← Issue №13/ week of Sep 27, 2026/Colorectal

The THOMAS Study: A Pilot Study for Patient-Administered Anal Cancer Screening.

From GI Signals issue №13: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Colorectal prospective cohort · n=50 · Sep 23, 2026 · Dis Colon Rectum · IF 3.5

The THOMAS Study: A Pilot Study for Patient-Administered Anal Cancer Screening.

New evidencecolorectal cancerdysplasiahealth services
Clinical takeawayPreliminary data suggest patient-administered anal dysplasia screening may be an option for high-risk patients (HIV-positive, anoreceptive intercourse) who decline in-office testing, but emphasize its moderate accuracy and need for further validation due to study limitations.
What it foundPatient-collected anal swabs had 72.0% accuracy for detecting atypical cells and 83.7% accuracy for high-risk HPV, with moderate agreement (κ = 0.51-0.63) compared to physician-collected samples in a pilot study.
ContextPilot study (n=50) at a single institution; expands screening access for a high-risk population where office-based sampling is a barrier but generalizability is limited.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS); Stier EA, et al. "International Anal Neoplasia Society's consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening." International Journal of Cancer, 2024

Decision at stakethe feasibility and accuracy of patient-administered anal cancer screening

Offer anal cancer screening only where there is capacity to perform high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and to treat what it finds. … Screen with anal cytology alone, high-risk HPV testing alone (with HPV16 genotyping), or hrHPV-cytology co-testing, all three perform acceptably; HRA is the DIAGNOSTIC procedure for an abnormal screen, not itself a screening test. …

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. … marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Offer anal cancer screening only where there is capacity to perform high-resolution anoscopy (HRA) and to treat what it finds. Screening is RECOMMENDED for: MSM and transgender women with HIV, beginning at age 35; all other people with HIV, and MSM and transgender women without HIV, beginning at age 45; solid organ transplant recipients, beginning 10 years post-transplant; and persons with a history of vulvar HSIL or vulvar cancer, beginning within 1 year of that diagnosis. Screening may be CONSIDERED via shared decision-making, and only where HRA capacity is adequate, for persons aged 45 or older with a history of cervical or vaginal HSIL/cancer, perianal warts, persistent (>1 year) cervical HPV16, or autoimmune conditions. Screen with anal cytology alone, high-risk HPV testing alone (with HPV16 genotyping), or hrHPV-cytology co-testing, all three perform acceptably; HRA is the DIAGNOSTIC procedure for an abnormal screen, not itself a screening test. Perform digital anal rectal examination as part of the physical exam at every screening visit. Refer immediately to HRA for any abnormal cytology, ASC-US or worse, when screening is by cytology alone, since there is no hrHPV result available to triage it; for ASC-US or worse cytology accompanied by a positive hrHPV result on co-testing; for ASC-H or HSIL cytology regardless of HPV result; and for any HPV16-positive result regardless of cytology. Repeat screening in 12 months after NILM cytology alone or a negative HPV test alone, or after ASC-US cytology with negative hrHPV; repeat in 12-24 months after co-testing that is both NILM and hrHPV-negative. Where HRA capacity is reduced, restrict immediate referral to ASC-H/HSIL cytology and to HPV16-positive results, and manage the remainder with repeat screening. Treat HSIL found at HRA-directed biopsy rather than observing it: in ANCHOR, treatment reduced progression to invasive cancer by approximately 57% in people with HIV aged 35 and older.

International Anal Neoplasia Society (IANS); Stier EA, et al. "International Anal Neoplasia Society's consensus guidelines for anal cancer screening." International Journal of Cancer, 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Miyazaki NL … Ng M · Diseases of the Colon and Rectum · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №13 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues