← Issue №1/
week of Jun 24, 2026/
the whole section, in full
Colorectal, in full.
All 5 Colorectal papers in this issue,
as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few;
this is the section, whole.
Actionability = is there something to do. Prevalence = how much of a general GI practice it touches. Stakes = how consequential the decision is. Evidence strength = how far the study design and the result support the action. Novelty = how likely you are not already doing it.
Colorectalguideline · Jul 1, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 14.9
Clinical takeawayIn immunocompetent patients with mild, CT-confirmed uncomplicated left-sided diverticulitis who are non-toxic (no SIRS, CRP under 140 mg/L, WBC under 15), tolerating oral intake, and safe for outpatient care, manage without antibiotics; reserve antibiotics for immunocompromise, frailty, significant comorbidity, systemic inflammation, or refractory symptoms.
What it foundComputed tomography imaging is essential for diverticulitis diagnosis, especially at first presentation or in severe cases; colonoscopy post-recovery is recommended for complicated cases and suggested for uncomplicated cases with alarm symptoms or inadequate CRC screening.
ContextRefines prior practice by deprioritizing antibiotics for low-risk uncomplicated cases (supported by RCTs) and clarifying imaging/colonoscopy roles. Challenges historical dietary restrictions (e.g., nuts/seeds). Confirms surgery referral for select recurrent cases.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al.), "Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer," Gastroenterology, 2017ShowHide
Decision at stakewhether to perform colonoscopy after diverticulitis
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA every 3 years, CT colonography every 5 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years as Tier 2 alternatives. A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
Clinical takeawayThe full LST subtype system has only fair inter-observer reliability (kappa about 0.36) versus moderate (about 0.48) for a simplified granular vs non-granular split, so weight the reproducible split but still document the high-risk nodular-mixed and pseudodepressed features, since guidelines use them to select en-bloc resection or ESD.
What it foundInter-observer agreement for LST classification was poor (κ=0.37 first round, κ=0.36 second round), improving to moderate (κ≈0.48) with a simplified 3-category granular vs non-granular model.
ContextChallenges current reliance on detailed LST subclassification, which lacks standardized reliability despite widespread use in predicting submucosal invasion risk and resection strategy.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al.), "Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer," Gastroenterology, 2017ShowHide
Decision at stakethe morphological assessment of large colorectal laterally spreading tumors for predicting submucosal invasion risk
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA every 3 years, CT colonography every 5 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years as Tier 2 alternatives. A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
Clinical takeawayFor older adults (≥80y) with high-risk T1 CRC, weigh delayed oncologic benefit (10+ years) against immediate surgical risks; consider pathologic risk, frailty, comorbidity, and competing mortality. Avoid routine additional surgery in frail or comorbid patients.
What it foundMeta-analysis shows the survival advantage of additional surgery for T1 CRC in older adults (≥80y) only becomes evident after 10 years, while perioperative morbidity occurs immediately.
ContextRefines prior standard of recommending additional surgery for all high-risk T1 CRC by showing age-specific trade-offs in competing mortality.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer (Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al.), "Colorectal Cancer Screening: Recommendations for Physicians and Patients From the U.S. Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer," Gastroenterology, 2017ShowHide
Decision at stakewhether to recommend additional surgery after endoscopic resection for T1 colorectal cancer in older adults
Begin average-risk colorectal cancer screening at age 45 using a patient-centered shared-decision modality choice, colonoscopy every 10 years (preferred) or annual FIT as Tier 1 options, with multi-target stool DNA every 3 years, CT colonography every 5 years, or flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5 to 10 years as Tier 2 alternatives. A positive stool-based test requires diagnostic colonoscopy, and stool tests should not be ordered for patients who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Generally stop at age 75 with individualized decisions for ages 76-85 and no screening beyond 85.
New evidencecolorectal cancerepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn two eradication trials, H. pylori treatment was linked to lower CRC risk mainly in genetically high-risk or virulence-factor-positive subgroups, an interesting hypothesis but not yet practice: H. pylori is not a CRC-prevention target, and infected patients should still be offered eradication on standard gastric indications regardless of genetic or virulence status.
What it foundH. pylori-positive individuals not treated with antibiotics had a higher CRC risk (SIT: HR=2.96; MITS: HR=1.27), with the greatest risk in those seropositive for four H. pylori antigens (CagA, HpaA, Omp, HP0305) or in the top decile of Polygenic Risk Score.
ContextConfirms prior observational links between H. pylori and CRC but refines by identifying high-risk subgroups (genetic predisposition, specific virulence factors) where treatment may reduce risk. Challenges the assumption of uniform benefit from H. pylori eradication for CRC prevention.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, Chey WD, Howden CW, Moss SF, et al. 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection.' Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(9):1730-1753ShowHide
Decision at stakewhether to treat H. pylori infection to reduce colorectal cancer risk
…The following are indications to TEST for H. pylori (and to treat whenever the test is positive): active or prior peptic ulcer disease, gastric MALT lymphoma, atrophic gastritis / gastric intestinal metaplasia and other gastric premalignant conditions, uninvestigated dyspepsia in patients under 60 without alarm features (test-and-treat), functional dyspepsia, long-term NSAID or aspirin use, unexplained iron-deficiency anemia, immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura, resected early gastric cancer or gastric adenomas, first-degree relatives of gastric-cancer patients, and adult household members of an infected person (test non-serologically).…
From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Confirm ACTIVE infection before treating using a urea breath test, fecal (stool) antigen test, or endoscopic biopsy-based test (histology or rapid urease); do NOT use serology. Testing and treatment are a SINGLE decision, do NOT test unless you intend to treat, and, conversely, offer eradication to EVERY patient found to have confirmed active infection regardless of why they were tested ('if you test, you treat'); confirmed active infection is itself the indication to treat, not one of the conditions below. The following are indications to TEST for H. pylori (and to treat whenever the test is positive): active or prior peptic ulcer disease, gastric MALT lymphoma, atrophic gastritis / gastric intestinal metaplasia and other gastric premalignant conditions, uninvestigated dyspepsia in patients under 60 without alarm features (test-and-treat), functional dyspepsia, long-term NSAID or aspirin use, unexplained iron-deficiency anemia, immune (idiopathic) thrombocytopenic purpura, resected early gastric cancer or gastric adenomas, first-degree relatives of gastric-cancer patients, and adult household members of an infected person (test non-serologically). First-line in treatment-naive patients: the PREFERRED regimen (strong recommendation, moderate quality of evidence) is optimized bismuth quadruple therapy (BQT) for 14 days = standard-dose PPI twice daily + bismuth subcitrate or subsalicylate four times daily + tetracycline 500 mg four times daily + metronidazole 500 mg three or four times daily; 'optimized' means the full 14 days, using tetracycline (do NOT substitute doxycycline) and adequate metronidazole (at least 1.5 g/day). Optimized BQT is preferred even with penicillin allergy; avoid tetracycline in women of childbearing potential and avoid bismuth subsalicylate in salicylate allergy. CONDITIONAL alternatives (low/moderate QOE, require no penicillin allergy) are rifabutin triple therapy (omeprazole 10 mg / amoxicillin 250 mg / rifabutin 12.5 mg, i.e. Talicia, 4 capsules three times daily for 14 days) and vonoprazan-amoxicillin DUAL therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg three times daily for 14 days). Vonoprazan-clarithromycin TRIPLE therapy (vonoprazan 20 mg twice daily + clarithromycin 500 mg twice daily + amoxicillin 1000 mg twice daily for 14 days) should be used ONLY when the strain is clarithromycin-susceptible. AVOID any empiric clarithromycin-containing (including PPI-clarithromycin triple) or levofloxacin-containing regimen unless susceptibility is documented (clarithromycin resistance ~22-31%, levofloxacin ~38%); prefer esomeprazole or rabeprazole, or a PCAB, over omeprazole/lansoprazole/pantoprazole in known rapid or ultrarapid CYP2C19 metabolizers. Test of cure is required for ALL treated patients: confirm eradication with a urea breath test, fecal antigen test, or biopsy-based test performed at least 4 weeks after finishing antibiotics and after holding PPIs/PCABs for at least 2 weeks (an H2-receptor antagonist may be used in the interim).
Clinical takeawayFor women with severe pelvic/GI symptoms and suspected endometriosis (e.g., dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia), evaluate for rectosigmoid endometriosis via transvaginal ultrasound or MRI. First-line hormonal therapy (OCPs/progestogens) may help symptoms; surgery only for confirmed obstruction/severe refractory cases.
What it foundBowel endometriosis affects 8-12% of women with endometriosis, primarily in the rectosigmoid colon, and diagnostic delays often exceed 7-10 years.
ContextThis review confirms the multifactorial pathogenesis and diagnostic challenges of bowel endometriosis, aligning with current practice of using imaging for diagnosis and reserving surgery for severe cases.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Management of Irritable Bowel Syndrome', 2021ShowHide
No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.
Our full summary of this standardShowHide
Diagnosis: use a positive diagnostic strategy based on Rome IV criteria rather than a strategy of exclusion (strong for cost-effectiveness, high quality; consensus for time-to-therapy), and categorize by IBS subtype (consensus). In patients with IBS and diarrhea symptoms: check celiac serology (strong, moderate) and, in those WITHOUT alarm features, fecal calprotectin (or fecal lactoferrin) plus CRP to rule out IBD (strong; moderate quality for CRP/calprotectin, very low for lactoferrin). Recommend AGAINST routine stool testing for enteric pathogens (conditional, low) and AGAINST routine colonoscopy in patients younger than 45 without warning signs (conditional, low). Anorectal physiology testing only when symptoms suggest a pelvic floor disorder and/or for refractory constipation not responding to standard medical therapy (consensus). Treatment, all subtypes: soluble, not insoluble, fiber (strong, moderate); a LIMITED trial of a low-FODMAP diet (conditional, very low); gut-directed psychotherapies for global symptoms (conditional, very low); TCAs for global symptoms (strong, moderate); peppermint suggested (conditional, low); antispasmodics for abdominal pain (conditional, low); AGAINST probiotics (conditional, very low), AGAINST fecal transplant (strong, very low). IBS-C: chloride channel activators (strong, moderate) and guanylate cyclase activators (strong, high); AGAINST PEG products for global IBS-C symptoms (conditional, low); tegaserod reserved for women younger than 65 with ≤1 cardiovascular risk factor who have not adequately responded to secretagogues (strong/conditional, low). IBS-D: rifaximin (strong, moderate); alosetron only for women with severe IBS-D who have failed conventional therapy (conditional, low); mixed opioid agonists/antagonists, i.e. eluxadoline (conditional, moderate); AGAINST bile acid sequestrants (conditional, very low).