← Issue №12/ week of Sep 20, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Pancreas/Biliary, in full.

All 6 Pancreas/Biliary papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 6, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Pancreas/Biliary rct · n=107 · Sep 16, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Impact of non-enteric-coated pancreatic enzyme replacement therapy (NEPERT) on pain in patients with chronic pancreatitis: a double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled, randomised trial.

New evidencechronic pancreatitis
Clinical takeawayDo not prescribe non-enteric-coated PERT for pain control in chronic pancreatitis.
What it foundNEPERT did not improve pain in chronic pancreatitis vs placebo (Izbicki score difference -2.5, 95% CI -9.3 to 4.2 at 12 weeks).
ContextChallenges prior assumptions about PERT's role in pain management for chronic pancreatitis, which lacked robust evidence.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720.

Confirm chronic pancreatitis on CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, CT for late calcific disease, MRI/MRCP (with secretin where available) for earlier ductal and parenchymal change, EUS an acceptable alternative; per ACG 2020, "Diagnosis is made usually on cross-sectional imaging, with modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography and pancreatic function tests playing a secondary role".

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Confirm chronic pancreatitis on CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, CT for late calcific disease, MRI/MRCP (with secretin where available) for earlier ductal and parenchymal change, EUS an acceptable alternative; per ACG 2020, "Diagnosis is made usually on cross-sectional imaging, with modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography and pancreatic function tests playing a secondary role". Fecal elastase does NOT confirm chronic pancreatitis: it is a test of exocrine FUNCTION and is the appropriate initial test for the exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) that chronic pancreatitis causes, a consequence of the disease, not the diagnosis of it. A normal fecal elastase does not exclude chronic pancreatitis and a low one does not establish it. Per AGA 2023, fecal elastase must be run on a semi-solid or solid stool specimen; below 100 mcg/g is good evidence of EPI and 100-200 mcg/g is indeterminate (below 200 mcg/g is the cutoff commonly used to screen). Then manage with smoking and alcohol cessation, PERT for exocrine insufficiency titrated to symptoms, fat-soluble vitamin and bone surveillance, and individualized type 3c diabetes control, considering insulin early in patients with marked hyperglycemia or symptoms of insulin deficiency. Treat pain with a stepwise ladder from scheduled acetaminophen and neuromodulators to EUS-guided celiac plexus block and endoscopic/surgical intervention, referring early for surgery per ESCAPE 2020 in candidates with main pancreatic duct obstruction. Screen for PDAC per lifetime risk and pursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing and autoimmune pancreatitis evaluation.

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Talukdar R … Reddy ND · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=1,785 · Sep 16, 2026 · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5

Liquid biopsy for early detection of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.

Diagnosticbiomarkerpancreatic cancerartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a promising biomarker for early PDAC detection requires validation in large-scale prospective studies.
What it foundA blood-based miRNA assay combined with CA19-9 (PANXEON) achieved 86.8% sensitivity for stage I-II PDAC, with false-positive rates of 3.2% in low-risk controls and 15.6% in high-risk controls.
ContextThis study introduces a novel composite biomarker for early PDAC detection, addressing a critical unmet need in a disease with poor outcomes when diagnosed late. It complements existing strategies but is not yet ready for clinical use.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457.

Decision at stakethe detection of early-stage pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma

Offer GERMLINE testing for inherited susceptibility to EVERY patient with confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma regardless of family history, using a comprehensive multi-gene panel; separately, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who are candidates for anti-cancer therapy, obtain TUMOR/SOMATIC molecular profiling (broad NGS; RNA-based assays improve fusion detection; cell-free/liquid biopsy if tissue is insufficient).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Evaluate suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with a dedicated pancreatic-protocol (multiphasic, contrast-enhanced) CT of the abdomen as the preferred imaging for diagnosis and staging (MRI/MRCP is an acceptable alternative); PET/CT may be added after, never as a substitute for, protocol CT/MRI in higher-risk situations. Obtain tissue confirmation, preferably by EUS-guided FNA/FNB with core biopsy where feasible; biopsy is generally required before neoadjuvant or palliative therapy, whereas patients with clearly resectable disease may proceed to surgery without preoperative biopsy. Measure baseline CA 19-9 (interpret after biliary decompression / with normal bilirubin; it can be falsely low in Lewis-antigen-negative patients and falsely elevated with cholestasis). Offer GERMLINE testing for inherited susceptibility to EVERY patient with confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma regardless of family history, using a comprehensive multi-gene panel; separately, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who are candidates for anti-cancer therapy, obtain TUMOR/SOMATIC molecular profiling (broad NGS; RNA-based assays improve fusion detection; cell-free/liquid biopsy if tissue is insufficient). Assign resectability, resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced (unresectable), or metastatic, by multidisciplinary review, ideally at a high-volume center. RESECTABLE disease: upfront resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy for head/uncinate; distal pancreatectomy ± splenectomy for body/tail) followed by adjuvant therapy, or neoadjuvant therapy in selected high-risk patients; preferred adjuvant regimen is modified FOLFIRINOX in patients able to tolerate it, ideally begun within 12 weeks of surgery, for a total of ~6 months of perioperative systemic therapy. BORDERLINE RESECTABLE and LOCALLY ADVANCED disease: neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with or without subsequent chemoradiation/RT, then restaging and reassessment for resection. METASTATIC disease by performance status: good PS (ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function), first-line FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX, or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, with clinical trial preferred; after ~4-6 months without progression, transition to a maintenance strategy (including olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 carriers who have NOT progressed on first-line platinum-based therapy), a clinical trial, or a treatment break; intermediate PS (ECOG 2), clinical trial preferred, otherwise less-intensive first-line therapy (preferred gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [category 1], or single-agent gemcitabine or capecitabine, or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI/CapeOx), since the intensive triplets (FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX and NALIRIFOX) are limited to ECOG 0-1 and are generally not appropriate at ECOG 2, with the same maintenance-versus-progression reassessment applied after ~4-6 months without progression; poor PS (ECOG 3-4), palliative/best supportive care, with single-agent chemotherapy or a biomarker-directed agent only if clinically appropriate. Treat by molecular target wherever an actionable alteration is present, across lines: pembrolizumab (or dostarlimab) for MSI-H/dMMR and pembrolizumab for TMB-H, olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 (maintenance after platinum), larotrectinib/entrectinib for NTRK fusions, selpercatinib for RET fusions, dabrafenib + trametinib for BRAF V600E, erdafitinib for FGFR2 alterations, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive disease, zenocutuzumab for NRG1 fusion-positive disease, and (in recent NCCN versions) KRAS G12C inhibitors (adagrasib/sotorasib), several of these after prior systemic therapy. Integrate supportive care throughout: relieve obstructive jaundice with an endoscopic self-expanding metal stent in non-operative or neoadjuvant pathways, but do NOT perform routine preoperative biliary drainage before planned upfront resection; treat exocrine insufficiency with pancreatic enzyme replacement titrated to symptoms (common starting dose ~40,000-50,000 units of lipase with main meals, roughly half with snacks, increased as needed); manage refractory pain with celiac plexus neurolysis or palliative RT; relieve gastric outlet obstruction with surgical or EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (or enteral stenting); and provide VTE prophylaxis, nutritional support, and early palliative care.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Xu C … Goel A · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=163 · Sep 16, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

A Prospective Evaluation of Serum MUC5AC for Predicting Malignancy in Patients With Acute Cholangitis.

Diagnosticbiomarkercholangiocarcinoma
Clinical takeawayConsider measuring serum MUC5AC alongside CA19-9 and total bilirubin in acute cholangitis patients to assess malignancy risk, particularly in cases where metastatic disease is suspected, pending further validation of MUC5AC thresholds and clinical availability.
What it foundHigher MUC5AC (OR: 1.2385, 95% CI: 1.0906-1.4065) and elevated total bilirubin (OR: 1.2086, 95% CI: 1.1068-1.3197) independently predict malignant cholangitis, with MUC5AC levels being significantly higher in metastatic cases.
ContextThis study introduces MUC5AC as a potential biomarker for malignant cholangitis, complementing existing markers like CA19-9 and total bilirubin, which are currently used in practice. However, specific thresholds for MUC5AC and its clinical utility require further validation.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), "ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis" (Buxbaum JL et al., Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89(6):1075-1105), 2019

Decision at stakepredicting malignancy in patients with acute cholangitis

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Risk-stratify suspected choledocholithiasis (high >50%, intermediate 10-50%, low <10% probability). HIGH-risk criteria, any of which should directly prompt ERCP: (1) CBD stone on ultrasound or cross-sectional imaging; (2) ascending cholangitis; (3) total bilirubin >4 mg/dL AND dilated CBD (>6 mm in adults with gallbladder in situ, >8 mm after cholecystectomy). Gallstone pancreatitis was deliberately REMOVED as a high-risk criterion in the 2019 revision. INTERMEDIATE risk (abnormal liver biochemical tests, age >55 y, or bile-duct dilation on imaging): the panel suggests confirmation with either EUS or MRCP (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence; choice by patient preference, local expertise, availability), laparoscopic intraoperative cholangiography (IOC) or intraoperative US are equally sanctioned alternatives. LOW risk: cholecystectomy with or without IOC/intraoperative US if indicated for symptomatic cholelithiasis; no ERCP and no mandatory advanced biliary imaging. In gallstone pancreatitis WITHOUT cholangitis or biliary obstruction/choledocholithiasis, the panel recommends AGAINST urgent (<48 h) ERCP (strong recommendation, low-quality evidence). Same-admission cholecystectomy is recommended for patients with MILD gallstone pancreatitis (consensus, PONCHO-based); ERCP with prophylactic sphincterotomy should not be used as an alternative to cholecystectomy unless surgery is absolutely contraindicated (e.g., recurrent pancreatitis in end-stage liver disease). For large bile-duct stones, the panel suggests endoscopic sphincterotomy followed by large-balloon dilation (ES-LBD) rather than sphincterotomy alone (conditional, moderate); for large AND difficult stones, it suggests intraductal therapy (cholangioscopy-guided EHL or laser lithotripsy) or conventional therapy with papillary dilation, chosen by local expertise, cost, and patient/physician preference (conditional, very low). Timing versus cholecystectomy: pre- or postoperative ERCP or laparoscopic bile-duct clearance for patients at high risk or with positive IOC, depending on local surgical and endoscopic expertise (consensus).

American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ASGE), "ASGE guideline on the role of endoscopy in the evaluation and management of choledocholithiasis" (Buxbaum JL et al., Gastrointest Endosc 2019;89(6):1075-1105), 2019 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Aslan M … Ateş İ · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary review · Sep 14, 2026 · Dig Dis Sci · IF 2.5

Advances in Minimally Invasive Diagnosis and Treatment Procedures for Pancreaticobiliary Maljunction: A Narrative Review.

New evidencepancreatic cancercholangiocarcinomabiliary stricture
Clinical takeawayConsider laparoscopic complete extrahepatic bile duct excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy as the standard surgical approach for PBM with congenital biliary dilatation, recognizing robotic-assisted surgery has longer operative times and higher costs, and endoscopic interventions are reserved for high-risk surgical patients.
What it foundLaparoscopic complete extrahepatic bile duct excision with Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy offers equivalent oncological outcomes to open surgery (the comparator) but with significantly less blood loss, shorter hospital stay, and faster recovery in pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) with congenital biliary dilatation.
ContextThis literature reports that minimally invasive approaches are increasingly favored for the management of pancreaticobiliary maljunction, though evidence remains narrative and not yet systematic.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· NCCN Biliary Tract Cancers V2.2025 (V1.2026 in circulation) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance on PSC and Cholangiocarcinoma

Decision at stakethe management of pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM) and its associated cancer risk

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Stage cholangiocarcinoma with multiphasic MRI/MRCP plus CT chest/abdomen/pelvis, obtain tissue via ERCP brush cytology with FISH, cholangioscopy-directed biopsy, or EUS-FNA (avoiding primary perihilar tumor sampling if liver transplant is being considered due to theoretical seeding risk), and manage through a multidisciplinary tumor board with treatment stratified by tumor location: resect (anatomic hepatectomy for intrahepatic, hemihepatectomy with bile duct resection for perihilar, Whipple for distal) with adjuvant capecitabine (category 1, per BILCAP) when resectable. For unresectable or metastatic disease, first-line systemic therapy is gemcitabine plus cisplatin combined with a PD-L1/PD-1 checkpoint inhibitor, either durvalumab (TOPAZ-1) or pembrolizumab (KEYNOTE-966), both listed as category 1 preferred options by NCCN; comprehensive molecular/genomic profiling is recommended for all unresectable/metastatic candidates for systemic therapy to identify actionable targets (e.g., FGFR2 fusions, IDH1 mutations, HER2 amplification) for later-line therapy. Selected unresectable early-stage perihilar tumors may undergo neoadjuvant chemoradiation and liver transplant per the Mayo Clinic protocol at experienced centers, and jaundice or cholangitis is managed with biliary drainage (ERCP preferred over PTC).

NCCN Biliary Tract Cancers V2.2025 (V1.2026 in circulation) / AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance on PSC and Cholangiocarcinoma · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Yasen A … Zheng L · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=202 · Sep 14, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Age-specific pancreatic cancer risk in Italian CDKN2A families.

New evidencepancreatic cancerepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider referring CDKN2A PV carriers for pancreatic cancer surveillance starting at age 40, ideally in a research setting by a multidisciplinary team, as cumulative incidence rises significantly thereafter. Tailor screening intensity based on variant type (higher risk for E27X vs G101W) and regional risk profiles. Ensure genetic counseling and germline testing are part of the process.
What it foundIn Italian CDKN2A pathogenic variant carriers, pancreatic cancer (PC) cumulative incidence was <1% until age 52, 10% by 70, and 19% after 90, with a standardized incidence ratio (SIR) of 34.26 [95%CI=27.12-42.7] compared to regional rates.
ContextConfirms high PC risk in CDKN2A PV carriers, aligning with Dutch data but emphasizing later onset in Italian families. Supports existing surveillance recommendations while refining age and variant-specific risks. Consistent with CAPS Consortium guidelines.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium, Goggins M, et al. "Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium." Gut, 2020;69(1):7-17.

Decision at stakestarting pancreatic cancer surveillance in CDKN2A carriers at age 40

Start ages (exact age often did not reach consensus): CDKN2A at age 40; Peutz-Jeghers at least by age 40, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative; hereditary pancreatitis/PRSS1 at age 40 or 20 years after the first attack; BRCA2/ATM/PALB2/BRCA1/Lynch carriers at age 45 or 50, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative; familial pancreatic cancer kindreds at age 50 or 55, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative (experts split between 50 and 55).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The CAPS Consortium recommends pancreatic surveillance for selected high-risk individuals to detect stage I (T1N0M0, margin-negative resectable) pancreatic cancer and high-grade precursors (PanIN-3, IPMN with high-grade dysplasia); it should ideally be performed in a research setting by a multidisciplinary team at a center with appropriate expertise. Candidate groups and their affected-relative requirements: Peutz-Jeghers/STK11 carriers regardless of family history; CDKN2A carriers regardless of family history (surveillance regardless of family history reached 77% agreement, still meeting the guideline's ≥75% consensus threshold as a Grade 1 'definitely do it' recommendation, while surveillance in those with at least one affected first-degree relative reached stronger 99% agreement); BRCA2 carriers with at least one affected FDR or at least two affected relatives of any degree; ATM, PALB2, and Lynch (MLH1/MSH2/MSH6) carriers only if at least one affected FDR; BRCA1 with an affected FDR did NOT reach consensus; hereditary pancreatitis was an area of disagreement (no consensus on whether or how to surveil); and familial pancreatic cancer kindreds, an individual with at least one affected FDR who in turn has an affected FDR, qualify on pedigree alone without an identified germline variant. Germline testing and genetic counseling should be considered for those eligible for surveillance but are not an absolute prerequisite. Start ages (exact age often did not reach consensus): CDKN2A at age 40; Peutz-Jeghers at least by age 40, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative; hereditary pancreatitis/PRSS1 at age 40 or 20 years after the first attack; BRCA2/ATM/PALB2/BRCA1/Lynch carriers at age 45 or 50, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative; familial pancreatic cancer kindreds at age 50 or 55, or 10 years younger than the youngest affected relative (experts split between 50 and 55). New-onset diabetes in a high-risk individual should trigger screening regardless of age. Modalities: both baseline and follow-up surveillance use EUS and MRI/MRCP, alternated (consensus that both are used, but NO consensus on if or how to alternate them); CT is reserved for individuals who cannot undergo MRI/EUS or when a solid lesion is detected; CA19-9 is an additional test only when imaging shows worrisome features; routine fasting glucose and/or HbA1c testing is advised. Interval: in the absence of pancreatic abnormalities, or with only low-risk findings such as pancreatic lobulation, cysts without worrisome features, or a <1 cm non-functioning neuroendocrine tumor, continue 12-monthly imaging. Concerning findings: a newly detected solid lesion of uncertain significance should be re-imaged at 3 months (3-6 months for CDKN2A carriers); EUS-FNA is indicated for solid lesions ≥5 mm, cystic lesions with worrisome features (mural nodule, solid component, duct dilation), or a main-pancreatic-duct stricture without a mass. Surgical resection, performed at a specialty center as an oncologic/radical resection, is indicated for a solid lesion (≥5 mm; resection regardless of size did not reach consensus), or an IPMN with a mural nodule, an enhancing solid component, symptoms (pancreatitis/jaundice/pain), or a main pancreatic duct ≥10 mm. Surveillance of average-risk individuals is not recommended.

International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium, Goggins M, et al. "Management of patients with increased risk for familial pancreatic cancer: updated recommendations from the International Cancer of the Pancreas Screening (CAPS) Consortium." Gut, 2020;69(1):7-17. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Dalmasso B … Ghiorzo P · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=30 · Sep 20, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

The Hidden Architecture of Pancreatic Ducts: 3D Anatomical Reconstruction and Its Implication on Pancreatic Resection.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic study in cadaveric specimens mapping ductal anatomy, which may inform future surgical planning but requires validation in living patients.
What it foundPancreatic heads had the highest number of branch ducts (median 96 ± 27, with 45 ± 8 first-order branches), while the isthmus had the fewest (p < 0.001), and 17% of specimens had main duct bifurcation at the corporeocaudal junction.
ContextCurrent practice recognizes main pancreatic duct diameter as a POPF risk factor, but this study is the first to quantify branch duct variability by region, suggesting a potential anatomical basis for site-specific fistula risk.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Frey S … Baqué P · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №12 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Pancreas/Biliary by RSS