Top journals this week: BMJ / J Hepatology / Lancet GH / Gastroenterology
Selectivity
6.6%
29 surfaced of 439 screened
surfaced 29held 19filtered out 391
93.4% of what published this week did not make the issue. That filter is the product.
Every paper vs. its guideline standard
No paper this week forces an outright change to the standard. That is the usual, honest result.
Each paper is matched to the guideline that governs its question, then placed by how it moves it. Every card quotes the standard it was measured against, with its source and review date. Click a segment to filter the issue.
The signal map
Study rigor (x) by shift in the standard (y, 1 to 5); dot area = journal impact factor, color = subspecialty. Click a dot to open its card.
Clinical takeawayAcupuncture may improve IBS symptoms compared to sham, but the high heterogeneity and low certainty of evidence limit clinical applicability. Discuss these limitations if patients inquire about acupuncture.
What it foundAcupuncture improved IBS response rate by 61% vs sham (RR 1.61, 95% CI 1.25-2.07) and reduced symptom severity (SMD 0.79, 95% CI 0.30-1.28) at end of treatment.
ContextThis meta-analysis provides stronger evidence for acupuncture's efficacy in IBS compared to prior inconsistent findings, though heterogeneity and low certainty remain limitations.
Today’s standard
Make a positive diagnosis of IBS using Rome IV criteria plus limited testing (CBC, CRP, celiac serology, fecal calprotectin for diarrhea-predominant), reserving colonoscopy for age ≥45, alarm features, or family history.
the full guideline text
Treat all subtypes with education, soluble fiber, a trial of low-FODMAP diet, and CBT/gut-directed hypnotherapy for refractory disease, then layer subtype-specific pharmacotherapy (secretagogues for IBS-C; loperamide, rifaximin, or bile acid sequestrant for IBS-D) and neuromodulators for pain.
New evidencecolorectal cancerepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn two eradication trials, H. pylori treatment was linked to lower CRC risk mainly in genetically high-risk or virulence-factor-positive subgroups, an interesting hypothesis but not yet practice: H. pylori is not a CRC-prevention target, and infected patients should still be offered eradication on standard gastric indications regardless of genetic or virulence status.
What it foundH. pylori-positive individuals not treated with antibiotics had a higher CRC risk (SIT: HR=2.96; MITS: HR=1.27), with the greatest risk in those seropositive for four H. pylori antigens (CagA, HpaA, Omp, HP0305) or in the top decile of Polygenic Risk Score.
ContextConfirms prior observational links between H. pylori and CRC but refines by identifying high-risk subgroups (genetic predisposition, specific virulence factors) where treatment may reduce risk. Challenges the assumption of uniform benefit from H. pylori eradication for CRC prevention.
Today’s standard
Confirm active H.
the full guideline text
pylori infection with urea breath test, monoclonal stool antigen, or endoscopic biopsy (never serology) before treating, and treat all patients with confirmed active infection who meet an indication (PUD, MALT lymphoma, atrophic gastritis/GIM, test-and-treat dyspepsia, unexplained IDA after bidirectional endoscopy, ITP). First-line is a 14-day regimen, bismuth quadruple preferred, or rifabutin triple (Talicia) or vonoprazan-based therapy, while empiric clarithromycin triple is no longer recommended in the US absent documented susceptibility. Mandatory test of cure by UBT or stool antigen confirms eradication after therapy.
ACG 2024 / Maastricht VI Florence 2022 · reviewed 2026-05-01
Clinical takeawayContinue standard UDCA dose (13-15 mg/kg/day) in PBC patients with complete biochemical response; reduction to 5 mg/kg/day is unsafe due to high relapse risk. Consider monitoring 10 mg/kg/day cautiously in select patients (future studies needed). Do not reduce below 10 mg/kg/day in remission.
What it foundIn PBC patients with complete biochemical response (Paris-II criteria), reducing UDCA to 5 mg/kg/day increased 12-month relapse to 19.4% vs 0% on standard dose (13-15 mg/kg/day), while 10 mg/kg/day showed no significant difference (2.9% relapse).
ContextChallenges prior uncertainty about UDCA dose reduction safety in remission; confirms standard dose remains gold standard but introduces 10 mg/kg/day as a potential future option if validated.
Today’s standard
Treat with first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) 13-15 mg/kg/d divided, and assess biochemical response at 12 months using Paris-II plus continuous risk scores (Globe, UK-PBC).
the full guideline text
Escalate to a second-line agent (obeticholic acid, seladelpar, elafibranor, or a fibrate) when response is inadequate, guided by a Child-Pugh/portal-hypertension hard gate, and manage pruritus with a stepwise ladder (cholestyramine → rifampin → sertraline → naltrexone). Refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, refractory pruritus, or rising bilirubin.
AASLD 2025 PBC Practice Guidance (Lindor) + AASLD 2018 PBC + EASL 2017 Cholestatic + APASL 2017 + FDA 2024 approvals (seladelpar Livdelzi Aug + elafibranor Iqirvo Jun) + FDA Drug Safety Communication May 2024 (OCA restriction) · reviewed 2026-05-20
Refinesrelative to this standard
He C … Zhang F · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗
Colorectalprospective cohort · n=46 · Jun 30, 2026
Clinical takeawayThe full LST subtype system has only fair inter-observer reliability (kappa about 0.36) versus moderate (about 0.48) for a simplified granular vs non-granular split, so weight the reproducible split but still document the high-risk nodular-mixed and pseudodepressed features, since guidelines use them to select en-bloc resection or ESD.
What it foundInter-observer agreement for LST classification was poor (κ=0.37 first round, κ=0.36 second round), improving to moderate (κ≈0.48) with a simplified 3-category granular vs non-granular model.
ContextChallenges current reliance on detailed LST subclassification, which lacks standardized reliability despite widespread use in predicting submucosal invasion risk and resection strategy.
Today’s standard
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA, CT colonography, or flexible sigmoidoscopy as Tier 2 alternatives.
the full guideline text
A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
Clinical takeawayIn immunocompetent patients with mild, CT-confirmed uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis who are non-toxic (no SIRS, CRP under 140 mg/L, WBC under 15), tolerating oral intake, and safe for outpatient care, manage without antibiotics; reserve antibiotics for immunocompromise, frailty, significant comorbidity, systemic inflammation, or refractory symptoms.
What it foundComputed tomography imaging is essential for diverticulitis diagnosis, especially at first presentation or in severe cases; colonoscopy post-recovery is recommended for complicated cases and suggested for uncomplicated cases with alarm symptoms or inadequate CRC screening.
ContextRefines prior practice by deprioritizing antibiotics for low-risk uncomplicated cases (supported by RCTs) and clarifying imaging/colonoscopy roles. Challenges historical dietary restrictions (e.g., nuts/seeds). Confirms surgery referral for select recurrent cases.
Today’s standard
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA, CT colonography, or flexible sigmoidoscopy as Tier 2 alternatives.
the full guideline text
A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
New evidencesystematic reviewmeta-analysisepidemiologyCrohn's disease
Clinical takeawayDisability is common in IBD and persists even in remission (about 27 percent), so consider periodically assessing it with a validated tool (IBD Disk or IBD-Disability Index) rather than assuming remission equals full function.
What it foundThe pooled prevalence of moderate-to-severe disability in IBD patients is 29.6%, higher in Crohn disease (36.9%) vs. ulcerative colitis (30.8%) and in active disease (56.9%) vs. inactive disease (27.0%).
ContextThis study confirms the high burden of disability in IBD, particularly in Crohn disease and active disease, and highlights the need for routine disability assessment, which is not yet standard practice.
Today’s standard
Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing and pathogen studies.
the full guideline text
Treat by disease extent and severity: mild-moderate proctitis/left-sided/extensive disease with topical and oral 5-ASA (escalating to budesonide-MMX), and moderate-severe disease with advanced therapy (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, or anti-IL-23p19). Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) reassessment, screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts criteria for inpatient IV-steroid management, and perform CRC surveillance colonoscopy starting 8 years from symptom onset.
AGA 2020 / ACG 2019 / AGA 2024 CPU on positioning · reviewed 2026-04-22
Emergingrelative to this standard
Nardone OM … Barberio B · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayConsider CADe for endoscopists with lower baseline ADR (<54.5%) in surveillance colonoscopy, as it improves detection in this subgroup. For high-performing endoscopists, CADe does not provide additional benefit.
What it foundCADe did not increase overall adenoma detection rate (ADR) in surveillance colonoscopy (57.4% vs 58.8%; aRR 1.02 [95% CI 0.95-1.10]), but improved ADR among lower-performing endoscopists (ADR<54.5%) (45.5% vs 52.1%; aRR 1.15 [95% CI 1.01-1.30]).
ContextThis challenges the assumption that CADe universally improves ADR in surveillance colonoscopy, showing its benefit is limited to lower-performing endoscopists in a high-performing screening program.
Today’s standard
After polyp removal, assign the next colonoscopy surveillance interval using USMSTF 2020 based on polyp number, size, and histology (e.g., low-risk adenomas 7-10 years, intermediate/high-risk adenomas and advanced serrated lesions 3 years, >10 adenomas 1 year with polyposis evaluation), and apply the shortest interval indicated when findings are mixed.
the full guideline text
Confirm complete resection and adequate prep before applying an interval, and use site-check/tumor-board pathways for piecemeal resection and malignant (T1) polyps. Refer for genetic evaluation when Lynch, FAP/AFAP/MAP, or serrated polyposis syndrome criteria are met.
New evidenceulcerative colitistranslationalbiomarkerbasic science
Clinical takeawaySB012, a GATA3-targeting DNAzyme enema, showed an early efficacy signal in a small phase 2a UC trial but is investigational and not clinically available, so no practice change pending larger trials.
What it foundIn glucocorticoid-free patients, SB012 enema (GATA3-targeting DNAzyme) improved Total Mayo Score by -2.2 vs placebo (P=0.027), but no effect was seen with corticosteroids (P=0.004 vs baseline in SB012 group).
ContextChallenges current UC therapies by targeting GATA3, a novel mechanistic approach, but efficacy signal is limited to steroid-naive patients.
Today’s standard
Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing and pathogen studies.
the full guideline text
Treat by disease extent and severity: mild-moderate proctitis/left-sided/extensive disease with topical and oral 5-ASA (escalating to budesonide-MMX), and moderate-severe disease with advanced therapy (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, or anti-IL-23p19). Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) reassessment, screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts criteria for inpatient IV-steroid management, and perform CRC surveillance colonoscopy starting 8 years from symptom onset.
AGA 2020 / ACG 2019 / AGA 2024 CPU on positioning · reviewed 2026-04-22
Emergingrelative to this standard
Atreya R … Neurath MF · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗
New evidenceulcerative colitisbiologicsanti-TNFmeta-analysis
Clinical takeawayA Bayesian meta-analysis suggests intensified infliximab induction may lower early colectomy in acute severe UC, but the only randomized trial (PREDICT-UC 2024) showed no benefit, so intensification remains non-standard and best individualized (e.g. high-clearance or hypoalbuminemic patients) rather than applied routinely.
What it foundIntensified infliximab dosing (10 mg/kg) cut 3-month colectomy rate to 6% vs 27% with standard dosing (5 mg/kg) in acute severe ulcerative colitis.
ContextConfirms and refines prior mixed evidence on intensified dosing efficacy, using Bayesian methods to integrate retrospective and trial data (PREDICT-UC).
Today’s standard
Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing and pathogen studies.
the full guideline text
Treat by disease extent and severity: mild-moderate proctitis/left-sided/extensive disease with topical and oral 5-ASA (escalating to budesonide-MMX), and moderate-severe disease with advanced therapy (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, or anti-IL-23p19). Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) reassessment, screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts criteria for inpatient IV-steroid management, and perform CRC surveillance colonoscopy starting 8 years from symptom onset.
AGA 2020 / ACG 2019 / AGA 2024 CPU on positioning · reviewed 2026-04-22
Refinesrelative to this standard
Goyal MK … Bishu S · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗
New evidenceviral hepatitishealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayPrognostic scores may help identify patients unlikely to benefit from standard adherence support. For elevated-risk patients, alternative strategies are needed as current adherence support did not improve outcomes.
What it foundIn minimal-risk hepatitis C patients, high-intensity adherence support (patient navigation + flexible directly observed therapy) showed a small SVR increase to 68.3% vs. 62.6% with low-intensity support (aRR 1.09, 95% CI: 1.00-1.19; p=0.04), but no benefit was seen in elevated-risk patients (SVR 50.8% vs. 48.4%).
ContextThis trial demonstrates that adherence support effectiveness varies by patient risk profile, but the clinical significance of the minimal-risk group difference is uncertain.
Today’s standard
Confirm active chronic HCV by reflexing a positive anti-HCV to HCV RNA, then assess fibrosis (FIB-4/elastography) and treat essentially all patients with a pan-genotypic DAA regimen, glecaprevir/pibrentasvir (Mavyret) for 8 weeks in treatment-naive patients including compensated F4 cirrhosis, or sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (Epclusa) for 12 weeks.
the full guideline text
For decompensated cirrhosis (Child B/C or any history of decompensation), use Epclusa ± weight-based ribavirin with concurrent transplant evaluation. Cure is defined by SVR12, with lifelong HCC surveillance continued in cirrhotics.
Clinical takeawayEUS-RFA for pancreatic neoplasms remains non-standardized outside insulinoma; indications, antibiotic prophylaxis, power settings, and follow-up vary widely, so it stays investigational pending consensus, with no immediate practice change.
What it foundSurvey reveals high variability in EUS-RFA practices: 94.1% use it for insulinoma, but technique, prophylaxis (57.5% use antibiotics), power settings, and follow-up definitions vary widely.
ContextChallenges prior assumptions of uniform EUS-RFA adoption; confirms widespread procedural heterogeneity in sedation (96.3% use deep/general), risk assessment (97.5% avoid main duct involvement), and success definitions.
Today’s standard
Confirm pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors with multiphasic pancreatic-protocol CT, EUS with FNB for tissue, DOTATATE PET-CT, functional hormone workup, and WHO 2019 grading (Ki-67/mitotic index).
the full guideline text
Surgical resection (enucleation, distal pancreatectomy, or Whipple) is preferred and curative for localized G1/G2 well-differentiated disease, with active surveillance an option for small low-grade non-functional lesions. For metastatic well-differentiated disease, first-line somatostatin analogs (octreotide LAR or lanreotide) are followed by targeted therapy (everolimus, sunitinib), PRRT (177Lu-DOTATATE), or CAPTEM chemotherapy.
NANETS 2020 + NCCN 2024 + ENETS 2023 + WHO 2019 NET classification · reviewed 2026-05-09
Emergingrelative to this standard
Lisotti A … Pham KD · Digestive Endoscopy : Official Journal of the Japan Gastroenterological Endoscopy Society · IF 5.2 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayFor older adults (≥80y) with high-risk T1 CRC, weigh delayed oncologic benefit (10+ years) against immediate surgical risks; consider pathologic risk, frailty, comorbidity, and competing mortality. Avoid routine additional surgery in frail or comorbid patients.
What it foundMeta-analysis shows the survival advantage of additional surgery for T1 CRC in older adults (≥80y) only becomes evident after 10 years, while perioperative morbidity occurs immediately.
ContextRefines prior standard of recommending additional surgery for all high-risk T1 CRC by showing age-specific trade-offs in competing mortality.
Today’s standard
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA, CT colonography, or flexible sigmoidoscopy as Tier 2 alternatives.
the full guideline text
A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
Clinical takeawayUnderwater immersion (U-POEM) may reduce post-procedural pain and opioid requirements vs CO2-POEM in achalasia type I/II, though larger trials are needed before protocol changes
What it foundU-POEM reduced immediate post-procedure pain scores compared to CO2-POEM (mean NPRS 1.6 vs. 3.3), cut moderate-severe pain incidence (16.7% vs. 55.5%), and lowered opioid use (5.5% vs. 50%).
ContextChallenges current standard CO2-POEM by demonstrating improved pain outcomes without compromising efficacy or safety in a randomized multicenter trial.
Today’s standard
Confirm achalasia with high-resolution manometry (absent peristalsis + elevated IRP) and Chicago 4.0 subtyping, and mandatorily rule out pseudoachalasia with EGD/GEJ biopsies (plus CT chest/abdomen if EGD non-diagnostic) before any definitive therapy.
the full guideline text
Offer subtype-matched definitive treatment, pneumatic dilation, laparoscopic Heller myotomy with partial fundoplication, or POEM, with POEM preferred for Type III; reserve botulinum toxin injection and pharmacologic agents for surgically unfit or bridge use. After treatment, monitor response with Eckardt score and timed barium, manage post-POEM reflux with lifelong PPI plus Barrett's surveillance, and consider esophageal SCC surveillance EGD after 10 years of disease.
Clinical takeawayUse ECCO UC therapeutics for the European perspective, but reconcile positioning against US ACG and AGA guidance and FDA safety labeling (notably the JAK-inhibitor boxed warning: age 50 or older with a cardiovascular risk factor, use after anti-TNF failure) before applying.
What it foundThe abstract does not report specific key results or effect sizes, as it is a guideline review rather than a study with new data.
ContextThis updates prior ECCO guidelines, reflecting new evidence and consensus on UC therapeutics since the last version.
Today’s standard
Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing and pathogen studies.
the full guideline text
Treat by disease extent and severity: mild-moderate proctitis/left-sided/extensive disease with topical and oral 5-ASA (escalating to budesonide-MMX), and moderate-severe disease with advanced therapy (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, or anti-IL-23p19). Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) reassessment, screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts criteria for inpatient IV-steroid management, and perform CRC surveillance colonoscopy starting 8 years from symptom onset.
AGA 2020 / ACG 2019 / AGA 2024 CPU on positioning · reviewed 2026-04-22
Reinforcesrelative to this standard
Gisbert JP … Kucharzik T · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · IF 8.3 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayDurvalumab added to gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is already standard first-line care for advanced biliary tract cancer (TOPAZ-1); TOURMALINE supports its safety and efficacy across a broader range of gemcitabine-based regimens rather than establishing a new, unadopted therapy.
What it foundDurvalumab plus gemcitabine-based chemotherapy regimens showed manageable safety (50.7% Grade 3/4 PRAEs) and efficacy (median OS 13.50 months, ORR 33.1%) in advanced biliary tract cancer.
ContextThis study expands on TOPAZ-1 by evaluating durvalumab with seven gemcitabine-based regimens, confirming its feasibility and efficacy in a broader, real-world population with advanced biliary tract cancer.
Today’s standard
Distinguish benign from malignant biliary strictures with MRCP, RUQ ultrasound, IgG4 serology, and CA 19-9 interpreted after biliary decompression, then work up indeterminate strictures sequentially (ERCP brush cytology → cholangioscopy with directed biopsy → FISH → EUS-FNA if extrinsic mass), escalating any positive feature to a multidisciplinary tumor board.
the full guideline text
Manage benign anastomotic and chronic-pancreatitis strictures with a fully-covered self-expanding metal stent for 6-12 months (multiple plastic stents when FCSEMS is contraindicated, hepaticojejunostomy if refractory), and treat cholangitis with an obstructed segment as a drainage emergency since every obstructed sector requires decompression. Direct etiology-specific care for Strasberg bile-duct injuries, post-transplant strictures, IgG4-sclerosing cholangitis, Mirizzi syndrome, and choledochal cysts.
Clinical takeawayNo need to prefer dye over virtual chromoendoscopy for dysplasia detection in IBD surveillance, as both methods perform similarly. Choose based on availability, cost, or operator preference.
What it foundNo significant difference in dysplasia detection odds between dye chromoendoscopy and virtual chromoendoscopy in IBD patients (meta-analysis of 8 RCTs).
ContextConfirms prior evidence that virtual chromoendoscopy is non-inferior to dye chromoendoscopy for dysplasia detection, simplifying IBD surveillance strategies.
Today’s standard
Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing and pathogen studies.
the full guideline text
Treat by disease extent and severity: mild-moderate proctitis/left-sided/extensive disease with topical and oral 5-ASA (escalating to budesonide-MMX), and moderate-severe disease with advanced therapy (anti-TNF, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, JAK inhibitors, S1P modulators, or anti-IL-23p19). Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) reassessment, screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts criteria for inpatient IV-steroid management, and perform CRC surveillance colonoscopy starting 8 years from symptom onset.
AGA 2020 / ACG 2019 / AGA 2024 CPU on positioning · reviewed 2026-04-22
Reinforcesrelative to this standard
Mohamed MFH … Shah SA · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayBe aware that DH prevalence in CD is ~6.8% overall (higher in adults, lower in children), but no change to current diagnostic practice is recommended.
What it foundPooled prevalence of dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) in celiac disease (CD) patients was 6.8% (95% CI: 5.0-9.3), with lower prevalence in pediatric CD (2.6%) than in adults (8.6%).
ContextThis meta-analysis provides pooled estimates of DH prevalence in CD (6.8%, 95% CI:5.0-9.3), clarifying higher adult (8.6%) vs pediatric (2.6%) rates, but with very high heterogeneity.
Today’s standard
Confirm celiac disease in patients on a gluten-containing diet with TTG-IgA plus total IgA (reflex to IgG-based serology if IgA-deficient), followed by duodenal biopsy when serology is positive; pursue biopsy regardless in seronegative patients with high pre-test probability.
the full guideline text
Treat all patients with a lifelong strict gluten-free diet with registered dietitian referral, obtain baseline nutritional labs and DEXA, and complete the asplenia-equivalent vaccination schedule. Monitor response by symptoms and TTG-IgA trend, targeting normalization within 1-2 years, and work up non-response by frequency starting with ongoing gluten exposure.
ACG 2023 · reviewed 2026-05-01
Reinforcesrelative to this standard
Ocagli H … Canova C · United European Gastroenterology Journal · IF 5.6 · PubMed ↗
IBDguideline · Jul 7, 2026
Rigor81
Shift75
Practice90
Standing42
Signal score, how each part rates
Study rigorStrongguideline
ShiftStrongShifts or challenges practice
Practice relevanceStrongBears on a bedside decision
Clinical takeawayBefore or early in immunosuppressive or biologic therapy for IBD, complete an infection-prevention bundle: screen for latent TB and hepatitis B, check VZV and measles immunity, and vaccinate (recombinant zoster for immunosuppressed adults, updated pneumococcal schedule, annual influenza, COVID), avoiding live vaccines during active immunosuppression.
What it foundThe abstract does not report specific numerical results or effect sizes, as it is a guideline review.
ContextThese guidelines consolidate and update prior evidence and recommendations, providing a comprehensive approach to infection management in IBD, which is critical given the immunosuppressive therapies commonly used.
Yanai H … Gisbert JP · Journal of Crohn's and Colitis · IF 8.3 · PubMed ↗
Endoscopyguideline · Jun 30, 2026
Rigor81
Shift75
Practice90
Standing41
Signal score, how each part rates
Study rigorStrongguideline
ShiftStrongShifts or challenges practice
Practice relevanceStrongBears on a bedside decision
Clinical takeawayApply ASGE ERCP adverse-event guidance now: routine rectal NSAID (indomethacin or diclofenac 100 mg) for post-ERCP pancreatitis prophylaxis and prophylactic pancreatic-duct stenting in high-risk cases, plus aggressive periprocedural hydration.
What it foundThe abstract does not provide specific quantitative results on adverse event rates or comparisons.
ContextThis appears to be a guideline publication aiming to summarize or update standards on ERCP-related adverse events, but without the abstract providing details, it cannot be placed against prior evidence.
ASGE Standards of Practice Committee … Thosani NC · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · IF 8.0 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayRome V criteria show lower sensitivity (66.1%) compared to Rome IV (78.9%) and Rome III (87.5%) in this secondary care study. No clinical action yet; await further validation and SOC updates.
What it foundRome V criteria for IBS had sensitivity of 66.1% (95% CI 62.1-69.9) and specificity of 80.1% (72.4-86.5), identifying a different patient group compared to Rome IV (sensitivity 78.9%, specificity 81.0%) and Rome III (sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 75.0%).
ContextRome V shifts diagnostic balance versus Rome IV (higher specificity, lower sensitivity) and Rome III (higher specificity, much lower sensitivity). This challenges prior reliance on Rome criteria alone for case identification in referrals.
Today’s standard
Make a positive diagnosis of IBS using Rome IV criteria plus limited testing (CBC, CRP, celiac serology, fecal calprotectin for diarrhea-predominant), reserving colonoscopy for age ≥45, alarm features, or family history.
the full guideline text
Treat all subtypes with education, soluble fiber, a trial of low-FODMAP diet, and CBT/gut-directed hypnotherapy for refractory disease, then layer subtype-specific pharmacotherapy (secretagogues for IBS-C; loperamide, rifaximin, or bile acid sequestrant for IBS-D) and neuromodulators for pain.
Clinical takeawayFor women with severe pelvic/GI symptoms and suspected endometriosis (e.g., dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia), evaluate for rectosigmoid endometriosis via transvaginal ultrasound or MRI. First-line hormonal therapy (OCPs/progestogens) may help symptoms; surgery only for confirmed obstruction/severe refractory cases.
What it foundBowel endometriosis affects 8-12% of women with endometriosis, primarily in the rectosigmoid colon, and diagnostic delays often exceed 7-10 years.
ContextThis review confirms the multifactorial pathogenesis and diagnostic challenges of bowel endometriosis, aligning with current practice of using imaging for diagnosis and reserving surgery for severe cases.
Today’s standard
Make a positive diagnosis of IBS using Rome IV criteria plus limited testing (CBC, CRP, celiac serology, fecal calprotectin for diarrhea-predominant), reserving colonoscopy for age ≥45, alarm features, or family history.
the full guideline text
Treat all subtypes with education, soluble fiber, a trial of low-FODMAP diet, and CBT/gut-directed hypnotherapy for refractory disease, then layer subtype-specific pharmacotherapy (secretagogues for IBS-C; loperamide, rifaximin, or bile acid sequestrant for IBS-D) and neuromodulators for pain.
New evidencesystematic reviewmeta-analysismicronutrient deficiency
Clinical takeawayIn critically ill patients, phosphorus derangements are prognostic markers of illness severity rather than treatment targets, so continue routine monitoring and repletion of symptomatic hypophosphatemia but do not treat the number expecting a mortality benefit.
What it foundHyperphosphatemia was associated with increased ICU mortality (RR: 1.21) and hospital mortality (RR: 2.10), while hypophosphatemia was linked to prolonged ICU stay (+1.53 days) and mechanical ventilation duration (+1.54 days).
ContextConfirms prior concerns about phosphate abnormalities in ICU patients but refines understanding by quantifying associations with specific outcomes. Current practice lacks standardized phosphate monitoring protocols in this setting.
Irandoost P … Moghaddam OM · JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayConsider heightened awareness for AITD symptoms in childhood-onset EoE patients (HR 2.53 for future AITD, OR 4.71 for prior AITD). No routine screening recommended for adult-onset EoE (HR 1.18, 95% CI 0.91-1.54).
What it foundEoE patients had a 29% higher prevalence of prior AITD (3.9% vs 3.0%, OR 1.29), while future AITD risk was similar (HR 1.18), except in childhood-onset EoE (HR 2.53 for future AITD, OR 4.71 for prior AITD).
ContextConfirms exploratory studies suggesting an EoE-AITD link but clarifies this is primarily in childhood-onset cases, refining prior uncertain evidence. Adult-onset association remains statistically inconclusive.
Today’s standard
Diagnose EoE by esophageal dysfunction symptoms plus ≥15 eosinophils/HPF on ≥6 biopsies sampling both proximal and distal esophagus (with gastric/duodenal biopsies to exclude EGID), after excluding competing causes.
the full guideline text
Treat with a first-line agent as monotherapy, high-dose PPI, swallowed topical steroid, or dietary elimination × 8-12 weeks, then re-biopsy to confirm histologic remission (<15 eos/HPF), escalating to dupilumab for refractory disease and reserving dilation for persistent strictures after medical therapy. Continue effective therapy indefinitely given 50-90% relapse off treatment.
New evidenceIBSfunctional dyspepsiamicrobiometranslational
Clinical takeawayThis mechanistic review of gut-barrier restoration (SCFAs, glutamine or tryptophan, probiotics) is hypothesis-generating only; barrier-targeted diet or probiotic therapy for disorders of gut-brain interaction is not yet guideline-supported and should await clinical trials.
What it foundShort-chain fatty acids, amino acids (glutamine and tryptophan), and targeted probiotics enhance tight junction integrity and mucin secretion, while psychological stress, low-fiber diets, and high-fat diets disrupt gut barrier function.
ContextConfirms and refines the growing recognition of gut barrier dysfunction in disorders of gut-brain interaction but highlights the lack of validated clinical interventions targeting barrier restoration.
Today’s standard
After excluding organic causes and confirming H.
the full guideline text
pylori test-of-cure, manage functional dyspepsia by eradicating H. pylori if positive and giving a PPI (4-8 weeks, dosed 30-60 min before meals); for persistent symptoms use gut neuromodulators, mirtazapine 15 mg QHS is first-line for PDS with weight loss, a TCA (amitriptyline 10-50 mg QHS, or nortriptyline in the elderly) for PPI-refractory EPS, buspirone 10 mg TID as a fundic relaxant, and prokinetics (prucalopride or short-course metoclopramide) for PDS. Initial evaluation follows ACG/CAG 2017: test-and-treat H. pylori in patients under 60 without alarm features, and EGD for age ≥60, alarm features, or high gastric-cancer-risk groups. Add psychological therapies (CBT, gut-directed hypnotherapy) and lifestyle measures.
ACG/CAG 2017 / Rome IV / ACG 2024 H. pylori · reviewed 2026-05-01
Emergingrelative to this standard
Britton TA, Grover M · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 30.9 · PubMed ↗
Clinical takeawayWhen evaluating patients with self-reported NCGS, assess for comorbid DGBI and ARFID symptoms, particularly in those with high psychological distress, somatic symptom reporting, increased healthcare utilization, and reduced quality of life.
What it found14.2% of adults self-reported NCGS, and 69.4% of these individuals had concomitant DGBI and/or ARFID symptoms, with 24.0% meeting criteria for all three conditions.
ContextThis study highlights the overlap between self-reported NCGS, DGBI, and ARFID, suggesting NCGS may be part of a broader syndrome of food-related symptom attribution rather than gluten-specific pathology.
Today’s standard
Non-celiac gluten/wheat sensitivity is a diagnosis of exclusion: first complete a full celiac workup (tTG-IgA plus total IgA, DGP-IgG, HLA DQ2/DQ8, and EGD with duodenal biopsies if needed) while the patient remains on a gluten-containing diet, then rule out organic alternatives such as IBS, microscopic colitis, bile acid diarrhea, SIBO, lactose intolerance, and pancreatic insufficiency.
the full guideline text
Trial a low-FODMAP diet first-often more effective than gluten-free because wheat fructans are frequently the true culprit-reserving a strict gluten-free trial for partial responders, with dietitian supervision and nutritional adequacy planning. Confirm reproducibility on gluten reintroduction.
New evidenceepidemiologyGERDgastroparesisacute pancreatitis
Clinical takeawayCounsel patients with DM or obesity starting GLP-1 analogs about the high likelihood (1 in 3) of GI side effects, particularly nausea, vomiting, and GERD, and monitor for gastroparesis symptoms (early satiety, bloating). Note the reduced bowel obstruction risk and no significant increase in ER visits or hospitalizations despite higher EGD use.
What it foundGLP-1 therapy was associated with a 31.9% rate of GI adverse events at one year (NNH 17.2), including nausea/vomiting (HR 1.24), GERD (HR 1.18), and gastroparesis (HR 1.57), while reducing bowel obstruction risk (HR 0.86).
ContextConfirms and quantifies real-world GI risks of GLP-1 analogs beyond clinical trial data, while challenging assumptions about healthcare utilization (lower admissions despite more EGDs). Prior evidence focused on GLP-1 benefits with less emphasis on AEs.
Today’s standard
Screen for alarm features (dysphagia, odynophagia, GI bleeding, iron-deficiency anemia, weight loss, persistent vomiting, palpable mass) before any empiric therapy, if present, EGD first rather than empiric PPI.
the full guideline text
Without alarm features, treat typical symptoms with an 8-week empiric PPI trial dosed 30-60 minutes before the first meal plus lifestyle modification; confirm GERD objectively (Lyon Consensus 2.0 AET, or erosive esophagitis LA-B/C/D or Barrett's on EGD) in refractory or atypical cases, and require EGD, off-PPI pH-impedance, and high-resolution manometry before any anti-reflux surgery or endoscopic therapy.
ACG 2022 / AGA 2022 CPU refractory GERD · reviewed 2026-04-22
Emergingrelative to this standard
Nathani P … Sharma P · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗
Pancreas/Biliaryguideline · Jul 1, 2026
Rigor68
Shift25
Practice80
Standing12
Signal score, how each part rates
Study rigorGoodguideline
ShiftModerateAdds to an open question
Practice relevanceStrongBears on a bedside decision
Clinical takeawayUse pRECIST criteria for consistent response assessment in clinical trials testing pancreatic cancer therapies, particularly in neoadjuvant settings, as it requires CT and PET imaging for combined size and metabolic evaluation.
What it foundpRECIST provides standardized criteria for assessing pancreatic tumor response via CT/PET scans, defining objective changes in tumor size (based on RECIST 1.1) and metabolic activity (via PET SUV measurements).
ContextRefines RECIST 1.1 by adding metabolic activity assessment via PET, addressing variability in pancreatic tumor response evaluation.
Today’s standard
Diagnose with pancreas-protocol multiphasic CT plus EUS-FNA/FNB and CA 19-9, and obtain germline multi-gene panel testing with genetic counseling for ALL patients regardless of family history.
the full guideline text
Determine resectability at a multidisciplinary tumor board: resectable disease gets surgery (Whipple for head, distal pancreatectomy for body/tail) with adjuvant mFOLFIRINOX, borderline-resectable/locally advanced gets neoadjuvant chemotherapy ± chemoradiation, and metastatic disease gets first-line systemic therapy (mFOLFIRINOX, gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, or NALIRIFOX). Integrate supportive care including biliary drainage, PERT, pain control, VTE prophylaxis, and early palliative care.
Clinical takeawayWhere it is available (Japan, India, not the US), a single non-randomized study suggests elobixibat may outperform prucalopride on sustained CSBM in refractory functional constipation, but this is hypothesis-generating and does not change guideline-based US practice, where elobixibat is unavailable.
What it foundElobixibat achieved a sustained complete spontaneous bowel movement (CSBM) response in 55.6% of patients vs. 33.9% with prucalopride (p=0.024).
ContextThis study directly compares two second-line therapies with distinct mechanisms, addressing a gap in evidence-based decision-making for functional constipation.
Today’s standard
Manage chronic idiopathic constipation stepwise: first-line soluble fiber (psyllium) plus PEG 3350 and lifestyle measures (fluids, activity, scheduled toileting); escalate after inadequate response to secretagogues (linaclotide, plecanatide, lubiprostone) or the prokinetic prucalopride.
the full guideline text
A mandatory digital rectal exam is performed at the initial visit, and anorectal manometry with balloon expulsion testing should be done early when a defecation disorder is suspected, directing those patients to biofeedback rather than drug escalation.
Clinical takeawayFor resectable pancreatic or periampullary disease in eligible patients at high-volume centers, consider robotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) as a non-inferior alternative to open surgery (OPD) for potentially faster recovery and reduced complications.
What it foundRobotic pancreatoduodenectomy (RPD) showed faster postoperative functional recovery than open pancreatoduodenectomy (OPD) (12.1 vs 16.0 days RMET, difference -3.9 days, P<0.001), with similar morbidity (31.1% vs 36.1%) and lower Clavien-Dindo grade II+ complications (23.5% vs 34.4%).
ContextThis RCT provides level 1 evidence that RPD is non-inferior to OPD in both safety and recovery outcomes, supporting its adoption in tertiary centers with robotic expertise.
Today’s standard
Characterize pancreatic cystic lesions with MRI/MRCP (preferred initial imaging), adding EUS ± FNA when diagnostic uncertainty remains and the result would change management.
the full guideline text
Triage by risk: high-risk stigmata, main-duct/mixed IPMN go directly to surgical resection, worrisome features get EUS-FNA first for multidisciplinary decision, and low-risk BD-IPMN enters size-stratified surveillance; all presumed MCNs are resected regardless of size or features. Post-resection remnant pancreas requires lifelong surveillance, and family history/germline variants trigger the CAPS high-risk pathway.
Kyoto 2024 (IAP) / AGA 2024 CPU / ACG 2018 / ASGE 2015 / Fukuoka 2017 · reviewed 2026-05-01
Also screened this week18 papers read, not selected
These cleared the journal filter and were read, but did not
clear the bar for a card this week. Listed for anyone going deeper; no
takeaway attached, because none was written.
How we choose →
GLP-1 receptor agonists in pediatric obesity.Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver
Every new paper across 48 vetted GI, hepatology, and general-medicine journals.
02
Screen
Drop what is not a study: letters, editorials, corrections, case reports. Classify the rest.
03
Anchor
Compare each paper to the guideline standard it touches, and record how far it moves it.
04
Verify
An adversarial second pass checks every claim against its cited source.
05
Vet
A physician editor stands behind each card before it publishes.
The first pass is AI-assisted; the judgment is human. Nothing is surfaced or emailed until
Simon Mathews, MD has reviewed it. We show the funnel, the evidence grade, and a primary-source link on
every paper because a source you can check is the only kind worth trusting. What was read but not
selected is listed at the foot of each issue, so the filter is inspectable rather than assumed.