← Issue №7/ week of Aug 16, 2026/ the whole section, in full

IBD, in full.

All 5 IBD papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 5, in full

most clinically useful first
IBD retrospective · n=15,687 · Aug 17, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Cancer Risk with Advanced Therapies in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: An Administrative Claims-based Study.

New evidencebiologicsJAK inhibitorshealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayWhen selecting an advanced IBD therapy, cancer risk is comparable among TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, and anti-interleukins; base selection on efficacy and tolerability. JAK inhibitor data are too sparse (n=384) and imprecise to determine if cancer risk differs. Counsel patients that follow-up was median 2.6 years; delayed malignancy risk over longer periods cannot be ruled out.
What it found3-year cancer incidence was 2.0-2.7% across TNF antagonists, vedolizumab, and anti-interleukins (adjusted HRs vs TNF antagonists 0.94-1.01, all 95% CIs crossing 1.0). JAK inhibitor data were from only 384 patients with very wide CI (0.5-4.6%, HR 0.33-2.16).
ContextThis real-world cohort addresses whether newer IBD biologics carry higher cancer risk than TNF antagonists. The comparable incidence across TNF antagonists and newer agents (vedolizumab, anti-interleukins, JAK inhibitors) supports basing therapy selection on efficacy and tolerability rather than cancer-risk differentiation.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH)

Decision at stakewhether cancer risk should differentiate choice among advanced therapy classes in Crohn's disease

… DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text. The rest of this standard includes MILD-TO-MODERATE.

Our full summary of this standard

Two current US guidelines govern Crohn's disease and should be read together. ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al.) remains the reference for diagnosis, mild-to-moderate disease, perianal, postoperative and abscess management. DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. MILD-TO-MODERATE: recommend against oral mesalamine; sulfasalazine only for symptomatic mild colonic CD; ileal-release budesonide 9 mg for induction in ileocecal disease but not for maintenance. MODERATE-TO-SEVERE (AGA Living Guideline, Scott et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1397-1448, 16 recommendations: 1 strong, 9 conditional, 6 knowledge gaps; updated quarterly, adult outpatients only): RECOMMEND infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab or upadacitinib over no treatment; SUGGEST certolizumab pegol or vedolizumab over no treatment. Advanced-therapy-naive: suggest higher-efficacy agents (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) over lower-efficacy ones (certolizumab pegol, upadacitinib). Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). Suggest against thiopurine monotherapy for induction; suggest it for maintenance of remission. Suggest SC/IM methotrexate monotherapy; suggest against oral methotrexate. In thiopurine-naive patients starting infliximab, suggest infliximab + thiopurine over infliximab alone. No recommendation on IFX + MTX, adalimumab + immunomodulator, or non-TNF biologic + immunomodulator. After ≥6 months of steroid-free remission on anti-TNF + immunomodulator, suggest withdrawing the immunomodulator and suggest against withdrawing the anti-TNF. SUGGEST upfront advanced therapy over step-up therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator first). No recommendation on treating to endoscopic vs symptomatic remission. The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA. ACG perianal (infliximab first; drain abscesses and place setons before escalating), postoperative (endoscopy at 6-12 months; anti-TNF strong, vedolizumab conditional in high-risk patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (>2 cm: antibiotics plus drainage, hold immunosuppression) positions are unchanged. THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). Longer or multiple strictures, or ≥3 risk factors, favor surgery.

ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Ahuja D … Singh S · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBD retrospective · n=183 · Aug 12, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Impact of Prior Biologic Mechanism of Action on Anti-TNF Effectiveness in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: An ENEIDA Registry Study.

New evidenceCrohn's diseaseulcerative colitisbiologicsanti-TNF
Clinical takeawayIn UC patients with active luminal disease requiring biologic escalation, anti-TNF therapy after vedolizumab shows lower remission rates and durability than anti-TNF as first-line or anti-TNF-to-anti-TNF switching. Consider moving anti-TNF earlier in the biologic sequence for UC, or anti-TNF-to-anti-TNF sequencing rather than vedolizumab-then-anti-TNF. In CD patients with active luminal disease, clinical effectiveness remains similar despite higher discontinuation rates, making the sequencing implications less clear.
What it foundIn UC, anti-TNF therapy after vedolizumab (90% of cases) had significantly lower remission rates at short- and long-term follow-up (p < 0.001) and higher treatment discontinuation (HR 1.69 vs first-line, HR 1.91 vs anti-TNF-to-anti-TNF); in CD, anti-TNF after ustekinumab (62% of cases) showed higher discontinuation (HR 1.55 vs first-line) without significant differences in clinical effectiveness.
ContextCurrent IBD guidelines recommend individualizing biologic sequencing based on prior response, but evidence comparing efficacy after different prior mechanisms of action is limited. This registry study provides observational evidence that in UC, the prior biologic choice affects subsequent anti-TNF effectiveness, with vedolizumab being particularly associated with reduced anti-TNF durability and remission. The CD findings are less decisive.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH)

Decision at stakewhether to use anti-TNF therapy after prior failure of a non-anti-TNF biologic (vedolizumab, ustekinumab, etc.)

… Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). … Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text. The rest of this standard includes DIAGNOSIS.

Our full summary of this standard

Two current US guidelines govern Crohn's disease and should be read together. ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al.) remains the reference for diagnosis, mild-to-moderate disease, perianal, postoperative and abscess management. DIAGNOSIS: fecal calprotectin (>50-100 μg/g) separates inflammatory from noninflammatory disease of the colon. Workup is ileocolonoscopy with biopsies, including uninvolved mucosa, plus small-bowel imaging. CTE and MRE are comparable; prefer MRE in patients <35 y and when serial exams are likely. Intestinal ultrasound is an ungraded adjunct. Do routine CRC surveillance in Crohn's colitis. MILD-TO-MODERATE: recommend against oral mesalamine; sulfasalazine only for symptomatic mild colonic CD; ileal-release budesonide 9 mg for induction in ileocecal disease but not for maintenance. MODERATE-TO-SEVERE (AGA Living Guideline, Scott et al., Gastroenterology 2025;169(7):1397-1448, 16 recommendations: 1 strong, 9 conditional, 6 knowledge gaps; updated quarterly, adult outpatients only): RECOMMEND infliximab, adalimumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab or upadacitinib over no treatment; SUGGEST certolizumab pegol or vedolizumab over no treatment. Advanced-therapy-naive: suggest higher-efficacy agents (infliximab, adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, risankizumab, mirikizumab, guselkumab) over lower-efficacy ones (certolizumab pegol, upadacitinib). Prior advanced-therapy (especially anti-TNF) exposure: suggest higher- or intermediate-efficacy agents (adalimumab, risankizumab, guselkumab, upadacitinib; ustekinumab, mirikizumab) over lower-efficacy ones (vedolizumab, certolizumab pegol). Suggest against thiopurine monotherapy for induction; suggest it for maintenance of remission. Suggest SC/IM methotrexate monotherapy; suggest against oral methotrexate. In thiopurine-naive patients starting infliximab, suggest infliximab + thiopurine over infliximab alone. No recommendation on IFX + MTX, adalimumab + immunomodulator, or non-TNF biologic + immunomodulator. After ≥6 months of steroid-free remission on anti-TNF + immunomodulator, suggest withdrawing the immunomodulator and suggest against withdrawing the anti-TNF. SUGGEST upfront advanced therapy over step-up therapy (corticosteroids and/or immunomodulator first). No recommendation on treating to endoscopic vs symptomatic remission. The ACG 2025 moderate-to-severe recommendations (anti-TNF, IFX + thiopurine combination and IL-12/23/IL-23 agents, each strong/moderate; upadacitinib after anti-TNF exposure; steroids for short-term induction only; TPMT/NUDT15 testing before thiopurines) still stand alongside AGA. ACG perianal (infliximab first; drain abscesses and place setons before escalating), postoperative (endoscopy at 6-12 months; anti-TNF strong, vedolizumab conditional in high-risk patients) and intra-abdominal abscess (>2 cm: antibiotics plus drainage, hold immunosuppression) positions are unchanged. THERAPEUTIC ENDOSCOPY (AGA Clinical Practice Update, CGH 2026; details below come from AGA news coverage, not the full text, and are ungraded advice): get cross-sectional imaging before the procedure. Endoscopic balloon dilation is first-line for short strictures (about ≤4-5 cm) with few risk factors (fistula, prestenotic dilation >5 cm, high CRP, prior anti-TNF). Longer or multiple strictures, or ≥3 risk factors, favor surgery.

ACG 2025 (Lichtenstein et al., Am J Gastroenterol) / AGA Living Guideline 2025 (Scott et al., Gastroenterology) / AGA Clinical Practice Update on Therapeutic Endoscopy in IBD 2026 (CGH) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Yagüe Caballero C … Casas Deza D · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBD review · Aug 13, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5

The role of glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel diseases.

Guideline / reviewCrohn's diseaseulcerative colitismicrobiome
Clinical takeawayGLP-1 RAs are not yet established for IBD disease modification. Consider offering them to obese IBD patients (particularly those with metabolic comorbidities including MASLD or cardiovascular disease) primarily for obesity and comorbidity management, with close monitoring for gastrointestinal tolerability, coordination with endoscopy plans, and assessment of lean muscle mass preservation. Pending results of ongoing randomized trials evaluating disease-modifying effects.
What it foundPreclinical studies show that GLP-1 receptor agonists reduce visceral adiposity and attenuate proinflammatory signaling; emerging human data suggest they are safe in patients with IBD and associated with lower hospitalization and surgical rates in those with obesity, although effects on disease activity remain unclear.
ContextObesity affects over half of IBD patients and is associated with increased disease activity, reduced treatment response, and higher surgical risk. GLP-1 RAs have transformed obesity management in the general population and confer cardiovascular benefits. This review synthesizes preclinical mechanisms and emerging clinical safety data to support further investigation of GLP-1 RAs in IBD management.
Measured against the standard of care· AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026)

Decision at stakewhether to offer glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists to overweight or obese patients with UC, particularly those with cardiometabolic comorbidities

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Outpatient positioning is unchanged from the ACG 2025 UC guideline and the AGA living guideline for moderate-to-severe UC. Confirm UC with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step C. difficile testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA chosen by route and extent: suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided disease, oral plus rectal for extensive disease. If 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by efficacy tier, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab. Intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab. Lower: adalimumab. Previously TNF-exposed, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab. Lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod. After anti-TNF primary non-response, switch mechanism rather than cycling within the class. Treat to target (STRIDE-II): endoscopic improvement, Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after diagnosis for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening. Inpatient care now follows the 2026 AGA Clinical Practice Update (13 best-practice statements). Admit for severe symptoms refractory to outpatient therapy, suspected complications (obstruction, abscess, toxic megacolon) or significant malnutrition, and identify acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts. Give every patient admitted with diarrhea two-step C. difficile testing. Test for CMV, with early endoscopy, if symptoms worsen, the patient is systemically toxic or disease is steroid-refractory. Give routine VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or fondaparinux unless contraindicated, and individualize post-discharge extension. Give IV methylprednisolone 60 mg/day or equivalent; the AGA living guideline says 40-60 mg/day, and higher doses add no benefit. Do not give adjunctive antibiotics without infection. Involve surgery early. Assess response by day 3 (72 h) using stool frequency and CRP (Oxford criteria); do not continue IV steroids beyond about 7 days without response. Rescue steroid non-responders with infliximab (accelerated or intensified dosing in selected patients with high inflammatory burden or protein-losing colopathy), cyclosporine, or a JAK inhibitor at standard or intensified dosing, or with colectomy. Before discharge, the response should be stable and a transition plan should be in place.

AGA Clinical Practice Update on Inpatient Management of Adults With IBD (Gastroenterology 2026) / ACG UC Guideline Update 2025 / AGA Living Guideline, Moderate-to-Severe UC 2024 (panel review March 2026) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Beniwal-Patel P … Yarur AJ · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBD retrospective · n=469 · Aug 12, 2026 · Inflamm Bowel Dis · IF 4.5

Prior adalimumab exposure alters infliximab pharmacokinetics and trough targets in pediatric Crohn's disease.

New evidenceCrohn's diseaseanti-TNFtherapeutic drug monitoringpediatric
Clinical takeawayIn children with CD and prior adalimumab exposure starting infliximab, lower trough levels should be anticipated and more frequent dose escalation is likely needed. Monitor trough levels closely, expect to intensify dosing sooner than in biologic-naive patients, and recognize that remission remains achievable despite lower observed levels.
What it foundIn 469 children with CD, those with prior adalimumab exposure had lower mean infliximab trough levels (4.73 vs 6.19 µg/mL, P=.003), more frequently required dose intensification (41.2% vs 35.2%, P=.001), yet achieved comparable 1-year endoscopic remission rates (58.8% vs 61.3%, not significant).
ContextStandard practice applies uniform infliximab trough targets. This finding suggests prior biologic exposure alters pharmacokinetics and the exposure-response relationship, refining dosing strategy based on treatment history rather than using fixed targets across all patients.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Kwon Y … Kim MJ · Inflammatory Bowel Diseases · IF 4.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
IBD retrospective · n=983 · Aug 14, 2026 · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5

Histological aging signatures for monitoring tissue-specific aging and disease.

Diagnosticartificial intelligencebiomarkerCrohn's diseasebasic science
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: tissue-specific aging biomarkers have been identified and correlate with disease presence and comorbidities, but prospective studies are needed to determine whether monitoring tissue-age acceleration predicts clinical outcomes or guides treatment.
What it foundDeveloped tissue clocks from deep learning analysis of 25,712 histopathology images (40 tissue types) that predict tissue-specific biological age and correlate with telomere attrition, subclinical pathology, and comorbidities; identified disease-relevant organ aging patterns in eight diseases including Crohn's disease.
ContextRefines the understanding of aging by demonstrating that tissue-specific architectural patterns can be quantified and predict biological age; tissue clocks correlate with disease presence, suggesting aging manifests heterogeneously across organ systems.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Abila E … Rendeiro AF · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №7 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow IBD by RSS