← Issue №5/ week of Aug 2, 2026/IBD

Fiber Intake in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Impact of Disease Activity and Predictors of High Fiber Intake.

From GI Signals issue №5: what this paper found, what it changes, and where it sits against the current standard of care, reviewed by Simon Mathews, MD.

IBD prospective cohort · n=117 · Aug 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Fiber Intake in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Impact of Disease Activity and Predictors of High Fiber Intake.

New evidenceulcerative colitisCrohn's diseasediet therapyepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel IBD patients, especially those with active UC, on the benefits of high fiber diets and provide nutritional education to improve intake.
What it foundOnly 26% of IBD patients consumed high fiber diets (≥30 g/day for men, ≥25 g/day for women), with lower intake in active vs. inactive disease (19 g vs. 24 g, P=0.0048), particularly in UC (13 g vs. 22 g, P=0.0044).
ContextConfirms prior evidence that IBD patients often fall short of dietary fiber recommendations, particularly during active disease, and highlights UC as a subgroup with notably lower intake.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults, Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120(6):1187-1224; AGA Living Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe UC, Gastroenterology 2024 (panel review March 2026, no changes)

Decision at stakethe role of dietary fiber in managing ulcerative colitis

Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA by route and extent (suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided, oral plus rectal for extensive); if 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by EFFICACY TIER, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab; intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab; lower: adalimumab. PREVIOUSLY TNF-EXPOSED, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab; lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod - S1P modulators are weakest in exactly this group. Do not cycle within the anti-TNF class after primary non-response; switch mechanism. Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) to endoscopic improvement (MES 0-1). Screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts and admit for IV steroids. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after DIAGNOSIS for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening.

ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults, Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120(6):1187-1224; AGA Living Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe UC, Gastroenterology 2024 (panel review March 2026, no changes) ↗
Vasudevan J … Feagins LA · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Read the whole of issue №5 Every paper GI Signals surfaces gets a page like this one. All issues