← Issue №4/ week of Jul 26, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Esophagus/Reflux, in full.

All 4 Esophagus/Reflux papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 4, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Esophagus/Reflux prospective cohort · Jul 27, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Step-Down Dose Reduction Dupilumab Maintenance is an Effective Long-Term Treatment Strategy in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

New evidenceeosinophilic esophagitis
Clinical takeawayConsider step-down dose reduction of dupilumab for long-term maintenance in eosinophilic esophagitis patients who achieve initial remission, provided they are stable and monitored for adverse events.
What it foundStep-down dose reduction of dupilumab maintained remission in 85% of eosinophilic esophagitis patients over 12 months compared to continuous high-dose therapy.
ContextThis study supports the feasibility of dose reduction in maintaining remission, challenging the need for continuous high-dose therapy in stable patients. The population studied was adults with confirmed EoE in remission.
Measured against the standard of care· ACG 2025 (Dellon et al., Am J Gastroenterol 120(1):31-59) / ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (Dellon et al., Gastrointest Endosc 103(3):396-417)

Decision at stakethe use of dupilumab for EoE in individuals 12 years of age or older who are nonresponsive to PPI therapy

… MAINTENANCE: continue effective therapy (ACG STRONG despite low evidence) at the lowest effective dose. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text. The rest of this standard includes DIAGNOSIS, TREATMENT (ACG), DILATION and 2 more.

Our full summary of this standard

ACG 2025 (GRADE) is still the governing guideline. The ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (modified Delphi, 28 statements at ≥80% agreement; not GRADE) adds endoscopic and pediatric detail without contradicting it. DIAGNOSIS: symptoms of esophageal dysfunction plus ≥15 eos/hpf after excluding other causes of esophageal eosinophilia. A PPI trial is not a diagnostic criterion (PPI-REE abandoned). Do the initial diagnostic EGD off PPI, topical steroid and dietary therapy (ACG key concept; ASGE consensus, which gives no washout duration). Initial assessment is a standard EGD, not a less-invasive modality, so that full biopsies and dilation are possible (ASGE). Take ≥6 esophageal biopsies from ≥2 levels in anyone with symptoms or endoscopic findings consistent with EoE, targeting visible lesions. In CHILDREN with suspected EoE, also biopsy the stomach and duodenum (ASGE). Use EREFS at every endoscopy and report a quantified peak eosinophil count (ACG strong/low; ASGE). TREATMENT (ACG): swallowed topical steroids STRONG/moderate; high-dose PPI CONDITIONAL/low; empiric elimination diet CONDITIONAL/low. Choose a single initial therapy by shared decision-making. Fluticasone or budesonide are both reasonable. Adult doses: PPI double the reflux dose (e.g., omeprazole 20 mg BID or 40 mg daily); budesonide 2-4 mg/day (BOS 2 mg BID); fluticasone 1,760 mcg/day divided. Pediatric doses: PPI 2 mg/kg/day; budesonide 1-2 mg/day; fluticasone 110-880 mcg/day. Allergy testing is not used to direct diets. A 1FED/2FED step-up diet with a dietitian is acceptable, with endoscopic and biopsy confirmation after each reintroduced food. Dupilumab is CONDITIONAL for PPI-nonresponsive patients aged ≥12 (moderate) and for ages 1-11 at ≥15 kg (low). Weight-band dosing: 15-<30 kg 200 mg q2w; 30-<40 kg 300 mg q2w; ≥40 kg 300 mg weekly. Recommendations AGAINST: omalizumab, cromolyn, montelukast. No recommendation for cendakimab, benralizumab, lirentelimab, mepolizumab or reslizumab. DILATION: an adjunct to anti-inflammatory therapy for strictures causing dysphagia (ACG conditional/low). Start low and go slow; target ≥16 mm in adults and adolescents over ≥1 session. In children, ASGE supports dilation of symptomatic strictures or a narrow-caliber esophagus regardless of disease activity, using the same start-low/go-slow approach. MAINTENANCE: continue effective therapy (ACG STRONG despite low evidence) at the lowest effective dose. MONITORING: judge response on symptoms, endoscopy and histology together, never symptoms alone. Assess response endoscopically at 8-12 weeks after starting a PPI or topical steroid. For diet, ACG says 8-12 weeks and ASGE says 6-8 weeks. For dupilumab or biologics, assess at 12-24 weeks (ASGE: up to 24 weeks). Allow appropriate washout or timing after any treatment change before the follow-up EGD (ASGE). Take monitoring biopsies from the most severe-appearing lesions (rings, furrows, exudates) (ASGE). Monitoring biopsies may be limited to the esophagus when prior gastric and duodenal biopsies were normal and nothing new suggests other pathology (ASGE). The histologic response threshold of <15 eos/hpf is a 'may consider' target, read alongside endoscopic and symptom findings. Shorten follow-up after complications. Care gaps of ≥2 years are associated with fibrostenosis. PEDIATRIC (ACG): esophagram for children with dysphagia to assess fibrostenotic disease; feeding therapy and dietitian for feeding dysfunction; growth, development and nutrition are treatment goals.

ACG 2025 (Dellon et al., Am J Gastroenterol 120(1):31-59) / ASGE 2026 consensus Part 2 (Dellon et al., Gastrointest Endosc 103(3):396-417) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Alexander R … Ravi K · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux review · Jul 30, 2026 · J Neurogastro Motil · IF 3.4

Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Reflux-like Phenotypes: Using Lyon Consensus 2.0 to Guide Clinical Approach.

Guideline / reviewGERDproton pump inhibitorsesophageal motilityguideline
Clinical takeawayUse Lyon 2.0 criteria to phenotype reflux-like symptoms in patients with unclear diagnoses after initial evaluation: manage mucosal injury with reflux treatment and surveillance; treat abnormal reflux burden with reflux therapy; address E-DGBI with functional disorder management. Assess for overlapping hypervigilance/anxiety. Specific reflux burden thresholds and criteria are detailed in the source.
What it foundThe Lyon Consensus 2.0 integrates mucosal injury (Montreal), abnormal reflux burden (specific thresholds not provided here; see source), and Rome V criteria to phenotype reflux-like symptoms into GERD (mucosal injury or abnormal reflux) vs. E-DGBI (functional).
ContextRefines prior Montreal (mucosal injury) and Rome (functional) criteria by adding Lyon's reflux burden thresholds, enabling clearer phenotyping and targeted management in select patients with ambiguous presentations.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56

Decision at stakethe diagnosis and phenotyping of GERD and reflux-like symptoms

… Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In patients with classic GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and no alarm symptoms, give an 8-week trial of empiric PPI ONCE DAILY before a meal (strong, moderate evidence); administer PPI 30-60 minutes before a meal rather than at bedtime (strong, moderate). Endoscopy is the FIRST test in patients presenting with dysphagia or other alarm symptoms, the guideline names weight loss and GI bleeding, and also in patients with multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (strong, low). If classic symptoms respond to the 8-week trial, attempt to discontinue the PPI (conditional, low); for patients without erosive esophagitis or Barrett's whose symptoms resolved, an attempt at discontinuation should be made; patients requiring maintenance should take the lowest effective dose. If symptoms do not respond adequately to the 8-week trial, or return on discontinuation, perform diagnostic endoscopy, ideally after PPIs are stopped for 2-4 weeks (strong, low). Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low). In refractory GERD, optimize PPI therapy first (strong, moderate); then pH monitoring OFF PPIs if GERD was not previously established by pH study, long-segment Barrett's, or LA grade C/D esophagitis, versus impedance-pH ON PPIs where GERD is already established but symptoms persist on twice-daily PPI (both conditional, low). Before antireflux surgery or endoscopic therapy, HRM is recommended to rule out achalasia and absent contractility, with provocative testing (e.g., multiple rapid swallows) to identify contractile reserve in ineffective esophageal motility; on-therapy reflux monitoring is suggested before intervention in patients with prior objective GERD findings who remain symptomatic. Antireflux surgery by an experienced surgeon is an option for patients with OBJECTIVE evidence of GERD, with severe esophagitis (LA C/D), large hiatal hernia, or persistent troublesome symptoms benefiting most; TIF is suggested only for troublesome regurgitation or heartburn in patients who do not wish to undergo antireflux surgery and who are WITHOUT severe esophagitis (LA C/D) or hiatal hernia >2 cm. For extraesophageal symptoms WITHOUT typical GERD symptoms, perform reflux testing BEFORE starting PPI therapy (strong, moderate); with concomitant typical symptoms, consider twice-daily PPI for 8-12 weeks before further testing (conditional, low). Lifestyle: weight loss in overweight/obese patients (strong, moderate); avoid meals within 2-3 hours of bedtime, avoid tobacco, avoid trigger foods, and elevate the head of the bed for nighttime symptoms (all conditional, low).

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Schroeder MK, Gyawali CP · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux retrospective · n=289 · Jul 30, 2026 · J Neurogastro Motil · IF 3.4

Ineffective Esophageal Motility and Its Predictors in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease Patients with Pathologic Acid Exposure Time.

New evidenceGERDesophageal motilitybasic sciencebiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn GERD patients with pathologic acid exposure (AET >6%), further research is needed to determine if assessing for IEM with high-resolution manometry and MNBI leads to improved outcomes.
What it foundIEM was present in 41.5% of GERD patients with pathologic acid exposure; predictors included upright bolus exposure, LES pressure <19 mmHg (vs. normal motility group's 19 mmHg), delayed supine distal latency, and MNBI <1500 Ω (vs. normal motility group's 1780 Ω).
ContextConfirms and refines understanding of IEM predictors in GERD, highlighting mucosal integrity (MNBI) as a novel factor alongside traditional manometric measures, but clinical utility remains to be established.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56

Decision at stakethe need for comprehensive functional evaluation in GERD management

… Before antireflux surgery or endoscopic therapy, HRM is recommended to rule out achalasia and absent contractility, with provocative testing (e.g., multiple rapid swallows) to identify contractile reserve in ineffective esophageal motility; on-therapy reflux monitoring is suggested before intervention in patients with prior objective GERD findings who remain symptomatic. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In patients with classic GERD symptoms (heartburn, regurgitation) and no alarm symptoms, give an 8-week trial of empiric PPI ONCE DAILY before a meal (strong, moderate evidence); administer PPI 30-60 minutes before a meal rather than at bedtime (strong, moderate). Endoscopy is the FIRST test in patients presenting with dysphagia or other alarm symptoms, the guideline names weight loss and GI bleeding, and also in patients with multiple risk factors for Barrett's esophagus (strong, low). If classic symptoms respond to the 8-week trial, attempt to discontinue the PPI (conditional, low); for patients without erosive esophagitis or Barrett's whose symptoms resolved, an attempt at discontinuation should be made; patients requiring maintenance should take the lowest effective dose. If symptoms do not respond adequately to the 8-week trial, or return on discontinuation, perform diagnostic endoscopy, ideally after PPIs are stopped for 2-4 weeks (strong, low). Where GERD is suspected but unclear and endoscopy shows no objective evidence, perform reflux monitoring OFF therapy to establish the diagnosis (strong, low); conversely, do NOT perform off-therapy reflux monitoring solely as a diagnostic test in patients already known to have LA grade C or D esophagitis or long-segment Barrett's, because the diagnosis is already established (strong, low). In refractory GERD, optimize PPI therapy first (strong, moderate); then pH monitoring OFF PPIs if GERD was not previously established by pH study, long-segment Barrett's, or LA grade C/D esophagitis, versus impedance-pH ON PPIs where GERD is already established but symptoms persist on twice-daily PPI (both conditional, low). Before antireflux surgery or endoscopic therapy, HRM is recommended to rule out achalasia and absent contractility, with provocative testing (e.g., multiple rapid swallows) to identify contractile reserve in ineffective esophageal motility; on-therapy reflux monitoring is suggested before intervention in patients with prior objective GERD findings who remain symptomatic. Antireflux surgery by an experienced surgeon is an option for patients with OBJECTIVE evidence of GERD, with severe esophagitis (LA C/D), large hiatal hernia, or persistent troublesome symptoms benefiting most; TIF is suggested only for troublesome regurgitation or heartburn in patients who do not wish to undergo antireflux surgery and who are WITHOUT severe esophagitis (LA C/D) or hiatal hernia >2 cm. For extraesophageal symptoms WITHOUT typical GERD symptoms, perform reflux testing BEFORE starting PPI therapy (strong, moderate); with concomitant typical symptoms, consider twice-daily PPI for 8-12 weeks before further testing (conditional, low). Lifestyle: weight loss in overweight/obese patients (strong, moderate); avoid meals within 2-3 hours of bedtime, avoid tobacco, avoid trigger foods, and elevate the head of the bed for nighttime symptoms (all conditional, low).

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), ACG Clinical Guideline for the Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (Katz PO, Dunbar KB, Schnoll-Sussman FH, Greer KB, Yadlapati R, Spechler SJ), Am J Gastroenterol 2022;117(1):27-56 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Haktanır AE, Çelebi A · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Esophagus/Reflux review · Jul 30, 2026 · J Neurogastro Motil · IF 3.4

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers in Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Functional Dyspepsia: A Korean Expert Review With Original Meta-analyses.

New evidencemeta-analysiscost-effectivenessproton pump inhibitorsfunctional dyspepsia
Clinical takeawaycontinue reserving P-CABs for confirmed GERD cases after PPI failure
What it foundP-CABs show superior healing rates in severe erosive esophagitis (grade C/D) and higher endoscopic remission rates in maintenance therapy compared to PPIs.
ContextThis literature reports that potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a potent alternative to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) for treating gastroesophageal reflux disease and functional dyspepsia, based on evidence from randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· British Society of Gastroenterology-endorsed international consensus, "Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0" (Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, et al.), Gut, 2024

Decision at stakereserving P-CABs for PPI failure with confirmatory GERD evidence

… Empiric escalation to vonoprazan/P-CAB is NOT a routine pre-testing step: the AGA 2024 P-CAB clinical practice update advises against P-CABs as first-line therapy and reserves them for PPI failure with confirmatory GERD evidence (LA grade B or worse erosive esophagitis, biopsy-proven Barrett's, peptic stricture, or acid exposure time >6%). …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

For heartburn or regurgitation persisting despite PPI therapy, current practice (ACG 2022 GERD guideline, still the operative ACG guideline, plus the AGA 2022 personalized-GERD CPU) is to first optimize the PPI: confirm adherence, dose 30-60 minutes before meals, escalate to twice-daily dosing or switch agents for an 8-week trial. Empiric escalation to vonoprazan/P-CAB is NOT a routine pre-testing step: the AGA 2024 P-CAB clinical practice update advises against P-CABs as first-line therapy and reserves them for PPI failure with confirmatory GERD evidence (LA grade B or worse erosive esophagitis, biopsy-proven Barrett's, peptic stricture, or acid exposure time >6%). If symptoms persist after optimization, perform EGD (ideally 2-4 weeks off PPI when GERD is unproven) with esophageal biopsies to exclude EoE (>=15 eos/hpf; the ACG 2025 EoE guideline has removed the PPI trial from the diagnostic pathway) and then physiologic testing per Lyon Consensus 2.0: in unproven GERD, ambulatory reflux monitoring OFF therapy, applying Lyon 2.0's modality-specific thresholds -- on catheter-based single-day (24-hour) pH or pH-impedance, AET >6% is conclusive for GERD, 4-6% is inconclusive, and <4% argues against GERD; on prolonged wireless (Bravo, up to 96-hour) monitoring, AET >6% on >=2 days is conclusive for GERD while AET <4% on all days excludes it, and a study meeting neither threshold is inconclusive (the number of days with AET <4% carries prognostic weight for PPI discontinuation) -- and, in either modality, a normal-AET (<4%) study with positive symptom association indicates reflux hypersensitivity or, without it, functional heartburn; in previously proven GERD, pH-impedance ON optimized therapy, where AET >4% plus >80 reflux episodes defines actionable refractory GERD (MNBI <1500 ohms supportive, >2300 ohms against). High-resolution manometry per Chicago Classification 4.0 (still current) excludes achalasia and major motility disorders and is required before anti-reflux surgery. Therapy is phenotype-directed: surgical or endoscopic anti-reflux intervention for confirmed refractory pathologic reflux, and neuromodulators with or without brain-gut behavioral therapy for reflux hypersensitivity and functional heartburn.

British Society of Gastroenterology-endorsed international consensus, "Updates to the modern diagnosis of GERD: Lyon consensus 2.0" (Gyawali CP, Yadlapati R, Fass R, et al.), Gut, 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Seo SI … Korean Society of Neurogastroenterology Motility · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №4 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Esophagus/Reflux by RSS