← Issue №15/ week of Oct 11, 2026/Motility

Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback vs Dextranomer-Hyaluronate Injection for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

From GI Signals issue №15: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Motility rct · n=200 · Oct 6, 2026 · Clin Gastro Hep · IF 16.2

Comparative Effectiveness of Biofeedback vs Dextranomer-Hyaluronate Injection for Fecal Incontinence: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

New evidencefecal incontinencecost-effectivenesshealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider biofeedback over dextranomer-hyaluronate injection for moderate-to-severe MBT-refractory FI due to lower cost, equivalent efficacy, and fewer serious adverse events (biofeedback: 2 vs injection: 5).
What it foundBiofeedback and dextranomer-hyaluronate injection achieved similar efficacy (27.7% vs 29.3% with ≥75% reduction in FI episodes at 3 months) in MBT-refractory FI.
ContextThis study directly compares biofeedback and dextranomer-hyaluronate injection in moderate-to-severe MBT-refractory FI, confirming neither is superior but highlighting biofeedback's cost advantage and lower serious adverse events.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023

Decision at stakethe choice between biofeedback and dextranomer-hyaluronate injection for fecal incontinence refractory to medical and behavioral therapy

First exclude emergency/secondary causes (cauda equina/cord compression, fecal impaction with overflow) with a mandatory digital rectal exam, screen for eating disorder before dietary restriction, and classify the subtype (urge, passive, overflow, mixed) since it drives therapy. … Manage with a stepwise ladder: optimize stool consistency (fiber, loperamide, bile-acid sequestrant, or TCA neuromodulator), pelvic floor PT plus biofeedback, skin protection and bridge devices, then escalate to surgical therapy. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

First exclude emergency/secondary causes (cauda equina/cord compression, fecal impaction with overflow) with a mandatory digital rectal exam, screen for eating disorder before dietary restriction, and classify the subtype (urge, passive, overflow, mixed) since it drives therapy. Work up loose-stool FI for inflammatory, infectious, and bile-acid drivers before labeling idiopathic. Manage with a stepwise ladder: optimize stool consistency (fiber, loperamide, bile-acid sequestrant, or TCA neuromodulator), pelvic floor PT plus biofeedback, skin protection and bridge devices, then escalate to surgical therapy. Prescribe the antimotility/neuromodulator agents with their indications, dosing, and safety limits: loperamide is first-line for loose-stool/urge FI, start low (e.g., 2 mg before meals or as needed) and titrate to stool consistency while staying within the FDA-approved maximum (8 mg/day OTC, 16 mg/day prescription), because the FDA warns that higher-than-recommended doses cause QT prolongation, torsades de pointes, and cardiac arrest; the TCA neuromodulator (e.g., amitriptyline, typically low-dose ~20 mg) is an off-label option reserved for loose-stool/idiopathic FI, and the AGS Beers Criteria recommend avoiding TCAs such as amitriptyline in older adults given their strong anticholinergic burden, sedation, orthostatic hypotension, and fall risk. Per the dedicated ASCRS 2023 fecal-incontinence guideline (updating ASCRS 2007, superseding reliance on ACG's broader 2021 anorectal-disorders guideline as the primary specialty source), sacral neuromodulation is a first-line surgical option for incontinent patients WITH OR WITHOUT a defined anal sphincter defect (conditional recommendation, low-quality evidence), it is not gated on documenting a sphincter defect. Sphincteroplasty remains appropriate for symptomatic patients with a defined external anal sphincter defect; repeat sphincteroplasty after a failed overlapping repair should generally be avoided in favor of other modalities. Antegrade continence enemas are an option before colostomy, which remains last resort.

American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons (ASCRS), "The American Society of Colon and Rectal Surgeons Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Fecal Incontinence," Diseases of the Colon & Rectum, 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Bharucha AE … Hamilton FA · Clinical Gastroenterology and Hepatology : the Official Clinical Practice Journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · IF 16.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №15 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues