← Issue №1/ week of Jun 24, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Nutrition, in full.

All 3 Nutrition papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 3, in full

most clinically useful first
Nutrition meta analysis · n=73,905 · Jul 1, 2026 · UEG Journal · IF 5.6

Dermatitis Herpetiformis in Celiac Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Epidemiologysystematic reviewmeta-analysisepidemiologypediatric
Clinical takeawayBe aware that DH prevalence in CD is ~6.8% overall (higher in adults, lower in children), but no change to current diagnostic practice is recommended.
What it foundPooled prevalence of dermatitis herpetiformis (DH) in celiac disease (CD) patients was 6.8% (95% CI: 5.0-9.3), with lower prevalence in pediatric CD (2.6%) than in adults (8.6%).
ContextThis meta-analysis provides pooled estimates of DH prevalence in CD (6.8%, 95% CI:5.0-9.3), clarifying higher adult (8.6%) vs pediatric (2.6%) rates, but with very high heterogeneity.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease" (Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Semrad C, Kelly CP, Greer KB, Limketkai BN, Lebwohl B), Am J Gastroenterol 2023;118(1):59-76, 2023

Decision at stakethe inclusion of dermatitis herpetiformis as a leading presentation of celiac disease

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

DIAGNOSIS (patient must be on a gluten-containing diet). Serologic testing consists of TTG-IgA plus, if IgA deficiency has not previously been excluded, concurrent total IgA; if IgA deficiency is present, measure an IgG-based serology (DGP-IgG and/or TTG-IgG). This algorithm, previously restricted to those >=2 years, now applies to adults and children at ANY age. An elevated TTG-IgA should proceed to EGD with duodenal biopsy. A negative TTG-IgA in a non-IgA-deficient patient adequately rules out CD only when pretest probability is low or moderate; in symptomatic patients whose pretest suspicion is high (>5%), EGD with duodenal biopsy should be performed irrespective of serologic result. ACG recommends EGD with multiple duodenal biopsies to confirm the diagnosis in both children and adults with suspicion of CD (STRONG recommendation, moderate quality; 1 dissent); sampling should be 1 or 2 biopsies from the bulb (9-o'clock or 12-o'clock position) and at least 4 from the distal duodenum. Lymphocytic duodenosis (>=25 IELs/100 epithelial cells) without villous atrophy is NOT specific for CD. NONBIOPSY PATHWAY (CONDITIONAL recommendation, moderate quality): a combination of high-level TTG-IgA (>10x ULN) with a positive EMA in a SECOND blood sample is suggested as reliable for diagnosis in CHILDREN, and only if the family agrees with the no-biopsy strategy; in SYMPTOMATIC ADULTS unwilling or unable to undergo upper GI endoscopy the same criteria may be considered AFTER THE FACT, as a diagnosis of 'likely CD', ACG does not endorse a prospective no-biopsy pathway in adults, noting a >=10-fold TTG-IgA elevation carries a PPV of only ~95% in adults, which may be unacceptably low given lifelong treatment implications. HLA-DQ2/DQ8 is not required for diagnosis but is useful for serology-histology discrepancy or in patients already on a GFD; if negative, CD is ruled out. TREATMENT AND MONITORING. Strict lifelong GFD. A visit with a dietitian after diagnosis is MANDATORY, with subsequent visits as needed to reinforce education and adherence encouraged; interview with a dietitian experienced in the GFD is the standard of care for assessing adherence. ACG RECOMMENDS consumption of gluten-free oats (STRONG recommendation, moderate quality), with the qualifier that gluten contamination of oats, variable toxicity across oat varieties, and a small risk of immune reaction to avenin require monitoring for oat tolerance (monitoring intervals are not known). ACG suggests AGAINST routine use of gluten detection devices in food or biospecimens (conditional, low quality; 1 dissent), and finds INSUFFICIENT EVIDENCE to recommend for or against probiotics (evidence gap). ACG suggests setting a goal of intestinal healing as an end point of GFD therapy, advocating individualized discussion of goals beyond clinical and serological remission (CONDITIONAL recommendation, low quality). Follow-up may require multiple visits in the first year (e.g. 3, 6, and 12 months) and regular visits (e.g. twice a year or yearly) thereafter, tracking symptoms and TTG or DGP serology; other tests may include CBC, ALT, AST, vitamins A/D/E/B12, copper, zinc, folic acid, ferritin, and iron, with follow-up bloodwork individualized to verify correction of values abnormal at baseline. Preventive care includes vaccines and DXA. Symptoms improve within days of strict adherence (diarrhea improved in 80% within 60 days), but mucosal healing lags: median time from GFD onset to mucosal healing in adults is 3 years, so it is reasonable to consider a follow-up biopsy in adults after 2 years of starting a GFD, in the ABSENCE of symptoms, after shared decision-making; children heal faster (95% within 2 years), altering the risk-benefit calculus. Repeat biopsy is the only reliable method to document mucosal healing, seroconversion correlates poorly. Upper endoscopy with biopsies is also indicated for lack of clinical response or relapse of symptoms despite a GFD. VACCINATION: ACG suggests vaccination to prevent pneumococcal disease in patients with CD (CONDITIONAL recommendation, low quality), because increased pneumococcal risk is attributed to hyposplenism (frequently subclinical) present in roughly one-third of patients. The regimen follows CDC recommendations by age, immunization record, and comorbidity: for an adult with CD and functional asplenia not previously vaccinated or with unknown history, 1 dose of PCV15 (followed by PPSV23 at least 1 year later) or 1 dose of PCV20 (no PPSV23 indicated); for an adult with CD and no other condition carrying a specific CDC recommendation, ACG suggests 1 dose of PCV20 alone, or 1 dose of PCV15 first and then consider PPSV23 at least 1 year later. NONRESPONSIVE CD (NRCD): defined as persistent symptoms, signs, or laboratory abnormalities typical of CD despite 6-12 MONTHS of dietary gluten avoidance. Evaluation should review and confirm the initial diagnosis of CD, assess for inadvertent gluten exposure (via expert dietitian assessment and serology, positive serologies despite 12 months of GFD suggest ongoing gluten ingestion), assess for a coexisting functional disorder, and selectively test based on clinical suspicion for food intolerances (e.g. lactose, fructose), pancreatic insufficiency, microscopic colitis, and small intestinal bacterial overgrowth, among others. REFRACTORY CD (RCD) is a separate, rarer entity (<1% of patients outside referral centers): ongoing malabsorptive symptoms and signs with villous atrophy despite strict adherence to a GFD for MORE THAN 12 months and absence of other disorders including overt lymphoma; initial assessment centers on distinguishing RCD type 1 from type 2 by CD3/CD8 immunostains, T-cell receptor clonality by PCR, and/or flow cytometry of duodenal biopsies.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines Update: Diagnosis and Management of Celiac Disease" (Rubio-Tapia A, Hill ID, Semrad C, Kelly CP, Greer KB, Limketkai BN, Lebwohl B), Am J Gastroenterol 2023;118(1):59-76, 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Ocagli H … Canova C · United European Gastroenterology Journal · IF 5.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition prospective cohort · n=4,002 · Jul 1, 2026 · UEG Journal · IF 5.6

Prevalence of Self-Reported Non-Coeliac Gluten Sensitivity and Its Association With Disorders of Gut-Brain Interaction and Disordered Eating.

Epidemiology
Clinical takeawayWhen evaluating patients with self-reported NCGS, assess for comorbid DGBI and ARFID symptoms, particularly in those with high psychological distress, somatic symptom reporting, increased healthcare utilization, and reduced quality of life.
What it found14.2% of adults self-reported NCGS, and 69.4% of these individuals had concomitant DGBI and/or ARFID symptoms, with 24.0% meeting criteria for all three conditions.
ContextThis study highlights the overlap between self-reported NCGS, DGBI, and ARFID, suggesting NCGS may be part of a broader syndrome of food-related symptom attribution rather than gluten-specific pathology.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· Salerno Experts' Group (Catassi C, Elli L, Bonaz B, et al.), "Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): The Salerno Experts' Criteria," Nutrients, 2015

Decision at stakethe cautious approach to diagnosing and managing NCGS in patients with persistent celiac-like symptoms

The document stresses that, absent any validated biomarker, this blinded challenge is the reference standard precisely because self-reported gluten sensitivity is frequently not reproduced under blinding.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Per the Salerno Experts' Criteria, non-celiac gluten sensitivity is confirmed only after celiac disease and wheat allergy have been excluded while the patient is still on a gluten-containing diet (negative tTG-IgA with adequate total IgA/EMA and negative or near-normal duodenal histology, i.e. Marsh 0-1, on gluten; negative wheat-specific IgE / skin-prick testing), using a standardized two-step protocol. Step 1 - assess symptom response to a gluten-free diet over AT LEAST 6 weeks, scored with a validated instrument (a modified Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale rating up to three main symptoms on a 1-10 numerical rating scale); a responder shows a >=30% reduction from baseline in at least 3 of the 6 weekly assessments (>=50% of the observation period). Step 2 - confirm responders with a double-blind, placebo-controlled crossover gluten challenge: after >=4 weeks of strict (celiac-level) gluten-free diet, give 8 g gluten/day for 1 week in a vehicle that is FODMAP-free, contains amylase-trypsin inhibitors, and is indistinguishable from placebo, then a 1-week strict-GFD washout, then crossover to the other arm for 1 week; the test is positive only for gluten-directed worsening - the symptom score must be >=30% HIGHER (worse) during the gluten week than during the placebo week; a >=30% difference in the opposite direction (symptoms worse on placebo) is a negative result and does not support the diagnosis. Patients who do not respond to the gluten-free diet should be investigated for other causes (e.g., FODMAP intolerance, small-intestinal bacterial overgrowth). The document stresses that, absent any validated biomarker, this blinded challenge is the reference standard precisely because self-reported gluten sensitivity is frequently not reproduced under blinding.

Salerno Experts' Group (Catassi C, Elli L, Bonaz B, et al.), "Diagnosis of Non-Celiac Gluten Sensitivity (NCGS): The Salerno Experts' Criteria," Nutrients, 2015 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Shiha MG … Aziz I · United European Gastroenterology Journal · IF 5.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition meta analysis · Jul 1, 2026 · JPEN · IF 3.2

Association between blood phosphorus level and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

New evidencesystematic reviewmeta-analysismicronutrient deficiency
Clinical takeawayIn critically ill patients, phosphorus derangements are prognostic markers of illness severity rather than treatment targets, so continue routine monitoring and repletion of symptomatic hypophosphatemia but do not treat the number expecting a mortality benefit.
What it foundHyperphosphatemia was associated with increased ICU mortality (RR: 1.21) and hospital mortality (RR: 2.10), while hypophosphatemia was linked to prolonged ICU stay (+1.53 days) and mechanical ventilation duration (+1.54 days).
ContextConfirms prior concerns about phosphate abnormalities in ICU patients but refines understanding by quantifying associations with specific outcomes. Current practice lacks standardized phosphate monitoring protocols in this setting.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Irandoost P … Moghaddam OM · JPEN. Journal of Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition · IF 3.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №1 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Nutrition by RSS