← Issue №4/
week of Jul 26, 2026/
the whole section, in full
Hepatology, in full.
All 12 Hepatology papers in this issue,
as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few;
this is the section, whole.
Actionability = is there something to do. Prevalence = how much of a general GI practice it touches. Stakes = how consequential the decision is. Evidence strength = how far the study design and the result support the action. Novelty = how likely you are not already doing it.
Hepatologyprospective cohort · n=357 · Jul 24, 2026 · Nature Medicine · IF 52.5
Clinical takeawayConsider using MRE, VCTE-LSM, Agile 3+, or Agile 4 as noninvasive biomarkers for diagnosing cirrhosis in MASLD patients, as they demonstrated high diagnostic accuracy exceeding the MAC.
What it foundMRE (AUC 0.91; P < 0.01), VCTE-LSM (AUC 0.87; P < 0.01), Agile 3+ (AUC 0.89; P < 0.01), and Agile 4 (AUC 0.88; P < 0.01) exceeded the minimum acceptable performance criterion (MAC) for diagnosing cirrhosis in MASLD patients, as compared to other biomarkers.
ContextThis study validates the diagnostic accuracy of several noninvasive biomarkers for MASLD-related fibrosis and cirrhosis, confirming their utility in clinical practice for patients with MASLD.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)ShowHide
Decision at stakethe choice of non-invasive tests for fibrosis staging in MASLD
Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.
Clinical takeawayConsider resmetirom (80-100 mg daily) for MASH patients with F2-F3 fibrosis, given its efficacy in improving histology and LDL cholesterol, with no new safety signals.
What it foundResmetirom 80 mg and 100 mg achieved MASH resolution in 25.7% and 29.9% of F2-F3 fibrosis patients vs 9.5% with placebo, and fibrosis improvement in 26.5% and 28.9% vs 17.3% with placebo at 52 weeks.
ContextConfirms resmetirom's benefit in the F2-F3 fibrosis subgroup, aligning with its approved label and prior MAESTRO-NASH trial results.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)ShowHide
Decision at stakeusing resmetirom for adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests or biopsy
…For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.
New evidenceportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingpediatricsystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider Meso-Rex bypass for pediatric EHPVO patients with portal hypertension complications (GI bleeding, hypersplenism, thrombocytopenia) when standard medical therapy (NSBB, EVL) fails, given its high patency and low mortality but acknowledging thrombosis/stenosis risks and persistent portal hypertension.
What it foundMeso-Rex bypass achieved shunt patency in 87% (1229/1403) of pediatric EHPVO cases, with thrombosis in 9%, stenosis in 5%, recurrent GI bleeding in 13% (92/730), and 0.3% mortality (5 deaths, 1 MRB-related). Portal pressures decreased postoperatively but remained above 10 mmHg.
ContextConfirms MRB as a durable, effective surgical option for pediatric EHPVO, with consistent improvements in hematologic parameters and portal hypertension complications, though long-term follow-up protocols remain unstandardized.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases, 'Vascular Liver Disorders, Portal Vein Thrombosis, and Procedural Bleeding in Patients with Liver Disease', 2021ShowHide
Decision at stakechoosing a definitive treatment for pediatric extrahepatic portal vein obstruction (EHPVO)
…For concurrent portal vein thrombosis, anticoagulation decisions should be individualized based on thrombus acuity (recent vs. chronic), bleeding risk, and underlying etiology; liver transplantation is reserved for refractory complications, and HCC surveillance is not routine without cirrhosis.
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Manage portal hypertension without cirrhosis by confirming portal hypertensive features while excluding cirrhosis (liver biopsy is the gold standard), then performing a comprehensive etiology workup (drug history, MPN/thrombophilia/PNH screen, autoimmune, CVID, HIV, schistosomiasis). Treat portal hypertension complications the same as cirrhosis, variceal prophylaxis with NSBB (carvedilol preferred) or EVL, TIPS for refractory or recurrent bleeding, and address the underlying cause by discontinuing offending drugs and treating the specific etiology. For concurrent portal vein thrombosis, anticoagulation decisions should be individualized based on thrombus acuity (recent vs. chronic), bleeding risk, and underlying etiology; liver transplantation is reserved for refractory complications, and HCC surveillance is not routine without cirrhosis.
Riva P … Guérin F · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatologyretrospective · n=2,842 · Jul 28, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5
New evidenceMASLDalcohol-associated liver diseaseepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel men with MetALD consuming 280-419.9 g/week alcohol to reduce intake to lower fibrosis progression risk. Monitor women with MASLD who increase alcohol use, as it is associated with worsening FRS.
What it foundIn MetALD patients, reducing alcohol intake (280-419.9 g/week) lowered risk of worsening fibrosis risk scores (FRS) compared to maintaining the same intake level.
ContextAlcohol reduction benefits in MetALD are confirmed, with no FRS impact in MASLD men but harm in MASLD women who increase drinking.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54ShowHide
Decision at stakethe importance of reducing alcohol intake in alcohol-associated liver disease
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.
New evidenceautoimmune hepatitisPSCliver transplantbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider using LOS ≥5.9 to identify high-risk AIH patients (74.4% vs 94.3% 5-year transplant-free survival) and Hepascore ≥0.84 for high-risk PSC patients across all endpoints.
What it foundLOS predicted overall death or transplant in AIH (5-year tAUC=0.78, HR 1.28, cutoff ≥5.9) and PSC (5-year tAUC=0.77, HR 1.20) but not liver-related mortality or decompensation in AIH; Hepascore predicted overall death or transplant (5-year tAUC=0.81, HR 8.63), liver-related mortality (5-year tAUC=0.79, HR 60), and decompensation (5-year tAUC=0.76, HR 5.62, cutoff ≥0.84) in PSC.
ContextConfirms and refines predictive utility of LOS and Hepascore in AIH and PSC, previously proposed but not widely adopted. Prior standard relied on clinical judgment and less validated scoring systems.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 (Bowlus et al., Hepatology 77:659-702) practice guidance on PSC and cholangiocarcinoma, supersedes AASLD 2010; alongside EASL 2022 sclerosing cholangitis guidelineShowHide
Decision at stakepredicting clinical outcomes in primary sclerosing cholangitis
Diagnose PSC with high-quality MRCP as the reference-standard imaging (avoid ERCP for diagnostic purposes; if MRCP findings are equivocal, repeat MRCP rather than proceeding to ERCP), reserving ERCP for therapeutic intervention, and exclude secondary sclerosing cholangitis/IgG4-related disease.…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Diagnose PSC with high-quality MRCP as the reference-standard imaging (avoid ERCP for diagnostic purposes; if MRCP findings are equivocal, repeat MRCP rather than proceeding to ERCP), reserving ERCP for therapeutic intervention, and exclude secondary sclerosing cholangitis/IgG4-related disease. No disease-modifying therapy is proven to alter transplant-free survival, but moderate-dose UDCA (13-23 mg/kg/day) may now be considered and continued in patients not enrolled in or eligible for a clinical trial if it produces a meaningful improvement in alkaline phosphatase (GGT in children) and/or symptoms by 12 months, discontinuing if no response; high-dose UDCA remains contraindicated. Perform annual abdominal MRI/MRCP with or without serum CA19-9 for cholangiocarcinoma/gallbladder-cancer surveillance in adults with large-duct PSC (not recommended under age 18 or in small-duct PSC). Manage gallbladder polyps by size, cholecystectomy for polyps >8 mm, ultrasound surveillance every 6 months for polyps ≤8 mm, rather than referring every polyp. For colorectal surveillance, begin surveillance colonoscopy at the time of PSC-IBD diagnosis (or at age 15 for childhood-onset disease) and repeat at 1-2 year intervals; in PSC without IBD, perform a diagnostic colonoscopy at PSC diagnosis and repeat every 5 years if IBD is not found. Evaluate dominant strictures with brush cytology plus FISH (± cholangioscopy) before/at balloon dilation, repeating ERCP with sampling in 3 months if cytology is suspicious regardless of FISH result. Treat recurrent cholangitis and cholestatic pruritus, maintain bone health, and refer for transplant evaluation for decompensation, intractable pruritus, recurrent bacterial cholangitis, or early-stage CCA per Mayo protocol.
Jayabalan D … Jeffrey GP · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionliver transplant
Clinical takeawayConsider avatrombopag for Japanese CLD patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) undergoing invasive procedures, particularly in those weighing ≤68 kg (higher response). No adverse events, including portal vein thrombosis, were observed in this study.
What it foundAvatrombopag increased platelets to ≥50,000/μL in 92.5% of Japanese CLD patients with severe thrombocytopenia (<50,000/μL) before procedures, and 96.2% avoided platelet transfusions. Platelet-increasing effects did not differ by prior TPO-RA treatment history.
ContextConfirms avatrombopag's efficacy in a real-world Japanese cohort, aligning with prior trials but adding weight-based response data (≤68 kg better). No new safety signals vs. known TPO-RA risks.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association, 'AGA Clinical Practice Update on Surgical Risk Assessment and Perioperative Management in Cirrhosis: Expert Review' (Northup PG et al., Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol 2019;17(4):595-606). DOI 10.1016/j.cgh.2018.09.043, PMID 30273751.ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Determine GI surgical clearance based on the specific condition and its activity rather than an automatic sign-off: most stable chronic GI conditions (GERD, IBS, controlled IBD, compensated MASLD, asymptomatic gallstones) may be cleared, while active conditions, cirrhosis, and perioperative drug management require explicit stratification and documentation. For any cirrhotic patient, perform mandatory risk stratification with VOCAL-Penn and Child-Pugh class before clearance; manage variceal prophylaxis per individualized endoscopic and hemodynamic assessment (including NSBB for appropriate candidates) and address rebalanced hemostasis without prophylactic INR correction. Defer elective surgery for active GI bleeding, active IBD flare, recent pancreatitis, or unoptimized anemia, and specify perioperative precautions (stress-dose steroids, biologic hold matrix, GLP-1/SGLT2 holds, aspiration precautions) where indicated.
Clinical takeawayConsider using the nomogram to estimate PMV risk in liver transplant recipients for early intervention planning and resource allocation.
What it foundA nomogram predicts prolonged mechanical ventilation (PMV) after liver transplantation with a C-index of 0.780 (95% CI, 0.734-0.827), validated at 0.731 (95% CI, 0.653-0.810), using ASA ≥3, pre-LT mechanical ventilation, MELD score, albumin levels, and anhepatic phase.
ContextThis refines risk stratification for PMV post-LT, a known complication, by providing a validated predictive tool based on multicenter data.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Zhou X … Zhang Q · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: new obesity definitions did not improve liver risk prediction over BMI in MASLD. Continue using BMI for risk stratification until further evidence supports alternative metrics.
What it found20.4% and 34.1% of MASLD patients not obese by BMI met obesity criteria under EASO and Lancet definitions, but these groups had no higher liver-related event risk (aSHR 1.15 [0.64-2.08] for EASO; 0.75 [0.42-1.34] for Lancet) vs non-obese counterparts.
ContextChallenges the utility of newer obesity definitions (EASO, Lancet) for liver risk prediction in MASLD, confirming BMI remains the simpler and equally predictive metric in this cohort.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Cai J … VCTE-Prognosis Study Group · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatologyprospective cohort · n=115,971 · Jul 29, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a proteomic score derived from a large cohort study, not yet validated for clinical use in individual patients.
What it foundA four-protein score (PS4) significantly outperformed established non-invasive scores in predicting all-cause mortality in MASLD patients, accounting for 10-20% of the effect of phenotypic class on mortality.
ContextChallenges current liver-centric prognostic models by identifying systemic proteomic markers linked to mortality in MASLD, highlighting sex-driven differences in disease severity.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674.ShowHide
Decision at stakeidentifying high-risk MASLD subgroups for mortality prediction
Statins are safe and recommended in MASLD/MASH and compensated cirrhosis when indicated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Start per standard CV risk-based criteria with baseline LFTs; routine ALT monitoring on statin is not required and pre-existing transaminitis is not a contraindication. Hold or reduce only for clinically significant ALT elevation, severe muscle symptoms, or decompensated cirrhosis on an individualized basis.
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: confirms MELD 3.0's race-neutral predictive validity in a matched cohort, but does not alter current MELD-based decision-making.
What it foundNo significant difference in 5-year liver-related mortality between Black and White patients with F4 fibrosis at similar MELD 3.0 scores (propensity-matched for age, gender, comorbidities, and social vulnerability).
ContextConfirms MELD 3.0's mortality prediction is unaffected by race when social determinants and comorbidities are controlled, addressing prior concerns about potential racial bias.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.ShowHide
Decision at stakeusing MELD 3.0 to predict mortality in cirrhosis
…They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply.…Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation.…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a psychometric validation study of a new instrument. Consider future use if adopted in guidelines for assessing goal-concordant care in CLD, but the instrument is not yet ready for clinical use.
What it foundA novel dyadic instrument (7-item Goals of Care Conversations scale and 4-item Care Concordant with Preferences scale) showed acceptable fit (CFI 0.95-0.99, RMSEA 0.06-0.18) and internal consistency (α=0.79-0.85) for measuring perceived goal-concordant care in advanced CLD patients and caregivers.
ContextFirst validated instrument to measure perceived goal-concordant care in advanced CLD, addressing a gap in patient-centered outcome measures for this population.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Rogal SS, Hansen L, Patel A, et al. 'AASLD Practice Guidance: Palliative care and symptom-based management in decompensated cirrhosis.' Hepatology. 2022;76(3):819-853. doi:10.1002/hep.32378ShowHide
Decision at stakeincorporating patient and caregiver goals into pain management decisions in advanced chronic liver disease
…Opioids should be avoided when possible for chronic pain; when necessary, opioid use should be approached with caution and with careful discussion with patients and caregivers, and low-dose oxycodone or hydromorphone can be started in select cases on an as-needed basis and titrated to effect, often in consultation with pain-management experts (Statement 32).…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
In adults with cirrhosis, acetaminophen 500 mg every 6 h, up to a maximum of 2 g/day, is the preferred first-line analgesic (Statement 30), and systemic NSAIDs should be avoided (Statement 31). Opioids should be avoided when possible for chronic pain; when necessary, opioid use should be approached with caution and with careful discussion with patients and caregivers, and low-dose oxycodone or hydromorphone can be started in select cases on an as-needed basis and titrated to effect, often in consultation with pain-management experts (Statement 32). First-line opioids are low-dose, short-acting agents with extended dosing intervals: oxycodone 2.5 mg PO q6-8h PRN or hydromorphone 1 mg PO q6h PRN (hydromorphone 0.4 mg IV); the initial prescription should be a 7-day supply of a low-dose short-acting opioid with close follow-up, and extended-release formulations should be avoided. Codeine, morphine, and tramadol should generally be avoided; because morphine is relatively contraindicated in advanced cirrhosis, clinicians should first consider hydromorphone or oxycodone. Methadone should only be used in consultation with a specialist. IV fentanyl is a preferred opioid because of its favorable metabolism, but the transdermal fentanyl patch is problematic for outpatient use because its lowest available dose (12 µg/h) may be too high for patients with cirrhosis, and cachexia is a relative contraindication to the patch. When an opioid is started, prophylactic medications should be considered proactively to prevent constipation and hepatic encephalopathy (e.g., lactulose).
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: the review highlights gaps in histological assessment of fibrosis regression and calls for better tools, but does not provide actionable clinical guidance.
What it foundSignificant liver fibrosis can regress or remodel after removing the initiating agent or with therapy, including reversal of established cirrhosis.
ContextChallenges current semiquantitative staging systems for fibrosis, which were designed for progressive disease and lack nuance for regression. The Beijing P-I-R classification is only validated in viral liver disease.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.ShowHide
Decision at stakethe clinical significance of fibrosis regression in chronic liver disease
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.