← Issue №2/ week of Jul 12, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 5 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 5, in full

most clinically useful first · the 1 the issue led with is ruled in green
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=344 · Jul 17, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Recompensation of decompensated cirrhosis in a spectrum of metabolic-dysfunction-related steatotic liver disease, with PEth-corroborated alcohol abstinence and modification of cardiometabolic risk factors.

New evidencecirrhosisMASLDalcohol-associated liver diseasebiomarker
Clinical takeawayIn decompensated MASLD/MetALD cirrhosis, prioritize and monitor: (1) ≥10% weight loss, (2) PEth-confirmed alcohol abstinence in MetALD, (3) glycemic control, and (4) variceal screening. MetALD patients (higher mortality: 22.6% vs 12.0%) require intensified alcohol cessation efforts. Note: recompensation rate is low (18.6%).
What it found18.6% of decompensated MASLD/MetALD cirrhosis patients achieved recompensation (Baveno VII criteria: absence of ascites, hepatic encephalopathy, and variceal bleeding; normal bilirubin, albumin, and INR), with weight loss ≥10% (sHR 7.42), alcohol abstinence (sHR 1.87), glycemic control (sHR 1.43), and absence of large varices (sHR 1.97) as key predictors. Mortality was higher in MetALD (22.6%) than MASLD (12.0%; p=0.011).
ContextFirst evidence that recompensation is achievable in MASLD/MetALD cirrhosis (previously uncertain), with modifiable factors (weight loss, abstinence, glycemic control) now quantified. PEth improves alcohol exposure detection.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54

Decision at stakethe management of alcohol abstinence in decompensated cirrhosis

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Treatment of AUD with sustained abstinence is the most effective strategy to prevent progression and improve long-term outcomes at any stage of ALD; ACG recommends brief screening with a tool such as AUDIT-C (strong, high), brief motivational interventions (strong, low), and integrated multidisciplinary care combining behavioral therapy and/or pharmacotherapy (strong, low). AUD pharmacotherapy recommendations are scoped specifically to COMPENSATED ALD and are not co-equal: baclofen is recommended as an option (strong recommendation, moderate evidence); acamprosate or naltrexone are only suggested as options (conditional, very low); gabapentin or topiramate are suggested as options (conditional, very low); disulfiram is suggested AGAINST along any spectrum of ALD (conditional, very low). For severe alcohol withdrawal, benzodiazepines are the treatment of choice but with explicitly cautious use and careful monitoring given their potential to precipitate or exacerbate hepatic encephalopathy (strong, moderate); AWS is managed per CIWA-Ar protocol, differentiating it from HE while acknowledging the two can coexist. For alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH), severity is stratified by MELD: MELD >20 defines severe AH, which carries high short-term mortality and should preferably be managed in hospital; MELD ≤20 defines moderate AH. In severe AH (MELD >20) ACG recommends corticosteroid therapy ONLY if there are no contraindications (strong, moderate); active infection (including untreated HBV infection), uncontrolled diabetes mellitus, gastrointestinal bleeding, and severe renal failure are contraindications to corticosteroid use, though corticosteroids can be started after adequate control or reversal of infection, renal failure, and gastrointestinal bleeding. Prednisolone is preferred over prednisone; both are dosed 40 mg/day for a total of 4 weeks, with IV methylprednisolone 32 mg/day as the alternative for patients unable to take oral medication; there is no evidence supporting rapid vs slow tapering after the 4-week course. Corticosteroid response is assessed by Lille score at day 7 OR day 4 (day-4 shown as accurate as day-7); among non-responders (Lille >0.45) corticosteroids should be discontinued. ACG recommends IV N-acetylcysteine as an adjuvant to corticosteroids in severe AH (strong, moderate), while explicitly noting that other society guidelines have not adopted this recommendation. ACG recommends AGAINST pentoxifylline (strong, moderate) and AGAINST universal prophylactic antibiotics in hospitalized severe AH (strong, moderate); data on G-CSF and microbiome-based therapies are insufficient. Nutrition: target 35 kcal/kg/day with 1.2-1.5 g/kg/day protein; patients consuming <21 kcal/kg/day should receive nutritional support, preferably oral/enteral, oral nutritional supplements first, escalating to enteral nutrition if caloric targets remain unmet (strong, moderate). Thiamine, vitamin B12 and zinc deficiencies are common in AH and should be supplemented. For severe AH unresponsive to medical management with high risk of death, early liver transplantation for highly selected patients should be considered according to regional and institutional protocols (conditional recommendation, low level of evidence); LT selection must not be based solely on an arbitrary duration of sobriety, and should rest on detailed psychosocial evaluation by a social worker and addiction specialist, optionally supported by tools such as SIPAT, HRAR, MAPS, HPSS or SALT. For severe AH with 4 or more organ failures, non-responsive to corticosteroids and ineligible for early LT, palliative care engagement is appropriate.

American College of Gastroenterology (ACG), "ACG Clinical Guideline: Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease" (Jophlin, Singal, Bataller, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(1):30-54 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Premkumar M … Reddy KR · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=131,470 · Jul 16, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

A machine learning approach to non-invasive prediction of hepatic decompensation in compensated advanced chronic liver disease: the CIRI model.

New evidenceartificial intelligencebiomarkercirrhosisportal hypertension
Clinical takeawayConsider using the CIRI model (cutoff ≥-8.25) as a non-invasive alternative to HVPG for identifying cACLD patients at high risk of decompensation (ascites, encephalopathy, variceal bleeding), especially when HVPG or LSM is unavailable or impractical. The model requires 11 routine demographic and lab parameters. Note: performance was comparable to HVPG but not superior.
What it foundThe CIRI model predicted 1- and 2-year decompensation risk in cACLD with AUROCs of 0.816 and 0.815 (Optum CDM) and 0.836 and 0.769 (European cohort), comparable to HVPG (both p>0.900) and superior to LSM, FIB-4, and MELD (all p<0.05). A cutoff of ≥-8.25 identified patients at comparable decompensation risk as HVPG ≥10mmHg (CSPH).
ContextHVPG is the gold standard for decompensation risk assessment in cACLD but is invasive. CIRI offers comparable prognostic accuracy non-invasively, outperforming existing non-invasive tools (LSM, FIB-4, MELD). Validated in cACLD patients with steatotic liver disease as the leading etiology.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakeidentifying cACLD patients at high risk for first decompensation

Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Kramer G … Ambery P · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=187 · Jul 15, 2026 · Lancet GH · IF 30.9

Efficacy and safety of zalfermin co-administered with semaglutide in participants with fibrosis and cirrhosis due to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis: a phase 2, dose-ranging, double-blind, randomised controlled trial.

New evidencecirrhosisMASLDbiomarkertranslational
Clinical takeawayAwait phase 3 data before considering zalfermin; semaglutide 2.4 mg remains the evidence-based pharmacotherapy for select F2-F3 MASH patients per SOC.
What it foundIn a phase 2 trial, zalfermin 30 mg plus semaglutide 2.4 mg demonstrated a higher proportion of participants achieving ≥1-stage liver fibrosis improvement without MASH worsening vs placebo (specific % not stated in abstract), with safety data pending full analysis.
ContextPhase 2 proof-of-concept in compensated F2-F4c MASH; zalfermin is investigational and not yet approved.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe choice of pharmacotherapy for F2-F3 MASH

For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Loomba R … Gluud LL · Lancet Gastroenterology & Hepatology · IF 30.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=349 · Jul 15, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

IgA-Enriched Phenotype Predicts Liver-Related Events in MASLD.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarkerbasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayConsider measuring serum IgA in MASLD patients to identify those at higher risk of liver-related events, particularly if fibrosis staging alone does not fully explain disease progression. No clinical action yet: the therapeutic implications of IgA-targeted interventions remain to be tested in humans.
What it foundA high-risk MASLD subgroup with elevated IgA (≥ 318 mg/dL) had a 5-year liver-related event rate of 24.0% vs other subgroups, with a hazard ratio of 3.17 (95% CI 1.27-7.91) independent of fibrosis.
ContextChallenges the current fibrosis-centric risk stratification in MASLD by identifying an immune-driven high-risk phenotype independent of fibrosis stage, supported by multi-omics validation.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674.

Decision at stakeidentifying high-risk MASLD patients for liver-related events

Statins are safe and recommended in MASLD/MASH and compensated cirrhosis when indicated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Start per standard CV risk-based criteria with baseline LFTs; routine ALT monitoring on statin is not required and pre-existing transaminitis is not a contraindication. Hold or reduce only for clinically significant ALT elevation, severe muscle symptoms, or decompensated cirrhosis on an individualized basis.

AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Kimura T … Tanaka N · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=30,847 · Jul 16, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Cryptogenic steatotic liver disease: a lean phenotype associated with increased liver-related mortality.

New evidenceMASLDepidemiologybiomarkerbasic science
Clinical takeawayConsider evaluating lean patients with SLD (BMI <25 kg/m²) for cryptogenic SLD, even in the absence of traditional CMRFs, due to their increased risk of liver-related mortality. Monitor liver injury markers (e.g., contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image values, PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 risk variants) and fibrosis in this subgroup, though the feasibility of these specific tests in routine practice may vary.
What it foundCryptogenic steatotic liver disease (SLD), operationally defined as lean SLD (BMI <25 kg/m²) without recorded cardiometabolic risk factors (CMRFs), was associated with higher liver-related mortality (HR 2.5, 95% CI 1.4 to 4.3 in KNHIS cohort; HR 13.2, 95% CI 1.9 to 92.4 in UKB cohort). Cryptogenic SLD also showed less favourable metabolic and liver-related profiles, including higher contrast-enhanced T1-weighted image values, increased prevalence of PNPLA3 and TM6SF2 risk variants, and higher fibrosis rates.
ContextThis challenges the assumption that SLD in lean individuals is benign if metabolic risk factors are absent, identifying a distinct high-risk phenotype that requires closer monitoring. The association in the UKB cohort was imprecise, and further validation is needed.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakerisk stratification and management of lean patients with steatotic liver disease without cardiometabolic risk factors

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Yoon EL … Jun DW · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №2 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS