← Issue №16/ week of Oct 18, 2026/Colorectal

Serrated polyp detection rates beyond adenoma detection rate for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: findings from the SCREESCO trial.

From GI Signals issue №16: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Colorectal prospective cohort · n=15,857 · Oct 16, 2026 · Endoscopy · IF 11.8

Serrated polyp detection rates beyond adenoma detection rate for postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer: findings from the SCREESCO trial.

New evidencecolorectal cancer screeningserrated polypepidemiology
Clinical takeawayMonitor and aim to improve PSPDR alongside ADR in colonoscopy practice, particularly for endoscopists with low PSPDR (<10%), to reduce PCCRC risk. Specific strategies for improvement should be developed based on further evidence.
What it foundEndoscopists with low PSPDR (<10%) had a 5-year PCCRC incidence of 0.16% vs. 0.06% for those with high PSPDR (≥10%), and PCCRC incidence decreased as PSPDR increased (HR 0.90 per percentage-point increase; 95%CI 0.82-1.00; P = 0.04).
ContextRefines current practice by highlighting PSPDR as a complementary metric to ADR for identifying higher PCCRC risk, particularly in endoscopists with high ADR. Applies to average-risk colorectal cancer screening populations aged 45-75.
Measured against the standard of care· USMSTF 2017 (Rex et al., Gastroenterology) + USMSTF 2022 focused update on age (Patel et al., Gastroenterology 2022;162:285-299) / ACS 2026 (CA Cancer J Clin)

Decision at stakethe role of serrated polyp detection rates in postcolonoscopy colorectal cancer risk

… Multi-Society Task Force (2017 guideline, revised by the 2022 focused update on age to start and stop): offer average-risk colorectal cancer screening to everyone aged 45-75. … Colonoscopy every 10 years and annual FIT are the Tier 1 cornerstones. … The American Cancer Society's May 2026 guideline agrees on the 45-75 range, no screening after 85, and colonoscopy as the preferred option. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

U.S. Multi-Society Task Force (2017 guideline, revised by the 2022 focused update on age to start and stop): offer average-risk colorectal cancer screening to everyone aged 45-75. Screening at 45-49 is a weaker recommendation than at 50-75. Colonoscopy every 10 years and annual FIT are the Tier 1 cornerstones. Tier 2 alternatives are multi-target stool DNA every 3 years, CT colonography every 5 years, and flexible sigmoidoscopy every 5-10 years. Capsule colonoscopy every 5 years is Tier 3. Any abnormal non-colonoscopy test requires a diagnostic colonoscopy, and a stool test should not be offered to a patient who would decline follow-up colonoscopy. Patients who are up to date with negative prior screening, particularly a high-quality colonoscopy, may consider stopping at 75 or when life expectancy is under 10 years. Decisions at 76-85 are individualized by health and prior screening, and screening after 85 is not recommended. The American Cancer Society's May 2026 guideline agrees on the 45-75 range, no screening after 85, and colonoscopy as the preferred option. It adds the next-generation mt-sDNA test and the multitarget stool RNA test (ColoSense), both every 3 years, and it adds an FDA-approved blood-based cfDNA test (Shield) only for people who decline or do not complete visual or stool screening. ACS says a positive stool or blood test should be followed by colonoscopy, preferably within 6 months. The 2026 ASGE paper on follow-up after an abnormal stool test is an implementation review (navigation, tracking, direct-access colonoscopy), not a new screening guideline.

USMSTF 2017 (Rex et al., Gastroenterology) + USMSTF 2022 focused update on age (Patel et al., Gastroenterology 2022;162:285-299) / ACS 2026 (CA Cancer J Clin) · reviewed 2026-10-11 ↗
Sekiguchi M … Forsberg AM · Endoscopy · IF 11.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №16 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues