← Issue №16/ week of Oct 18, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 10 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 10, in full

most clinically useful first · the 2 the issue led with are ruled in green
Hepatology meta analysis · Oct 15, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Optimal Incidence Threshold for Cost-Effective Hepatocellular Carcinoma Surveillance in Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis.

New evidencealcohol-associated liver diseasehepatocellular carcinomacost-effectivenessepidemiology
Clinical takeawayModel-based: surveillance was cost-effective in both active drinkers and abstinent patients once annual HCC incidence reaches about 0.45 per 100 person-years, well below the 1% threshold current guidelines cite; the authors argue for updating that threshold.
What it foundBiannual HCC surveillance becomes cost-effective when annual HCC incidence exceeds 0.45 per 100 person-years, yielding an ICER of $18,952 per QALY in active drinkers and $56,000 per QALY in abstinent patients compared to no surveillance.
ContextModel-based, not outcomes data; ICER $18,952 per QALY in active drinkers and $56,000 in abstinent patients.
Measured against the standard of care· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology)

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance with abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP every ~6 months (semiannual, not annual) in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who could benefit from HCC treatment: Child-Turcotte-Pugh A or B, and CTP C only if a liver-transplant candidate or listed. Do not surveil patients whose life expectancy is <1-2 years from comorbidity that neither transplantation nor HCC therapy can remedy, and weigh the physical, psychological and financial harms of surveillance case by case. Also surveil selected non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers: Asian men >40 and women >50 from endemic regions, people of African origin at younger ages, family history of HCC, or high viral load/active hepatitis. AGA 2026 endorses PAGE-B (intermediate/high risk at ≥10) and REAL-B to stratify these patients. Patients with HCV cirrhosis stay in surveillance after SVR. Patients without cirrhosis from other causes are NOT surveilled because incidence is too low (≤F3 fibrosis, MASLD without cirrhosis, HCV cured before cirrhosis), though fibrosis staging uncertainty warrants individual discussion. CT/MRI are not routine surveillance tools. Abbreviated MRI, GALAD and other blood biomarkers are investigational and should not replace ultrasound+AFP. Multicancer blood detection tests should not be used. Recall per AASLD 2023: AFP ≥20 ng/mL or a rising AFP (doubling, or a rise on two consecutive tests even below 20), any ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate ultrasound triggers multiphasic contrast CT or MRI read with LI-RADS. Treatment per AASLD 2023 is BCLC-linked: resection, ablation or transplant within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease, TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease, systemic therapy for advanced disease. Preferred first-line systemic therapy in Child-Pugh A is atezolizumab+bevacizumab or durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE); sorafenib, lenvatinib or durvalumab monotherapy are the alternatives. BEACON-HCC (AASLD/HCC-LIVE, Hepatology 2026) is a Delphi consensus framework for treatment allocation that complements BCLC; it does not replace it. Under BEACON-HCC, macrovascular invasion does not automatically mean systemic therapy, and EBRT/SBRT and TARE are primary options. Continue post-treatment surveillance with contrast-enhanced cross-sectional imaging early after curative therapy.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (Hepatology 78(6):1922-1965) / AGA Clinical Practice Update 2026 (Gastroenterology, Rich et al.) / BEACON-HCC consensus 2026 (Hepatology) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Hajjar A … Chhatwal J · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=226 · Oct 12, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Abnormal left ventricular mass as a prognostic marker for outcomes in infants and children with cirrhosis.

New evidencecirrhosispediatricbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider echocardiographic LVMI as a pretransplant risk marker in children with cirrhosis for perioperative planning. It is not a validated allocation tool; PELD/MELD still governs listing.
What it foundLeft ventricular mass index (LVMI) ≥ 88 g/m2.7, ≥ 91 g/m2.7, and ≥ 95 g/m2.7 independently predicted waitlist decompensation, composite serious adverse events, and mortality in children with cirrhosis, with OR 6.9 [CI 3,16] for LV hypertrophy.
ContextAbout 25% of children with cirrhosis had LV hypertrophy on echo and necropsy; cirrhotic cardiomyopathy remains undefined in children.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Bashir DA … Desai MS · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=300 · Oct 16, 2026 · Lancet GH · IF 39.1

Thyroid hormone receptor-β agonist simedeutirom (HSK31679) for Chinese patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a 52-week, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 2b trial.

New therapyMASLDbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayInvestigational: simedeutirom is not approved anywhere and the trial was China-only. Treat this as class evidence for THR-beta agonism in F2-F3 MASH, where resmetirom is the approved agent; no clinical use yet.
What it foundSimedeutirom 80 mg and 160 mg achieved MASH improvement (defined as a two-point or more reduction in NAS, one-point or more improvement in hepatocellular ballooning, and no increase in steatosis score) without fibrosis worsening in 37% and 30% of patients, respectively, vs 10% with placebo (ORs 4.87 and 5.24). Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 5% and 8% of patients, respectively.
ContextThis phase 2b trial provides promising evidence for simedeutirom in MASH, extending prior findings on hepatic fat reduction to fibrosis improvement in a specific population.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Xue F … Simedeutirom-202 Trial Investigators · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 39.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=60 · Oct 17, 2026 · GIE · IF 8.0

Bicentric comparison of 3-year clinical outcomes between endoscopic ultrasound-guided embolization with coil and hemostatic adjunct versus balloon-occluded retrograde transvenous obliteration for treatment of bleeding gastric varices: A propensity-score matched study.

New evidencevariceal bleedingcirrhosisportal hypertension
Clinical takeawayWhere EUS-coil expertise exists it is a reasonable alternative to BRTO for gastric variceal bleeding. Small and retrospective, so not a basis to prefer either; anatomy and local expertise still decide.
What it foundEUS-COIL had 100% technical/clinical success vs 93.3% for BRTO, fewer adverse events (3% vs 37%), and lower hepatic decompensation (10% vs 40%) over 3 years in cirrhosis patients.
ContextTwo tertiary centres, 2009 to 2024, 94 patients overall; reintervention, transfusion, stay and mortality did not differ in cirrhosis.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD, 'Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis', Hepatology 2024 (PMID 37870298), the governing document for acute variceal hemorrhage. Baveno VII (J Hepatol 2022, PMID 35120736) is the consensus it operationalises. The prior citation, ACG 'Disorders of the Hepatic and Mesenteric Circulation' (2020), covers Budd-Chiari, portal vein thrombosis and mesenteric ischemia and does NOT address variceal bleeding, a mis-anchor, not a stale edition.

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

For acute variceal hemorrhage in cirrhosis, resuscitate conservatively with a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy targeting hemoglobin 7-8 g/dL, start a vasoactive agent as soon as bleeding is suspected and before endoscopy (terlipressin, somatostatin, or octreotide; octreotide is the agent available for this indication in US practice) and continue it 2-5 days, and give empiric IV ceftriaxone 1 g every 24 hours in patients with advanced cirrhosis. Perform upper endoscopy within 12 hours of presentation once resuscitated, or as soon as safely possible if the patient is unstable, with band ligation for esophageal varices and for GOV1 (which is treated as an esophageal varix); cardiofundal varices (GOV2 and IGV1) are treated with cyanoacrylate injection, with EUS-guided coil placement with or without cyanoacrylate increasingly used as first-line where expertise exists, and TIPS or BRTO as alternatives or salvage. PPIs started empirically should be stopped immediately after endoscopy unless there is a separate strict indication. Evaluate every patient at presentation for pre-emptive (early) TIPS with a PTFE-covered stent, placed within 72 hours and ideally within 24 hours, in high-risk patients defined as Child-Pugh class C with score under 14 (that is, 10-13) or Child-Pugh class B with score above 7 who have active bleeding at initial endoscopy despite vasoactive drugs; the decision is individualized and multidisciplinary, weighing age, frailty, comorbidity, heart failure, HCC, portal vein thrombosis, and transplant candidacy. For uncontrolled bleeding, a self-expanding covered esophageal metal stent is as effective as balloon tamponade and is the safer option; both are a bridge to definitive therapy (PTFE-covered TIPS) and neither is definitive therapy. Balloon tamponade must NOT be left in place for more than 24 hours, 24 hours is the ceiling, not a range: Baveno VI states it "should only be used in refractory oesophageal bleeding, as a temporary bridge (for a maximum of 24 h) with intensive care monitoring and considering intubation, until definitive treatment can be instituted", because severe esophageal injury/necrosis, perforation and aspiration rise sharply beyond that point. The 72-hour figure in this standard belongs to the pre-emptive TIPS window and must not be read as a permissible tamponade duration. Secondary prophylaxis is mandatory in all survivors and is combination therapy: a nonselective beta-blocker, either a traditional NSBB (propranolol or nadolol) or carvedilol, which Baveno VII endorses as an equivalent rather than clearly superior option in this specific indication, plus serial EVL every 2 to 8 weeks until variceal eradication, with surveillance endoscopy thereafter. TIPS is the treatment of choice for patients who rebleed despite NSBB plus EVL.

AASLD, 'Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis', Hepatology 2024 (PMID 37870298), the governing document for acute variceal hemorrhage. Baveno VII (J Hepatol 2022, PMID 35120736) is the consensus it operationalises. The prior citation, ACG 'Disorders of the Hepatic and Mesenteric Circulation' (2020), covers Budd-Chiari, portal vein thrombosis and mesenteric ischemia and does NOT address variceal bleeding, a mis-anchor, not a stale edition. · reviewed 2026-07-31 ↗
Siranart N … Ryou M · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · IF 8.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Oct 12, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Alcohol-associated liver disease.

Guideline / reviewalcohol-associated liver diseaseliver transplantcirrhosis
Clinical takeawayUse non-invasive methods like elastography and blood-based tests to assess histological severity in ALD, reducing reliance on liver biopsy.
What it foundNon-invasive methods, particularly elastography and blood-based tests, have largely replaced liver biopsy for assessing histological severity in ALD.
ContextConfirms the shift from liver biopsy to non-invasive methods for assessing ALD severity, aligning with current practice trends.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54

… For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Lee BP … Louvet A · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=239 · Oct 12, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

Prognostic Impact of the C-Reactive Protein-Albumin-Lymphocyte (CALLY) Index in Patients With Hepatocellular Carcinoma Undergoing Living Donor Liver Transplantation.

Practice-changinghepatocellular carcinomaliver transplantbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider incorporating the CALLY index into preoperative risk assessment for HCC patients undergoing LDLT to identify those at higher mortality risk, alongside existing models.
What it foundLow CALLY index was associated with higher 1-year mortality (12.7% vs. 4.0%, p=0.0153) and overall mortality (HR 2.17, 95% CI 1.20-3.93, p=0.0099) after LDLT for HCC.
ContextThis study introduces the CALLY index as a prognostic tool for mortality risk in HCC patients undergoing LDLT, complementing existing models focused on recurrence risk.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD/AST, 'AASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation' (Dove L et al., Hepatology 2026;83(6):1609-1645). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001644, PMID 41405234.

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Refer patients with decompensated cirrhosis (including those with MELD-Na <15 or MELD 3.0 <15 if they have clinically significant portal hypertension, recurrent ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, or variceal bleeding), acute liver failure meeting King's College Criteria/UNOS Status 1A, or HCC within Milan/UCSF criteria for comprehensive multidisciplinary liver transplant evaluation, with MELD 3.0 driving UNOS waitlist allocation and MELD exception scoring for HCC/HPS/FAP. Optimize modifiable risk factors before listing (alcohol abstinence, HCV DAA treatment, vaccinations, DM/obesity/OSA and dental clearance) and use bridging/downstaging locoregional therapy for HCC while awaiting transplant. After transplant, maintain lifelong immunosuppression with tacrolimus plus mycophenolate ± tapered steroids alongside infection prophylaxis and recurrent-disease surveillance.

AASLD/AST, 'AASLD AST Practice Guideline on adult liver transplantation: Candidate evaluation' (Dove L et al., Hepatology 2026;83(6):1609-1645). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000001644, PMID 41405234. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Mita J … Yoshizumi T · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=130 · Oct 13, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

One-year outcomes of hepatic artery stenosis after pediatric liver transplantation: Results from the international, multicenter HEPATIC registry.

New evidenceliver transplantpediatricepidemiology
Clinical takeawayAfter paediatric liver transplant, hepatic artery stenosis within 21 days carried 16% one-year graft loss versus 1% for later stenosis, and all deaths were in the early group, so early Doppler surveillance and prompt evaluation matter most. The registry cannot say whether antithrombotic therapy or endovascular treatment is better.
What it foundOne-year graft and patient survival after hepatic artery stenosis (HAS) were 93% and 96%, respectively, with early HAS (≤21 days post-pLT) associated with significantly higher graft loss compared to late HAS (16% vs. 1%; p < 0.001). All deaths occurred in the early HAS group.
ContextThis study confirms that HAS is a rare but serious complication post-pLT, with early HAS posing a higher risk. It refines understanding by showing comparable outcomes between antithrombotic therapy and EVT, challenging the assumption that EVT is superior.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

HEPATIC Study Group · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=97 · Oct 13, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Effectiveness and safety of three years of bulevirtide monotherapy in patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis: the Italian compassionate use program.

New evidenceviral hepatitiscirrhosishepatocellular carcinomabiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider bulevirtide monotherapy (2 mg/day) for patients with HDV-related compensated cirrhosis, as it demonstrated sustained virological and biochemical responses with low rates of decompensation and HCC over 3 years.
What it foundBulevirtide monotherapy achieved 77% virological response, 84% biochemical response, and 64% combined response at 144 weeks, with 3-year cumulative probabilities of decompensation and HCC at 1.3% and 10%, respectively.
ContextThis real-world study confirms the long-term safety and efficacy of bulevirtide monotherapy in HDV-related cirrhosis, extending phase III trial findings and supporting its use in clinical practice.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Anolli MP … HEP4Di study group · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=709 · Oct 16, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Integrating Plain 2D Ultrasound and Clinical Data for Identification of At-Risk MASH: A Multicenter Proof of Concept Study.

Basic scienceartificial intelligencebiomarkerepidemiologyMASLD
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a proof-of-concept study validating a CNN model for ultrasound-based MASH risk assessment. Further validation in clinical practice is needed.
What it foundA CNN model applied to clinical ultrasound images achieved AUROC 0.974 (95% CI 0.947-0.993) for FAST 0.35 and 0.908 (95% CI 0.854-0.950) for AGILE 3+ 0.451 in detecting at-risk MASH.
ContextThis study introduces a potential alternative to VCTE-based risk scores for detecting at-risk MASH, particularly in settings with limited access to transient elastography.
Measured against the standard of care· EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798)

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

This standard applies to MASLD: hepatic steatosis on imaging or biopsy, at least one cardiometabolic criterion, no other liver disease, and alcohol below the MetALD range. The AGA 2026 MetALD update sets MetALD at about 140-350 g/week of alcohol in women and 210-420 g/week in men, averaged over at least 3 months. MASLD therefore means under about 140 g/week (women) or 210 g/week (men), and drinking above the MetALD range is ALD. Assess alcohol use in every patient with steatotic liver disease at diagnosis and at least once a year, by interview, a validated questionnaire (e.g., AUDIT-C) and/or biomarkers such as phosphatidylethanol (PEth). Advise every patient with steatotic liver disease to stop drinking. Screen people with type 2 diabetes, people with overweight or obesity plus at least one more metabolic risk factor, and anyone with incidental steatosis or raised aminotransferases. Use FIB-4 first. A score below 1.3 (below 2.0 at age 65 or older) is low risk: the patient stays in primary care and repeats FIB-4 every 1-2 years. A score at or above the cutoff goes to a second-line test: VCTE, or ELF if elastography is not available. VCTE below 8 kPa is low risk. VCTE of 8 kPa or more, or ELF of 9.2 or more, means clinically significant fibrosis is likely and the patient should be referred to hepatology. Read liver stiffness with caution if the patient is actively drinking. Reserve biopsy for discordant or unclear results. Lifestyle change is the base of treatment for everyone: at least 5% weight loss improves steatosis, and 10% or more is usually needed for fibrosis to improve. Pharmacotherapy is recommended for adults with non-cirrhotic MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis (by non-invasive tests or biopsy), alongside structured lifestyle intervention and optimised management of comorbidities. The NIT ranges that stand in for F2-F3 differ by society. AASLD uses VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa or ELF 9.2-10.5. EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 frames the treatable high-risk group as, for example, VCTE 10-20 kPa, MRE 3.1-5.0 kPa or ELF 9.8-11.3. Two drugs are approved: resmetirom (80 mg oral daily, or 100 mg at body weight of 100 kg or more; AASLD Oct 2024 guidance) and semaglutide 2.4 mg subcutaneously once weekly (FDA accelerated approval Aug 2025, AASLD Nov 2025 guidance; in ESSENCE, MASH resolved without fibrosis worsening in 62.9% vs 34.3% on placebo). EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 says to choose between them by patient preference, risks and cardio-renal-metabolic profile. Semaglutide may be preferred with obesity, type 2 diabetes, established cardiovascular disease or high cardiovascular risk. Resmetirom may be prioritised without obesity, or when the patient is already on or cannot tolerate a GLP-1 receptor agonist. On semaglutide, monitoring includes nutrition and sarcopenia assessment, and fibrosis NITs are used over time to judge response. In MASH cirrhosis, resmetirom and semaglutide appear safe but should not be used as MASH-targeted treatment until liver-related benefit is shown. Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options under the AASLD 2023 guidance. Neither resmetirom nor semaglutide has been formally studied in MetALD. Manage cardiometabolic risk in every patient whatever the fibrosis stage, including statins for ASCVD and control of glucose and blood pressure. On semaglutide, watch for GI side effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, retinopathy, loss of lean mass). For MetALD, treat moderate or severe alcohol use disorder with medication plus behavioural therapy, correct micronutrient deficiencies (folate, thiamine, vitamin D), and do not offer bariatric or endobariatric procedures. HCC surveillance with ultrasound, with or without AFP, every 6 months is indicated only when cirrhosis is present.

EASL-EASD-EASO 2026 Guidance on Resmetirom and Semaglutide as MASH-Targeted Therapy (J Hepatol, doi:10.1016/j.jhep.2026.08.028) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance (+ Oct 2024 resmetirom and Nov 2025 semaglutide updates) / AGA 2026 Clinical Care Pathway for MASLD (Gastroenterology, doi:10.1053/j.gastro.2026.01.047) / AGA 2026 Clinical Practice Update on MetALD (Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol, 2026) / EASL 2026 SLD trajectory guidance (JHEP Rep, doi:10.1016/j.jhepr.2026.101798) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Selvakumar V … Huang DQ · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · Oct 13, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Autoimmune hepatitis and primary biliary cholangitis are among a subset of autoimmune diseases defined by profound co-prevalence and genetic risk association with the IL12 pathway.

Basic sciencebasic scienceepidemiologybiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding identifying genetic associations with IL12 pathway in autoimmune diseases.
What it foundA rare variant upstream of IL12A increases risk of autoimmune hepatitis (OR=2.98) and primary biliary cholangitis (OR=2.80), with homozygote carriers having a 6-fold higher lifetime risk of developing at least one of these conditions (OR=5.73).
ContextThis study identifies a shared genetic etiology for AIH, PBC, and other autoimmune diseases, suggesting potential for targeted therapies in the future.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021

Decision at stakethe genetic and mechanistic underpinnings of primary biliary cholangitis

Treat with first-line ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) 13-15 mg/kg/d divided, and assess biochemical response at 12 months using Paris-II plus continuous risk scores (Globe, UK-PBC). Escalate to a second-line agent (obeticholic acid [contraindicated in cirrhosis with portal hypertension or prior decompensation], seladelpar, elafibranor, or a fibrate) when response is inadequate, guided by a Child-Pugh/portal-hypertension hard gate, and manage pruritus with a stepwise ladder (cholestyramine → rifampin → sertraline → naltrexone). Refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, refractory pruritus, or rising bilirubin.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Primary Biliary Cholangitis: 2021 Practice Guidance', 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Nakka P … Discover Me South Africa Study · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №16 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS