is potentially harmful and is not recommended. Gadolinium (PP 4.4.2.1): for GFR <30 (CKD G4-G5) requiring gadolinium, preferentially offer ACR group II and III agents, greatest NSF risk is in AKI, KRT and CKD G4-G5, most unconfounded cases involved group I agents, and no case has been reported since 2012.

Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO) CKD Work Group. KDIGO 2024 Clinical Practice Guideline for the Evaluation and Management of Chronic Kidney Disease. Kidney International 2024;105(4S):S117-S314, Chapter 4, 'Medication management and drug stewardship in CKD' (with Recommendation 3.16.1 / Practice Points 3.16.2-3.16.3 on anticoagulation and Practice Point 3.14.3 on acute gout). · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Singh C … Roytman M · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=156 · Aug 4, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Nucleos(t)ide withdrawal vs Nucleos(t)ide withdrawal with adjuvant pegylated-interferon in HBeAg-negative hepatitis B virus infection (NUC-B Trial).

New therapyviral hepatitisbasic sciencebiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayConsider adjuvant PEG-IFNα (180μg weekly for 16 weeks starting 4 weeks post-NA withdrawal) in non-cirrhotic HBeAg-negative CHB patients seeking finite therapy, as it significantly improves HBsAg loss rates (14% vs 3%) and reduces flare risk (13.4% vs 27.9%) compared to NA withdrawal alone, though absolute rates remain modest.
What it foundAdjuvant PEG-IFNα after NA withdrawal increased HBsAg loss to 14% vs 3% (OR 5.39, 95% CI 1.11-26.19) and reduced exaggerated flares to 13.4% vs 27.9% at 3 years.
ContextChallenges current practice of NA withdrawal alone (3% HBsAg loss) by showing PEG-IFNα adjuvant therapy quadruples HBsAg loss rates (14%) with fewer flares, though absolute rates remain modest. Study limited by under-recruitment (156/240 target).
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakewhether to use adjuvant pegylated interferon after nucleos(t)ide withdrawal in HBeAg negative CHB

(5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Thursz M … NUC-B Study Group · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=170 · Aug 3, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Weight reduction-dependent/-independent effects of survodutide on liver endpoints: Mediation analysis of a phase 2 trial in MASH.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn phase 2 trials, survodutide showed potential for direct liver benefits beyond weight loss in MASH patients with fibrosis F2-F3, but further clinical validation is needed before clinical use.
What it foundSurvodutide's effect on MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening was 66.7% weight-dependent, but fibrosis improvement without MASH worsening was 36.3% weight-independent, compared to placebo.
ContextChallenges the assumption that MASH therapies act solely via weight loss; suggests direct glucagon agonism contributes to fibrosis improvement.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, "6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026," Diabetes Care 2026;49(Supplement_1):S132-S149

Decision at stakethe role of weight reduction-independent mechanisms in treating MASH

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Manage diabetes in GI/hepatology patients by individualizing the A1c target to the population, in cirrhosis, A1c is unreliable because altered red blood cell turnover typically underestimates glycemia, so set glycemic goals using blood glucose monitoring and/or CGM rather than a fixed A1c cutoff, and in diabetic gastroparesis individualize the target rather than applying a universal cutoff; ≤7% pre-bariatric, <6.5% pre-conception, while screening all T2DM for MASLD with FIB-4, screening T1DM for concurrent celiac disease, and screening for diabetic gastroparesis when chronic nausea, early satiety, or postprandial fullness are present. Evaluate new-onset DM after age 50 without obesity for a pancreatic cancer differential, and coordinate peri-procedural medication holds and multidisciplinary endocrinology involvement.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, "6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026," Diabetes Care 2026;49(Supplement_1):S132-S149 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Noureddin M … Younes R · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=567 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Preoperative MRI Intratumoral Heterogeneity Radiomics for Microvascular Invasion and Recurrence-Free Survival in HCC.

Diagnostichepatocellular carcinomaartificial intelligencebiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: this preoperative MRI radiomics model requires prospective validation before routine adoption for MVI prediction or recurrence risk stratification in HCC patients.
What it foundA radiomics model integrating MRI intratumoral heterogeneity and clinical variables predicted microvascular invasion (MVI) with AUC 0.924 (validation set) and 0.895 (external test set) and stratified recurrence-free survival with higher discrimination (C-index 0.766) than BCLC, CNLC, or AJCC staging (all p < 0.001).
ContextChallenges current reliance on post-resection pathology for MVI assessment and morphology-based staging for recurrence risk, offering a noninvasive preoperative alternative with superior discrimination in a retrospective multicenter study.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Liu R … Zhuo L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=35 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Neurofilament Light Chain in Cerebrospinal Fluid and Blood Identifies Patients With Minimal and Overt Hepatic Encephalopathy.

Diagnostichepatic encephalopathybiomarkerbasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayConsider serum NfL as a potential minimally invasive biomarker for detecting and monitoring MHE and overt HE in patients with cirrhosis, pending further validation and clinical trials.
What it foundSerum NfL discriminated MHE and overt HE from unimpaired patients and healthy controls with AUROCs of 0.930-0.951.
ContextSerum NfL shows promise as a simpler alternative to PHES for diagnosing MHE, though further validation is needed to confirm its clinical utility.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy," 2022

Decision at stakediagnosing minimal and overt hepatic encephalopathy

In adults with cirrhosis, diagnose hepatic encephalopathy (HE) clinically: an alteration in mental status graded by the West Haven criteria (minimal + grade 1 = covert; grades 2-4 = overt, e.g. disorientation, asterixis, somnolence to coma) in a patient with liver disease/portosystemic shunting, made only after excluding other causes of altered mentation (structural, infectious, metabolic, toxic).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with cirrhosis, diagnose hepatic encephalopathy (HE) clinically: an alteration in mental status graded by the West Haven criteria (minimal + grade 1 = covert; grades 2-4 = overt, e.g. disorientation, asterixis, somnolence to coma) in a patient with liver disease/portosystemic shunting, made only after excluding other causes of altered mentation (structural, infectious, metabolic, toxic). Use the operational classification (type, time course [episodic/recurrent/persistent], and precipitated vs spontaneous). Measure blood ammonia primarily as a RULE-OUT test: a NORMAL ammonia level questions the diagnosis of HE (high negative predictive value), but ammonia does NOT add diagnostic, staging or prognostic value in a patient with known HE and should not be used to grade HE or to titrate therapy; sample and handle it correctly (prompt, on ice). In every patient with overt HE, actively search for and treat a precipitating factor, infection, GI bleeding, dehydration/diuretic overuse, electrolyte disturbance, constipation, sedatives/psychoactive drugs. Treat an episode of overt HE with a non-absorbable disaccharide (lactulose) titrated to 2-3 soft bowel movements per day (oral, or by enema in grade 3-4 to avoid aspiration); polyethylene glycol may be substituted for a lactulose enema in patients with persistent constipation, sub-ileus, or intolerance to lactulose, and although small single-centre trials suggest more rapid resolution of HE, the evidence is limited and whether it should replace or be combined with lactulose is unclear, so it is not an established faster-acting alternative or adjunct. After a first episode of overt HE, give lactulose as secondary prophylaxis (titrated to 2-3 BM/day); add rifaximin 550 mg twice daily as an ADJUNCT to lactulose only after >=1 further episode of overt HE occurs within 6 months of the first (or continue rifaximin already in use). Do not restrict dietary protein: target the general cirrhosis nutrition goals (protein 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day, energy ~35 kcal/kg/day) with meals distributed across the day and a late-evening snack; in recurrent/persistent HE, substitution of animal protein with vegetable and dairy protein can be considered provided total protein intake is not compromised. For HE refractory to lactulose + rifaximin, reconsider the diagnosis and re-search for a missed precipitant or a large spontaneous portosystemic shunt; obliteration of an accessible portosystemic shunt can be considered in stable patients with preserved liver function (MELD <11), and post-TIPS HE refractory to medical therapy may warrant TIPS reduction/occlusion. Evaluate for liver transplantation in eligible patients, refer for transplant assessment in patients with recurrent/persistent HE (and hepatic myelopathy as soon as possible), recognizing that a first episode of overt HE already carries a poor prognosis.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy," 2022 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Jonasson E … Lauridsen MM · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=10,856 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Hepatic and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Primary Biliary Cholangitis With Metabolic-Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

New evidencePBCMASLDepidemiology
Clinical takeawayprioritize cardiovascular risk assessment and management in patients with PBC and MASLD, while maintaining standard liver surveillance
What it foundPBC patients with MASLD had a 30% higher risk of MACE (HR 1.30; 95% CI 1.14-1.48) but lower all-cause mortality (HR 0.60; 95% CI 0.54-0.67) and hepatic decompensation (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.71-0.93) over 4 years.
ContextChallenges prior assumptions that MASLD worsens liver outcomes in PBC, highlighting a distinct metabolic phenotype with increased cardiovascular risk and paradoxically better liver outcomes.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe management of cardiovascular risk in patients with PBC and MASLD

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tan JJ … Wong YJ · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Noninvasive Screening for High-Risk Esophageal Varices in Cirrhosis: Current and Emerging Methods.

Guideline / reviewcirrhosisportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayConsider using validated noninvasive risk stratification tools (e.g., Baveno criteria, EVendo score) to select cirrhotic patients with cACLD for endoscopic screening for HREV, rather than universal endoscopy.
What it foundthis paper reviews and supports existing non-invasive methods like the Baveno criteria and introduces emerging tools like the EVendo score
ContextChallenges the historical standard of universal endoscopic screening for HREV in cirrhosis, aligning with current guidelines advocating for tailored screening based on noninvasive risk assessment in cACLD.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakeusing non-invasive methods to risk-stratify patients with cirrhosis for high-risk esophageal varices

Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Markarian E … Tabibian JH · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=63 · Jul 30, 2026 · J Gastroenterology · IF 5.7

Real-world efficacy and safety of avatrombopag in Japanese patients with chronic liver disease and severe thrombocytopenia.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider avatrombopag for Japanese CLD patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) undergoing invasive procedures, particularly in those weighing ≤68 kg (higher response). No adverse events, including portal vein thrombosis, were observed in this study.
What it foundAvatrombopag increased platelets to ≥50,000/μL in 92.5% of Japanese CLD patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) before procedures, and 96.2% avoided platelet transfusions. Platelet-increasing effects did not differ by prior TPO-RA treatment history.
ContextConfirms avatrombopag's efficacy in a real-world Japanese cohort, aligning with prior trials but adding weight-based response data (≤68 kg better). No new safety signals vs. known TPO-RA risks.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association, 'AGA Clinical Practice Update on Surgical Risk Assessment and Perioperative Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review' (Northup PG et al., Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17(4):595-606). DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043, PMID 30273751.

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Determine GI surgical clearance based on the specific condition and its activity rather than an automatic sign-off: most stable chronic GI conditions (GERD, IBS, controlled IBD, compensated MASLD, asymptomatic gallstones) may be cleared, while active conditions, cirrhosis, and perioperative drug management require explicit stratification and documentation. For any cirrhotic patient, perform mandatory risk stratification with VOCAL-Penn and Child-Pugh class before clearance; manage variceal prophylaxis per individualized endoscopic and hemodynamic assessment (including NSBB for appropriate candidates) and address rebalanced hemostasis without prophylactic INR correction. Defer elective surgery for active GI bleeding, active IBD flare, recent pancreatitis, or unoptimized anemia, and specify perioperative precautions (stress-dose steroids, biologic hold matrix, GLP-1/SGLT2 holds, aspiration precautions) where indicated.

American Gastroenterological Association, 'AGA Clinical Practice Update on Surgical Risk Assessment and Perioperative Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review' (Northup PG et al., Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17(4):595-606). DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043, PMID 30273751. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Otsuka Y … Liver Investigators in Northern Kanto Study (LINKS) Group · Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 5.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Emerging Immune-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Basic sciencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic review of HCC immunotherapy, focusing on immune landscape complexities and emerging therapies.
What it foundImmune checkpoint inhibitors show durable responses in only a subset of HCC patients, influenced by disease aetiology and tumour microenvironment-mediated immune suppression.
ContextRefines understanding of why HCC immunotherapy efficacy varies, emphasizing the role of chronic liver diseases and tumour microenvironment in immune suppression.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393

Decision at stakethe role of immunotherapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) management

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

For suspected ICI colitis, exclude infectious causes of diarrhea (including C. difficile) before treating. In grade 2 or higher colitis/diarrhea, early stool inflammatory markers (lactoferrin, calprotectin) may help stratify patients for endoscopy, and endoscopic confirmation of the diagnosis and severity should be considered before starting high-dose systemic glucocorticoids; abdominal imaging is reserved for dominant pain, fever, or bleeding and should not be done routinely for diarrhea alone. The AGA cautions that no validated severity index for ICI colitis exists and that symptoms correlate poorly with endoscopic, radiologic, and treatment-response severity, and that rapid progression over days can occur, particularly with ipilimumab. ICI colitis typically responds to high-dose systemic glucocorticoids at 0.5-2 mg/kg prednisone-equivalent daily tapered over 4-6 weeks (the AGA explicitly notes these doses and schedules have not been rigorously examined). If there is no improvement after 2-3 days, add infliximab or vedolizumab while continuing glucocorticoids; both are reasonable options for glucocorticoid-refractory colitis. Budesonide is ineffective as prophylaxis and is not a standard treatment for ICI colitis, it is reserved for ICI-associated microscopic colitis. Retreatment with immunotherapy is possible under select conditions. For hepatitis, obtain baseline liver chemistries (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT) and HBV serologies before ICI; grade by CTCAE and manage as follows: grade 1 (AST/ALT 1-3x ULN or bilirubin 1-1.5x ULN), monitor liver chemistries 1-2 times weekly; grade 2 (AST/ALT >3-5x ULN or bilirubin >1.5-3x ULN), hold ICI until resolution to grade 1, and if symptomatic give prednisone 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 3 (AST/ALT >5-20x ULN or bilirubin >3-10x ULN), discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 4 (AST/ALT >20x ULN or bilirubin >10x ULN or hepatic decompensation), permanently discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/d. For ICI hepatitis that does not adequately improve after 3-5 days of high-dose glucocorticoids, escalate to a second-line immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil (with azathioprine as an accepted alternative), while continuing glucocorticoids; infliximab is not recommended for ICI hepatitis because of its potential for hepatotoxicity. Evaluate all ICI-related liver-chemistry elevations for alternate etiologies (consider liver biopsy), and obtain biliary imaging when alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin are elevated.

American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Kah J … Lueth S · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=1,393 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

High Rates of Advanced Chronic Liver Disease in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis D Virus Infection in Uzbekistan.

New evidenceviral hepatitiscirrhosisepidemiology
Clinical takeawayScreen all HBsAg-positive patients in Uzbekistan for HDV coinfection due to high prevalence and severe liver disease risk. No clinical action yet: this is a retrospective cohort study highlighting an unmet need.
What it foundHDV coinfection was more prevalent than HBV monoinfection (73.9% vs 26.1%) and associated with higher cirrhosis rates (78.4% vs 43.9%, p < 0.001), with 57.8% of HDV patients classified as Child-Pugh B.
ContextConfirms prior reports of high HDV prevalence in Uzbekistan and establishes its strong association with advanced liver disease, contrasting with HBV monoinfection in a specific population.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe need for improved access to HDV-directed therapy and HCC surveillance in HDV-coinfected patients

(6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Khodjaeva ME … Sandmann L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=115,971 · Jul 29, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Proteomic resolution of the MASLD cardiometabolic spectrum identifies sex-driven endotypes and predicts systemic mortality.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a proteomic score derived from a large cohort study, not yet validated for clinical use in individual patients.
What it foundA four-protein score (PS4) significantly outperformed established non-invasive scores in predicting all-cause mortality in MASLD patients, accounting for 10-20% of the effect of phenotypic class on mortality.
ContextChallenges current liver-centric prognostic models by identifying systemic proteomic markers linked to mortality in MASLD, highlighting sex-driven differences in disease severity.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674.

Decision at stakeidentifying high-risk MASLD subgroups for mortality prediction

Statins are safe and recommended in MASLD/MASH and compensated cirrhosis when indicated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Start per standard CV risk-based criteria with baseline LFTs; routine ALT monitoring on statin is not required and pre-existing transaminitis is not a contraindication. Hold or reduce only for clinically significant ALT elevation, severe muscle symptoms, or decompensated cirrhosis on an individualized basis.

AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Diambra L … Pirola CJ · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=4,607 · Jul 31, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Development and Validation of a Symptom-Based Patient-Reported Outcome Measure for MASH: The CLDQ-MASH Symptom Questionnaire (CLDQ-MASH-SQ).

DiagnosticMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a newly validated symptom questionnaire for MASH, not yet integrated into routine practice. Consider future use in clinical trials or symptom monitoring if externally validated.
What it foundThe 36-item, 8-domain CLDQ-MASH Symptom Questionnaire (CLDQ-MASH SQ) demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha >0.80 for 7/8 domains) and discriminated across histologic disease severity (early fibrosis vs. F2-F3 vs. cirrhosis) and liver stiffness categories (<10 vs. 10-20 vs. >20 kPa).
ContextFirst disease-specific symptom questionnaire for MASH, addressing a gap in patient-reported outcome measures for this population. Confirms symptom burden correlates with disease severity.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeassessing symptom burden in patients with MASH

For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Younossi ZM … Racila A · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=247 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Machine Learning Predicts Treatment Response and Prognostic Pathways From Whole-Blood Transcriptome in Primary Biliary Cholangitis.

Diagnosticartificial intelligencebiomarkerbasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a preclinical biomarker study in PBC requiring validation before clinical use.
What it foundML model predicted OCA response (AUROC 0.93) and disease progression (AUROC 0.94) in PBC using a 105-gene panel from whole-blood transcriptomics.
ContextFirst demonstration of a blood-based transcriptomic signature for PBC prognosis and treatment response, linking pathways (FXR, stress response) to outcomes.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021

Decision at stakepredicting treatment response and disease progression in PBC

Treat with first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) 13-15 mg/kg/d divided, and assess biochemical response at 12 months using Paris-II plus continuous risk scores (Globe, UK-PBC). Escalate to a second-line agent (obeticholic acid [contraindicated in cirrhosis with portal hypertension or prior decompensation], seladelpar, elafibranor, or a fibrate) when response is inadequate, guided by a Child-Pugh/portal-hypertension hard gate, and manage pruritus with a stepwise ladder (cholestyramine → rifampin → sertraline → naltrexone). Refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, refractory pruritus, or rising bilirubin.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Syed H … Mason AL · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=46 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

CD11c(+) T-Bet(+) B Cell Expansion Reveals a Distinct Pathogenic Signature in Autoimmune Liver Diseases.

Basic scienceautoimmune hepatitisPBCbasic sciencebiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in human blood samples identifying distinct immune signatures in AIH and AIH/PBC overlap. Potential therapeutic implications for targeting pathogenic B cell subsets remain investigational.
What it foundCD11c+T-bet+ B cells were significantly expanded in AIH (n=15) and AIH/PBC overlap (n=11) but not in PBC (n=8), with increased cTfh cells and higher IL-21 levels in non-responders.
ContextChallenges the traditional T cell-driven model of autoimmune liver diseases by highlighting B cell alterations, particularly in AIH and AIH/PBC overlap, which may refine disease classification and therapeutic strategies.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021

Decision at stakethe potential for targeted B-cell therapies in autoimmune liver diseases

Treat with first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) 13-15 mg/kg/d divided, and assess biochemical response at 12 months using Paris-II plus continuous risk scores (Globe, UK-PBC). Escalate to a second-line agent (obeticholic acid [contraindicated in cirrhosis with portal hypertension or prior decompensation], seladelpar, elafibranor, or a fibrate) when response is inadequate, guided by a Child-Pugh/portal-hypertension hard gate, and manage pruritus with a stepwise ladder (cholestyramine → rifampin → sertraline → naltrexone). Refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, refractory pruritus, or rising bilirubin.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
D'Orso S … Cardinale V · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=197 · Aug 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

The Association of Free Testosterone Levels With Frailty Metrics in Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

New evidencecirrhosisbiomarkerhepatic encephalopathy
Clinical takeawayConsider assessing FT levels in male AdvCLD patients with frailty (LFI, 6MWT) as a potential contributor. No clinical action yet: association does not establish causality or therapeutic benefit.
What it foundLow free testosterone (FT) levels (OR: 2.4, P=0.043) were independently associated with greater frailty (higher LFI scores, shorter 6MWT distances) in male AdvCLD patients.
ContextConfirms a plausible link between hypogonadism and frailty in AdvCLD, but prior evidence on testosterone replacement in cirrhosis is limited and mixed.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakeassessing frailty in advanced chronic liver disease

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Sogbe M … Duarte-Rojo A · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=94 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Changes in SSM Assessed via 100 Hz-VCTE Are Associated With Acute HVPG-Response to i.v. Propranolol: A European Multicentre Study.

New evidenceportal hypertensionbiomarkeralcohol-associated liver disease
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: SSM-100 Hz changes correlate with HVPG response but lack sufficient accuracy (AUROC 0.717) to replace invasive HVPG measurement in routine practice.
What it foundSSM-100 Hz decreased by -8.7 kPa post-propranolol, with HVPG responders showing a -12.4 kPa drop (p < 0.001), correlating moderately with HVPG changes (Spearman’s ρ: 0.387).
ContextConfirms SSM-100 Hz as a potential surrogate for HVPG changes in ACLD with CSPH but refines its role as insufficiently accurate for clinical use outside trials.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakewhether spleen stiffness measurement can replace HVPG for monitoring acute NSBB response

Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Thöne P … Jachs M · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Drug Development for MASH-Related Compensated Cirrhosis: Past, Present and Future.

New evidencecirrhosisMASLDbiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayMonitor development of fibroblast growth factor 21 analogues for future potential use in compensated MASH-related cirrhosis, recognizing current limitations of available agents.
What it foundFibroblast growth factor 21 analogues show the most encouraging efficacy signals among investigational agents for compensated MASH-related cirrhosis, though most candidates lack clear histological or clinical benefit in completed trials.
ContextHighlights the challenges in treating compensated MASH-related cirrhosis, where most therapies effective in non-cirrhotic MASH show limited efficacy once cirrhosis is established.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Zeng RQ … Feng Q · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=48 · Jul 30, 2026 · J Gastroenterology · IF 5.7

Tofogliflozin alters amino acid metabolism in gut microbiota linked to hepatic transcriptomic signatures in MASLD.

Basic sciencemicrobiomebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding linking microbial metabolism to liver fibrosis in MASLD. Further human studies are needed to confirm therapeutic potential.
What it foundSGLT2i tofogliflozin increased phenylalanine biosynthesis pathways, which were inversely associated with liver fibrosis in MASLD.
ContextThis refines understanding of gut-liver interactions in MASLD, suggesting microbial amino acid metabolism as a potential therapeutic target beyond traditional approaches.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe role of gut microbiota modulation in MASLD treatment

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Yasuda K … Yamashita T · Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 5.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=830 · Jul 29, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Measuring Perceived Goal Concordant Care Among Patients with Advanced Chronic Liver Diseases and their Caregivers.

New evidencehealth services
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a psychometric validation study of a new instrument. Consider future use if adopted in guidelines for assessing goal-concordant care in CLD, but the instrument is not yet ready for clinical use.
What it foundA novel dyadic instrument (7-item Goals of Care Conversations scale and 4-item Care Concordant with Preferences scale) showed acceptable fit (CFI 0.95-0.99, RMSEA 0.06-0.18) and internal consistency (α=0.79-0.85) for measuring perceived goal-concordant care in advanced CLD patients and caregivers.
ContextFirst validated instrument to measure perceived goal-concordant care in advanced CLD, addressing a gap in patient-centered outcome measures for this population.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Rogal SS, Hansen L, Patel A, et al. 'AASLD Practice Guidance: Palliative care and symptom-based management in decompensated cirrhosis.' Hepatology. 2022;76(3):819-853. doi:10.1002/hep.32378

Decision at stakeincorporating patient and caregiver goals into pain management decisions in advanced chronic liver disease

Opioids should be avoided when possible for chronic pain; when necessary, opioid use should be approached with caution and with careful discussion with patients and caregivers, and low-dose oxycodone or hydromorphone can be started in select cases on an as-needed basis and titrated to effect, often in consultation with pain-management experts (Statement 32).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with cirrhosis, acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 h, up to a maximum of 2 g/day, is the preferred first-line analgesic (Statement 30), and systemic NSAIDs should be avoided (Statement 31). Opioids should be avoided when possible for chronic pain; when necessary, opioid use should be approached with caution and with careful discussion with patients and caregivers, and low-dose oxycodone or hydromorphone can be started in select cases on an as-needed basis and titrated to effect, often in consultation with pain-management experts (Statement 32). First-line opioids are low-dose, short-acting agents with extended dosing intervals: oxycodone 2.5 mg PO q6-8h PRN or hydromorphone 1 mg PO q6h PRN (hydromorphone 0.4 mg IV); the initial prescription should be a 7-day supply of a low-dose short-acting opioid with close follow-up, and extended-release formulations should be avoided. Codeine, morphine, and tramadol should generally be avoided; because morphine is relatively contraindicated in advanced cirrhosis, clinicians should first consider hydromorphone or oxycodone. Methadone should only be used in consultation with a specialist. IV fentanyl is a preferred opioid because of its favorable metabolism, but the transdermal fentanyl patch is problematic for outpatient use because its lowest available dose (12 µg/h) may be too high for patients with cirrhosis, and cachexia is a relative contraindication to the patch. When an opioid is started, prophylactic medications should be considered proactively to prevent constipation and hepatic encephalopathy (e.g., lactulose).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Rogal SS, Hansen L, Patel A, et al. 'AASLD Practice Guidance: Palliative care and symptom-based management in decompensated cirrhosis.' Hepatology. 2022;76(3):819-853. doi:10.1002/hep.32378 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Verma M … Volk M · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=2,004 · Aug 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Urinary Volatile Organic Compound Metabolites Are Associated With MASLD/MASH in Humans and Induce Steatosis in Liver Organoids.

Basic sciencebiomarkerbasic sciencetranslationalepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in humans and liver organoids. Consider environmental VOC exposure as a potential risk factor for MASLD/MASH, but no specific testing or intervention is currently supported.
What it foundHigher VOC metabolite levels increased MASLD risk (aOR 1.47 per quartile) and at-risk MASH risk (aOR 2.69 per quartile), driven by CEMA and HMPMA.
ContextThis study confirms prior links between VOC exposure and metabolic dysfunction, providing new evidence of associations with MASLD/MASH in a general population cohort.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe role of environmental exposures in MASLD/MASH progression

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
van Kleef LA … Brouwer WP · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №5 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS