← Issue №9/ week of Aug 30, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Motility, in full.

All 2 Motility papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 2, in full

most clinically useful first
Motility guideline · Aug 28, 2026 · J Neurogastro Motil · IF 3.4

Asian Neurogastroenterology and Motility Association and Asia-Pacific Association of Gastroenterology Chronic Constipation Consensus 2026.

Guideline / reviewchronic constipationguidelinehealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider adopting the algorithm-based framework for managing chronic constipation in Asian healthcare settings, prioritizing symptom assessment and stepwise management. Reserve specialized tests and surgery for selected cases after comprehensive evaluation.
What it foundThirty-nine consensus statements developed, emphasizing comprehensive symptom assessment, early severity evaluation, and stepwise management of chronic constipation in Asia, including lifestyle modification, conventional laxatives, and treatment optimization within 4 weeks.
ContextRefines and regionalizes current practice by providing a tailored, evidence-based algorithm for chronic constipation management in Asian healthcare settings, compared to broader international guidelines.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association & American College of Gastroenterology, "American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation" (Chang L, Chey WD, Imdad A, et al.), 2023

Decision at stakethe stepwise pharmacological management of chronic idiopathic constipation

In adults with chronic idiopathic constipation, the AGA-ACG panel makes 10 GRADE-based pharmacological recommendations, and the strength tier is part of the recommendation.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

In adults with chronic idiopathic constipation, the AGA-ACG panel makes 10 GRADE-based pharmacological recommendations, and the strength tier is part of the recommendation. Unqualified as to prior therapy: STRONG recommendation (moderate certainty) for polyethylene glycol; STRONG recommendation (moderate certainty) for bisacodyl or sodium picosulfate, but explicitly qualified as short-term or rescue therapy; CONDITIONAL suggestion for fiber supplementation (low certainty), magnesium oxide (very low certainty), and senna (low certainty). Reserved for patients who do not respond to, fail, or are intolerant of over-the-counter agents: STRONG recommendation (moderate certainty) for linaclotide, plecanatide, and prucalopride; CONDITIONAL suggestion for lubiprostone (low certainty) and lactulose (very low certainty). The guideline states no specific doses, no mandatory ordering algorithm, and no fixed trial duration; it notes only that nonpharmacological therapies 'often represent the initial steps in management' and directs clinicians to shared decision making incorporating patient preference, cost, and availability. The guideline explicitly does not cover anorectal evacuation disorders, referring those to the ACG 2021 benign anorectal guideline.

American Gastroenterological Association & American College of Gastroenterology, "American Gastroenterological Association-American College of Gastroenterology Clinical Practice Guideline: Pharmacological Management of Chronic Idiopathic Constipation" (Chang L, Chey WD, Imdad A, et al.), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Patcharatrakul T … Gonlachanvit S · Journal of Neurogastroenterology and Motility · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Motility prospective cohort · n=30 · Aug 25, 2026 · GIE · IF 8.0

Associations between body surface gastric mapping parameters and response to gastric peroral endoscopic myotomy for gastroparesis.

New evidencegastroparesisbiomarkerartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayConsider BSGM phenotyping (dysrhythmic/continuous vs. higher-frequency patterns) when selecting refractory gastroparesis patients for GPOEM, as it may predict response. Specific BSGM protocols include 30 min fasting, standardized nutrient drink with oatmeal bar (482 kcal), and 4 h postprandial recording.
What it found53% of patients responded to GPOEM (≥1 point GCSI reduction or symptom resolution), with all dysrhythmic/continuous BSGM phenotypes responding vs. higher gastric frequencies predicting non-response (aOR 0.01, 95% CI 0.00-0.39) compared to lower frequencies.
ContextRefines patient selection for GPOEM, a therapy with uncertain response rates, by identifying BSGM phenotypes associated with benefit in adults with refractory gastroparesis.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Gastroparesis," 2025

Decision at stakepatient selection for G-POEM in medically refractory gastroparesis

Procedures, all AGAINST, all conditional: G-POEM, except for selected patients with medically refractory disease (low certainty), candidates should have gastroparesis on an appropriately performed 4-hour study, generally at least moderate delay (≥20% retention at 4 hours with the EggBeaters meal), at least 6 months of moderate cardinal symptoms, and a prior trial of a prokinetic such as metoclopramide plus at least one antiemetic; intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection in medically refractory gastroparesis (very low certainty), noting retreatment as often as every 3 months and the risk that repeat injection causes pyloric scarring complicating later G-POEM; and gastric electrical stimulation in medically refractory gastroparesis (very low certainty), noting a roughly 7% serious adverse event rate, that patients should be told GES targets nausea and vomiting rather than abdominal pain, and that patients valuing nausea/vomiting improvement over that risk may reasonably select placement.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: AGA 2025 addresses adults with idiopathic or diabetic gastroparesis; it does not issue diabetes-specific graded recommendations, and every one of its 12 recommendations is CONDITIONAL ("we suggest"), with explicit shared-decision-making carve-outs. Diagnosis: the AGA suggests AGAINST a 2-hour (or shorter) gastric emptying study and in favor of a 4-hour study (conditional, low certainty); the 4-hour value must be measured directly, not mathematically extrapolated from earlier time points, and the study should be done off confounders (opioids, GLP-1 receptor agonists, prokinetics) and without hyperglycemia. Pharmacotherapy, FOR: the AGA suggests using metoclopramide over no metoclopramide (conditional, VERY LOW certainty), typically oral or intranasal starting at 5 mg before meals titrated up to 10 mg before meals, noting the FDA black-box tardive dyskinesia warning and 12-week prescribing limit while observing that absolute tardive dyskinesia risk is low (~1 in 17,800 to 1 in 35,000 prescriptions); and suggests using erythromycin over no erythromycin (conditional, VERY LOW certainty), low-dose 100-150 mg orally 30 minutes before meals, with drug holidays (e.g. 3 weeks on, 1 week off) to counter tachyphylaxis. Efficacy of any pharmacologic agent should be reassessed at 4 to 8 weeks to decide on continuation. Pharmacotherapy, AGAINST (all conditional): domperidone (very low certainty; patients valuing improvement in nausea, vomiting and early satiety over adverse events may reasonably elect it where available, and it may suit those with neurologic side effects on metoclopramide or with Parkinson's disease; requires an FDA IND, with baseline potassium, magnesium and QTc monitoring); prucalopride (very low certainty; patients with idiopathic gastroparesis, or with coexisting chronic idiopathic constipation, may reasonably elect it); aprepitant (low certainty; may help when 5-HT3 antagonists such as ondansetron are not helpful); nortriptyline (low certainty; may reasonably be elected by patients with co-occurring irritable bowel syndrome or significant abdominal pain, started low at 10-25 mg and titrated slowly); buspirone (very low certainty; may help predominant early satiety and bloating); and cannabidiol except in the context of a clinical trial (low certainty). Procedures, all AGAINST, all conditional: G-POEM, except for selected patients with medically refractory disease (low certainty), candidates should have gastroparesis on an appropriately performed 4-hour study, generally at least moderate delay (≥20% retention at 4 hours with the EggBeaters meal), at least 6 months of moderate cardinal symptoms, and a prior trial of a prokinetic such as metoclopramide plus at least one antiemetic; intrapyloric botulinum toxin injection in medically refractory gastroparesis (very low certainty), noting retreatment as often as every 3 months and the risk that repeat injection causes pyloric scarring complicating later G-POEM; and gastric electrical stimulation in medically refractory gastroparesis (very low certainty), noting a roughly 7% serious adverse event rate, that patients should be told GES targets nausea and vomiting rather than abdominal pain, and that patients valuing nausea/vomiting improvement over that risk may reasonably select placement. Surgical pyloric intervention: the AGA recommends surgical pyloromyotomy or pyloroplasty ONLY in the context of clinical trials, designated a knowledge gap, with no recommendation for or against. Ungraded general implementation considerations (explicitly not GRADE recommendations): optimize glycemic control in gastroparesis in the setting of diabetes; review and eliminate medications that delay gastric emptying (opioids, GLP-1 receptor agonists); use small-particle, low-fat, low-residue diets before or alongside pharmacotherapy; and use antiemetics as needed (5-HT3 antagonists such as ondansetron, H1 antagonists such as promethazine, D2 antagonists such as prochlorperazine).

American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Guideline on Management of Gastroparesis," 2025 · reviewed 2026-07-19 ↗
Ayubi H … Hayee B · Gastrointestinal Endoscopy · IF 8.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №9 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Motility by RSS