← Issue №11/ week of Sep 13, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Esophagus/Reflux, in full.

All 3 Esophagus/Reflux papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 3, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=230 · Sep 8, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

Clinical Spectrum of Esophageal Motility Disorders in Nonobstructive Dysphagia: A Multicenter, Multiethnic Study.

Diagnosticesophageal motilitydysphagiaachalasiabiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn patients with nonobstructive dysphagia, recognize weight loss, nausea, and absence of dyspepsia as clues to achalasia. Use RDC-IRP at approximately 18 mmHg during HRM to differentiate achalasia from EGJOO. This threshold was validated in an Asian population; generalizability to other demographics may require confirmation.
What it foundAmong 230 Asian dysphagia patients, achalasia (23.9%) was predicted by weight loss (adjusted OR 2.99), nausea/vomiting (OR 3.35), and absence of dyspepsia (OR 0.09). RDC-IRP at 18 mmHg threshold differentiated achalasia from non-achalasia with 90% sensitivity, 76.9% specificity, and AUC 0.894.
ContextAchalasia diagnosis relies on HRM and Chicago Classification criteria, which are standard. This study validates the RDC-IRP (rapid drink challenge integrated relaxation pressure) threshold for differentiation from EGJOO in a multiethnic Asian population, providing an actionable diagnostic refinement.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function (Chicago Classification Working Group); Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. "Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©." Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2021;33(1):e14058

Decision at stakeUse rapid drink challenge-integrated relaxation pressure to discriminate achalasia from other esophageal motility disorders when baseline IRP values are borderline or overlap between diagnoses

Diagnose non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry performed with the full CCv4.0 protocol, and treat the manometric pattern as a disorder only when it is accompanied by clinically relevant symptoms.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry performed with the full CCv4.0 protocol, and treat the manometric pattern as a disorder only when it is accompanied by clinically relevant symptoms. The protocol requires both positions: supine (60-second adaptation, 30-second landmark/baseline, ten 5 mL wet swallows, one multiple rapid swallow of five 2 mL swallows at 2-3 second intervals) and upright at >=80 degrees (five 5 mL wet swallows plus a 200 mL rapid drink challenge); solid swallows, a solid test meal, or pharmacologic provocation (amyl nitrite, cholecystokinin) are added when standard swallows do not explain the symptom. IRP thresholds are manufacturer- and position-specific (for the Medtronic system, abnormal median IRP is >=15 mmHg supine and >=12 mmHg upright). CCv4.0 grades diagnoses as conclusive or inconclusive: distal esophageal spasm requires a normal median IRP plus >=20% premature contractions (distal latency <4.5 s with DCI >=450 mmHg*s*cm) AND clinically relevant dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain; hypercontractile esophagus requires a normal median IRP plus >=20% hypercontractile supine swallows (DCI >8,000 mmHg*s*cm) AND clinically relevant dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain, with mechanical obstruction excluded. Ineffective esophageal motility requires a normal IRP in both positions plus >70% ineffective swallows or >=50% failed peristalsis, where an ineffective swallow is weak (DCI 100-450), failed (DCI <100), or fragmented; 50-70% ineffective swallows is inconclusive and requires supportive testing. Absent contractility requires a normal median IRP in both supine and upright positions with 100% failed peristalsis, and because achalasia can present this way, provocative testing and adjunctive investigation are needed when there is any clinical suspicion of achalasia. Manometric EGJ outflow obstruction is never conclusive on manometry alone: it requires an elevated median IRP in BOTH the primary and secondary position plus >=20% of swallows with elevated intrabolus pressure, with peristalsis preserved; a conclusive, clinically relevant diagnosis additionally requires compatible symptoms (dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain) AND at least one supportive investigation showing obstruction (timed barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe). An isolated elevated supine IRP, an isolated elevated upright IRP, or isolated elevated intrabolus pressure alone are each inconclusive and do not establish EGJOO. CCv4.0 is a diagnostic classification and does not issue treatment recommendations; therapy for these entities is not traceable to this document.

International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function (Chicago Classification Working Group); Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. "Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©." Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2021;33(1):e14058 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Lim JX … Chuah KH · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=580 · Sep 7, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Excessive supragastric belching can be identified in up to one-fifth of patients with conclusive gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.

New evidenceGERDesophageal motility
Clinical takeawayIn GERD patients undergoing off-therapy pH-impedance monitoring with >115 total or >56 proximal reflux episodes, excessive SGB is likely present. However, this phenotype carries lower overall acid burden than non-excessive SGB; patients with predominant heartburn or chest pain and higher distal acid exposure are less likely to have excessive SGB. While SGB phenotyping may inform behavioral counseling strategies, the lower total acid exposure in this group suggests it is not a marker of severe reflux burden.
What it found18.5% of GERD patients with pathological reflux have excessive supragastric belching (≥13 episodes/24 hours). SGB-related acid contributes 24.6% of total AET in this phenotype, but excessive SGB patients paradoxically have lower TOTAL acid exposure than non-excessive SGB patients (p=0.01). Thresholds >115 total reflux episodes or >56 proximal episodes achieve >90% specificity for excessive SGB.
ContextApplies to GERD patients selected for tertiary-center off-therapy pH-impedance monitoring. Does not establish intervention efficacy or generalize to routine GERD populations managed without diagnostic monitoring.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56

Decision at stakePerform reflux monitoring off therapy in patients with refractory or unclear GERD to establish diagnosis and characterize mechanism

Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In patients with classic GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and no alarm symptoms, give an 8-week trial of empiric PPI ONCE DAILY before a meal (strong, moderate evidence); administer PPI 30-60 minutes before a meal rather than at bedtime (strong, moderate). Endoscopy is the FIRST test in patients presenting with dysphagia or other alarm symptoms, the guideline names weight loss and GI bleeding, and also in patients with multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (strong, low). If classic symptoms respond to the 8-week trial, attempt to discontinue the PPI (conditional, low); for patients without erosive esophagitis or Barrett's whose symptoms resolved, an attempt at discontinuation should be made; patients requiring maintenance should take the lowest effective dose. If symptoms do not respond adequately to the 8-week trial, or return on discontinuation, perform diagnostic endoscopy, ideally after PPIs are stopped for 2-4 weeks (strong, low). Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low). In refractory GERD, optimize PPI therapy first (strong, moderate); then pH monitoring OFF PPIs if GERD was not previously established by pH study, long-segment Barrett's, or LA grade C/D esophagitis, versus impedance-pH ON PPIs where GERD is already established but symptoms persist on twice-daily PPI (both conditional, low). Before antireflux surgery or endoscopic therapy, HRM is recommended to rule out achalasia and absent contractility, with provocative testing (e.g., multiple rapid swallows) to identify contractile reserve in ineffective esophageal motility; on-therapy reflux monitoring is suggested before intervention in patients with prior objective GERD findings who remain symptomatic. Antireflux surgery by an experienced surgeon is an option for patients with OBJECTIVE evidence of GERD, with severe esophagitis (LA C/D), large hiatal hernia, or persistent troublesome symptoms benefiting most; TIF is suggested only for troublesome regurgitation or heartburn in patients who do not wish to undergo antireflux surgery and who are WITHOUT severe esophagitis (LA C/D) or hiatal hernia >2 cm. For extraesophageal symptoms WITHOUT typical GERD symptoms, perform reflux testing BEFORE starting PPI therapy (strong, moderate); with concomitant typical symptoms, consider twice-daily PPI for 8-12 weeks before further testing (conditional, low). Lifestyle: weight loss in overweight/obese patients (strong, moderate); avoid meals within 2-3 hours of bedtime, avoid tobacco, avoid trigger foods, and elevate the head of the bed for nighttime symptoms (all conditional, low).

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Chan WW … Gyawali CP · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=174 · Sep 11, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

International case-control study of DNA methylation biomarkers for the minimally invasive diagnosis of esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Diagnosticbiomarkertranslationalesophageal cancer
Clinical takeawayNo direct clinical action yet: this case-control study validates a biomarker signature in tissue samples but has not been prospectively tested against EGD or in intended clinical populations. Prospective validation is required before clinical adoption. The approach is promising for expanding ESCC screening access in LMICs if validated.
What it foundFour-marker methylation signature (C1ORF70, CG20655070, SKOR1, PPFIA3) achieved AUC 0.92 in a 52-patient test cohort using sponge-capsule-obtained esophageal samples, with AUC 0.93 in the 122-patient training cohort.
ContextESCC diagnosis currently requires EGD, which is expensive and limited in availability in LMICs where ESCC is most common. This work expands on five prior methylation markers with six new markers and tests their combined diagnostic performance in minimally invasive sponge-capsule samples, a collection method that could increase access if prospective evidence supports it.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2023 (peer-reviewed publication; medically-unfit-vs-fit pathway split confirmed unchanged in current Version 3.2025)

Decision at stakehow to diagnose esophageal squamous cell carcinoma in resource-limited settings where endoscopy is unavailable

SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (ESOPH-2): cT1b-cT2, N0 LOW-RISK (<3 cm, well differentiated) → esophagectomy (non-cervical esophagus). cT2 N0 high-risk (LVI, ≥3 cm, poorly differentiated), cT1b-cT2 N+, or cT3-cT4a any N → PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION is preferred (or definitive chemoradiation). cT4b → definitive chemoradiation, or chemotherapy alone for trachea/great-vessel/vertebral/cardiac invasion. NCCN states explicitly: 'Preoperative chemoradiation is preferred for esophageal SCC.' Preoperative RT dose 41.4-50.4 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/day (23-28 fractions); preferred concurrent regimens include weekly paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 2 (CROSS, category 1) and fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (category 1).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text. The rest of this standard includes WORKUP (NCCN ESOPH-1), BIOMARKERS, POSTOPERATIVE (ESOPH-F) and 2 more.

Our full summary of this standard

WORKUP (NCCN ESOPH-1): H&P; EGD with biopsy; chest/abdomen CT with oral and IV contrast; pelvis CT with contrast ONLY as clinically indicated; FDG-PET/CT (skull base to mid-thigh) if no evidence of M1 disease; CBC and comprehensive chemistry; EUS if no evidence of M1 or unresectable disease; endoscopic resection (ER) is recommended for accurate staging of early-stage cancers (Tis, T1a, or T1b) and may also be therapeutic; bronchoscopy if the tumor is at or above the carina with no evidence of M1; biopsy of metastatic disease as clinically indicated; assign Siewert category; nutritional assessment and counseling; smoking-cessation counseling; screen for family history. BIOMARKERS: universal MSI (PCR/NGS) or MMR (IHC) testing AND universal PD-L1 testing in ALL newly diagnosed patients; HER2 and CLDN18.2 testing if advanced/metastatic adenocarcinoma is documented or suspected; NGS should be considered. Multidisciplinary evaluation is recommended for stage I-IVA (locoregional) disease (ESOPH-E). ENDOSCOPIC THERAPY (ESOPH-A): the goal of endoscopic therapy (EMR, ESD, and/or ablation) is complete removal or eradication of early-stage disease, pTis, pT1a, and SELECTED superficial pT1b without LVI, plus the pre-neoplastic Barrett's segment. Tis/HGD must first be fully characterized for nodularity, lateral spread and multifocality, with EUS to rule out nodal metastases in select higher-risk cases. Areas of nodularity or ulceration must be RESECTED, not ablated. Completely flat lesions ≤2 cm (squamous HGD/Tis, and BE with flat HGD) should be treated by ER because it gives more accurate histologic assessment; flat lesions >2 cm can be treated by ER but with greater complication risk, and may be treated by ablation alone (data for ablation-alone in squamous HGD are very limited). Lesions pathologically limited to lamina propria/muscularis mucosae (pT1a) or superficial submucosa (pT1b), in the absence of nodal metastases, LVI, or poor differentiation, can be treated with full ER, HOWEVER a thorough patient-and-surgeon discussion of esophagectomy versus the risk of concurrent nodal disease should be undertaken, especially for larger tumors or deeper invasion. Ablation of residual Barrett's should follow ER; complete BE eradication may also be achieved by widefield EMR or ESD at the initial intervention when needed to resect superficial tumor or nodularity ≤2 cm. For SCC, the level of evidence for ablation after ER is LOW; additional ablation may be needed only for multifocal HGD/CIS elsewhere, and may not be needed for completely excised lesions. Endoscopic therapy is 'PREFERRED' for limited early-stage disease: Tis and T1a, ≤2 cm, well or moderately differentiated. Esophagectomy is indicated for extensive carcinoma in situ (pTis/HGD), pT1a, or superficial pT1b, especially nodular disease not adequately controlled endoscopically. PRIMARY TREATMENT, MEDICALLY FIT PATIENTS, ADENOCARCINOMA (ESOPH-13): cT1b-cT2, N0 LOW-RISK (<3 cm, well differentiated) → esophagectomy. cT2 N0 HIGH-RISK (LVI, ≥3 cm, or poorly differentiated), cT1b-cT2 N+, or cT3-cT4a any N → perioperative systemic therapy is PREFERRED (FLOT: 5-FU 2600 mg/m2 IV over 24 h day 1, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, docetaxel 50 mg/m2, every 14 days, 4 cycles pre- and 4 cycles postoperatively; or FLOT + durvalumab 1500 mg for PD-L1 CPS ≥1 or TAP ≥1%, category 1 for EGJ, category 2A for esophageal adenocarcinoma; note MATTERHORN showed no EFS advantage for durvalumab in diffuse-type disease), QUALIFIER: perioperative therapy is preferred for patients medically fit and with access to frequent toxicity evaluation; preoperative chemoradiation for planned esophagectomy remains an option and may be considered for borderline-resectable patients or patients who are not FLOT candidates (perioperative FOLFOX/CAPOX is another alternative). Consider neoadjuvant or perioperative immune checkpoint inhibitor if the tumor is MSI-H/dMMR (in multidisciplinary consultation; the role of surgery after complete response is unclear). Definitive chemoradiation for patients who are medically unfit/inoperable for surgery or who decline surgery. cT4b → definitive chemoradiation, or chemotherapy alone with invasion of trachea, great vessels, vertebral body, or heart. SQUAMOUS CELL CARCINOMA (ESOPH-2): cT1b-cT2, N0 LOW-RISK (<3 cm, well differentiated) → esophagectomy (non-cervical esophagus). cT2 N0 high-risk (LVI, ≥3 cm, poorly differentiated), cT1b-cT2 N+, or cT3-cT4a any N → PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION is preferred (or definitive chemoradiation). cT4b → definitive chemoradiation, or chemotherapy alone for trachea/great-vessel/vertebral/cardiac invasion. NCCN states explicitly: 'Preoperative chemoradiation is preferred for esophageal SCC.' Preoperative RT dose 41.4-50.4 Gy at 1.8-2.0 Gy/day (23-28 fractions); preferred concurrent regimens include weekly paclitaxel 50 mg/m2 + carboplatin AUC 2 (CROSS, category 1) and fluorouracil + oxaliplatin (category 1). POSTOPERATIVE (ESOPH-F): nivolumab is the preferred postoperative regimen ONLY after PREOPERATIVE CHEMORADIATION with R0 resection and residual pathologic disease (category 1), 240 mg IV every 14 days for 16 weeks, then 480 mg IV every 28 days, maximum treatment duration 1 year. PALLIATION (ESOPH-A/H): esophageal dilation with balloons or bougies for temporary relief of malignant or treatment-related obstruction (avoid overdilation, perforation risk); long-term dysphagia palliation by endoscopic tumor ablation (Nd:YAG laser, PDT, cryoablation) or expandable metal/plastic stents; feeding gastrostomy or jejunostomy for anorexia/dysphagia/malnutrition, but placement of a GASTROSTOMY preoperatively may compromise the gastric vasculature and interfere with gastric-conduit reconstruction and SHOULD BE AVOIDED (feeding jejunostomy is generally preferred for postoperative nutritional support; multidisciplinary expertise is recommended before percutaneous gastrostomy).

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines): Esophageal and Esophagogastric Junction Cancers, Version 2.2023 (peer-reviewed publication; medically-unfit-vs-fit pathway split confirmed unchanged in current Version 3.2025) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Cheng Y … Meltzer SJ · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №11 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Esophagus/Reflux by RSS