← Issue №7/ week of Aug 16, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 9 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 9, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=2,817 · Aug 14, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Shear wave elastography demonstrates similar risk stratification performance to vibration-controlled transient elastography in FIB-4-based two-step algorithms for MASLD.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawaySWE demonstrated similar performance to VCTE for MASLD risk stratification. If SWE is available at your institution, this study supports its use as an alternative to VCTE. If your institution is implementing an elastography program and choosing between modalities, either is supported by this evidence; decide based on cost, operator expertise, and availability. Ongoing VCTE use does not require change.
What it foundSWE and VCTE showed similar 60-month risk prediction for liver-related events in MASLD (time-dependent AUROC: AGA 0.770 vs 0.775, EASL 0.804 vs 0.805; no significant difference between modalities).
ContextThis prospective cohort study validates SWE against hard clinical endpoints (liver-related events) in MASLD, showing similar risk stratification performance to VCTE and establishing SWE as a viable alternative modality.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Lee J … Lee SK · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=220,160 · Aug 13, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Xenobiotic-Induced Liver Injury in the United States: A 25-Year Retrospective Analysis of National Poison Data System.

Epidemiologyacute liver failureepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel patients taking acetaminophen on the hepatotoxic risk and overdose potential, particularly those using over-the-counter analgesics. Screen for acetaminophen use when evaluating unexplained transaminitis or ALT/AST elevation >100 U/L, given acetaminophen-alone products now account for one-third to one-half of medication-related liver injury cases.
What it foundAcetaminophen-alone exposures increased 349-380% from 2000 to 2024 and now account for one-third to one-half of medication-related liver injury cases (defined by ALT/AST >100 U/L), while APAP-combination products declined 60-85%.
ContextAcetaminophen's role in drug-induced liver injury is well-known. This analysis documents a major epidemiologic shift: acetaminophen-alone products now dominate (33-45% of cases, up 349-380%) while combination products declined 60-85% following FDA restrictions in the early 2010s, indicating regulatory efforts to limit APAP in combination formulations have redirected risk to isolated products.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Towers EB … Farah R · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=60 · Aug 12, 2026 · BMC Gastro · IF 2.5

Effect of high dose N-acetyl cysteine supplementation on markers of oxidative stress and insulin resistance in non-diabetic patients with metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease: a randomized controlled trial.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayDo not add NAC to lifestyle counseling for MASLD. Although NAC was safe and well-tolerated, it provided no additional benefit over lifestyle intervention alone for fibrosis, insulin resistance, oxidative stress, or steatosis indices. Lifestyle modification remains the evidence-based foundation.
What it foundHigh-dose NAC (2400 mg/day) for 12 weeks did not significantly reduce serum malondialdehyde, fasting insulin, HOMA-IR, or hepatic fibrosis compared to lifestyle intervention alone in 60 non-diabetic MASLD patients; the control group (lifestyle alone) showed greater liver steatosis score reduction (p=0.004).
ContextNAC has theoretical antioxidant and hepatoprotective effects and has been studied in NASH/MASLD, but this RCT provides clear evidence it does not improve the hallmark features of the disease (steatosis, fibrosis, insulin resistance). Confirms that lifestyle intervention alone is the evidence-based foundation of MASLD management.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeWhether N-acetylcysteine supplementation provides clinical benefit for non-diabetic MASLD patients

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Ramadan AM … Fahmy SF · BMC Gastroenterology · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · Aug 17, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Neighbourhood Deprivation Is Associated With Greater Mortality in Patients With Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.

Epidemiologyalcohol-associated liver diseasecirrhosisepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayThis observational finding documents a substantial health disparity in ALD outcomes by neighborhood socioeconomic status. While the study does not test a specific clinical intervention, the result warrants awareness that your ALD patients from lower-income neighborhoods face significantly higher mortality risk independent of their comorbidities or insurance type. Consider whether your practice provides adequate access to addiction medicine support, social work consultation, and assistance addressing practical barriers such as transportation and insurance navigation for patients from socioeconomically disadvantaged areas.
What it foundPatients with ALD in the most deprived neighborhoods (Quartile 4 by Social Deprivation Index) had 48% higher adjusted mortality compared to those in least deprived neighborhoods (aHR 1.48, 95% CI 1.09-2.01), independent of individual-level health factors.
ContextThis extends prior work on social determinants in ALD by specifically quantifying the neighborhood-level effect. It confirms that socioeconomic neighborhood factors drive mortality risk independent of individual health factors, comorbidities, insurance, race/ethnicity, and substance use-suggesting that structural and contextual factors beyond an individual patient's profile meaningfully influence outcomes.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54

Decision at stakewhether to systematically assess and address neighbourhood-level social determinants of health in ALD management planning

For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Ghani L … Wijarnpreecha K · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=471 · Aug 17, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Impact of Intestinal Colonization with Clostridioides difficile on Clinical Outcomes in Alcohol-associated Hepatitis.

Epidemiologyalcohol-associated liver diseasemicrobiomeascitesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayAsymptomatic C. difficile colonization serves as a marker of disease severity and infection risk in hospitalized AH. If detected (whether through surveillance or incidentally), it identifies a higher-risk subset warranting closer monitoring for complications and a lower threshold for intervention. Whether routine screening or treatment of asymptomatic colonization improves outcomes remains unproven.
What it foundIn hospitalized AH patients, asymptomatic C. difficile colonization (14.7% prevalence) independently predicts 90-day mortality (aHR 1.604, median survival 66.7 vs 77.2 days, p=0.007) and is associated with higher infection rates (53.6% vs 31.3%), ascites (78.3% vs 22.5%), gastrointestinal bleeding (39.1% vs 27.9%), and ICU admission (46.4% vs 34.6%).
ContextPrior evidence links dysbiosis to increased disease severity in liver disease. This study identifies asymptomatic C. difficile colonization as an independent prognostic marker in AH, though the therapeutic or screening implications are not yet established and require prospective validation.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, et al.), "ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections," 2021 (Am J Gastroenterol 116(6):1124-1147; recommendations 12-13, p.1135)

Decision at stakewhether asymptomatic C. difficile colonization should inform clinical monitoring or intervention in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis

IBD, test for C. difficile in patients with IBD presenting with an acute flare associated with diarrhea (strong, low); vancomycin 125 mg 4 times daily for a MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS in patients with IBD and CDI (strong, very low); FMT should be considered for recurrent CDI in IBD (strong, very low).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Test only patients with symptoms suggestive of active CDI (≥3 unformed stools in 24 hours); testing patients with formed stool is rarely clinically indicated. Use a testing algorithm including both a highly sensitive and a highly specific modality to distinguish colonization from active infection (conditional recommendation, low quality evidence): begin with a highly sensitive test (GDH or NAAT), and if positive proceed to the more specific toxin EIA. A sensitive-test-positive/toxin-EIA-negative result means not CDI or colonization, a false-negative EIA, or toxin below detection, it requires clinical evaluation, and treatment should not be withheld when clinical suspicion is high, because no test is perfect and the diagnosis is a clinical one. Classify as severe when WBC ≥15,000 cells/mm3 or serum creatinine >1.5 mg/dL; classify as fulminant when severe criteria are met plus hypotension or shock, or ileus, or megacolon. INITIAL NONSEVERE EPISODE, ACG gives two co-equal strong recommendations, not a preference: oral vancomycin 125 mg 4 times daily for 10 days (strong recommendation, low quality) OR oral fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily for 10 days (strong recommendation, moderate quality); oral metronidazole 500 mg 3 times daily for 10 days may be considered for an initial nonsevere episode in LOW-RISK patients (strong recommendation, moderate quality), ACG explicitly retains metronidazole as an appropriate alternative for lower-risk patients (younger outpatients with minimal comorbidities, cost-sensitive environments). SEVERE CDI, vancomycin 125 mg 4 times daily for 10 days (strong, low quality) or fidaxomicin 200 mg twice daily for 10 days (conditional, very low quality). FULMINANT CDI, adequate volume resuscitation plus oral vancomycin 500 mg every 6 hours for the first 48-72 hours (strong recommendation, very low quality); combination therapy with parenteral metronidazole 500 mg every 8 hours can be considered (conditional, very low); for patients with ileus, adding vancomycin enemas 500 mg every 6 hours may be beneficial (conditional, very low); FMT is suggested for severe and fulminant CDI refractory to antibiotic therapy, particularly when patients are poor surgical candidates (strong recommendation, low quality). Surgical options (total colectomy with end ileostomy vs diverting loop ileostomy with colonic lavage and intraluminal vancomycin) depend on clinical circumstances and surgeon judgment. FIRST RECURRENCE, tapering/pulsed-dose vancomycin after an initial course of fidaxomicin, vancomycin, or metronidazole (strong recommendation, very low quality), or fidaxomicin after an initial course of vancomycin or metronidazole (strong recommendation, moderate quality). SECOND OR FURTHER RECURRENCE, treat with FMT to prevent further recurrences (strong recommendation, moderate quality), delivered by colonoscopy or capsules (strong, moderate), with enema suggested only if other methods are unavailable (conditional, low); repeat FMT is suggested for recurrence within 8 weeks of an initial FMT (conditional, very low). Suppressive oral vancomycin may be used to prevent further recurrences in rCDI patients who are not FMT candidates, who relapsed after FMT, or who require ongoing/frequent antibiotics (conditional, very low). Bezlotoxumab is suggested for prevention of CDI recurrence in patients at HIGH RISK OF RECURRENCE (conditional recommendation, moderate quality), ACG ties it to recurrence risk, not to a specific recurrence number. Antisecretory therapy should not be discontinued in patients with CDI provided there is an appropriate indication for its use (strong, very low). IBD, test for C. difficile in patients with IBD presenting with an acute flare associated with diarrhea (strong, low); vancomycin 125 mg 4 times daily for a MINIMUM OF 14 DAYS in patients with IBD and CDI (strong, very low); FMT should be considered for recurrent CDI in IBD (strong, very low). Vancomycin is recommended for pregnant, peripartum, and breastfeeding patients; vancomycin or fidaxomicin first line if immunocompromised. Do NOT test for cure: routine testing in asymptomatic patients after treatment is not recommended, because persistent shedding occurs in 56% of patients who had resolution of diarrhea as long as 4 weeks after completing treatment.

American College of Gastroenterology (Kelly CR, Fischer M, Allegretti JR, et al.), "ACG Clinical Guidelines: Prevention, Diagnosis, and Treatment of Clostridioides difficile Infections," 2021 (Am J Gastroenterol 116(6):1124-1147; recommendations 12-13, p.1135) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Vu J … Rachakonda V · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Aug 17, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Review Article: Fibrosis Reversal in Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatohepatitis-The Promise of Emerging Therapeutics.

New therapyMASLDcirrhosisportal hypertensionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayResmetirom and semaglutide have conditional approval for MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis and improve fibrosis stage in one-quarter to one-third of patients. Consider these agents for patients with F2-F3 fibrosis, recognizing the demonstrated benefit is fibrosis improvement; whether this translates to clinical outcomes (cirrhosis prevention, transplant reduction, mortality) remains unproven, a critical gap the authors acknowledge.
What it foundResmetirom improved fibrosis by at least one stage in up to 26% of MASH patients versus 14% placebo (52 weeks); semaglutide in 37% versus 22% (72 weeks); several agents in development show encouraging Phase 2 results with Phase 3 trials ongoing.
ContextA shift from no approved pharmacotherapy for MASH to agents with conditional approval demonstrating fibrosis reversal. Critically, the link between histological improvement and clinical outcome reduction (the most important question) remains unproven, a gap that must be resolved before long-term use can be endorsed for outcome prevention.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeuse resmetirom or semaglutide to improve fibrosis in adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis

For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Ayoub M … Rinella ME · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology guideline · Aug 14, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

The Malaysian Society of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Consensus Statements on Prevention and Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Malaysia.

Guideline / reviewhepatocellular carcinomaviral hepatitisguidelinehealth services
Clinical takeawayPursue 6-monthly ultrasound and serum AFP surveillance for at-risk patients; use noninvasive fibrosis assessment in primary care settings to identify patients requiring surveillance and ensure referral to specialist hepatology care; establish clear multidisciplinary referral pathways.
What it foundConsensus recommends 6-monthly ultrasound and serum AFP for HCC surveillance, with particular emphasis on using noninvasive fibrosis assessment in primary healthcare to identify at-risk patients requiring surveillance.
ContextThis literature reports a Malaysian multidisciplinary consensus on evidence-based approaches to hepatocellular carcinoma prevention and early detection.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakeSurveillance interval and modality: ultrasound plus serum AFP every 6 months for at-risk cirrhotic patients

Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Lau SY … Chan WK · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=64 · Aug 12, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

A First-in-Human study of AHB-137, an unconjugated antisense oligonucleotide, in healthy subjects and patients with chronic hepatitis B.

New therapyviral hepatitis
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: Phase 1 study in a pre-selected patient population. Efficacy in typical CHB and optimal dosing remain to be determined in Phase 2-3 trials.
What it foundIn virally suppressed, HBeAg-negative CHB patients on stable nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AHB-137 300 mg achieved mean HBsAg reductions of 0.7-1.0 log10 IU/mL, with HBsAg loss (<0.05 IU/mL) in 3 patients.
ContextCurrent CHB management relies on nucleos(t)ide analogues (first-line) or pegylated interferon. AHB-137 targeting HBV mRNA represents a novel mechanism distinct from existing therapies. This first-in-human data demonstrates early HBsAg activity in a highly selected population of already-suppressed patients; treatment-related adverse events (primarily mild to moderate injection-site reactions and headaches) occurred in 71% of CHB patients, with no serious adverse events or discontinuations. Whether this activity translates to improved outcomes in treatment-naive or typical CHB patients, and how tolerability scales with dosing and duration in Phase 2-3, remains unknown.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakepotential role of novel antisense oligonucleotide therapies in chronic hepatitis B management

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Gane EJ … Yuen MF · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · Aug 17, 2026 · Aliment Pharm Ther · IF 6.7

Pruritus Is Frequent and Persistent and Impacts Quality of Life Among Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis.

EpidemiologyPSCcirrhosis
Clinical takeawayAsk PSC patients systematically about pruritus; 38% report moderate-to-severe symptoms strongly associated with cirrhosis and cholestasis markers. Assess using validated scales (WI-NRS, 5-D Itch scale) and recognize pruritus as an indicator of disease severity and quality-of-life burden. No new therapies identified, but findings underscore the existing treatment gap.
What it found38% of PSC patients report moderate-to-severe pruritus (WI-NRS ≥ 4) over 6 months, correlating with cirrhosis (p=0.01), alkaline phosphatase elevation (p=0.0001), bilirubin elevation (p=0.0006), and low albumin (p=0.01); 86.5% of those with recent moderate-to-severe itch experienced severe itch at least once during 6-month follow-up.
ContextConfirms pruritus as a major symptom burden in PSC and establishes specific prevalence (38% moderate-to-severe over 6 months) and quality-of-life impact (SF-36 correlation -0.47). Identifies cirrhosis and cholestasis markers as correlates of severity but does not propose new interventions.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries," Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(1):18-35

Decision at stakewhether to systematically assess and monitor pruritus severity in patients with confirmed primary sclerosing cholangitis

Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should also be tested for primary sclerosing cholangitis with cholangiography by MRCP (or ERCP) together with serum IgG4, because some extrahepatic cholestatic disease (e.g., PSC, HIV/AIDS cholangiopathy) may not be visible on ultrasound; a history of cholangitis or of colonic inflammatory bowel disease further raises suspicion but is not a prerequisite for obtaining cholangiography.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

An elevated alkaline phosphatase should first be confirmed to be of hepatic origin: confirm with an elevated GGT, or use ALP isoenzyme fractionation or 5'-nucleotidase to separate liver from non-hepatic (e.g., bone) sources. GGT should NOT be used as a standalone screening test in the absence of otherwise-abnormal liver chemistries, and GGT is not specific (elevated in >50% of alcohol users without overt liver disease). Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should be tested for primary biliary cholangitis with an anti-mitochondrial antibody (AMA). Once ALP is confirmed to be of hepatic origin, obtain a liver ultrasound to assess the hepatic parenchyma and bile ducts: biliary dilatation suggests an extrahepatic cause, while a non-dilated biliary system suggests an intrahepatic cause. Patients with an elevated ALP, with or without elevated bilirubin, should also be tested for primary sclerosing cholangitis with cholangiography by MRCP (or ERCP) together with serum IgG4, because some extrahepatic cholestatic disease (e.g., PSC, HIV/AIDS cholangiopathy) may not be visible on ultrasound; a history of cholangitis or of colonic inflammatory bowel disease further raises suspicion but is not a prerequisite for obtaining cholangiography. Liver biopsy is generally not required; about 80% of isolated ALP elevations can be diagnosed from history, physical exam, routine labs, and chest X-ray.

American College of Gastroenterology (Kwo PY, Cohen SM, Lim JK), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Evaluation of Abnormal Liver Chemistries," Am J Gastroenterol 2017;112(1):18-35 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Dean R … Bowlus CL · Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №7 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS