← Issue №1/ week of Jun 24, 2026/Motility

Acupuncture versus sham non-acupoint acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

From GI Signals issue №1: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Motility meta analysis · n=1,105 · Jul 7, 2026 · Gastroenterology · IF 25.1

Acupuncture versus sham non-acupoint acupuncture for irritable bowel syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

New evidenceIBSsystematic reviewmeta-analysis
Clinical takeawayAcupuncture may improve IBS symptoms compared to sham, but the high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence limit clinical applicability. Discuss these limitations if patients inquire about acupuncture.
What it foundAcupuncture improved IBS response rate by 61% vs sham (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25-2.07) and reduced symptom severity (SMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.30-1.28) at end of treatment.
ContextThis meta-analysis provides stronger evidence for acupuncture's efficacy in IBS compared to prior inconsistent findings, though heterogeneity and low certainty remain limitations.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021

Decision at stakewhether to recommend acupuncture as a supplemental therapy for IBS

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnosis: use a positive diagnostic strategy based on Rome IV criteria rather than a strategy of exclusion (strong for cost-effectiveness, high quality; consensus for time-to-therapy), and categorize by IBS subtype (consensus). In patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms: check celiac serology (strong, moderate) and, in those WITHOUT alarm features, fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) plus CRP to rule out IBD (strong; moderate quality for CRP/calprotectin, very low for lactoferrin). Recommend AGAINST routine stool testing for enteric pathogens (conditional, low) and AGAINST routine colonoscopy in patients younger than 45 without warning signs (conditional, low). Anorectal physiology testing only when symptoms suggest a pelvic floor disorder and/or for refractory constipation not responding to standard medical therapy (consensus). Treatment, all subtypes: soluble, not insoluble, fiber (strong, moderate); a LIMITED trial of a low-FODMAP diet (conditional, very low); gut-directed psychotherapies for global symptoms (conditional, very low); TCAs for global symptoms (strong, moderate); peppermint suggested (conditional, low); antispasmodics for abdominal pain (conditional, low); AGAINST probiotics (conditional, very low), AGAINST fecal transplant (strong, very low). IBS-C: chloride channel activators (strong, moderate) and guanylate cyclase activators (strong, high); AGAINST PEG products for global IBS-C symptoms (conditional, low); tegaserod reserved for women younger than 65 with ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor who have not adequately responded to secretagogues (strong/conditional, low). IBS-D: rifaximin (strong, moderate); alosetron only for women with severe IBS-D who have failed conventional therapy (conditional, low); mixed opioid agonists/antagonists, i.e. eluxadoline (conditional, moderate); AGAINST bile acid sequestrants (conditional, very low).

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Zheng HZ … Huang XB · Gastroenterology · IF 25.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №1 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues