← Issue №12/ week of Sep 20, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 18 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 18, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Everything here, in one line each18
Hepatology rct · n=230 · Sep 16, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Lactulose with or without TeleTai-Chi for the prevention of falls: A sequential multiple assignment randomized controlled trial (LiveSMART).

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionhepatic encephalopathy
Clinical takeawayConsider lactulose for fall prevention in cirrhosis patients without overt HE, especially those at high fall risk. Sequential lactulose/TeleTai-Chi may offer additional benefit but requires further validation.
What it foundLactulose reduced injurious falls (4% vs 12%) and non-injurious falls (19% vs 32%) compared to enhanced usual care in cirrhosis patients without prior overt HE, with a win ratio of 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-4.0). Sequential lactulose/TeleTai-Chi further reduced the primary outcome compared to enhanced usual care (win ratio 2.7, 95% CI 1.3-5.5).
ContextCurrent practice lacks specific fall prevention strategies in cirrhosis patients without prior overt HE. This trial provides the first evidence for lactulose's role in reducing falls, independent of HE prevention.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy," 2022

Decision at stakethe use of lactulose in patients with cirrhosis without prior overt hepatic encephalopathy

In adults with cirrhosis, diagnose hepatic encephalopathy (HE) clinically: an alteration in mental status graded by the West Haven criteria (minimal + grade 1 = covert; grades 2-4 = overt, e.g. disorientation, asterixis, somnolence to coma) in a patient with liver disease/portosystemic shunting, made only after excluding other causes of altered mentation (structural, infectious, metabolic, toxic).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with cirrhosis, diagnose hepatic encephalopathy (HE) clinically: an alteration in mental status graded by the West Haven criteria (minimal + grade 1 = covert; grades 2-4 = overt, e.g. disorientation, asterixis, somnolence to coma) in a patient with liver disease/portosystemic shunting, made only after excluding other causes of altered mentation (structural, infectious, metabolic, toxic). Use the operational classification (type, time course [episodic/recurrent/persistent], and precipitated vs spontaneous). Measure blood ammonia primarily as a RULE-OUT test: a NORMAL ammonia level questions the diagnosis of HE (high negative predictive value), but ammonia does NOT add diagnostic, staging or prognostic value in a patient with known HE and should not be used to grade HE or to titrate therapy; sample and handle it correctly (prompt, on ice). In every patient with overt HE, actively search for and treat a precipitating factor, infection, GI bleeding, dehydration/diuretic overuse, electrolyte disturbance, constipation, sedatives/psychoactive drugs. Treat an episode of overt HE with a non-absorbable disaccharide (lactulose) titrated to 2-3 soft bowel movements per day (oral, or by enema in grade 3-4 to avoid aspiration); polyethylene glycol may be substituted for a lactulose enema in patients with persistent constipation, sub-ileus, or intolerance to lactulose, and although small single-centre trials suggest more rapid resolution of HE, the evidence is limited and whether it should replace or be combined with lactulose is unclear, so it is not an established faster-acting alternative or adjunct. After a first episode of overt HE, give lactulose as secondary prophylaxis (titrated to 2-3 BM/day); add rifaximin 550 mg twice daily as an ADJUNCT to lactulose only after >=1 further episode of overt HE occurs within 6 months of the first (or continue rifaximin already in use). Do not restrict dietary protein: target the general cirrhosis nutrition goals (protein 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day, energy ~35 kcal/kg/day) with meals distributed across the day and a late-evening snack; in recurrent/persistent HE, substitution of animal protein with vegetable and dairy protein can be considered provided total protein intake is not compromised. For HE refractory to lactulose + rifaximin, reconsider the diagnosis and re-search for a missed precipitant or a large spontaneous portosystemic shunt; obliteration of an accessible portosystemic shunt can be considered in stable patients with preserved liver function (MELD <11), and post-TIPS HE refractory to medical therapy may warrant TIPS reduction/occlusion. Evaluate for liver transplantation in eligible patients, refer for transplant assessment in patients with recurrent/persistent HE (and hepatic myelopathy as soon as possible), recognizing that a first episode of overt HE already carries a poor prognosis.

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on the management of hepatic encephalopathy," 2022 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tapper EB … Serper M · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,010 · Sep 18, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Alcohol consumption increases risk of hepatocellular carcinoma in chronic hepatitis B patients.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaviral hepatitisalcohol-associated liver diseaseepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel CHB patients, regardless of cirrhosis status, to abstain from alcohol or reduce intake to <140/210 g/week to lower HCC risk, especially in those with high alcohol consumption (>350/420 g/week), which quadruples HCC risk (aHR 4.00, P<0.001).
What it foundEach 100 g/week increase in alcohol intake raised HCC risk by 33% (aHR 1.33, P<0.001), and high alcohol intake (>350/420 g/week) quadrupled HCC risk (aHR 4.00, P<0.001) in CHB patients.
ContextConfirms and quantifies the synergistic risk of alcohol and CHB for HCC, extending prior evidence by showing consistent risk across cirrhotic and non-cirrhotic subgroups.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Chen Y … Nan Y · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=951 · Sep 18, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

High rates of transition to immune active disease in a cohort of strictly defined immune tolerant patients with chronic hepatitis B: results from the RADICAL consortium.

New evidenceviral hepatitisepidemiologybiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayConsider more frequent monitoring for immune-tolerant CHB patients, particularly those with high-normal ALT (20-40 U/L), given their elevated risk of transitioning to immune-active disease. Pre-emptive therapy is not currently supported by SOC.
What it found51%, 67%, and 72% of immune-tolerant CHB patients transitioned to immune-active disease within 5, 10, and 15 years, respectively, with higher risk in those with high-normal ALT (sHR: 20-30 U/L: 1.744, sHR: >30 U/L: 3.130). The risk of progression to significant fibrosis was 6.3% and HCC was 1.1% at 15 years.
ContextChallenges the benign view of the immune-tolerant phase in CHB, showing high rates of transition to immune-active disease, especially in patients with high-normal ALT, but with low risk of fibrosis and HCC.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakewhether to treat immune-tolerant patients with chronic hepatitis B

(3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
van Velsen LM … RADICAL consortium · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=2,395 · Sep 16, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Risk Factors and Definition of Younger-Onset Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD) Cirrhosis.

New evidencecirrhosisMASLDepidemiology
Clinical takeawayIn MASLD patients under 50 with T2DM or BMI ≥35kg/m2, consider heightened surveillance for cirrhosis given their higher genetic risk (PNPLA3, TM6SF2, HSD17B13 alleles) and metabolic burden, per standard diabetes and MASLD management.
What it found25% of MASLD cirrhosis cases present before age 50, associated with high genetic risk score (OR 2.33, dichotomized at median) and T2DM (OR 3.74).
ContextRefines understanding of MASLD cirrhosis risk beyond age, highlighting a high-risk younger subgroup (<50 years) with distinct genetic and metabolic drivers.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, "6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026," Diabetes Care 2026;49(Supplement_1):S132-S149

Decision at stakescreening all T2DM for MASLD with FIB-4

Manage diabetes in GI/hepatology patients by individualizing the A1c target to the population, in cirrhosis, A1c is unreliable because altered red blood cell turnover typically underestimates glycemia, so set glycemic goals using blood glucose monitoring and/or CGM rather than a fixed A1c cutoff, and in diabetic gastroparesis individualize the target rather than applying a universal cutoff; ≤7% pre-bariatric, <6.5% pre-conception, while screening all T2DM for MASLD with FIB-4, screening T1DM for concurrent celiac disease, and screening for diabetic gastroparesis when chronic nausea, early satiety, or postprandial fullness are present.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Manage diabetes in GI/hepatology patients by individualizing the A1c target to the population, in cirrhosis, A1c is unreliable because altered red blood cell turnover typically underestimates glycemia, so set glycemic goals using blood glucose monitoring and/or CGM rather than a fixed A1c cutoff, and in diabetic gastroparesis individualize the target rather than applying a universal cutoff; ≤7% pre-bariatric, <6.5% pre-conception, while screening all T2DM for MASLD with FIB-4, screening T1DM for concurrent celiac disease, and screening for diabetic gastroparesis when chronic nausea, early satiety, or postprandial fullness are present. Evaluate new-onset DM after age 50 without obesity for a pancreatic cancer differential, and coordinate peri-procedural medication holds and multidisciplinary endocrinology involvement.

American Diabetes Association Professional Practice Committee, "6. Glycemic Goals, Hypoglycemia, and Hyperglycemic Crises: Standards of Care in Diabetes-2026," Diabetes Care 2026;49(Supplement_1):S132-S149 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Ajmera V … Loomba R · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=452 · Sep 17, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Noninvasive Prediction of Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Tumor-Adjusted Model.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionhepatocellular carcinomabiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider using the Baveno-HCC model for improved CSPH prediction in HCC patients, especially those with larger tumors (>5 cm), but be cautious in patients with large right-lobe tumors due to reduced LSM accuracy.
What it foundThe Baveno-HCC model (incorporating LSM, platelet count, spleen size, and tumor burden) improved positive predictive value (PPV) for CSPH from 46.2% to 84.6% in the derivation cohort and from 56.3% to 100.0% in the validation cohort compared to Baveno VII criteria, particularly in patients with tumor burden >5 cm, though LSM accuracy was reduced in those with large right-lobe tumors.
ContextRefines the Baveno VII criteria by addressing limitations in CSPH prediction in HCC patients, particularly those with larger tumors, though LSM accuracy is reduced in large right-lobe tumors.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakenoninvasive assessment of clinically significant portal hypertension in cirrhosis

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Demirtas CO … Garcia-Tsao G · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=247 · Sep 17, 2026 · Eur J Gastro Hep · IF 2.2

Rapid ammonia normalization and long-term efficacy of rifaximin in patients with cirrhosis: a multicenter retrospective study.

New evidencecirrhosishepatic encephalopathybiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider rifaximin for hyperammonemia in cirrhosis, especially in patients with lower baseline albumin who may experience delayed normalization. Monitor for rare (2.0%) mild adverse events.
What it foundRifaximin reduced blood ammonia by 34.7% at 1 week, with 74.5% achieving normalization by median 63 days, and cut hepatic encephalopathy hospitalizations by 60.2% compared with the preceding 2 years.
ContextConfirms rifaximin's rapid ammonia-lowering effect and adds long-term data on hepatic function markers and hospitalization reduction, supporting its role beyond acute encephalopathy. Mild adverse events occurred in 2.0% of patients.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakethe use of rifaximin for hyperammonemia in cirrhosis

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tani J … Kobara H · European Journal of Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 2.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 14, 2026 · Nat Rev Gastro Hep · IF 57.5

Occult hepatitis B virus infection.

Guideline / reviewviral hepatitisepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn patients with isolated anti-HBc positivity, hepatitis C virus, or HIV infection, combine anti-HBc (which only suggests prior exposure) with serum HBV DNA testing to evaluate for occult HBV infection, particularly before immunosuppressive therapy or organ transplantation.
What it foundOccult HBV infection prevalence ranges from 0.8% in the general population to >40% in individuals with isolated anti-HBc positivity, but diagnosis is challenging due to extremely low and fluctuating HBV DNA levels.
ContextThis review summarizes the clinical significance of occult HBV infection in high-risk populations and highlights diagnostic challenges.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe clinical management of occult hepatitis B virus infection

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Mak LY … Yuen MF · Nature Reviews Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 57.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=315 · Sep 16, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Longitudinal gut microbiome dynamics during immunotherapy identify microbial features of clinical benefit in advanced primary liver cancer.

Diagnosticmicrobiomebiomarkertranslationalbasic science
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a biomarker finding requiring validation before clinical use in liver cancer immunotherapy.
ContextExtends prior links between baseline microbiome and ICI response by showing dynamic on-treatment microbial remodeling improves prediction.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Qian Z … Lu Y · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=143 · Sep 14, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Access to liver transplantation for ACLF patients in a French center: initial trajectory matters.

New evidencealcohol-associated liver diseaseliver transplanthealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayIn ACLF patients, especially those with active alcohol use, older age, or early clinical deterioration, early referral to an LT center may improve listing probability. However, no direct clinical action is recommended yet as this is a retrospective single-center study.
What it found40% of ACLF patients referred for liver transplantation (LT) underwent LT, 34% died on the waiting list, and 26% were denied LT; active alcohol use (OR 0.19 [0.04-0.77]), age (OR 0.13 [0.03-0.43]), early clinical deterioration (OR 0.21 [0.06-0.65]), and initial care in non-LT centers (OR 3.82 [1.23-13.7]) were independently associated with lower listing probability.
ContextThis study confirms the impact of patient trajectory and comorbidities on LT listing, highlighting disparities based on referral source and alcohol use in a French LT center.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54

Decision at stakeearly liver transplantation for highly selected patients with severe AH unresponsive to medical management

For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Angles B … Lebossé F · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=636 · Sep 18, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Interpretable prediction model for short- and long-term hepatic encephalopathy and variceal rebleeding after TIPS: a real-world study.

New evidencehepatic encephalopathyvariceal bleedingartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a retrospective study validating a predictive model, not yet implemented in practice. Consider awaiting prospective validation before adopting this tool for risk stratification in patients undergoing TIPS.
What it foundMachine learning model (ML-VE) predicted 2-year post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy (OHE) and variceal rebleeding (VRB) with AUCs of 0.960 and 0.966, respectively, outperforming conventional scores (Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na; AUC 0.528-0.563 for OHE, 0.528-0.555 for VRB).
ContextChallenges reliance on conventional scores (Child-Pugh, MELD, MELD-Na) for post-TIPS risk prediction, showing superior discrimination with machine learning in a cohort of 636 patients with 2-6 years follow-up.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakerisk stratification for post-TIPS hepatic encephalopathy and variceal rebleeding

In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wan S … Song B · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=2,146 · Sep 17, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Association Between Trajectories of Estimated Plasma Volume Status and All-Cause Mortality in Severe Liver Cirrhosis Patients.

New evidencecirrhosisbiomarkerepidemiology
What it foundIn ICU cirrhosis patients, a high-level slightly decreasing ePVS trajectory (traj 4) had 1.65x higher 28-day mortality vs low-level slow increase (traj 1) (HR 1.65, 95% CI 1.15-2.38).
ContextExtends prior evidence on ePVS as a prognostic marker by showing trajectory-specific mortality risks in ICU cirrhosis patients, refining risk stratification.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Yan P … Luo L · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=1,876 · Sep 16, 2026 · JPEN · IF 3.2

Intravenous lipid emulsions with or without fish oil for the prevention of liver disease in VLBW neonates: A network meta-analysis.

New evidencemeta-analysispediatricparenteral nutritionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider fish oil-containing lipid emulsions for very low birth weight neonates at high risk of PN-associated liver disease, but recognize evidence is low certainty and derived from a single high-risk-of-bias study. A multicomponent emulsion showed nonsignificant reduction (OR 0.695, 0.440-1.099). No definitive recommendation yet: await larger trials with standardized cholestasis definitions.
What it foundFish oil/olive oil/soybean oil emulsion reduced liver disease vs soybean oil (OR 0.099, 95% CI 0.016-0.613), but based on one high-risk study; a multicomponent emulsion showed non-significant reduction (OR 0.695, 0.440-1.099).
ContextRefines prior pairwise comparisons by ranking all available lipid emulations via network meta-analysis, but with low certainty due to limited high-quality data.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK. "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries." Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:18-35 (doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.517)

Decision at stakethe prevention of parenteral nutrition-associated liver disease in very low birth weight neonates

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Per the ACG 2017 abstract and the 'Elevation of Total Bilirubin Level' section (summary statements + Figure 5 + Table 6): Elevated total serum bilirubin (normal usually <1.1 mg/dl) should be FRACTIONATED into conjugated (direct) and unconjugated (indirect) fractions; fractionation is most helpful when ALT/AST and alkaline phosphatase are normal or near-normal. An elevated serum conjugated (direct) bilirubin implies hepatocellular disease or biliary obstruction IN MOST SETTINGS, in contrast to unconjugated (which is over-production/hemolysis, decreased uptake, or decreased conjugation), the guideline keeps 'in most settings' rather than stating an absolute rule. PREDOMINANT-UNCONJUGATED elevation (Fig 5, left arm): history/exam, assess transaminases and ALP, review medications, evaluate for hemolysis (haptoglobin, reticulocytes, LDH) and for Gilbert's syndrome; in an asymptomatic person with mild unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia (<4 mg/dl) with normal transaminases/ALP, no hemolysis, and no offending drug, a presumptive Gilbert's diagnosis can be made and further evaluation is not routinely necessary (Gilbert's: total almost never >6 mg/dl, usually <3; fasting/illness raises it 2-3 fold). Optional UGT1A1 genotype and workup of uncommon Table-6 causes only if persistently unexplained. PREDOMINANT-CONJUGATED elevation (Fig 5, right arm): history/exam, assess transaminases and ALP, review medications, evaluate clinically overt etiologies (sepsis, TPN, cirrhosis, biliary obstruction), and perform right-upper-quadrant ultrasound, if ductal dilatation → ERCP or MRCP; if no ductal dilatation → check AMA, ANA and SMA. Per graded Recommendations 14-15, alkaline phosphatase elevation with or without bilirubin warrants anti-mitochondrial antibody for PBC and MR cholangiography or ERCP in conjunction with IgG4 for PSC (both Strong recommendation, very low quality). Consider liver biopsy for diagnostic confirmation when the elevation is otherwise unexplained, symptomatic, worsening over time, or associated with abnormal transaminases. Two rare BENIGN inherited conjugated hyperbilirubinemias, Dubin-Johnson and Rotor, show direct bilirubin ~50% of total with all other liver tests normal including ALP and GGT; it is not necessary to distinguish them. Conjugated total bilirubin may exceed 30 mg/dl in severe liver damage (e.g., alcoholic hepatitis with cirrhosis, or advanced cirrhosis with sepsis/renal failure), and an isolated conjugated hyperbilirubinemia may follow major surgery and typically resolves.

American College of Gastroenterology, Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK. "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries." Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112:18-35 (doi:10.1038/ajg.2016.517) · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Chiara MD … Terrin G · JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology meta analysis · n=3,220 · Sep 18, 2026 · Lancet GH · IF 39.1

Genetic variants and the risk of renal impairment in decompensated cirrhosis: a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study.

Basic sciencebasic sciencebiomarkerepidemiologytranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding identifying genetic risk for kidney failure in decompensated cirrhosis.
What it foundEach additional copy of the rs2099161(C) risk allele increased kidney failure risk in decompensated cirrhosis (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.21-2.11 for CC vs TT genotypes).
ContextThis literature reports that genetic variants are associated with the risk of renal impairment in decompensated cirrhosis, based on a multi-ancestry genome-wide association study.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· International Club of Ascites (ICA) & Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI), "Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting," Journal of Hepatology, 2024

Decision at stakethe genetic basis of renal impairment in decompensated cirrhosis

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Per the 2024 ADQI-ICA joint consensus (which updates the 2015 ICA-AKI criteria referenced in AASLD 2021), in a patient with cirrhosis and ascites: DIAGNOSE HRS-AKI when all of (a) cirrhosis with ascites; (b) AKI by KDIGO/ICA criteria, serum creatinine rise ≥0.3 mg/dL (26.5 µmol/L) within 48h or ≥50% from a baseline known or presumed within the prior 7 days, and/or urine output ≤0.5 mL/kg/h for ≥6h (strong recommendation, grade A); (c) absence of improvement in serum creatinine and/or urine output within 24h following adequate volume resuscitation WHEN CLINICALLY INDICATED, the consensus recommends AGAINST systematic 48h albumin administration as a diagnostic requisite (strong recommendation, grade D), and only where volume status is equivocal is a single fluid challenge (250-500 mL crystalloid, or 1-1.5 g/kg of 20-25% albumin) assessed within 24h; and (d) absence of strong evidence for an alternative primary cause of AKI (e.g., septic shock requiring vasopressors, acute glomerular injury, obstruction, or nephrotoxin-induced AKI) (not graded). HRS-AKI is a phenotype specific to advanced cirrhosis and ascites: coexisting CKD, tubular injury or proteinuria do NOT exclude it, and it may coexist with, or be superimposed on, other AKI etiologies rather than requiring pure exclusion. TREAT: immediately on diagnosis start a vasoconstrictor plus 20-25% albumin (strong recommendation, grade A). Terlipressin is first-line, continuous IV infusion 2-12 mg/day, titrated up by ≥2 mg/day every 24h to a maximum 12 mg/day if serum creatinine has not fallen ≥25%; or IV bolus 1-2 mg every 6h, escalated from 1 mg to 2 mg every 6h on that same ≥25% serum-creatinine response threshold, with the 12 mg/day maximum applying only to continuous infusion and not to bolus dosing. If terlipressin is unavailable or contraindicated, norepinephrine (continuous infusion 0.5-3 mg/h, up-titrated 0.5 mg/h every 4h to raise MAP ≥10 mmHg; requires ICU care and a central line) may be more appropriate. Midodrine 7.5-15 mg PO every 8h plus octreotide 100-200 µg SC every 8h with albumin is third-line, considered only if terlipressin is contraindicated AND transfer to ICU for norepinephrine is not possible. Give 20-25% albumin 20-40 g/day with any vasoconstrictor, adjusted daily to volume status and withheld for fluid overload/pulmonary edema. Discontinue vasoconstrictors when serum creatinine returns to within 0.3 mg/dL of baseline, for a severe adverse reaction, if kidney function does not improve after 48h at maximum tolerated dose, if RRT is indicated, or at a maximum of 14 days of therapy (strong recommendation, grade B). Initiation of RRT should be individualized to clinical context and anticipated or observed life-threatening AKI-related complications (best-practice statement) rather than framed strictly as a transplant-bridge measure. Recommend expedited evaluation for liver transplantation following an episode of AKI (best-practice statement); LT in selected patients is the definitive treatment for HRS-AKI regardless of vasoconstrictor response (strong recommendation, grade A), with vasoconstrictors serving as a bridge to transplantation or renal recovery rather than a cure.

International Club of Ascites (ICA) & Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI), "Acute kidney injury in patients with cirrhosis: Acute Disease Quality Initiative (ADQI) and International Club of Ascites (ICA) joint multidisciplinary consensus meeting," Journal of Hepatology, 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Sanchez LO … CANONIC, PREDICT, ACLARA, ANRS CO12 CirVir, and CIRRAL study groups · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 39.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=192 · Sep 17, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Carriage of the Laboratory of Genetics and Physiology Protein 2 Q425R Variant Reduces Liver Disease Severity in European Patients With Chronic Hepatitis Delta.

Basic scienceviral hepatitisbiomarkerbasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in untreated CHD patients, suggesting a potential role of host innate immunity in disease progression.
What it foundLGP2 Q425R carriers had a lower prevalence of cirrhosis (60.7% vs. 76.3% in WT carriers, p=0.025) and higher platelet counts (152 vs. 116 × 10³/μL, p=0.022) in untreated European CHD patients, with cirrhosis defined by LSM > 12 kPa.
ContextThis study confirms in vivo that enhanced host innate immune responses, mediated by the LGP2 Q425R variant, may modulate CHD progression in untreated European patients, aligning with prior in vitro findings.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakerisk stratification of cirrhosis in chronic hepatitis delta

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Cmet S … Toniutto P · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=45 · Sep 16, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

HBV induces immunosuppressive macrophages via metabolic and epigenetic reprogramming to facilitate the establishment of chronic persistent infection.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalviral hepatitisbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in vitro identifying potential therapeutic targets for HBV chronicity.
What it foundHBV surface antigen (HBsAg) drives immunosuppressive macrophage differentiation via H3K18 lactylation, increasing IL-10 secretion and reducing TNF-α synthesis in vitro.
ContextOpens a question on HBV's role in immune evasion, suggesting metabolic-epigenetic pathways as novel therapeutic targets.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakeunderstanding the mechanisms of HBV persistence and immunosuppression in chronic infection

Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wang Z … Tu Z · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=286 · Sep 14, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

An integrated Phase II/III randomized study comparing durvalumab and tremelimumab ± Hepatic ArteriaL infusion chemotherapy with GEMOX in hepatocellular Carcinoma with high tumor burdEn - ALICE (PRODIGE89 - UCGI44 - ALICE).

New therapyhepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a phase II/III trial in progress, awaiting efficacy and safety results.
What it foundPhase II/III trial testing GEMOX-based HAIC plus durvalumab/tremelimumab vs durvalumab/tremelimumab alone in advanced HCC with high tumor burden (Vp4 PVTT, Vp3 PVTT with bilateral involvement, >50% liver involvement).
ContextAddresses an unmet need in advanced HCC with high tumor burden, a population underrepresented in prior trials; HAIC has shown promise in Asian populations but lacks validation in Western cohorts.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Letissier O … Edeline J · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=11 · Sep 16, 2026 · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5

Factor IX Padua AAV gene therapy in adolescents with hemophilia B: a phase 1 trial.

New evidencepediatricbiomarkertranslationalbasic science
Clinical takeawayConsider BBM-H901 gene therapy for adolescents with severe or moderately severe hemophilia B (FIX:C ≤2 IU/dl) in clinical trials, monitoring for adverse events such as liver enzyme elevation and corticosteroid-associated rash.
What it foundAAV gene therapy BBM-H901 in adolescents with hemophilia B (FIX:C ≤2 IU/dl) increased mean FIX:C to 41.8 IU/dl at 52 weeks and reduced annualized bleeding rate from 13.9 to 0.5, with observed adverse events including elevated liver enzymes, white blood cell count, and rash.
ContextExtends prior adult data on AAV gene therapy for hemophilia B to adolescents, showing similar efficacy and safety, but with notable adverse events requiring careful monitoring.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Xue F … Zhang L · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=120 · Sep 14, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Cumulative mean pulmonary artery pressure as a marker of hepatic congestion in patients with chronic heart failure.

Basic sciencehepatic encephalopathyportal hypertensionbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a proof-of-concept study using hemodynamic data from the CardioMEMS device to explore hepatic congestion in chronic heart failure.
What it foundCumulative mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) correlates with MELD-XI score, suggesting persistent venous congestion over time is more relevant to hepatic injury than single time-point measurements.
ContextChallenges current clinical markers by proposing cumulative mPAP as a potential predictor of hepatic dysfunction in chronic heart failure.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries', 2017

Decision at stakethe clinical decision to pursue cardiac workup for congestive hepatopathy

When LFT abnormalities (either cholestatic-pattern with relatively spared transaminases or acute hepatocellular injury) occur alongside elevated right-sided filling pressures, pericardial disease, or systemic congestion, pursue cardiac workup (echocardiogram, BNP/NT-proBNP, hepatic venous Doppler, cardiac MRI or right heart catheterization if equivocal) and treat the underlying cardiac/pericardial driver, pericardiectomy for constriction, volume management for right heart failure, valve surgery for severe TR, HF GDMT.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

When LFT abnormalities (either cholestatic-pattern with relatively spared transaminases or acute hepatocellular injury) occur alongside elevated right-sided filling pressures, pericardial disease, or systemic congestion, pursue cardiac workup (echocardiogram, BNP/NT-proBNP, hepatic venous Doppler, cardiac MRI or right heart catheterization if equivocal) and treat the underlying cardiac/pericardial driver, pericardiectomy for constriction, volume management for right heart failure, valve surgery for severe TR, HF GDMT. Defer the cirrhosis SOC pathway (NSBB initiation, HCC screen intensification, transplant workup) until cardiac evaluation completes, since congestion-driven liver findings often improve with treatment of the cardiac cause and elastography is falsely elevated in a congested liver. Monitor LFTs during diuresis and reserve liver biopsy for cases where etiology remains unclear after cardiac workup.

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries', 2017 · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Pan C … Ge J · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №12 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS