← Issue №8/ week of Aug 23, 2026/ the whole section, in full

Pancreas/Biliary, in full.

All 6 Pancreas/Biliary papers in this issue, as full cards, ranked by clinical utility. The issue page carries the strongest few; this is the section, whole.

Sections this issue
Filter

All 6, in full

most clinically useful first
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=341 · Aug 18, 2026 · Gut · IF 24.6

Ciliogenic pancreatopathy reveals a link between ciliopathies and exocrine pancreatic disease.

Epidemiologybasic sciencetranslationalpediatricpancreatic cyst
Clinical takeawayPatients with ciliopathy-causing mutations HNF1B or NPHP3, particularly those with kidney disease and pediatric-onset pancreatic disease, develop pancreatic fat accumulation (adipopancreatosis) detectable on MRI; clinical significance and impact on pancreatic function or renal outcomes remain unclear.
What it foundHNF1B and NPHP3 mutations are associated with pancreatic fat accumulation (adipopancreatosis), demonstrated by increased Dixon-MRI signal intensity in patients and reproduced in Nphp3 mouse models.
ContextA previously unrecognised pancreatic phenotype in ciliopathies (ciliogenic pancreatopathy); translational study demonstrates mechanistic association via mouse models and human imaging but does not establish clinical consequences or define screening or management approaches.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720.

Decision at stakepursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing

Screen for PDAC per lifetime risk and pursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing and autoimmune pancreatitis evaluation.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Confirm chronic pancreatitis on CROSS-SECTIONAL IMAGING, CT for late calcific disease, MRI/MRCP (with secretin where available) for earlier ductal and parenchymal change, EUS an acceptable alternative; per ACG 2020, "Diagnosis is made usually on cross-sectional imaging, with modalities such as endoscopic ultrasonography and pancreatic function tests playing a secondary role". Fecal elastase does NOT confirm chronic pancreatitis: it is a test of exocrine FUNCTION and is the appropriate initial test for the exocrine pancreatic insufficiency (EPI) that chronic pancreatitis causes, a consequence of the disease, not the diagnosis of it. A normal fecal elastase does not exclude chronic pancreatitis and a low one does not establish it. Per AGA 2023, fecal elastase must be run on a semi-solid or solid stool specimen; below 100 mcg/g is good evidence of EPI and 100-200 mcg/g is indeterminate (below 200 mcg/g is the cutoff commonly used to screen). Then manage with smoking and alcohol cessation, PERT for exocrine insufficiency titrated to symptoms, fat-soluble vitamin and bone surveillance, and individualized type 3c diabetes control, considering insulin early in patients with marked hyperglycemia or symptoms of insulin deficiency. Treat pain with a stepwise ladder from scheduled acetaminophen and neuromodulators to EUS-guided celiac plexus block and endoscopic/surgical intervention, referring early for surgery per ESCAPE 2020 in candidates with main pancreatic duct obstruction. Screen for PDAC per lifetime risk and pursue etiologic workup via TIGAR-O v2, including genetic testing and autoimmune pancreatitis evaluation.

American College of Gastroenterology, 'ACG Clinical Guideline: Chronic Pancreatitis' (Gardner TB et al., Am J Gastroenterol 2020;115(3):322-339). DOI 10.14309/ajg.0000000000000535, PMID 32022720. · reviewed 2026-07-21 ↗
Rajput M … Scheers I · Gut · IF 24.6 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=75 · Aug 20, 2026 · Pancreas · IF 1.9

Prognostic Utility of the Cachexia Index in Resectable and Borderline Resectable Pancreatic Cancer Treated with Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Diagnosticpancreatic cancerbiomarker
Clinical takeawayS-CXI may identify high-risk resectable pancreatic cancer patients who could benefit from intensified perioperative multidisciplinary care. However, this retrospective study does not test interventions to improve outcomes in high-risk patients; prospective validation and trials of outcome-improvement strategies are needed before routine clinical use.
What it foundLow pre-treatment skeletal-muscle cachexia index (combining muscle area, albumin, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio; stratified using sex-specific tertiles) independently predicted recurrence (HR 1.81, p=0.045) and mortality (HR 2.16, p=0.033) in 75 patients with resectable or borderline resectable pancreatic cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection.
ContextPrognostic biomarkers in PDAC are common but few change practice. This study validates the cachexia index in resectable disease undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy and resection, a new finding for this population. It represents incremental evidence for a risk-stratification tool rather than practice-changing evidence; whether identifying high-risk patients leads to better outcomes with specific interventions remains untested.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457.

Decision at stakeselection of resectable pancreatic cancer patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on prognostic risk factors

BORDERLINE RESECTABLE and LOCALLY ADVANCED disease: neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with or without subsequent chemoradiation/RT, then restaging and reassessment for resection.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Evaluate suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with a dedicated pancreatic-protocol (multiphasic, contrast-enhanced) CT of the abdomen as the preferred imaging for diagnosis and staging (MRI/MRCP is an acceptable alternative); PET/CT may be added after, never as a substitute for, protocol CT/MRI in higher-risk situations. Obtain tissue confirmation, preferably by EUS-guided FNA/FNB with core biopsy where feasible; biopsy is generally required before neoadjuvant or palliative therapy, whereas patients with clearly resectable disease may proceed to surgery without preoperative biopsy. Measure baseline CA 19-9 (interpret after biliary decompression / with normal bilirubin; it can be falsely low in Lewis-antigen-negative patients and falsely elevated with cholestasis). Offer GERMLINE testing for inherited susceptibility to EVERY patient with confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma regardless of family history, using a comprehensive multi-gene panel; separately, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who are candidates for anti-cancer therapy, obtain TUMOR/SOMATIC molecular profiling (broad NGS; RNA-based assays improve fusion detection; cell-free/liquid biopsy if tissue is insufficient). Assign resectability, resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced (unresectable), or metastatic, by multidisciplinary review, ideally at a high-volume center. RESECTABLE disease: upfront resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy for head/uncinate; distal pancreatectomy ± splenectomy for body/tail) followed by adjuvant therapy, or neoadjuvant therapy in selected high-risk patients; preferred adjuvant regimen is modified FOLFIRINOX in patients able to tolerate it, ideally begun within 12 weeks of surgery, for a total of ~6 months of perioperative systemic therapy. BORDERLINE RESECTABLE and LOCALLY ADVANCED disease: neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with or without subsequent chemoradiation/RT, then restaging and reassessment for resection. METASTATIC disease by performance status: good PS (ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function), first-line FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX, or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, with clinical trial preferred; after ~4-6 months without progression, transition to a maintenance strategy (including olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 carriers who have NOT progressed on first-line platinum-based therapy), a clinical trial, or a treatment break; intermediate PS (ECOG 2), clinical trial preferred, otherwise less-intensive first-line therapy (preferred gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [category 1], or single-agent gemcitabine or capecitabine, or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI/CapeOx), since the intensive triplets (FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX and NALIRIFOX) are limited to ECOG 0-1 and are generally not appropriate at ECOG 2, with the same maintenance-versus-progression reassessment applied after ~4-6 months without progression; poor PS (ECOG 3-4), palliative/best supportive care, with single-agent chemotherapy or a biomarker-directed agent only if clinically appropriate. Treat by molecular target wherever an actionable alteration is present, across lines: pembrolizumab (or dostarlimab) for MSI-H/dMMR and pembrolizumab for TMB-H, olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 (maintenance after platinum), larotrectinib/entrectinib for NTRK fusions, selpercatinib for RET fusions, dabrafenib + trametinib for BRAF V600E, erdafitinib for FGFR2 alterations, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive disease, zenocutuzumab for NRG1 fusion-positive disease, and (in recent NCCN versions) KRAS G12C inhibitors (adagrasib/sotorasib), several of these after prior systemic therapy. Integrate supportive care throughout: relieve obstructive jaundice with an endoscopic self-expanding metal stent in non-operative or neoadjuvant pathways, but do NOT perform routine preoperative biliary drainage before planned upfront resection; treat exocrine insufficiency with pancreatic enzyme replacement titrated to symptoms (common starting dose ~40,000-50,000 units of lipase with main meals, roughly half with snacks, increased as needed); manage refractory pain with celiac plexus neurolysis or palliative RT; relieve gastric outlet obstruction with surgical or EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (or enteral stenting); and provide VTE prophylaxis, nutritional support, and early palliative care.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Tsuruta S … Hakamada K · Pancreas · IF 1.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=205 · Aug 18, 2026 · Dig Liver Dis · IF 4.2

Timing of cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis: Impact of disease severity and biological sex.

New evidenceacute pancreatitishealth services
Clinical takeawayFor mild biliary pancreatitis, early cholecystectomy during index admission remains safe; counsel male patients about anticipated surgical complexity and intensive care utilization. For moderate/severe biliary pancreatitis, particularly in female patients, consider interval cholecystectomy to reduce intensive care duration and hospitalization length. Use disease severity and sex to individualize timing strategies and set realistic expectations for recovery resource needs.
What it foundOverall postoperative morbidity did not differ between early one-stage and interval cholecystectomy after biliary pancreatitis, but one-stage surgery increased postoperative inflammatory response, intensive care need, and hospitalization duration. In males with mild disease, surgery was more complex with longer operative times and higher conversion rates. In females with moderate/severe disease, one-stage surgery resulted in prolonged intensive care and trend toward prolonged hospitalization.
ContextCurrent practice recommends early cholecystectomy within the index admission for mild acute biliary pancreatitis and interval surgery for moderate/severe disease. This study confirms early surgery is morbidity-safe in mild disease but refines the approach by identifying sex-specific patterns in resource utilization and operative complexity. The findings support individualization by severity and sex rather than applying uniform timing strategies.
Refinessuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437

Decision at staketiming of cholecystectomy after acute biliary pancreatitis, stratified by disease severity

Perform cholecystectomy preferably before discharge for mild acute biliary pancreatitis, and after a second unexplained AP episode even without identified gallstones; reserve ERCP within 24h for AP complicated by cholangitis, with rectal indomethacin +/- pancreatic duct stent and periprocedural hydration to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose acute pancreatitis (AP) by the Atlanta criteria (2 of 3: characteristic epigastric/LUQ pain, lipase or amylase >3x ULN [lipase preferred for specificity/duration], or characteristic imaging). ACG 2024 stratifies severity risk using SIRS on admission plus bedside risk factors, rising/elevated BUN, rising/elevated hematocrit (>44), obesity (BMI>30), extrapancreatic fluid collections/pleural effusion/infiltrates, altered mental status, and older age/comorbidities, rather than mandating a formal BISAP or APACHE II composite score. Give moderately aggressive lactated Ringer's, most important in the first 6-12 hours, reassessing volume status/BUN/HCT at 6 hours (further aggressive hydration has little added benefit after 24-48h). Start oral low-fat solid food within 24-48h as tolerated in mild disease; if enteral feeding is needed for moderately severe/severe disease, prefer nasogastric over nasojejunal with small-peptide/medium-chain-triglyceride formula and continuous (not bolus/cyclic) feeding; avoid parenteral nutrition if possible. Do not give prophylactic antibiotics, even in severe disease or sterile necrosis; reserve antibiotics for suspected infected necrosis (typically arising 10-14 days in), and choose agents that penetrate pancreatic necrosis while together covering both gut-derived gram-negative enterics and anaerobes, a carbapenem supplies this as monotherapy, whereas a fluoroquinolone or a third-or-higher-generation cephalosporin must be combined with metronidazole; metronidazole alone (anaerobic cover only), or a cephalosporin or a quinolone alone, does not adequately treat infected necrosis. Perform cholecystectomy preferably before discharge for mild acute biliary pancreatitis, and after a second unexplained AP episode even without identified gallstones; reserve ERCP within 24h for AP complicated by cholangitis, with rectal indomethacin +/- pancreatic duct stent and periprocedural hydration to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. Check triglycerides when gallstones/alcohol are absent (>1000 mg/dL supports a hypertriglyceridemia etiology). For stable pancreatic necrosis, defer surgical, radiological, or endoscopic intervention 4-6 weeks to allow walling-off (step-up approach).

American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Bender F … Reichert M · Digestive and Liver Disease : Official Journal of the Italian Society of Gastroenterology and the Italian Association for the Study of the Liver · IF 4.2 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary prospective cohort · n=226 · Aug 23, 2026 · J Gastroenterology · IF 5.7

Long-term impact of acute pancreatitis on patients' quality of life: a multi-center prospective study in Japan.

Epidemiologyacute pancreatitishealth servicesepidemiology
Clinical takeawayAssess physical and social function at 3 months in acute pancreatitis survivors (measurement instruments detailed in source), emphasizing females and those with higher initial disease severity. Patients with lower physical component scores warrant intensive psychosocial support. Important: At 12 months, younger age paradoxically predicts incomplete recovery-do not assume standard age-based recovery trajectories.
What it foundAt 3 months post-hospitalization, 21.7% of acute pancreatitis survivors had incomplete social participation recovery; 73.5% of these had a physical component score below 45 versus 24.9% of those with complete recovery (p < 0.01). Incomplete recovery persisted in 17.5% at 12 months, associated with younger age and worsened mental health.
ContextAcute pancreatitis is often assumed to resolve fully; this prospective multi-center cohort documents persistent limitations in ~20% at 3 months and ~18% at 12 months, with distinct risk phases: female sex and higher initial severity predict incomplete recovery at 3 months, but paradoxically younger age predicts it at 12 months. These findings support biphasic recovery and targeted post-discharge surveillance regardless of patient demographics.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437

Decision at stakeProvide targeted post-acute follow-up and psychosocial support for acute pancreatitis survivors

No single passage of this standard matched the paper closely enough to quote, so none is shown. The standard is cited above.

Our full summary of this standard

Diagnose acute pancreatitis (AP) by the Atlanta criteria (2 of 3: characteristic epigastric/LUQ pain, lipase or amylase >3x ULN [lipase preferred for specificity/duration], or characteristic imaging). ACG 2024 stratifies severity risk using SIRS on admission plus bedside risk factors, rising/elevated BUN, rising/elevated hematocrit (>44), obesity (BMI>30), extrapancreatic fluid collections/pleural effusion/infiltrates, altered mental status, and older age/comorbidities, rather than mandating a formal BISAP or APACHE II composite score. Give moderately aggressive lactated Ringer's, most important in the first 6-12 hours, reassessing volume status/BUN/HCT at 6 hours (further aggressive hydration has little added benefit after 24-48h). Start oral low-fat solid food within 24-48h as tolerated in mild disease; if enteral feeding is needed for moderately severe/severe disease, prefer nasogastric over nasojejunal with small-peptide/medium-chain-triglyceride formula and continuous (not bolus/cyclic) feeding; avoid parenteral nutrition if possible. Do not give prophylactic antibiotics, even in severe disease or sterile necrosis; reserve antibiotics for suspected infected necrosis (typically arising 10-14 days in), and choose agents that penetrate pancreatic necrosis while together covering both gut-derived gram-negative enterics and anaerobes, a carbapenem supplies this as monotherapy, whereas a fluoroquinolone or a third-or-higher-generation cephalosporin must be combined with metronidazole; metronidazole alone (anaerobic cover only), or a cephalosporin or a quinolone alone, does not adequately treat infected necrosis. Perform cholecystectomy preferably before discharge for mild acute biliary pancreatitis, and after a second unexplained AP episode even without identified gallstones; reserve ERCP within 24h for AP complicated by cholangitis, with rectal indomethacin +/- pancreatic duct stent and periprocedural hydration to reduce post-ERCP pancreatitis risk. Check triglycerides when gallstones/alcohol are absent (>1000 mg/dL supports a hypertriglyceridemia etiology). For stable pancreatic necrosis, defer surgical, radiological, or endoscopic intervention 4-6 weeks to allow walling-off (step-up approach).

American College of Gastroenterology, "American College of Gastroenterology Guidelines: Management of Acute Pancreatitis" (Tenner S, Vege SS, Sheth SG, et al.), Am J Gastroenterol 2024;119(3):419-437 · reviewed 2026-07-20 ↗
Ueno M … Japan Pancreas Society Clinical Research Promotion Committee Group · Journal of Gastroenterology · IF 5.7 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=66 · Aug 21, 2026 · Dig Dis Sci · IF 2.5

Emerging Issue - Fatty Pancreas in Pancreatic Cystic Neoplasms: Results of a Matched Case-Control Study.

Epidemiologypancreatic cystepidemiologybiomarker
Clinical takeawayFatty pancreas does not appear to independently increase pancreatic cystic neoplasm risk based on this study. Current PNCL risk stratification using established imaging features and CA 19-9 levels should not change; fatty pancreas should not be incorporated as a risk factor at this time. The non-significant tail trend warrants further investigation but does not yet support modified surveillance or management.
What it foundIn a matched case-control study of 22 patients with pancreatic cystic neoplasms (14 with malignant potential) and 44 controls, pancreas-to-spleen attenuation ratio (P/S) and fatty pancreas prevalence (P/S < 0.7) did not differ significantly between groups (p=0.496 and p=0.573 respectively); a non-significant trend toward increased tail steatosis in premalignant lesions was observed (p=0.059).
ContextRisk stratification for pancreatic cystic lesions uses established imaging criteria (Fukuoka guidelines for IPMN, distinct criteria for other lesion types) and tumor markers. This study suggests fatty pancreas does not discriminate malignant risk and should not be incorporated into existing assessment frameworks without stronger evidence.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· International Association of Pancreatology, "International evidence-based Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas" (Ohtsuka T, Fernández-del Castillo C, Furukawa T, et al.), Pancreatology, 2024

Decision at stakeWhether to incorporate pancreatic steatosis into IPMN risk stratification

After resection of non-invasive IPMN the pancreatic remnant carries increased risk and warrants long-term surveillance as long as the patient remains fit for further intervention (roughly yearly imaging without additional risk factors, every 6 months with higher-risk features); after total pancreatectomy for non-invasive disease, IPMN-specific surveillance may stop if uneventful over 5 years.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Kyoto 2024 (IAP) applies a single HRS/WF risk-stratification algorithm to all IPMN, including main-duct and mixed types. Workup uses a combination of MDCT, MRI/MRCP, and EUS plus blood tests (tumor markers, HbA1c) per institutional policy, the guideline considers MDCT, MRI, and EUS equivalent for diagnosis rather than designating MRI/MRCP as the single preferred initial modality; new in 2024, EUS imaging and EUS-FNA cytology are folded into the HRS/WF assessment when EUS is performed. High-risk stigmata (HRS): (1) obstructive jaundice in a patient with a cystic lesion of the pancreatic head, (2) enhancing mural nodule >=5 mm or a solid component, (3) main pancreatic duct >=10 mm, and (4) suspicious or positive cytology if EUS-FNA was done. Worrisome features (WF): (1) acute pancreatitis, (2) elevated CA19-9 (>37 U/mL), (3) new-onset or acute exacerbation of diabetes within the past year, (4) cyst >=30 mm, (5) enhancing mural nodule <5 mm, (6) thickened/enhancing cyst walls, (7) MPD >=5 and <10 mm, (8) abrupt change in duct caliber with distal parenchymal atrophy, (9) lymphadenopathy, and (10) cyst growth rate >=2.5 mm/year. Importantly, Kyoto deliberately keeps the 'HRS/WF' framing rather than 'absolute/relative indication': the operative decision is a careful multidisciplinary judgment weighing the degree of suspicion for high-grade dysplasia/invasive carcinoma AGAINST the patient's general condition, comorbidity, life expectancy, and preference, HRS should trigger consideration of resection, not automatic resection, and WF should prompt EUS and multidisciplinary evaluation, with EUS-FNA cytology/molecular sampling reserved for cases in which its results would actually alter management (per Kyoto, the indication for cyst-fluid sampling by EUS-FNA is limited to when further management will be altered according to the results, and FNA should not be performed when HRS is already obvious on MDCT/MRI and surgery is otherwise indicated). MD-IPMN and mixed IPMN are managed by the SAME algorithm, with the surgical decision driven by suspicion for invasive carcinoma and the goal of a negative margin, not by main-duct involvement alone. Non-resected BD-IPMN enters size-stratified surveillance: <20 mm, at 6 months once, then every 18 months if stable; 20 to <30 mm, every 6 months x2, then every 12 months if stable; >=30 mm, every 6 months. On discontinuing surveillance, Kyoto offers TWO options for small unchanged BD-IPMN ('stop surveillance' vs 'continue surveillance' because of possible concomitant pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma): surveillance MAY be discontinued for cysts <20 mm with no morphological change and no worrisome features after 5 years, with consideration of patient condition and life expectancy, and SHOULD be discontinued for patients unfit for surgery or with life expectancy <10 years, but this discontinuation guidance may not apply to younger patients, and cumulative concomitant-PDAC risk continues to accrue (reported 2.2%, 4.6%, 7.4% at 5, 10, 15 years in one Japanese BD-IPMN cohort), so continued surveillance remains a legitimate alternative. After resection of non-invasive IPMN the pancreatic remnant carries increased risk and warrants long-term surveillance as long as the patient remains fit for further intervention (roughly yearly imaging without additional risk factors, every 6 months with higher-risk features); after total pancreatectomy for non-invasive disease, IPMN-specific surveillance may stop if uneventful over 5 years. (Kyoto 2024 addresses IPMN specifically; the 'all presumed MCNs are resected' rule and the family-history/germline CAPS pathway in the current entry come from other guidelines and are not part of this document.)

International Association of Pancreatology, "International evidence-based Kyoto guidelines for the management of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas" (Ohtsuka T, Fernández-del Castillo C, Furukawa T, et al.), Pancreatology, 2024 · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Vlăduț C … Ciocîrlan M · Digestive Diseases and Sciences · IF 2.5 · PubMed ↗Permalink
Pancreas/Biliary retrospective · n=284 · Aug 19, 2026 · Pancreas · IF 1.9

Chemotherapy for Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer Complicated by Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Epidemiologypancreatic cancer
Clinical takeawayRecognize tumor-related DIC in APC as a marker of extremely poor prognosis (median 1.3 months versus 10.4 months without DIC). Infection-related DIC outcomes differ from both but specific survival not quantified in this series. In patients with tumor-related DIC, chemotherapy with anticoagulation or antifibrinolytic support achieved transient DIC resolution in 4 of 8 patients in this series; however, resolution was temporary and recurrence occurred with tumor progression. Its independent contribution to improved survival requires cautious interpretation. This is exploratory evidence from a small retrospective cohort; selection criteria not detailed.
What it foundAdvanced pancreatic cancer complicated by DIC occurred in 19 of 284 patients (6.7%): 10 tumor-related, 9 infection-related. Median OS was 1.3 months with tumor-related DIC versus 10.4 months without DIC; infection-related DIC outcomes differed significantly from both groups but specific medians not reported. Among 8 patients with tumor-related DIC treated with chemotherapy plus anticoagulation or antifibrinolytic therapy, 4 achieved DIC resolution (50%), but resolution was transient and recurred with tumor progression.
ContextDIC is known to carry dismal prognosis in advanced malignancies. This series refines that understanding by stratifying APC with DIC according to etiology (tumor-related versus infection-related), with tumor-related DIC showing particularly poor outcomes. The observation that chemotherapy response transiently improved DIC suggests tumor control may temporarily ameliorate the coagulopathy, though the data are preliminary and limited to 8 treated patients without clear methodology for patient selection.
Emergingsuggested applicable standard· National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457.

Decision at stakeFeasibility of administering systemic chemotherapy to patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer complicated by disseminated intravascular coagulation

Assign resectability, resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced (unresectable), or metastatic, by multidisciplinary review, ideally at a high-volume center.

From our summary of this standard, unedited — the part the paper bears on. marks omitted text. Our wording, not the guideline's; read the source for its own text.

Our full summary of this standard

Evaluate suspected pancreatic adenocarcinoma with a dedicated pancreatic-protocol (multiphasic, contrast-enhanced) CT of the abdomen as the preferred imaging for diagnosis and staging (MRI/MRCP is an acceptable alternative); PET/CT may be added after, never as a substitute for, protocol CT/MRI in higher-risk situations. Obtain tissue confirmation, preferably by EUS-guided FNA/FNB with core biopsy where feasible; biopsy is generally required before neoadjuvant or palliative therapy, whereas patients with clearly resectable disease may proceed to surgery without preoperative biopsy. Measure baseline CA 19-9 (interpret after biliary decompression / with normal bilirubin; it can be falsely low in Lewis-antigen-negative patients and falsely elevated with cholestasis). Offer GERMLINE testing for inherited susceptibility to EVERY patient with confirmed pancreatic adenocarcinoma regardless of family history, using a comprehensive multi-gene panel; separately, for patients with locally advanced or metastatic disease who are candidates for anti-cancer therapy, obtain TUMOR/SOMATIC molecular profiling (broad NGS; RNA-based assays improve fusion detection; cell-free/liquid biopsy if tissue is insufficient). Assign resectability, resectable, borderline resectable, locally advanced (unresectable), or metastatic, by multidisciplinary review, ideally at a high-volume center. RESECTABLE disease: upfront resection (pancreaticoduodenectomy for head/uncinate; distal pancreatectomy ± splenectomy for body/tail) followed by adjuvant therapy, or neoadjuvant therapy in selected high-risk patients; preferred adjuvant regimen is modified FOLFIRINOX in patients able to tolerate it, ideally begun within 12 weeks of surgery, for a total of ~6 months of perioperative systemic therapy. BORDERLINE RESECTABLE and LOCALLY ADVANCED disease: neoadjuvant systemic therapy, with or without subsequent chemoradiation/RT, then restaging and reassessment for resection. METASTATIC disease by performance status: good PS (ECOG 0-1, adequate organ function), first-line FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX, NALIRIFOX, or gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel, with clinical trial preferred; after ~4-6 months without progression, transition to a maintenance strategy (including olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 carriers who have NOT progressed on first-line platinum-based therapy), a clinical trial, or a treatment break; intermediate PS (ECOG 2), clinical trial preferred, otherwise less-intensive first-line therapy (preferred gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel [category 1], or single-agent gemcitabine or capecitabine, or FOLFOX/FOLFIRI/CapeOx), since the intensive triplets (FOLFIRINOX/modified FOLFIRINOX and NALIRIFOX) are limited to ECOG 0-1 and are generally not appropriate at ECOG 2, with the same maintenance-versus-progression reassessment applied after ~4-6 months without progression; poor PS (ECOG 3-4), palliative/best supportive care, with single-agent chemotherapy or a biomarker-directed agent only if clinically appropriate. Treat by molecular target wherever an actionable alteration is present, across lines: pembrolizumab (or dostarlimab) for MSI-H/dMMR and pembrolizumab for TMB-H, olaparib for germline BRCA1/2 (maintenance after platinum), larotrectinib/entrectinib for NTRK fusions, selpercatinib for RET fusions, dabrafenib + trametinib for BRAF V600E, erdafitinib for FGFR2 alterations, fam-trastuzumab deruxtecan for HER2-positive disease, zenocutuzumab for NRG1 fusion-positive disease, and (in recent NCCN versions) KRAS G12C inhibitors (adagrasib/sotorasib), several of these after prior systemic therapy. Integrate supportive care throughout: relieve obstructive jaundice with an endoscopic self-expanding metal stent in non-operative or neoadjuvant pathways, but do NOT perform routine preoperative biliary drainage before planned upfront resection; treat exocrine insufficiency with pancreatic enzyme replacement titrated to symptoms (common starting dose ~40,000-50,000 units of lipase with main meals, roughly half with snacks, increased as needed); manage refractory pain with celiac plexus neurolysis or palliative RT; relieve gastric outlet obstruction with surgical or EUS-guided gastrojejunostomy (or enteral stenting); and provide VTE prophylaxis, nutritional support, and early palliative care.

National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN), NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology (NCCN Guidelines®): Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2025, verified directly against the metastatic first-line algorithm (PANC-10) and Principles of Systemic Therapy (PANC-F, 6 of 13), footnote y: "Good PS is defined as ECOG 0-1 ... and intermediate PS is defined as ECOG 2"; peer-reviewed publication of this guideline series with a resolving identifier: Tempero MA, et al. Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma, Version 2.2021, NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021;19(4):439-457. · reviewed 2026-07-23 ↗
Nagata K … Yasuda I · Pancreas · IF 1.9 · PubMed ↗Permalink
← Back to issue №8 Every section of this issue is one click away, at the top of this page. Follow Pancreas/Biliary by RSS