← Issue №10/ week of Sep 6, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Hepatology, in full.

All 30 Hepatology papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 30, in full

most clinically useful first · the 4 the issue led with are ruled in green
Everything here, in one line each30
Hepatology rct · n=100 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Naltrexone Is Superior to Placebo for Abstinence and Craving Reduction in Alcohol-Associated Cirrhosis: NAL-CI Trial.

New therapyalcohol-associated liver diseasecirrhosis
Clinical takeawayConsider naltrexone 50 mg/day for patients with compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis (CTP ≤6, MELD ≤13) and alcohol use disorder, alongside psychosocial support, to improve abstinence and reduce craving compared to placebo. Adverse events were comparable between groups.
What it foundNaltrexone (50 mg/day) achieved 64% abstinence at 12 weeks vs 22% with placebo (OR 10.86, 95% CI: 1.89-62.2) and reduced craving scores (OCDS-O 6.63 vs 9.29, p < 0.01; OCDS-C 6.35 vs 9.02, p < 0.01) in compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis.
ContextFirst RCT to demonstrate safety and efficacy of naltrexone in compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis, addressing a prior gap where no pharmacotherapy was approved due to liver safety concerns.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakepharmacological management of alcohol use disorder in compensated alcohol-associated cirrhosis

Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Alla M … Sarin SK · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=16,560 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Time-Varying Impact of Steatosis and Alcohol on Mortality: A Marginal Structural Model of the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging.

New evidencealcohol-associated liver diseaseepidemiology
Clinical takeawayCounsel patients with steatotic liver disease (SLD), especially females with ALD, on the significant mortality risk associated with alcohol use and emphasize the need for ongoing alcohol cessation support. Monitor and reassess alcohol consumption and SLD subtype at regular intervals, as classifications can change over time.
What it foundIn a longitudinal cohort of adults aged 45-85 years, ALD showed the highest mortality risk (aHR 6.11; 95% CI 1.76-21.19), with females having higher mortality rates than males (11.37 vs. 5.60 per 1000 person-years).
ContextThis study challenges the reliance on static SLD classifications by demonstrating that disease phenotypes and associated mortality risks are dynamic, with substantial transitions between subtypes over time in a longitudinal cohort.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe recommendation to limit alcohol intake in MASLD/MetALD patients

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Rapino C … Saeed S · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,531 · Sep 2, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Comparative performance of HCC risk scores in identifying low-risk patients with cirrhosis: A multicenter cohort study.

New evidencecirrhosishepatocellular carcinomabiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider using THRI over aMAP to identify cirrhosis patients with truly low HCC risk (0.5% 5-year risk) who may safely defer surveillance, particularly in non-viral etiologies (60% of cohort).
What it foundTHRI identified low-risk cirrhosis patients (18% of cohort) with a 0.5% 5-year HCC risk vs 2.9% for aMAP low-risk patients, and had higher discrimination than aMAP (AUC 0.74 vs 0.64 at 3 years).
ContextChallenges current reliance on aMAP for HCC risk stratification in cirrhosis, particularly for non-viral etiologies in a Western cohort.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakeidentifying low-risk cirrhosis patients who may not need HCC surveillance

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Moussa M … Sonneveld MJ · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=87 · Sep 3, 2026 · J Gastro Hep · IF 3.5

A Novel Anchoring Catheter Improves the Success, Efficiency, and Satisfaction of Paracentesis in Refractory Ascites: A Multicenter Randomized Crossover Trial.

New therapyasciteshealth servicesbasic science
Clinical takeawayConsider using the KH anchoring catheter instead of conventional angiocatheters for repeated paracentesis in cirrhotic patients with refractory ascites, given its higher success rate and shorter procedure time without increased adverse events.
What it foundThe novel anchoring catheter (KH) increased paracentesis success to 87.5% vs 71.6% with conventional angiocatheter (OR 2.78) and reduced median procedure time by 9 minutes (71 vs 80 min). Adverse events were comparable, with no major complications.
ContextChallenges the conventional angiocatheter by demonstrating superior efficacy and efficiency in a randomized crossover trial, without increased adverse events.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021

Decision at stakethe choice of catheter for large volume paracentesis in refractory ascites

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset ascites that is accessible for sampling, and in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is emergently admitted to the hospital for any reason, to rule out SBP even in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection (up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset ascites that is accessible for sampling, and in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is emergently admitted to the hospital for any reason, to rule out SBP even in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection (up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic). Also perform it whenever a patient with ascites develops signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of infection, and in patients with tense ascites and AKI to exclude SBP as the cause. LVP/paracentesis is safe even with coagulopathy: elevated prothrombin time (INR >1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets <50×10^9/L) is not a contraindication, and routine transfusion of clotting factors or platelets is NOT recommended, with possible exceptions in disseminated intravascular coagulation, or uremia with thrombocytopenia (where desmopressin may be considered, especially with prior bleeding). The initial laboratory investigation of ascitic fluid should include ascitic fluid neutrophil (PMN) count, ascitic fluid total protein, and ascitic fluid albumin plus a simultaneous serum albumin to calculate the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG). Ascitic fluid culture is not part of that routine initial panel but should be obtained whenever SBP is being evaluated (routinely for inpatients and when secondary bacterial peritonitis is suspected); when cultured, inoculate ≥10 mL of fluid into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles at the bedside, before the first dose of antibiotics. Amylase, cytology, glucose, LDH, and mycobacterial (AFB/ADA) or triglyceride testing are not routinely indicated and should be guided by clinical context (e.g., suspected pancreatic, malignant, secondary-bacterial, tuberculous, or chylous ascites). Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites. Within high-SAAG ascites, use ascitic total protein to distinguish the source: total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastasis, late Budd-Chiari), whereas total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a postsinusoidal/cardiac source (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, early Budd-Chiari), directing workup toward right-heart catheterization, hepatic-vein Doppler, and echocardiography. The diagnosis of SBP is established with an ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil (PMN) count >250/mm^3 (with or without a positive culture, and in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection). Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) is the analogous spontaneous infection of a pre-existing hepatic hydrothorax, not a parapneumonic effusion, and is established by the same pleural fluid PMN count >250/mm^3, but only after pneumonia and other secondary causes of the effusion have been excluded; despite the term "empyema" it is managed as an infection with antibiotics, and a chest tube should NOT be placed.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Jeon SH … Kim SG · Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology · IF 3.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology systematic review · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Acceptability and Effectiveness of Point-of-Care HCV Testing in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Systematic Review.

New evidenceviral hepatitishealth servicessystematic review
Clinical takeawayConsider advocating for decentralized HCV testing models, including oral-based self-testing, in LMIC settings where centralized lab access is a barrier, particularly for high-risk populations.
What it foundIn LMICs, point-of-care HCV testing with onsite treatment achieved >90% testing/treatment uptake compared to centralized lab testing, and self-testing had 91%-99% acceptability in high-risk groups, with oral-based self-testing showing higher recommendation rates (94%-99%) than blood-based testing (86.1%).
ContextChallenges the reliance on centralized lab testing in LMICs, showing decentralized models can achieve high uptake where traditional systems fail.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023

Decision at stakethe use of point-of-care HCV testing in low- and middle-income countries

Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose active infection with HCV antibody testing with reflex HCV RNA PCR (Rating I, A); one-time opt-out anti-HCV testing is recommended for all adults ≥18 years and with each pregnancy (I, B), with annual testing for people who inject drugs, men with HIV who have unprotected sex with men, and MSM on PrEP (IIa, C). Treatment is recommended for all persons with acute or chronic HCV infection EXCEPT those with a short life expectancy that cannot be remediated by HCV therapy, liver transplantation, or another directed therapy. Stage fibrosis noninvasively (FIB-4; biopsy not required). The simplified treatment algorithm applies only to treatment-naive adults and EXCLUDES prior HCV treatment, HBsAg positivity, current pregnancy, known or suspected HCC, prior liver transplantation, and any current or prior episode of decompensated cirrhosis; excluded patients are managed by the genotype/population-specific sections, not the simplified pathway. Treatment-naive WITHOUT cirrhosis (FIB-4 ≤3.25 and no other evidence of cirrhosis): glecaprevir 300 mg/pibrentasvir 120 mg once daily with food × 8 weeks, OR sofosbuvir 400 mg/velpatasvir 100 mg once daily × 12 weeks, both pangenotypic and equally recommended; pretreatment CBC, hepatic function panel, eGFR, quantitative HCV RNA, HIV, HBsAg, pregnancy test within 6 months, plus medication reconciliation for drug-drug interactions. Treatment-naive WITH compensated cirrhosis (Child-Pugh A): glecaprevir/pibrentasvir × 8 weeks for genotypes 1-6, OR sofosbuvir/velpatasvir × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 2, 4, 5, and 6 only, in genotype 3 with compensated cirrhosis, baseline NS5A resistance testing is required before sofosbuvir/velpatasvir and the presence of Y93H changes the regimen; pretreatment labs within 3 months plus CTP score and liver ultrasound within 6 months. On treatment, no routine laboratory monitoring is required except counseling diabetic patients about hypoglycemia and monitoring INR in patients on warfarin. Decompensated cirrhosis (CTP class B or C, or any prior decompensation): refer to a practitioner with expertise, ideally at a liver transplant center; ALL protease-inhibitor-containing regimens (glecaprevir, grazoprevir, voxilaprevir) are contraindicated. Ribavirin-eligible, treatment-naive: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 12 weeks (all genotypes), or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir + ribavirin × 12 weeks for genotypes 1, 4, 5, 6; ribavirin-ineligible: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (or ledipasvir/sofosbuvir for GT 1, 4, 5, 6) × 24 weeks without ribavirin; prior sofosbuvir-based or NS5A inhibitor-based treatment failure: sofosbuvir/velpatasvir + weight-based ribavirin × 24 weeks. In CTP class C, start ribavirin at 600 mg/day and increase as tolerated toward weight-based dosing. Cure is defined by quantitative HCV RNA undetectable ≥12 weeks after completing therapy (SVR12), checked with a hepatic function panel; patients without cirrhosis who achieve SVR need no further liver-related follow-up, while patients with cirrhosis continue HCC ultrasound surveillance every 6 months and variceal screening per AASLD guidelines after SVR. Repeat annual HCV RNA testing in anyone with ongoing exposure risk.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases and Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD-IDSA), "Hepatitis C Guidance 2023 Update: AASLD-IDSA Recommendations for Testing, Managing, and Treating Hepatitis C Virus Infection" (Patients With Decompensated Cirrhosis section), 2023 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Yee WL … Luchters S · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=8,592 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Portal Vein Thrombosis Risk in Cirrhotic Patients With Portal Hypertension on Beta-Blockers: A Multi-Institutional Cohort Study.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionvariceal bleeding
Clinical takeawayprefer carvedilol over propranolol for portal hypertension in cirrhosis when initiating NSBB therapy
What it foundNSBB use after variceal band ligation increased PVT incidence compared to no NSBB (9.5% vs 5.4%; RR 1.765), with propranolol driving the risk while carvedilol matched no-NSBB PVT rates and had lower mortality compared to both propranolol and no NSBB.
ContextThe literature reports uncertainty regarding the effect of nonselective beta-blockers (NSBBs) on portal vein thrombosis (PVT) risk in cirrhotic patients with portal hypertension, with a multi-institutional cohort study suggesting a need for further investigation.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakethe choice of non-selective beta-blocker for portal hypertension in cirrhosis

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Abosheaishaa H … El-Kassas M · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 2, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Emerging strategies for hepatocellular carcinoma surveillance: abbreviated MRI, biomarkers and benefit stratification.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarkercost-effectivenesshealth services
Clinical takeawayConsider NC-aMRI as an alternative to ultrasound for HCC surveillance in patients with cirrhosis or high-risk chronic HBV (e.g., active hepatitis, family history of HCC), particularly where adherence or ultrasound sensitivity is a concern. Note: NC-aMRI avoids contrast but requires further validation for broader adoption. No clinical action yet for blood-based biomarkers: pending validation in prospective studies.
What it foundNon-contrast abbreviated MRI (NC-aMRI) showed superior sensitivity and specificity compared to ultrasound for HCC surveillance in recent trials.
ContextChallenges current guideline-recommended ultrasound + AFP surveillance, which has suboptimal sensitivity and lacks RCT evidence for mortality benefit. Proposes benefit stratification over risk stratification alone.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakewhether to adopt abbreviated MRI or biomarker panels for HCC surveillance

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Ioannou GN … Rowe IA · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=645 · Sep 1, 2026 · UEG Journal · IF 5.6

Course of Portal Hypertension and Its Prognostic Impact After Liver Transplantation.

New evidenceportal hypertensionliver transplantcirrhosis
Clinical takeawaymonitor platelet counts at 3 months post-LT as a marker of persistent portal hypertension and increased mortality risk
What it foundPersistent thrombocytopenia (< 110 G/L) at 3 months post-LT independently predicted mortality (aHR 2.31, 95% CI 1.01-5.30) after adjustment for MELD, age, CRP, and pre-LT TIPS.
ContextRecent literature from specialty journals suggests that the persistence of portal hypertension after liver transplantation may have a prognostic impact on post-transplant outcomes (pmid_42570327).
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021

Decision at stakemonitoring portal hypertension after liver transplantation

Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset ascites that is accessible for sampling, and in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is emergently admitted to the hospital for any reason, to rule out SBP even in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection (up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic). Also perform it whenever a patient with ascites develops signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of infection, and in patients with tense ascites and AKI to exclude SBP as the cause. LVP/paracentesis is safe even with coagulopathy: elevated prothrombin time (INR >1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets <50×10^9/L) is not a contraindication, and routine transfusion of clotting factors or platelets is NOT recommended, with possible exceptions in disseminated intravascular coagulation, or uremia with thrombocytopenia (where desmopressin may be considered, especially with prior bleeding). The initial laboratory investigation of ascitic fluid should include ascitic fluid neutrophil (PMN) count, ascitic fluid total protein, and ascitic fluid albumin plus a simultaneous serum albumin to calculate the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG). Ascitic fluid culture is not part of that routine initial panel but should be obtained whenever SBP is being evaluated (routinely for inpatients and when secondary bacterial peritonitis is suspected); when cultured, inoculate ≥10 mL of fluid into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles at the bedside, before the first dose of antibiotics. Amylase, cytology, glucose, LDH, and mycobacterial (AFB/ADA) or triglyceride testing are not routinely indicated and should be guided by clinical context (e.g., suspected pancreatic, malignant, secondary-bacterial, tuberculous, or chylous ascites). Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites. Within high-SAAG ascites, use ascitic total protein to distinguish the source: total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastasis, late Budd-Chiari), whereas total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a postsinusoidal/cardiac source (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, early Budd-Chiari), directing workup toward right-heart catheterization, hepatic-vein Doppler, and echocardiography. The diagnosis of SBP is established with an ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil (PMN) count >250/mm^3 (with or without a positive culture, and in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection). Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) is the analogous spontaneous infection of a pre-existing hepatic hydrothorax, not a parapneumonic effusion, and is established by the same pleural fluid PMN count >250/mm^3, but only after pneumonia and other secondary causes of the effusion have been excluded; despite the term "empyema" it is managed as an infection with antibiotics, and a chest tube should NOT be placed.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Dominik N … Reiberger T · United European Gastroenterology Journal · IF 5.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology rct · n=198 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Liver Fat Changes in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes by Presence of Genetic Hepatic Steatosis: A Post Hoc Analysis of SURPASS-3 MRI.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet; exploratory post hoc analysis suggests tirzepatide's liver fat reduction in this population is unaffected by PNPLA3 genotype, but requires confirmation in prospective studies.
What it foundIn insulin-naïve type 2 diabetes patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, tirzepatide significantly reduced liver fat content versus insulin degludec and improved cardiometabolic parameters, with consistent effects across PNPLA3 I148M allele subgroups (GG/CG vs CC genotypes).
ContextPost hoc analysis of SURPASS-3 MRI substudy provides preliminary evidence that PNPLA3 I148M allele status does not modify tirzepatide's metabolic benefits in this specific cohort.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakethe choice of pharmacotherapy for MASLD in patients with type 2 diabetes

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Cusi K … Rodríguez Á · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=346 · Sep 1, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Spleen stiffness measurement rules out high-risk varices in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis without cirrhosis.

New evidenceportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider using SSM-VCTE ≤40 kPa to avoid screening endoscopy in chronic PVT without cirrhosis, as it reliably excludes HRV in this population.
What it foundSSM-VCTE ≤40 kPa ruled out high-risk varices (HRV) with 97% sensitivity and 96-97% NPV in chronic PVT without cirrhosis, sparing 41-43% of endoscopies with 3-5% HRV missed.
ContextChallenges current practice of mandatory endoscopy in all chronic PVT patients without cirrhosis, offering a non-invasive alternative with high accuracy.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021

Decision at stakewhether to perform screening endoscopy for high-risk varices in patients with chronic portal vein thrombosis without cirrhosis

Within high-SAAG ascites, use ascitic total protein to distinguish the source: total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastasis, late Budd-Chiari), whereas total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a postsinusoidal/cardiac source (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, early Budd-Chiari), directing workup toward right-heart catheterization, hepatic-vein Doppler, and echocardiography.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform a diagnostic paracentesis in all patients with new-onset ascites that is accessible for sampling, and in any patient with cirrhosis and ascites who is emergently admitted to the hospital for any reason, to rule out SBP even in the absence of signs or symptoms of infection (up to one-third of SBP is asymptomatic). Also perform it whenever a patient with ascites develops signs, symptoms, or laboratory abnormalities suggestive of infection, and in patients with tense ascites and AKI to exclude SBP as the cause. LVP/paracentesis is safe even with coagulopathy: elevated prothrombin time (INR >1.5) or thrombocytopenia (platelets <50×10^9/L) is not a contraindication, and routine transfusion of clotting factors or platelets is NOT recommended, with possible exceptions in disseminated intravascular coagulation, or uremia with thrombocytopenia (where desmopressin may be considered, especially with prior bleeding). The initial laboratory investigation of ascitic fluid should include ascitic fluid neutrophil (PMN) count, ascitic fluid total protein, and ascitic fluid albumin plus a simultaneous serum albumin to calculate the serum-ascites albumin gradient (SAAG). Ascitic fluid culture is not part of that routine initial panel but should be obtained whenever SBP is being evaluated (routinely for inpatients and when secondary bacterial peritonitis is suspected); when cultured, inoculate ≥10 mL of fluid into aerobic and anaerobic blood culture bottles at the bedside, before the first dose of antibiotics. Amylase, cytology, glucose, LDH, and mycobacterial (AFB/ADA) or triglyceride testing are not routinely indicated and should be guided by clinical context (e.g., suspected pancreatic, malignant, secondary-bacterial, tuberculous, or chylous ascites). Interpret SAAG to classify the cause: SAAG ≥1.1 g/dL indicates portal hypertension (~97% accuracy), while SAAG <1.1 g/dL points to non-portal-hypertensive (peritoneal) causes such as peritoneal carcinomatosis, tuberculous peritonitis, nephrotic syndrome, or pancreatic/chylous ascites. Within high-SAAG ascites, use ascitic total protein to distinguish the source: total protein <2.5 g/dL suggests cirrhosis (also massive liver metastasis, late Budd-Chiari), whereas total protein ≥2.5 g/dL suggests a postsinusoidal/cardiac source (heart failure, portal vein thrombosis, sinusoidal obstruction syndrome, early Budd-Chiari), directing workup toward right-heart catheterization, hepatic-vein Doppler, and echocardiography. The diagnosis of SBP is established with an ascitic fluid absolute neutrophil (PMN) count >250/mm^3 (with or without a positive culture, and in the absence of a surgically treatable intra-abdominal source of infection). Spontaneous bacterial empyema (SBE) is the analogous spontaneous infection of a pre-existing hepatic hydrothorax, not a parapneumonic effusion, and is established by the same pleural fluid PMN count >250/mm^3, but only after pneumonia and other secondary causes of the effusion have been excluded; despite the term "empyema" it is managed as an infection with antibiotics, and a chest tube should NOT be placed.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "Diagnosis, Evaluation, and Management of Ascites, Spontaneous Bacterial Peritonitis and Hepatorenal Syndrome: 2021 Practice Guidance" (Biggins et al.), Hepatology, 2021 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Moga L … ERN RARE-LIVER; a study of VALDIG, an EASL consortium · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Hepatology: Emerging Paradigms in MASLD, Viral Hepatitis, Cholestatic Liver Disease, Portal Hypertension and Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Summary of the First Annual Paris International Liver Meeting 2026.

New therapyMASLDviral hepatitisportal hypertensionhepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayConsider resmetirom or semaglutide for eligible MASH patients with F2-F3 fibrosis; monitor emerging anti-fibrotic therapies in clinical trials. Note significant treatment gaps persist in PBC, and effective pharmacotherapies for PSC remain a major challenge.
What it foundthis paper highlights the evolution of non-invasive tests beyond diagnosis to include prognostic stratification and treatment monitoring
ContextMarks a shift from disease characterization to precision therapeutics in MASLD/MASH, with first approved disease-modifying drugs now available. However, unmet clinical needs persist in PBC and PSC.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeusing non-invasive tests for fibrosis risk stratification and treatment selection in MASLD/MASH

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Younossi ZM … Castera L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=1,983 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Barriers to Hepatitis B Treatment: A Multicentre Cross-Sectional Registry and Survey Study by the Canadian Hepatitis B Network.

New evidenceviral hepatitishealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayScreen younger, female, and Black/African/Caribbean patients with CHB for treatment eligibility using the 2018 Canadian Association for the Study of the Liver guidelines, addressing patient concerns about side effects, long-term therapy, and lack of curative options, and specialist-identified barriers such as cost.
What it found46.4% of untreated patients with CHB were treatment-eligible, with untreated patients being younger (median 47.3 vs. 54.5 years), more female (54.2% vs. 39.7%), and more likely of Black/African/Caribbean origin (18.2% vs. 9.7%) compared to treated patients.
ContextConfirms a significant treatment gap in CHB care among treatment-eligible patients, highlighting demographic disparities and a mismatch between patient concerns and clinician perceptions.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakeidentifying and addressing barriers to hepatitis B treatment to prevent cirrhosis and HCC

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Ko HH … Coffin CS · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=23 · Sep 1, 2026 · Am J Gastro · IF 9.8

Do Patients on Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 (GLP-1) Receptor Agonists Require Longer Fasting Prior to Vibration Controlled Transient Elastography?

New evidencebiomarkerbasic sciencetranslational
Clinical takeawayContinue current 3-hour fasting for VCTE in GLP-1 RA users, but extend to 4 hours if baseline LSM is critical or results are borderline, especially in patients with cirrhosis.
What it foundLSM increased 20.6% at 30-60 minutes post-meal but returned to <10% by 3 hours in GLP-1 RA users, including 12 with cirrhosis, with most returning to baseline by 3-4 hours.
ContextConfirms current fasting guidance remains generally adequate for GLP-1 RA users, though extends the possible window to 4 hours for select cases, particularly those with cirrhosis.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· Gorgojo-Martínez JJ, et al. 'Clinical Recommendations to Manage Gastrointestinal Adverse Events in Patients Treated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus,' Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022

Decision at stakefasting duration before vibration controlled transient elastography in patients on GLP-1 receptor agonists

Manage GLP-1 receptor agonist GI symptoms with slow titration per package insert, dietary modification (small frequent meals, low-fat, low-fiber initially, avoid alcohol), and hydration; treat nausea with PRN ondansetron and consider dose reduction, constipation with hydration/fiber/PEG, and reflux with an H2 blocker or PPI.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Manage GLP-1 receptor agonist GI symptoms with slow titration per package insert, dietary modification (small frequent meals, low-fat, low-fiber initially, avoid alcohol), and hydration; treat nausea with PRN ondansetron and consider dose reduction, constipation with hydration/fiber/PEG, and reflux with an H2 blocker or PPI. Discontinue the drug for severe persistent nausea/vomiting, suspected acute pancreatitis, or severe weight loss with malnutrition, and evaluate red-flag presentations for pancreatitis, obstruction/ileus, or failure to thrive; for suspected gallbladder disease (cholelithiasis/cholecystitis), obtain gallbladder studies and clinical follow-up rather than mandatory discontinuation. Do not routinely check lipase; hold and evaluate only if symptoms suggest pancreatitis.

Gorgojo-Martínez JJ, et al. 'Clinical Recommendations to Manage Gastrointestinal Adverse Events in Patients Treated with GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: A Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus,' Journal of Clinical Medicine, 2022 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Sandhu S … Goldberg DS · American Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 9.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=611 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Temporal Differentiation of Nonperipheral Washout Refines Prognostic Stratification in HCC.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomabiomarkerepidemiologyartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayFor patients with single early-stage HCC (BCLC 0/A) planned for curative resection, request radiologist assessment of nonperipheral washout timing (early vs late vs absent) on preoperative MRI to stratify recurrence risk.
What it foundEarly nonperipheral washout on preoperative MRI (present in portal venous phase) predicted higher 2-year recurrence (67.3% vs 82.1% for late washout, 85.2% for no washout) and lower 5-year RFS (53.4% vs 62.1% and 71.8%) in resected single BCLC 0/A HCC.
ContextNonperipheral washout is an established HCC feature, but this study newly demonstrates that its TIMING (early vs late) independently stratifies recurrence risk beyond standard imaging criteria in single BCLC 0/A HCC patients undergoing curative resection.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakestratifying recurrence risk after curative therapy for early HCC

AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wu Y … Wang Y · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 5, 2026 · J Hepatology · IF 40.1

Barriers to Viral Hepatitis Elimination and New Strategies to Overcome Them in Low- and Middle-Income Countries.

Epidemiologyviral hepatitishealth servicescost-effectivenessepidemiology
Clinical takeawayAdvocate for simplified diagnostic and treatment pathways, decentralized care models, and integration of viral hepatitis services into existing healthcare programs in LMICs, alongside strengthening health systems.
What it foundGaps in viral hepatitis care in LMICs persist across prevention, testing, treatment, and follow-up, despite effective tools and therapies, due to structural weaknesses in health systems, limited laboratory infrastructure, centralized care models, financial constraints, stigma, and fragmented programs.
ContextConfirms and expands on known systemic and structural barriers to viral hepatitis elimination in LMICs, emphasizing the need for comprehensive approaches beyond technological advances.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe need for comprehensive strategies to implement existing HBV management guidelines in LMICs

Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Vo-Quang E … Pawlotsky JM · Journal of Hepatology · IF 40.1 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=4,208 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Comparison of Factors Associated With 30-Day and 90-Day Readmission Among a Global Cohort of Patients Hospitalised With Cirrhosis.

Epidemiologycirrhosisepidemiologyhealth services
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: identifies predictors of readmission and mortality in cirrhosis but does not test an intervention to modify them. Consider counseling high-risk patients (those with prior ascites, hyponatremia, variceal bleeding, or vasopressor use) about their elevated post-discharge risks and monitor them more closely.
What it foundIn a global cohort of 4,208 hospitalized cirrhosis patients, 47% were readmitted, 8% received liver transplantation, and 23% died within 90 days post-discharge. Country income level was strongly associated with readmission, mortality, and transplantation rates (all p < 0.001). Independent predictors of higher readmission rates included disease severity, prior ascites, prior hospitalization, hyponatremia, and in-hospital vasopressor use. Prior variceal bleeding predicted higher 90-day readmission rates, while age, disease severity, mechanical ventilation, and vasopressor use increased odds of post-discharge death.
ContextConfirms known high readmission and mortality rates in cirrhosis but highlights disparities by country income level, independent of etiology. Prior evidence linked disease severity and comorbidities to outcomes; this study adds global socioeconomic stratification as a major independent factor and identifies specific clinical predictors.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026

Decision at stakethe management of cirrhosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

The 2026 AASLD/IDSA guideline addresses six PICO questions only; it states explicitly that all other 2018 AASLD recommendations for CHB management remain applicable, and that screening/diagnosis were out of scope. Baseline evaluation and the standard treatment indications (cirrhosis with detectable HBV DNA; HBeAg-positive immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >20,000 IU/mL; HBeAg-negative immune-active with ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL; prophylaxis for reactivation risk during immunosuppression) derive from the 2018 document, not this update, which lists 'treatment of HBeAg-positive and -negative immune active CHB with ALT >2x ULN', treatment of children, treatment of cirrhosis, low-level viremia, virologic breakthrough, and special populations (transplant, acute HBV, HCV/HDV/HIV coinfection) as topics 'well covered in previous AASLD 2018 Guidance and for which recommendations have not changed'. Preferred agents remain entecavir, TDF, or TAF. THE SIX 2026 RECOMMENDATIONS: (1) PMTCT, for pregnant persons with HBV DNA >200,000 IU/mL at any time point during pregnancy, regardless of HBeAg status, AASLD RECOMMENDS initiating TDF or TAF at gestational week 28 (STRONG recommendation, MODERATE certainty, the only strong recommendation in the guideline); TDF has a more extensive safety record in pregnancy than TAF. Implementation qualifiers: initiate immediately if care is first sought after week 28; initiate at week 16 if infant HBIG will be unavailable (with subsequent infant vaccination); consider earlier initiation when amniocentesis is anticipated (transmission risk is increased with HBV DNA >2,000,000 IU/mL) or when preterm labor risk is high; continue TDF/TAF if already on it, switch entecavir or other agents to TDF/TAF; if treatment was solely for perinatal prophylaxis it may be discontinued at delivery, with HBV DNA and ALT monitored every 1-3 months for up to 6 months for withdrawal flare and treatment reinitiated if ALT >=5x ULN; use TDF or TAF in breastfeeding persons requiring treatment. (2) HORIZONTAL TRANSMISSION, for HBsAg-positive viremic persons not meeting disease-specific treatment indications who are in high-risk scenarios for transmission to others, AASLD SUGGESTS a shared decision-making approach regarding antiviral treatment (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Qualifiers the guideline stresses: the decision weighs exposure risk and the vaccine/immunity status of contacts, favoring treatment if contacts are unvaccinated, vaccine-nonresponsive, immunocompromised, or of unknown vaccine status; persons requesting treatment for prevention may be prescribed it since risks may not be disclosed; explicitly, people with CHB must NOT be restricted in daily activities, contact sports, school, or professional training and must NOT be required to take antivirals because of transmission risk in those settings; routine contact, shared meals, and hugging are not transmission routes (avoid sharing toothbrushes/razors); most healthcare workers with CHB are NOT high-risk, but those performing SHEA Category III exposure-prone procedures may require antivirals (SHEA target HBV DNA <1000 IU/mL); neither CDC nor SHEA requires disclosure to patients or staff; anti-stigma framing is part of the recommendation. (3) IMMUNE-TOLERANT PHASE, defined as HBeAg-positive, HBV DNA >10^7 IU/mL, and normal ALT; AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy for those over age 40 years, OR with significant liver inflammation (grade >=2) or fibrosis (>=F2) on biopsy or noninvasive tests (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). For persons under age 40 who are interested in starting treatment earlier, AASLD suggests shared decision-making weighing risk factors and the benefits and risks of treatment. Accurate phase identification requires persistently normal ALT on >=2 measurements >=6 months apart, using ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females). (4) INDETERMINATE ('grey zone') PHASE, the HBeAg-negative indeterminate phase is defined as HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative persons whose ALT and/or HBV DNA fall outside the thresholds for HBeAg-negative immune-active CHB (ALT >2x ULN and HBV DNA >2,000 IU/mL) and outside those for inactive CHB (HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL with normal ALT), comprising predominantly two subgroups, (I) normal (<ULN) or mildly elevated (<2x ULN) ALT with HBV DNA >=2,000 IU/mL, or (II) elevated ALT (>ULN) with HBV DNA <2,000 IU/mL, with ALT interpreted against ULN 35 U/L (males) and 25 U/L (females) and phase assigned on >=2 ALT and HBV DNA measurements over a 6-12 month period; in adults who are HBsAg-positive, HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis and in the indeterminate phase so defined, AASLD SUGGESTS antiviral therapy using a shared decision-making approach assessing risks and benefits, and re-evaluating that decision at each follow-up visit if treatment has not been initiated (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). Decision-relevant factors include fibrosis stage, age, and sex, e.g. age >40, male sex, and low-normal platelets (<180 k/mm3) favor treatment. (5) DISCONTINUATION, in adults with CHB who are HBeAg-negative, without cirrhosis, with sustained undetectable HBV DNA on nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, AASLD SUGGESTS NOT withdrawing NA therapy until HBsAg loss (CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty). If a patient nonetheless has a strong desire to stop, shared decision-making applies and ALL of the following must be met: no history of advanced fibrosis/cirrhosis, hepatic decompensation (variceal bleed, ascites, encephalopathy, hepatorenal syndrome), HCC, or extrahepatic HBV complications; if HBeAg-positive at treatment start, HBeAg seroconversion to anti-HBe-positive for >=1 year with undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; if HBeAg-negative at start, undetectable HBV DNA >=2 years; no HIV or HDV coinfection; quantitative HBsAg <100 IU/mL; and willingness to adhere to frequent monitoring. After stopping, monitor ALT and HBV DNA every 1-3 months for 6 months, then every 3 months for 6-12 months, then every 3-6 months. Restart antivirals IMMEDIATELY if HBV DNA >=10,000 IU/mL (4 log IU/mL) at any time regardless of ALT, OR ALT >=5x ULN regardless of HBV DNA, OR total bilirubin >2.5 mg/dL. (6) HCC SURVEILLANCE (all CONDITIONAL, VERY LOW certainty; modality/interval per AASLD 2023 HCC Practice Guidance), Rec 6: after HBsAg loss, continue surveillance in those with cirrhosis, family history of HCC, men who lost HBsAg after age 40, and women who lost HBsAg after age 50. Rec 7: in HBV-HDV coinfection, surveil adults independent of cirrhosis status; in children, individualize because HCC risk in that population is unknown. Rec 8: in HBV-HIV coinfection, surveil men >=18 years and women >=40 years. Rec 9: in HBV-HCV coinfection, AASLD recommends treating HCV and suggests HCC surveillance per HBV mono-infection criteria. Where a person has more than one coinfection, the surveillance recommendation should follow the coinfection carrying the highest associated risk. The guideline notes that most of its recommendations rest on low or very low certainty evidence and that shared decision-making, not uniform policy, is the intended mode of application.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases / Infectious Diseases Society of America (AASLD/IDSA), "AASLD/IDSA Practice Guideline on Treatment of Chronic Hepatitis B," Hepatology, 2026 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Idilman R … CLEARED Investigators · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=160 · Sep 2, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Clinical utility of a 30% reduction in VCTE-derived liver stiffness measurement for identifying histologic improvement in MASH.

New evidenceMASLDbiomarkerepidemiology
Clinical takeawayConsider a ≥30% decline in VCTE liver stiffness as a supportive but not definitive marker of fibrosis regression in MASH with stage 2-3 fibrosis. No clinical action yet: validation in larger cohorts is needed.
What it foundIn a placebo-controlled trial of pegozafermin, a ≥30% decline in VCTE-derived liver stiffness had modest accuracy (AUC 0.68, 95% CI 0.58-0.77; validation cohort AUC 0.62) for detecting fibrosis regression without worsening MASH in stage 2-3 fibrosis, with adjusted OR 4.23 (95% CI 1.79-10.38).
ContextRefines AASLD's provisional recommendation by quantifying the accuracy of a 30% LSM decline for fibrosis regression in a therapeutic trial context, though performance remains modest.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide)

Decision at stakeusing a ≥30% decline in VCTE liver stiffness to monitor treatment response in MASH

For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose MASLD by hepatic steatosis on imaging (or biopsy) plus at least one cardiometabolic criterion and exclusion of competing etiologies (significant alcohol use, other liver disease), then risk-stratify fibrosis using a sequential non-invasive approach: FIB-4 first, followed by a second-line imaging-based test (VCTE, MRE, or ELF) for indeterminate/high-risk FIB-4, with liver biopsy reserved for discordant or unclear cases. Lifestyle modification (≥7-10% weight loss, Mediterranean diet, exercise) remains the foundation for all patients. For adults with MASH and F2-F3 fibrosis identified by non-invasive tests (VCTE 8-15 kPa, MRE 3.1-4.4 kPa, or ELF 9.2-10.5) rather than biopsy, AASLD now gives dedicated, updated practice guidance on both FDA-approved pharmacotherapies: resmetirom (Oct 2024 update) and semaglutide 2.4mg/week subcutaneous (Nov 2025 update, following August 2025 accelerated FDA approval based on ESSENCE trial data: 62.9% vs 34.3% MASH resolution without fibrosis worsening; 36.8% vs 22.4% ≥1-stage fibrosis improvement). Pioglitazone or vitamin E remain options per the 2023 base guidance. Manage cardiometabolic risk with statins for ASCVD reduction plus glycemic and blood-pressure control; for semaglutide specifically, routine hepatic panels are recommended only as clinically indicated (no discontinuations for LFT elevation in ESSENCE), with monitoring for GI adverse effects and rare risks (AKI, gallbladder disease, pancreatitis, thyroid C-cell tumors, retinopathy progression, lean mass loss). HCC surveillance with ultrasound and AFP every 6 months remains indicated only if cirrhosis is present.

AASLD 2023 Practice Guidance, updated by AASLD Practice Guidance October 2024 (resmetirom) and November 2025 (semaglutide) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Loomba R … Huang DQ · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=78 · Sep 4, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Splenic Elastography as a Predictor of Gastroesophageal Varices in Cirrhosis.

New evidencecirrhosisportal hypertensionvariceal bleedingbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a moderate-accuracy noninvasive predictor in a single-center study needs external validation before replacing endoscopy.
What it foundSplenic elastography (≥27 kPa cutoff) predicted gastroesophageal varices with AUC 0.72, sensitivity 82%, specificity 67%, and median stiffness rose from 25 kPa (no varices) to 50 kPa (large varices).
ContextConfirms splenic elastography correlates with variceal size but does not yet match endoscopy's role in variceal screening.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674.

Decision at stakepredicting gastroesophageal varices in cirrhosis

Statins are safe and recommended in MASLD/MASH and compensated cirrhosis when indicated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Start per standard CV risk-based criteria with baseline LFTs; routine ALT monitoring on statin is not required and pre-existing transaminitis is not a contraindication. Hold or reduce only for clinically significant ALT elevation, severe muscle symptoms, or decompensated cirrhosis on an individualized basis.

AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Pacheco Oliva J … Sánchez Orozco AA · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=235 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Steatosis in Cirrhosis: A Prognostic Marker for Liver-Related Outcomes in Metabolic-Dysfunction Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

New evidencecirrhosisMASLDbiomarker
Clinical takeawayConsider lower steatosis grades (qS0/1) in cirrhotic MASLD patients as a potential warning sign for higher risk of liver-related complications (ascites, HCC, death). No clinical action yet: a digital pathology finding needing validation.
What it foundLower steatosis grades (qS0/1 vs qS2/3) in cirrhotic MASLD patients correlated with a 17.24-fold higher risk of major adverse liver outcomes (MALO) (95% CI 3.12-95.32) using digital pathology (qFIBs).
ContextChallenges the assumption that lower steatosis is protective in MASLD; suggests fat resorption in advanced disease may signal worsening prognosis.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakeprognostic markers for liver-related outcomes in MASLD cirrhosis

Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Pei Y … Goh GBB · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=57,034 · Sep 5, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Steatosis liver index: A validated machine learning model using clinical data distinguishes steatotic liver disease phenotypes.

Diagnosticartificial intelligencebiomarkerepidemiologyMASLD
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a diagnostic model derived from NHANES data requires prospective validation before clinical use.
What it foundThe Steatosis Liver Index (SLI) distinguished MASLD from MetALD (c-statistic 0.770) and from ALD (c-statistic 0.802) using 15 clinical and lab variables without alcohol quantification.
ContextCurrent SLD phenotyping relies on self-reported alcohol use, which is often unreliable; this offers a potential objective alternative if validated.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835 (with the October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide Practice Guidance updates)

Decision at stakedistinguishing MASLD from MetALD and ALD phenotypes without relying on self-reported alcohol use

Lifestyle modification is the foundation of MASLD treatment, centered on a tiered weight-loss ladder targeting 7-10% body-weight loss for NASH/fibrosis improvement via a Mediterranean dietary pattern, elimination of sugar-sweetened beverages, 150 min/week of moderate aerobic activity plus resistance training, and alcohol reduction toward abstinence.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Lifestyle modification is the foundation of MASLD treatment, centered on a tiered weight-loss ladder targeting 7-10% body-weight loss for NASH/fibrosis improvement via a Mediterranean dietary pattern, elimination of sugar-sweetened beverages, 150 min/week of moderate aerobic activity plus resistance training, and alcohol reduction toward abstinence. Pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery are added on top of lifestyle when lifestyle alone is insufficient, but each is gated by disease stage, comorbidity, and eligibility rather than applied as generic escalation: resmetirom is indicated (in conjunction with diet and exercise) only for noncirrhotic MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2-F3) and is not recommended in cirrhosis; GLP-1 receptor agonists are directed to patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with semaglutide now guidance-supported for noncirrhotic MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis; pioglitazone is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH, with or without type 2 diabetes; vitamin E 800 IU/day is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH in patients without type 2 diabetes and without cirrhosis; and bariatric/metabolic surgery is an option only for patients meeting metabolic weight-loss-surgery eligibility (BMI ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 with comorbidities), cannot be considered primary therapy for compensated MASH cirrhosis, and carries increased operative risk in decompensated cirrhosis. Comorbidity management-CV risk, statins, diabetes, OSA screening, thyroid, vaccination-is integral to MASLD care.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835 (with the October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide Practice Guidance updates) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Pagadala M … Singal AK · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=339 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Endotrophin Measured by PRO-C6 as a Prognostic Biomarker for Liver-Related Events in Patients With Advanced Chronic Liver Disease.

Diagnosticbiomarkercirrhosisviral hepatitis
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a prognostic biomarker in HCV-related cirrhosis requiring validation in other liver diseases.
What it foundEach doubling of PRO-C6 was associated with increased hazard of liver-related events in all patients (HR=2.22, 95% CI 1.57-3.14) and in patients with cirrhosis (HR=1.71, 95% CI 1.14-2.58).
ContextAdds to the search for non-invasive prognostic markers in compensated cirrhosis, but current practice relies on clinical scores and imaging.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211.

Decision at stakerisk stratification for liver-related events in compensated advanced chronic liver disease

Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Scope: this primary document covers portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis ONLY. Everything else in the current entry (HCC surveillance, transplant referral, nutrition, vaccination, ascites/SBP/HE/HRS/ACLF management) belongs to the separate documents listed as supporting sources and must not be attributed to this guidance. Risk-stratify compensated advanced chronic liver disease (cACLD) with non-invasive tests before defaulting to endoscopy. By vibration-controlled transient elastography, liver stiffness (LSM) under 10 kPa excludes cACLD, 10 to 14.9 kPa is suggestive and warrants further testing, and 15 kPa or above rules cACLD in. Clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH, i.e. HVPG above 10 mm Hg) is ruled in non-invasively by LSM at or above 25 kPa alone, or LSM 20 to 24.9 kPa with platelets below 150 x 10^9/L, or LSM 15 to 19.9 kPa with platelets below 110 x 10^9/L. Where spleen stiffness measurement is available, values below 21 kPa argue against CSPH and above 50 kPa argue for it. These non-invasive cutoffs are conditional probability thresholds, not universal diagnostic rules, and hold only when their derivation conditions are met. They were established in compensated advanced chronic liver disease of viral (treated or untreated HBV/HCV), alcohol-related, or non-obese (BMI under 30) MASLD etiology, and are not validated for and should not be applied to cholestatic (e.g. PBC, PSC), vascular, or other etiologies, in which different cutoffs apply. They also require a technically reliable liver stiffness measurement by vibration-controlled transient elastography, fasting, at least 10 valid acquisitions, and an IQR/median ratio below 30 percent, and are confounded by factors that raise liver stiffness independently of fibrosis, including ALT flares or acute hepatitis, extrahepatic cholestasis, hepatic congestion (right heart failure), and recent food intake; Baveno VII recommends confirming an LSM-based rule-in on a repeat measurement obtained on a separate day. The spleen stiffness cutoffs apply only to a dedicated 100 Hz spleen module, carry a higher technical failure rate, are machine-dependent, and are not interchangeable with values obtained using the standard 50 Hz liver probe. Where these population or acquisition conditions are not met, the numeric thresholds do not reliably classify CSPH, and HVPG measurement or endoscopy is required rather than a non-invasive determination. Preserve the gray zone: LSM 15 to 25 kPa without a qualifying platelet count is explicitly indeterminate (roughly 40 to 60 percent of cACLD patients) and calls for HVPG and/or endoscopy rather than assumption in either direction. Once CSPH is established, offer a non-selective beta-blocker, carvedilol preferred at 12.5 mg/day, to lower portal pressure and prevent FIRST decompensation, on the strength of PREDESCI. This is a treat-the-pressure strategy rather than a treat-the-varices one: because a patient already on NSBB for CSPH would not have management changed by the finding, screening endoscopy becomes unnecessary for most such patients. Screening EGD is still indicated where elastography is unavailable, technically difficult, or gives discordant results, and for patients who do not meet non-invasive criteria. Standard beta-blocker contraindications (severe asthma, advanced heart block, bradyarrhythmias) continue to apply. For varices needing treatment managed endoscopically, band ligation is repeated every 2 to 4 weeks until obliteration, with surveillance endoscopy at 6 months and annually thereafter. Gastric/cardiofundal varices are treated with cyanoacrylate injection or EUS-guided coil embolization rather than banding, with hepatology involvement. In acute variceal hemorrhage, consider preemptive (early) TIPS within 24 to 72 hours in high-risk patients: Child-Turcotte-Pugh class B with score above 7 and active bleeding at endoscopy despite vasoactive therapy, or CTP class C with score 10 to 13. Keep the document's own qualifier: there is no established universal MELD or CTP cutoff at which TIPS is mandatory, and the decision is case-by-case with hepatology consultation. Statin use in compensated cirrhosis is NOT a recommendation traceable to this document; the current entry's statin sentence needs its own source or removal. Verification note: the Hepatology full text is paywalled (402/403 on direct fetch). Document identity, title, year, volume, pages and authorship were confirmed via Crossref and PubMed metadata; the numeric thresholds above were corroborated from two independent peer-reviewed commentaries on this specific guidance and match the Baveno VII rule-of-five, but were not read verbatim from the primary PDF. A human should confirm the exact guidance-statement wording against the full text before this entry is treated as quotation-grade.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), Kaplan DE, Ripoll C, Thiele M, et al. "AASLD Practice Guidance on risk stratification and management of portal hypertension and varices in cirrhosis." Hepatology. 2024;79(5):1180-1211. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wiggers T … Patel K · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology review · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Autophagy in MASLD: A Metabolic and Precision Medicine Perspective.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: mechanistic insights from genetic and preclinical studies. Consider future genetic testing or autophagy biomarkers if validated in humans.
What it foundGenetic variants (PNPLA3 p.I148M, ATG7 loss-of-function) impair autophagy and predispose to MASLD progression to ballooning, fibrosis, and HCC.
ContextConfirms autophagy's role in MASLD pathogenesis and introduces genetic modifiers as potential precision medicine targets, but human therapeutic applications remain unproven.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674.

Decision at stakethe role of autophagy in MASLD progression and potential therapeutic targets

Statins are safe and recommended in MASLD/MASH and compensated cirrhosis when indicated for cardiovascular risk reduction. Start per standard CV risk-based criteria with baseline LFTs; routine ALT monitoring on statin is not required and pre-existing transaminitis is not a contraindication. Hold or reduce only for clinically significant ALT elevation, severe muscle symptoms, or decompensated cirrhosis on an individualized basis.

AASLD, "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease" (Rinella ME et al., Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835). DOI 10.1097/HEP.0000000000000323, PMID 36727674. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Cazzaniga A … Valenti L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=304 · Sep 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Medications for Weight Loss and MASLD: A National Survey of Hepatology and Gastroenterology Provider Practices, Attitudes, and Knowledge Before Resmetirom.

New evidenceMASLDhealth servicescost-effectiveness
Clinical takeawayAssess comfort and knowledge gaps in weight loss pharmacotherapy for MASLD patients; consider structured education on FDA-approved options (e.g., GLP-1 agonists) if prescribing barriers align with survey findings (lack of training, cost, side-effects).
What it found96% of hepatology/GI providers believe weight loss medications benefit MASLD patients, but 77% rarely/never prescribe them due to low comfort (81%) and lack of knowledge (only 33% correctly identified >50% of FDA-approved weight loss drugs).
ContextConfirms underutilization of weight loss medications in MASLD despite AASLD guidance, highlighting a disconnect between provider beliefs and practice driven by knowledge deficits.
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835 (with the October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide Practice Guidance updates)

Decision at stakethe use of weight loss medications in MASLD management

Pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery are added on top of lifestyle when lifestyle alone is insufficient, but each is gated by disease stage, comorbidity, and eligibility rather than applied as generic escalation: resmetirom is indicated (in conjunction with diet and exercise) only for noncirrhotic MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2-F3) and is not recommended in cirrhosis; GLP-1 receptor agonists are directed to patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with semaglutide now guidance-supported for noncirrhotic MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis; pioglitazone is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH, with or without type 2 diabetes; vitamin E 800 IU/day is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH in patients without type 2 diabetes and without cirrhosis; and bariatric/metabolic surgery is an option only for patients meeting metabolic weight-loss-surgery eligibility (BMI ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 with comorbidities), cannot be considered primary therapy for compensated MASH cirrhosis, and carries increased operative risk in decompensated cirrhosis.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Lifestyle modification is the foundation of MASLD treatment, centered on a tiered weight-loss ladder targeting 7-10% body-weight loss for NASH/fibrosis improvement via a Mediterranean dietary pattern, elimination of sugar-sweetened beverages, 150 min/week of moderate aerobic activity plus resistance training, and alcohol reduction toward abstinence. Pharmacotherapy and bariatric surgery are added on top of lifestyle when lifestyle alone is insufficient, but each is gated by disease stage, comorbidity, and eligibility rather than applied as generic escalation: resmetirom is indicated (in conjunction with diet and exercise) only for noncirrhotic MASH with moderate-to-advanced fibrosis (F2-F3) and is not recommended in cirrhosis; GLP-1 receptor agonists are directed to patients with coexisting type 2 diabetes and/or obesity, with semaglutide now guidance-supported for noncirrhotic MASH with F2-F3 fibrosis; pioglitazone is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH, with or without type 2 diabetes; vitamin E 800 IU/day is reserved for biopsy-proven MASH in patients without type 2 diabetes and without cirrhosis; and bariatric/metabolic surgery is an option only for patients meeting metabolic weight-loss-surgery eligibility (BMI ≥40 kg/m2, or ≥35 kg/m2 with comorbidities), cannot be considered primary therapy for compensated MASH cirrhosis, and carries increased operative risk in decompensated cirrhosis. Comorbidity management-CV risk, statins, diabetes, OSA screening, thyroid, vaccination-is integral to MASLD care.

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), "AASLD Practice Guidance on the clinical assessment and management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease," Hepatology 2023;77(5):1797-1835 (with the October 2024 resmetirom and November 2025 semaglutide Practice Guidance updates) · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Im GY … Bansal MB · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=350 · Sep 2, 2026 · Clin Transl Gastro · IF 3.4

Impact of hepatitis C viremia on overall survival and hepatic decompensation among patients with unresectable HCC receiving immunotherapy.

New evidencehepatocellular carcinomaviral hepatitisbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: retrospective single-center data with mixed findings (PFS benefit but no OS impact) and no clear management implication.
What it foundHCV viremia in unresectable HCC patients on ICIs was not linked to overall survival (HR 0.88, 95% CI 0.53-1.44) but was associated with longer real-world PFS (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.36-0.96) and time on treatment (HR 0.63, 95% CI 0.40-0.99).
ContextChallenges the hypothesis that HCV viremia worsens ICI outcomes in HCC, but does not establish a clear benefit to leaving HCV untreated in this setting.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393

Decision at stakewhether HCV viremia affects outcomes or hepatic decompensation in HCC patients receiving ICIs

For hepatitis, obtain baseline liver chemistries (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT) and HBV serologies before ICI; grade by CTCAE and manage as follows: grade 1 (AST/ALT 1-3x ULN or bilirubin 1-1.5x ULN), monitor liver chemistries 1-2 times weekly; grade 2 (AST/ALT >3-5x ULN or bilirubin >1.5-3x ULN), hold ICI until resolution to grade 1, and if symptomatic give prednisone 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 3 (AST/ALT >5-20x ULN or bilirubin >3-10x ULN), discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 4 (AST/ALT >20x ULN or bilirubin >10x ULN or hepatic decompensation), permanently discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/d.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

For suspected ICI colitis, exclude infectious causes of diarrhea (including C. difficile) before treating. In grade 2 or higher colitis/diarrhea, early stool inflammatory markers (lactoferrin, calprotectin) may help stratify patients for endoscopy, and endoscopic confirmation of the diagnosis and severity should be considered before starting high-dose systemic glucocorticoids; abdominal imaging is reserved for dominant pain, fever, or bleeding and should not be done routinely for diarrhea alone. The AGA cautions that no validated severity index for ICI colitis exists and that symptoms correlate poorly with endoscopic, radiologic, and treatment-response severity, and that rapid progression over days can occur, particularly with ipilimumab. ICI colitis typically responds to high-dose systemic glucocorticoids at 0.5-2 mg/kg prednisone-equivalent daily tapered over 4-6 weeks (the AGA explicitly notes these doses and schedules have not been rigorously examined). If there is no improvement after 2-3 days, add infliximab or vedolizumab while continuing glucocorticoids; both are reasonable options for glucocorticoid-refractory colitis. Budesonide is ineffective as prophylaxis and is not a standard treatment for ICI colitis, it is reserved for ICI-associated microscopic colitis. Retreatment with immunotherapy is possible under select conditions. For hepatitis, obtain baseline liver chemistries (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT) and HBV serologies before ICI; grade by CTCAE and manage as follows: grade 1 (AST/ALT 1-3x ULN or bilirubin 1-1.5x ULN), monitor liver chemistries 1-2 times weekly; grade 2 (AST/ALT >3-5x ULN or bilirubin >1.5-3x ULN), hold ICI until resolution to grade 1, and if symptomatic give prednisone 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 3 (AST/ALT >5-20x ULN or bilirubin >3-10x ULN), discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 4 (AST/ALT >20x ULN or bilirubin >10x ULN or hepatic decompensation), permanently discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/d. For ICI hepatitis that does not adequately improve after 3-5 days of high-dose glucocorticoids, escalate to a second-line immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil (with azathioprine as an accepted alternative), while continuing glucocorticoids; infliximab is not recommended for ICI hepatitis because of its potential for hepatotoxicity. Evaluate all ICI-related liver-chemistry elevations for alternate etiologies (consider liver biopsy), and obtain biliary imaging when alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin are elevated.

American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Lee EY … Li M · Clinical and Translational Gastroenterology · IF 3.4 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=120 · Sep 4, 2026 · J Hepatobil Pancreat Sci · IF 3.8

Interleukin-37 Enhances Liver NK Cell Cytotoxicity and Improves Recurrence-Free Survival in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarkerhepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in vitro and an association in humans, not a tested intervention.
What it foundHigher preoperative serum IL-37 levels were associated with improved 5-year recurrence-free survival (35.5% vs 20.1%, p=0.02) and lower early recurrence in HCC patients post-resection.
ContextIdentifies IL-37 as a potential biomarker for recurrence risk post-HCC resection, but does not establish causality or a therapeutic role.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakethe role of immune modulation in reducing HCC recurrence after resection

AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Imaoka Y … Ohdan H · Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences · IF 3.8 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=12 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

p38 Inhibitor SB203580 Inhibits HEV Infection and Prevents HEV-Related Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in a Pregnant Rabbit Model.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalviral hepatitisbiomarker
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: preclinical evidence in a rabbit model. SB203580 is not approved for human use.
What it foundSB203580 (p38 inhibitor) reduced HEV viral load in feces and serum, decreased placental apoptosis, and prevented adverse pregnancy outcomes in HEV-infected pregnant rabbits.
ContextCurrent HEV treatments (ribavirin, pegylated interferon-α) are contraindicated in pregnancy due to fetal risks. This study identifies a potential alternative but requires human trials.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis E virus infection," Journal of Hepatology, 2018

Decision at staketreatment of HEV infection in pregnant women

Severe/fulminant HEV, notably genotype 1 (and 2) infection acquired in the second/third trimester of pregnancy, where acute liver failure with high maternal and fetal mortality is frequent, is managed in a specialist/ICU liver-failure setting with emergency liver-transplant evaluation; ribavirin is teratogenic and contraindicated in pregnancy (used only anecdotally in the third trimester in otherwise-fatal cases).

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Acute HEV in immunocompetent hosts is usually self-limiting and requires only supportive care; routine antiviral therapy is not indicated. EASL notes that ribavirin (typically a ~3-month course) may be considered in severe acute hepatitis E or acute-on-chronic liver failure. Chronic HEV, defined by EASL as HEV RNA persistence for more than 3 months (essentially confined to immunosuppressed patients, chiefly solid-organ transplant recipients, and predominantly genotype 3), is managed first by reducing immunosuppression where feasible, preferentially agents targeting T cells (this alone clears the virus in roughly a third of transplant recipients). If viremia persists, ribavirin monotherapy is first-line for at least 3 months (12 weeks); the ~600 mg/day figure is a study-derived median starting dose (from the pivotal retrospective transplant cohort), not a fixed standard, and the dose must be individualized, ribavirin is renally cleared and accumulates in renal impairment, so it is reduced according to creatinine clearance/eGFR, and it is adapted to hematologic tolerance, with hemoglobin monitored routinely for dose-dependent hemolytic anemia and the dose reduced as needed (adding epoetin and/or blood transfusion if the dose cannot be lowered further); at the end of therapy HEV RNA should be assessed in BOTH serum and stool, and treatment extended (e.g., to 6 months) if RNA remains detectable, particularly in stool, with sustained virological response defined as undetectable HEV RNA 12 weeks after stopping. Pegylated interferon-alfa is an alternative for ribavirin failures but is contraindicated in kidney, heart, lung and pancreas transplant recipients because of rejection risk; it may be considered in LIVER transplant recipients who fail ribavirin and in non-transplant immunosuppressed patients (e.g., HIV or haematological disease). Severe/fulminant HEV, notably genotype 1 (and 2) infection acquired in the second/third trimester of pregnancy, where acute liver failure with high maternal and fetal mortality is frequent, is managed in a specialist/ICU liver-failure setting with emergency liver-transplant evaluation; ribavirin is teratogenic and contraindicated in pregnancy (used only anecdotally in the third trimester in otherwise-fatal cases).

European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), "EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines on hepatitis E virus infection," Journal of Hepatology, 2018 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Li M … Zhou H · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · Sep 1, 2026 · J Clin Gastro · IF 2.9

Trends in Urban-rural Disparities in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Mortality in the United States From 1999 to 2020.

Epidemiologyepidemiologyhepatocellular carcinomahealth services
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: this is an epidemiological analysis identifying disparities in HCC mortality by geography and sociodemographics.
What it foundHCC mortality increased more rapidly in rural areas (AAPC: 1.97%) than urban areas (AAPC: 1.11%), surpassing urban mortality by 2020.
ContextRecent literature highlights urban-rural disparities in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) mortality in the United States over the past two decades (pmid_40549571).
Reinforcessuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakethe need for HCC surveillance in high-risk populations

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Pan CW … Wong RJ · Journal of Clinical Gastroenterology · IF 2.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=1,217 · Sep 1, 2026 · Hepatology · IF 18.0

Genetic regulation of CPEB3-mediated alternative polyadenylation associated with survival of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Basic sciencebasic sciencetranslationalbiomarkerhepatocellular carcinoma
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a mechanistic finding in HCC cell lines and genetic association in patient cohorts.
What it foundA functional apaQTL variant rs2037547, mediated by CPEB3, was associated with poor survival in HCC patients (pooled HR=1.29, p=0.016) and promoted HCC cell proliferation, invasion, and migration.
ContextIdentifies a novel genetic regulator (CPEB3) and variant (rs2037547) linked to HCC progression, adding to understanding of post-transcriptional mechanisms in HCC but not yet translatable to clinical practice.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965).

Decision at stakeprognostic stratification and personalized therapy in HCC

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Perform HCC surveillance in adults with cirrhosis of any etiology who are able to benefit from HCC treatment, accordingly, do not enroll patients with Child-Turcotte-Pugh class C cirrhosis unless they are candidates for (or listed for) liver transplantation, and do not surveil those with life-limiting comorbidity (life expectancy <1-2 years) that transplantation cannot remedy, and in select non-cirrhotic chronic HBV carriers at elevated risk (e.g., active hepatitis/high viral load, family history of HCC, African/African-American ancestry, Asian men >40 and Asian women >50; AASLD references risk scores such as PAGE-B but stops short of mandating a specific numeric cutoff). Surveillance is abdominal ultrasound PLUS serum AFP at ~6-month (semiannual) intervals, a change from prior AASLD guidance, which had left AFP optional (Strong recommendation). Pursue diagnostic evaluation for an AFP ≥20 ng/mL or for a rising AFP, defined as a doubling of AFP or an increase on two consecutive tests even if the absolute value is <20 ng/mL. Any suspicious ultrasound observation ≥1 cm, or an inadequate/limited ultrasound, should be evaluated with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT or MRI interpreted with CT/MRI LI-RADS. AASLD 2023 stages confirmed HCC using the BCLC framework and links stage to therapy (curative resection, ablation, or transplantation within Milan criteria for very-early/early disease; TACE and other locoregional therapy for intermediate disease; systemic therapy for advanced disease). Its first-line systemic options for advanced HCC with preserved liver function (Child-Pugh A) are atezolizumab+bevacizumab OR durvalumab+tremelimumab (STRIDE) as preferred, with sorafenib, lenvatinib, or durvalumab monotherapy as alternatives when the preferred combinations are contraindicated. After potentially curative therapy, continue surveillance for recurrence given high recurrence risk (AASLD monitors with cross-sectional contrast-enhanced imaging, not ultrasound, in the early post-treatment period).

American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), 'AASLD Practice Guidance on prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma,' Hepatology, 2023 (78(6):1922-1965). · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Wang H … Zhong R · Hepatology · IF 18.0 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology retrospective · n=122 · Sep 4, 2026 · J Gastroenterology · IF 5.7

B cell receptor-associated protein 31 levels in serum-derived extracellular vesicles are associated with therapeutic response and prognosis in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma receiving atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: a multicenter study.

Diagnosticbiomarkerhepatocellular carcinomatranslationalartificial intelligence
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: exploratory biomarker data in HCC requires prospective validation before clinical use.
What it foundPretreatment BAP31 levels in serum-derived EVs distinguished non-progressive from progressive disease (AUC 0.719, optimal cutoff -14.582) and stratified OS (44.8 vs 25.3 months for low vs high levels, P=0.039), though the OS association lost significance after propensity score adjustment.
ContextAddresses an unmet need for biomarkers in HCC ICI response but does not yet challenge or refine current practice due to retrospective design and attenuated significance after adjustment.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393

Decision at stakeidentifying biomarkers for therapeutic response to ICIs in hepatocellular carcinoma

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

For suspected ICI colitis, exclude infectious causes of diarrhea (including C. difficile) before treating. In grade 2 or higher colitis/diarrhea, early stool inflammatory markers (lactoferrin, calprotectin) may help stratify patients for endoscopy, and endoscopic confirmation of the diagnosis and severity should be considered before starting high-dose systemic glucocorticoids; abdominal imaging is reserved for dominant pain, fever, or bleeding and should not be done routinely for diarrhea alone. The AGA cautions that no validated severity index for ICI colitis exists and that symptoms correlate poorly with endoscopic, radiologic, and treatment-response severity, and that rapid progression over days can occur, particularly with ipilimumab. ICI colitis typically responds to high-dose systemic glucocorticoids at 0.5-2 mg/kg prednisone-equivalent daily tapered over 4-6 weeks (the AGA explicitly notes these doses and schedules have not been rigorously examined). If there is no improvement after 2-3 days, add infliximab or vedolizumab while continuing glucocorticoids; both are reasonable options for glucocorticoid-refractory colitis. Budesonide is ineffective as prophylaxis and is not a standard treatment for ICI colitis, it is reserved for ICI-associated microscopic colitis. Retreatment with immunotherapy is possible under select conditions. For hepatitis, obtain baseline liver chemistries (total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, AST, ALT) and HBV serologies before ICI; grade by CTCAE and manage as follows: grade 1 (AST/ALT 1-3x ULN or bilirubin 1-1.5x ULN), monitor liver chemistries 1-2 times weekly; grade 2 (AST/ALT >3-5x ULN or bilirubin >1.5-3x ULN), hold ICI until resolution to grade 1, and if symptomatic give prednisone 0.5-1.0 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 3 (AST/ALT >5-20x ULN or bilirubin >3-10x ULN), discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 1-2 mg/kg/d or equivalent; grade 4 (AST/ALT >20x ULN or bilirubin >10x ULN or hepatic decompensation), permanently discontinue ICI and start methylprednisolone 2 mg/kg/d. For ICI hepatitis that does not adequately improve after 3-5 days of high-dose glucocorticoids, escalate to a second-line immunosuppressant, mycophenolate mofetil (with azathioprine as an accepted alternative), while continuing glucocorticoids; infliximab is not recommended for ICI hepatitis because of its potential for hepatotoxicity. Evaluate all ICI-related liver-chemistry elevations for alternate etiologies (consider liver biopsy), and obtain biliary imaging when alkaline phosphatase and/or bilirubin are elevated.

American Gastroenterological Association (AGA), "AGA Clinical Practice Update on Diagnosis and Management of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Colitis and Hepatitis: Expert Review" (Dougan M, Wang Y, Rubio-Tapia A, Lim JK), Gastroenterology 2021;160(4):1384-1393 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Suzuki T … Tanaka Y · Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 5.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Hepatology prospective cohort · n=625 · Sep 1, 2026 · Liver International · IF 6.7

Gene-Based Clustering Identifies QSOX1 and IL1RAP as Biomarkers of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease.

Diagnosticbiomarkerbasic sciencetranslationalepidemiology
Clinical takeawayNo clinical action yet: a preclinical biomarker finding requiring validation in prospective human studies before clinical use.
What it foundQSOX1/IL1RAP plasma ratio had AUROC 0.95 for MASLD diagnosis by proteomics and 0.82 by ELISA, correlating with disease severity.
ContextIdentifies potential non-invasive biomarkers for MASLD, a condition currently diagnosed via imaging or biopsy, but these markers are not yet validated for clinical practice.
No standard claimed for this paper

Every paper is compared to the standard governing its question. This one is not: either no standard in the corpus matches it, or the comparison did not hold up on review and was withdrawn rather than published unverified. Both are logged.

Ma W … Lin L · Liver International : Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 6.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №10 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Hepatology by RSS