← Issue №4/ week of Jul 26, 2026/Motility

Machine Learning Clustering Identifies Achalasia-Spectrum Phenotypes in Distal Esophageal Spasm.

From GI Signals issue №4: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

Motility retrospective · n=42 · Jul 30, 2026 · J Neurogastro Motil · IF 3.4

Machine Learning Clustering Identifies Achalasia-Spectrum Phenotypes in Distal Esophageal Spasm.

New evidenceartificial intelligenceachalasia
Clinical takeawayConsider premature supine contraction frequency (median ≥8) as a potential marker for DES patients who may benefit from lower esophageal sphincter-directed therapies like POEM, though validation in larger studies is needed due to the rarity of DES.
What it foundMachine learning identified 33/42 DES patients clustering with type III achalasia, characterized by higher premature supine contraction frequency (median 8 vs 0, P < 0.001) and higher Esophageal Hypervigilance and Anxiety Scale scores (30 vs 20.5, P = 0.010). All 3 within-cluster patients who underwent peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) achieved symptom resolution, compared to partial response in outside-cluster patients.
ContextChallenges the view of DES as a uniform disorder, suggesting a subset may share pathophysiology with type III achalasia and respond similarly to therapies targeting the lower esophageal sphincter.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function (Chicago Classification Working Group); Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. "Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©." Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2021;33(1):e14058

Decision at stakediagnosing and treating distal esophageal spasm (DES) based on high-resolution manometry findings

Diagnose non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry performed with the full CCv4.0 protocol, and treat the manometric pattern as a disorder only when it is accompanied by clinically relevant symptoms.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose non-achalasia esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry performed with the full CCv4.0 protocol, and treat the manometric pattern as a disorder only when it is accompanied by clinically relevant symptoms. The protocol requires both positions: supine (60-second adaptation, 30-second landmark/baseline, ten 5 mL wet swallows, one multiple rapid swallow of five 2 mL swallows at 2-3 second intervals) and upright at >=80 degrees (five 5 mL wet swallows plus a 200 mL rapid drink challenge); solid swallows, a solid test meal, or pharmacologic provocation (amyl nitrite, cholecystokinin) are added when standard swallows do not explain the symptom. IRP thresholds are manufacturer- and position-specific (for the Medtronic system, abnormal median IRP is >=15 mmHg supine and >=12 mmHg upright). CCv4.0 grades diagnoses as conclusive or inconclusive: distal esophageal spasm requires a normal median IRP plus >=20% premature contractions (distal latency <4.5 s with DCI >=450 mmHg*s*cm) AND clinically relevant dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain; hypercontractile esophagus requires a normal median IRP plus >=20% hypercontractile supine swallows (DCI >8,000 mmHg*s*cm) AND clinically relevant dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain, with mechanical obstruction excluded. Ineffective esophageal motility requires a normal IRP in both positions plus >70% ineffective swallows or >=50% failed peristalsis, where an ineffective swallow is weak (DCI 100-450), failed (DCI <100), or fragmented; 50-70% ineffective swallows is inconclusive and requires supportive testing. Absent contractility requires a normal median IRP in both supine and upright positions with 100% failed peristalsis, and because achalasia can present this way, provocative testing and adjunctive investigation are needed when there is any clinical suspicion of achalasia. Manometric EGJ outflow obstruction is never conclusive on manometry alone: it requires an elevated median IRP in BOTH the primary and secondary position plus >=20% of swallows with elevated intrabolus pressure, with peristalsis preserved; a conclusive, clinically relevant diagnosis additionally requires compatible symptoms (dysphagia or non-cardiac chest pain) AND at least one supportive investigation showing obstruction (timed barium esophagram with tablet and/or functional lumen imaging probe). An isolated elevated supine IRP, an isolated elevated upright IRP, or isolated elevated intrabolus pressure alone are each inconclusive and do not establish EGJOO. CCv4.0 is a diagnostic classification and does not issue treatment recommendations; therapy for these entities is not traceable to this document.

International Working Group for Disorders of Gastrointestinal Motility and Function (Chicago Classification Working Group); Yadlapati R, Kahrilas PJ, Fox MR, et al. "Esophageal motility disorders on high-resolution manometry: Chicago classification version 4.0©." Neurogastroenterology & Motility. 2021;33(1):e14058 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Fass OZ … Carlson DA · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №4 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues