← Issue №9/ week of Aug 30, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Nutrition, in full.

All 3 Nutrition papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 3, in full

most clinically useful first
Nutrition prospective cohort · n=2,064 · Aug 26, 2026 · Am J Clin Nutrition · IF 6.5

Development and Implementation of the MED4TUBE Evidence-Based Care Bundle to Reduce Medication Errors in Enteral Feeding Tubes: A Quality Improvement Study.

Practice-changinghealth servicesenteral nutrition
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting the MED4TUBE bundle (medication appropriateness, preparation, administration, and monitoring) for hospitalized geriatric, multimorbid patients on enteral tube feeding to reduce errors. Training based on the Knowledge-to-Action framework and Institute for Healthcare Improvement care bundle methodology is required for implementation.
What it foundThe MED4TUBE care bundle reduced medication errors from 3.8±2.3 to 0.6±0.8 per dose (84% reduction; IRR=6.19, 95% CI: 5.44-7.04, p<0.001) compared to pre-implementation and eliminated monitoring errors in enteral tube feeding.
ContextCurrent practice lacks standardized protocols for medication administration via enteral tubes, leading to preventable errors. This bundle provides a structured approach with demonstrated efficacy in a predominantly geriatric, multimorbid inpatient population.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· ASGE 2024 (Gastrointest Endosc 2025;101:25-35) / ESGE 2021 (Endoscopy 2021;53:178-195)

Decision at stakemedication administration via enteral feeding tubes

Post-procedure bowel rest is no longer recommended: feeding may start within 3-4 hours of uncomplicated placement (ESGE 2021, strong/high-quality; ASGE 2024, strong/moderate), medications may be given immediately, and routine gastric residual volume checks are not indicated.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

PEG remains the standard for durable enteral access in patients unable to swallow safely or meet nutritional needs orally, placed by the pull (Gauderer-Ponsky) technique, and ASGE 2024 now suggests PEG over IR-guided gastrostomy for initial placement in normal foregut anatomy. A single prophylactic IV dose of a beta-lactam antibiotic (e.g., cefazolin) is given before placement. Post-procedure bowel rest is no longer recommended: feeding may start within 3-4 hours of uncomplicated placement (ESGE 2021, strong/high-quality; ASGE 2024, strong/moderate), medications may be given immediately, and routine gastric residual volume checks are not indicated. Buried bumper prophylaxis is daily site care with DAILY inward tube mobilization and a loose external bumper kept 1-2 cm from the abdominal wall (ESGE 2021), not weekly rotation. Antiplatelet agents, including dual antiplatelet therapy, need not be routinely withheld for PEG; anticoagulant management is individualized by multidisciplinary discussion of bleeding versus thrombotic risk. In malignant dysphagia, either transoral pull PEG or direct (introducer) PEG is acceptable with counseling about implantation metastasis and periodic site examination. Device selection among PEG, PEG-J, DPEJ, surgical gastrostomy, and parenteral nutrition remains multidisciplinary, and a goals-of-care discussion before placement, including avoiding routine PEG in advanced dementia in favor of careful hand feeding (AGA 2020 / Choosing Wisely), is unchanged.

ASGE 2024 (Gastrointest Endosc 2025;101:25-35) / ESGE 2021 (Endoscopy 2021;53:178-195) · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Memili S … Cakir BK · American Journal of Clinical Nutrition · IF 6.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition guideline · Aug 26, 2026 · Clin Nutrition · IF 6.6

Global Leadership Initiative on Indications to Nutritional Therapy and Support (GLINTS): A consensus report from the global clinical nutrition community.

Guideline / reviewguideline
Clinical takeawayConsider enteral tube feeding for adult patients with oral intake <50% of estimated energy/nutrient needs and no expected improvement; initiate parenteral nutrition for intestinal failure or when oral/enteral intake remains inadequate despite optimization compared to standard enteral nutrition.
What it foundglobal consensus reaffirms PN as standard for intestinal failure
ContextRefines and standardizes indications for nutritional therapy/support in adults, building on prior GLIM criteria for malnutrition and addressing gaps in consensus on when to escalate to enteral or parenteral nutrition.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· ESPEN (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism), "ESPEN guideline on chronic intestinal failure in adults, Update 2023," Clinical Nutrition, 2023

Decision at stakeintestinal failure is an indication for parenteral nutrition

Manage short bowel syndrome / intestinal failure with a multidisciplinary IF team using a three-phase nutrition strategy: initiate TPN with IV hydration and electrolyte replacement in the acute hypersecretory phase, progressively advance enteral feeds and wean PN during the 1-2 year adaptation phase, then maintain an oral diet with selective PN as needed.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Manage short bowel syndrome / intestinal failure with a multidisciplinary IF team using a three-phase nutrition strategy: initiate TPN with IV hydration and electrolyte replacement in the acute hypersecretory phase, progressively advance enteral feeds and wean PN during the 1-2 year adaptation phase, then maintain an oral diet with selective PN as needed. In carefully selected PN-dependent patients, and only when prescribed by clinicians experienced in SBS/IF management (generally once the adaptation phase is complete), consider the GLP-2 analog teduglutide (0.05 mg/kg/day subcutaneously) to promote intestinal adaptation and reduce PN volume, but only after baseline screening to exclude neoplasia and contraindications (colonoscopy with removal of any polyps when colon and/or rectum is present, and assessment for active or recent [within 5 years] gastrointestinal, hepatobiliary, or pancreatic malignancy, which contraindicate its use) and with mandatory ongoing safety monitoring (surveillance colonoscopy after 1-2 years then every 5 years, plus vigilance for colorectal/GI polyps and neoplasia, intestinal obstruction, biliary/gallbladder and pancreatic disease, and fluid overload); add antimotility agents (loperamide, then codeine/opium tincture) for high-output stoma, and provide lifelong nutrient surveillance/supplementation (notably B12) plus monitoring for CRBSI, IFALD, oxalate stones, and refeeding syndrome.

ESPEN (European Society for Clinical Nutrition and Metabolism), "ESPEN guideline on chronic intestinal failure in adults, Update 2023," Clinical Nutrition, 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Klek S … Gabe S · Clinical Nutrition · IF 6.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Nutrition retrospective · n=825 · Aug 25, 2026 · Dig Dis Sci · IF 2.5

Prevalence and Predictors of Folate Deficiency in Patients with Celiac Disease.

New evidencemicronutrient deficiencyepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider folate screening in celiac disease patients, especially younger individuals and those with ulcerative colitis, but no specific screening interval is yet supported by evidence.
What it found7% of treated celiac disease patients had folate deficiency, with younger age (37 vs 44 years) and concomitant ulcerative colitis (5.2% vs 0.3%) as predictors.
ContextConfirms folate deficiency as a concern in treated celiac disease, highlighting subgroups at higher risk, but does not establish causation or optimal management.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults, Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120(6):1187-1224; AGA Living Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe UC, Gastroenterology 2024 (panel review March 2026, no changes)

Decision at stakescreening for folate deficiency in patients with ulcerative colitis and celiac disease

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Confirm ulcerative colitis with endoscopy showing continuous colonic inflammation from the rectum plus histology, after excluding infection with two-step CDI testing. Treat mild-moderate disease with 5-ASA by route and extent (suppository for proctitis, enema for left-sided, oral plus rectal for extensive); if 5-ASA fails, treat as moderate-to-severe rather than stepping up gradually. Position advanced therapy by EFFICACY TIER, not by an anti-TNF-first rule. Advanced-therapy-naive, higher efficacy: infliximab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod, upadacitinib, risankizumab, guselkumab; intermediate: golimumab, ustekinumab, tofacitinib, filgotinib, mirikizumab; lower: adalimumab. PREVIOUSLY TNF-EXPOSED, higher efficacy: tofacitinib, upadacitinib, ustekinumab; lower: adalimumab, vedolizumab, ozanimod, etrasimod - S1P modulators are weakest in exactly this group. Do not cycle within the anti-TNF class after primary non-response; switch mechanism. Apply treat-to-target (STRIDE-II) to endoscopic improvement (MES 0-1). Screen for acute severe UC by Truelove-Witts and admit for IV steroids. Begin CRC surveillance 8-10 years after DIAGNOSIS for extensive or left-sided disease; isolated proctitis follows average-risk screening.

ACG Clinical Guideline Update: Ulcerative Colitis in Adults, Am J Gastroenterol 2025;120(6):1187-1224; AGA Living Guideline on Pharmacological Management of Moderate-to-Severe UC, Gastroenterology 2024 (panel review March 2026, no changes) ↗
Ezenekwe L … Lebwohl B · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №9 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Nutrition by RSS