Colorectal
Signal score, how each part rates
ActionabilityPrevalenceStakesEvidence strengthNovelty
See the full rubric →Addition of High-Dose Vitamin D3 to Standard Treatment in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: The SOLARIS Randomized Clinical Trial (Alliance A021703).
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action: high-dose vitamin D3 is not superior to standard-dose in mCRC treatment.
What it foundHigh-dose vitamin D3 (8000 IU loading then 4000 IU daily) did not improve PFS (11.8 vs 10.3 months) or OS (25.6 vs 27.0 months) compared to standard-dose vitamin D3 (400 IU daily) in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) receiving chemotherapy. There were no significant differences in adverse events between the two doses.
ContextChallenges prior phase 2 data suggesting benefit of high-dose vitamin D3 in mCRC; confirms standard-dose remains appropriate.
No standard claimed for this paper
Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.
Ng K … Meyerhardt JA · JAMA · IF 63.1 · PubMed ↗